This

Yup, in OP pic she looks bored as shit, wishing she were sucking off her CIA protectors or being anywhere else than there. The whole thing's a farce and parade. Wish someone would just pop that bitch in the head.

What is their plan here? If he makes it in, he's going to be a redpilled ruling dispenser.

Attached: illgiveyounothing.png (362x259, 156K)

zip it, autist.

Yeah, the manipulation tactics of the left are so fucking slimy they don't even realize what scumbags they're being.

Just fuck off back to Jow Forums with this shit.

They can't think that this proves anything besides the opposite of what they're trying to prove, right?
There's no way they can actually think that this is a meme that supports the point they want to make, right?

Reminder, journalists aren't really human, so you shouldn't feel bad when you kill them.

the npc blank stare vs the human soulful expression
Is being a blatant npc a leftist thing or just a woman thing?

This is obvious bait, but go back to Jow Forums you fucking mongloid.

Attached: donkey.png (1397x731, 1.57M)

>be called a child rapist by unknown internet enthusiasts
>people believe it because they're insane
>one of tries to blow up the Hoover dam

that's a good point, i can definitely see this backfiring majorly if he does end up getting the seat.
might even lead to a new bill on how rape accusations are handled, with him delivering the news to a press conference teary-eyed saying he knows what it's like
hm.

fuck yanks desu

Maybe because that old hag could have said whatever she wanted with ZERO repercussions and Brett (Not Brent you stupid bait casting fuck) can't say anything to make people believe he is honestly a good guy. That bitch Ford cried to, is she a liar you fucktard?

Being angry is a pretty rational response to libshit smears and lies attempting to ruin your career and reputation. As a judge he is probably getting even more upset over the "Innocent until proven guilty" principle of our justice system being reversed on him because it's politically convenient for Democrats to assume every accusation against him is true.

Attached: mockingbird.jpg (750x748, 91K)

He's crying because his whiteness, his maleness, his PRIVILEGE, his "promised" perfect future is being questioned, and society never prepared him for failure or for facing the consequences of his actions.

I bet the rape accusers were setup by the DNC in order to block, or at least delay, confirming Kavanaugh as a justice.

This. Wh*te "people" are finally getting knocked down to size and the psychological effects on them especially the men can be very traumatic and it's not surprise he would cry.

>Calm cool & collected

youtube.com/watch?v=JFZytEUCXu4

>this
ecks dee XD
now this, this is epic

>soulful human

That guy is literally Chad in the flesh.

>I bet the rape accusers were setup by the DNC in order to block, or at least delay, confirming Kavanaugh as a justice.
There are 52 Republican senators. They need a simple majority to confirm.
If the allegations are so obviously false, then just vote him in.

>Its because Hillary Clinton is a psychopath and Brent kavanaugh is actually human.
More like Hillary Clinton would be called hysterical if she showed emotion but boys will be boys amirite.
The guy obviously has deep-seated anger issues and an alcohol problem. Watching him made me believe that Dr. Ford was telling the truth.

Liberals are such fucking scumbags, I hope Kavanaugh repeals the 19th amendment out of spite once he gets in

Attached: 1529336349568.jpg (1200x1604, 217K)

>I hope Kavanaugh repeals the 19th amendment out of spite once he gets in
Kavanaugh would have no such power even if he were confirmed as one of the nine SC justices. Also, justices don't make laws; someone would need to file a lawsuit challenging women's right to vote, which would be retarded.

So crying=lying now? Good to know.

Who is he and why should i care?
t. not an americlap

Supreme court judges are required to judge impartially and rationally. They are held to a higher standard than even politicians, and are not supposed to have partisan biases. Him going on an unhinged rant about Clinton and Democrats should instantly disqualify him.

Because the DNC want to delay it until mid elections and ruin his reputation in order to discredit him so that even the GOP won't touch him. And if the GOP do confirm him, it would be an unpopular among voters that it could swing the election.

Shit like this whole Kavanaugh circus is a shining example of how democracies are failing.

Attached: kane.jpg (200x208, 11K)

So do you have any proof that Dr. Ford just committed a crime by lying to the senate?
Do you have any proof that the other accuser, who sent a sworn statement to the Senate committee (which would count as perjury) is also lying?

The allegations hurt him because it's clear as day that he's an alcoholic with anger issues who has repeatedly sexually assaulted women. He is not fit for the Supreme Court, and his gross behavior today proves it.

I think you forgot to mention how Hillary failed spectacularly at being elected President, while Kavanaugh is on the verge of being confirmed to the Supreme Court.

Just sayin'

Not his burden of proof. Dr. Ford and every other accuser has failed to come up with any decisive testimony against this man.

>Dr. Ford and every other accuser has failed to come up with any decisive testimony against this man.
She literally just testified under oath today. Victim statements under oath are evidence, genius.
Mark Judge, who she claimed was a witness, has refused to testify under oath and claims he has no memory of the event.
There is no "burden of proof" to not confirm someone as a Supreme Court justice. Kavanaugh has behaved childishly throughout this whole process and is not entitled to a damn thing.

Is isn't lying if you believe it to be the truth. Their whole story is ambiguous and circumstantial. Why now, conveniently when he is getting confirmed for the SCOTUS instead of 36 years ago when it occured? This is just a senseless witch hunt, she has no evidence that it occurred, she never made a statement and all the people who knew her at the time denied it happened. At most this is libel.

Nah, he confirmed that when liberals, journos and commies try to smear him with baseless claims, he's still a human. He's more fit to be on the SC than that dying old hag Ginsburg.

If a woman gets raped and doesn't immediately tell the police that she was raped, then she wasn't raped. If she waits 36 years to come up with something that other witnesses can't even corroborate, deny an actual trial, all because a man is about to take an important position in our society, then she's pulling a political hit-job.

It really is that simple.

Chad is the epitome of soulful, user.

Attached: IMG_4747.png (1334x750, 1.86M)

>Why now, conveniently when he is getting confirmed for the SCOTUS instead of 36 years ago when it occured?
Because 36 years ago, what happened to her would not have been taken seriously, and she would have faced horrible treatment from law enforcement. She is speaking up now so that an attempted rapist is not confirmed to the highest court in the country.

>she never made a statement
Her lawyers paid for a polygraph test conducted by an FBI agent back in fall 2017, which Dr. Ford passed.

>all the people who knew her at the time denied it happened
Wow, it's almost like rape is something personal and traumatic and she might not want to discuss it at the dinner table with friends.

If you think she's lying, then let's have an FBI investigation to clear Kavanaugh's name and indict Dr. Ford for perjury.

>Supreme court judges are required to judge impartially and rationally
No they're not, you fucking imbecile. Do you know anything about the past hundred years?

>one of tries to blow up the Hoover dam
We wont go quietly. The Legion can count on that.

>If a woman gets raped and doesn't immediately tell the police that she was raped, then she wasn't raped.
This is a retarded statement.

>If she waits 36 years to come up with something that other witnesses can't even corroborate, deny an actual trial, all because a man is about to take an important position in our society, then she's pulling a political hit-job.
It's almost like an attempted rapist doesn't belong on the Supreme Court.

Also
>deny an actual trial
SHE'S THE ONE ASKING FOR AN FBI INVESTIGATION

>No they're not, you fucking imbecile. Do you know anything about the past hundred years?
"(A) Respect for Law. A judge should respect and comply with the law and should act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

(B) Outside Influence. A judge should not allow family, social, political, financial, or other relationships to influence judicial conduct or judgment."
uscourts.gov/judges-judgeships/code-conduct-united-states-judges

Rape is a crime. If she doesn't tell the police about a crime, then it didn't happen. Sorry, I don't make the rules.
>SHE'S THE ONE ASKING FOR AN FBI INVESTIGATION
No, she's asking for Kavanaugh to ask for an investigation on himself because she and her Dem activist lawyers don't want to look bad on the books by claiming they were the ones asking for it.

Anyways I find this all funny and just helps cement more than journalists and liberals aren't really people and you shouldn't feel bad when you kill them.

>Be accused of henious acts by multiple women with literally zero evidence decades after the supposed events occured.
>Any possible investigation with any possible neutral third party investigation conducted by the FBI or any police organization would literally turn up nothing and could never turn up anything as there is no physical evidence of an attempted rape or a so called "rape train" and any circumstantial evidence is literally decades old and the only witnesses can't even give a solid date of the supposed crimes
>The first letter of this HORRENDOUS crime, committed 3 decades ago, was only ever given to Sen. Feinstein and she held onto it since JULY.
>The evidence against you is as solid as a madman claiming to be Ceasar or a raving lunatic claiming that the aliens stole his third kidney.

And yet you are called before the FUCKING SENATE and grilled as if there is even the slightest tiniest shred of evidence outside of a few liberal streaking harpies who simply want to deny you your life's work and undermine the evil Cheeto drumpf.

Yeah, I'd be a little pissed and emotional also.

>attempted rapist
Citation needed. A few curdled roasties don't count.

>polygraph
Polygraphs are a meme.

>Wow, it's almost like rape is something personal and traumatic and she might not want to discuss it at the dinner table with friends.
If it happened she should have either overcome that fear or given into being submissive to all men as she belongs.

>If you think she's lying, then let's have an FBI investigation to clear Kavanaugh's name and indict Dr. Ford for perjury.
Let's stone Doctor Ford and install Kavanaugh as the lord regent of America to God Emperor Trump.

Chad is still a human, much of all of our brothers in arms, of all creeds and walks of life!

>If she doesn't tell the police about a crime, then it didn't happen.
Holy shit haha how stupid are you? Most murders aren't reported immediately but they definitely still happened.

>No, she's asking for Kavanaugh to ask for an investigation on himself because she and her Dem activist lawyers don't want to look bad on the books by claiming they were the ones asking for it.
"In a letter addressed to Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley of Iowa, and obtained by CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360," Christine Blasey Ford's attorneys argue that "a full investigation by law enforcement officials will ensure that the crucial facts and witnesses in this matter are assessed in a non-partisan manner, and that the Committee is fully informed before conducting any hearing or making any decisions.""
cnn.com/2018/09/18/politics/ford-letter-fbi/index.html

American society is a shambling corpse at this point.

>Words on a website
Fuck off with that failed appreal to authority. What ACTUALLY requires them to do so? No one has given a fuck about impartiality for a century.

>Because 36 years ago, what happened to her would not have been taken seriously, and she would have faced horrible treatment from law enforcement. She is speaking up now so that an attempted rapist is not confirmed to the highest court in the country.
And you know why? She never spoke up so she wouldn't have known whether it was taken seriously or not.
>Her lawyers paid for a polygraph test conducted by an FBI agent back in fall 2017, which Dr. Ford passed.
Polygraph tests are unreliable and rather controversial as they can be easily faked.
>Wow, it's almost like rape is something personal and traumatic and she might not want to discuss it at the dinner table with friends.
She didn't even tell her parents or close friends? Yet now she wants so discuss in front of the whole country? Yeah, very consistent.
>If you think she's lying, then let's have an FBI investigation to clear Kavanaugh's name and indict Dr. Ford for perjury.
It would be a waste of time. There is no evidence occurred, there was no witnesses or anyone who confirms it occurred and all you have as "evidence" is someone who doesn't even remember who drove her home.

Interesting points but

Kavanaugh is still getting confirmed.

>Most murders aren't reported immediately but they definitely still happened.
Then they're not murders.

>(((cnn)))
Information discarded.

>If it happened she should have either overcome that fear or given into being submissive to all men as she belongs.
An attempted rapist is an attempted rapist no matter how the victim reacts. L M A O at this redirection.
Is it not theft if the victim doesn't report to the police and immediately tell everyone they know, also?

That's the code of conduct for US federal judges.
I'm sure you would say the constitution is just words on a paper, as well.

>It's almost like an attempted rapist doesn't belong on the Supreme Court.
Get the fuck out of my ethnostate, feminist cancer.

Attached: IMG_4829.jpg (800x430, 151K)

>An attempted rapist is an attempted rapist no matter how the victim reacts.
An attempted rapist is not an attempted rapist if he is not convicted of attempted rape. He literally dindu nuffin.

>L M A O at this redirection.
This isn't redirection. We fundamentally disagree about guilt vs innocence, and that's why I want people like you out of my country.

>Is it not theft if the victim doesn't report to the police and immediately tell everyone they know, also?
Absolutely. That's consent.

Damn straight I would.
I would say that for all of the parts of the constitution that are disregarded, of which there are many.

>Is someone commits x crime and you don't tell police, does that mean it's not really a crime?
Well, yeah, you let them do it without reporting it or reacting in any way so it must not be that important to you.

>An attempted rapist is not an attempted rapist if he is not convicted of attempted rape. He literally dindu nuffin.
OJ Simpson is still a murderer even though he was acquitted. There's a reason they call it "not guilty" and not "innocent." A crime can be committed and still not have the evidence to be proven in court. If you do research into unsolved mysteries and other true crimes, you'll see that there are many murder cases where LE has a prime suspect but not enough evidence to convict. That doesn't make them not murderers.

>Absolutely. That's consent.
You must be an actual troll, because no one can consent to being a victim of crime.

>Well, yeah, you let them do it without reporting it or reacting in any way so it must not be that important to you.
How fucking stupid are you people?
Murder is illegal. It is murder if you kill someone. It is murder even if the police aren't notified. It is still murder even if no one tells you no.
Theft is illegal. It is theft if you steal someone's property. It is theft even if the police aren't notified. It is still theft even if no one tells you no.
Rape is illegal. It is rape if you fuck someone without their consent. It is rape even if the police aren't notified. It is still rape even if no one tells you no.

Fords alleged assault happened in 1982. 36 years ago. That doesn't mean it DIDNT happen, but, it does seem suspicious to keep that under wraps for 36 goddamn years and ONLY come forward once Kavanaugh was about to beade a justice by evil Cheeto drumpf.

Also, the only other witness denies it, but of course he would, he's a fucking white male, am I right? In America the testimony of a woman is worth more than two men, am I right?

Also, the only TINY sliver of evidence a couple's therapist that Ford and her husband visited in 2012 (30 years after the horrible and terrible life ending attempted rape) released his notes and said that FOUR men were involved in the attempted rape. Kavanaugh was NOT mentioned by name and the notes of a professional therapist stated clearly 4 men were involved. Ford claims only 2 were involved when Kavanaugh tried to rape her.

So who is lying? Is it the therapist taking notes which would under any normal circumstances stay confidential and thus had no reason at all to lie, or Ford who wants to disrupt the evil Cheeto drumpf Nazi because of mass hysteria?

Ask yourself a single simple question, do you want this to be the new political norm? Any politician can be smeared by any political opponent by claiming that there was some unprovable sexual assault 3 decades ago?

>OJ Simpson is still a murderer even though he was acquitted.
OJ was innocent of murder. Unfortunately for him, he's guilty of being a pavement ape, and he also had a preponderance of evidence against him in civil court, which is inherently corrupt and should be purged violently.

>There's a reason they call it "not guilty" and not "innocent."
Speak for yourself. There's a reason why "innocent until proven guilty" is a thing.

>A crime can be committed and still not have the evidence to be proven in court.
Then it's not a crime.

>If you do research into unsolved mysteries and other true crimes, you'll see that there are many murder cases where LE has a prime suspect but not enough evidence to convict.
Then the prime suspect is innocent.

>That doesn't make them not murderers.
That doesn't make anyone not murders, but we should assume they're not, especially when they're trying to purge leftist filth.

>You must be an actual troll, because no one can consent to being a victim of crime.
It's not a crime at all if they consent.

Brett Kavanaugh will be fine. There was no evidence that proved without reasonable doubt that he was a rapist. the other side couldn't prove anything.
T. former law student

It doesn't matter how illegal it is if no one reports it, especially if you wait three decades and change your story every five minutes.
>He raped me
>He molested me
>We were both drunk and he touched my boobie
Also; if there's no body, no murder weapon, no motive, no actual person who was actually killed, etc. There's no case, right? So why is it when people try to say they were raped with zero evidence or anything backing it up they get taken seriously.

>Also, the only other witness denies it,
He didn't deny it; he refused to testify and said he had no recollection of the event. If it didn't happen, then why doesn't he just come testify that it didn't happen?

>Also, the only TINY sliver of evidence a couple's therapist that Ford and her husband visited in 2012
Victim statements made under oath are evidence.

>Kavanaugh was NOT mentioned by name
That's not evidence in his favor if no one was.

>the notes of a professional therapist stated clearly 4 men were involved. Ford claims only 2 were involved when Kavanaugh tried to rape her.
Source?

>So who is lying?
Why don't we let the FBI investigate and find out? They would surely be capable of finding more evidence in favor of the true telling of events.

>How fucking stupid are you people?
Infinitely stupid compared to you, brainlet. Nice digits though.

>Murder is illegal. It is murder if you kill someone. It is murder even if the police aren't notified.
You're innocent of murder if you're not convicted.

>Theft is illegal. It is theft if you steal someone's property. It is theft even if the police aren't notified.
It's not theft if they don't notify the police. They're consenting to their shit getting stolen.

>Rape is illegal. It is rape if you fuck someone without their consent.
Women always consent to rape if they don't tell. That means they like it, because they're whores.

>>A crime can be committed and still not have the evidence to be proven in court.
>Then it's not a crime.
You're a retard.

Say a man rapes a woman with no witnesses, using a condom, in an area with no security cameras, and leaves behind no physical evidence. The crime, by definition, has occurred.
What evidence would prove him guilty in a court?

>There's no case, right? So why is it when people try to say they were raped with zero evidence or anything backing it up they get taken seriously.
WITNESS STATEMENTS UNDER OATH ARE EVIDENCE. The victim is a witness to the crime.
Blasey Ford experienced significant psychological trauma, which she elaborated on in her testimony to the Senate.

>If it didn't happen, then why doesn't he just come testify that it didn't happen?
Because he's scared of getting labeled as a purgerer by the deep state.

>Victim statements made under oath are evidence.
Fake evidence, if the person under oath is a roastie.

>Why don't we let the FBI investigate and find out?
Because they're corrupt, deep state kikes.

Congratulations, this is the dumbest thing I've read on Jow Forums this month. Impressive.

>You're a retard.
You're a chimp-brained cuckhold.

>The crime, by definition, has occurred.
It did not occur, and since the woman didn't report it, no rape would've happened at all because she consented. Women enjoy "rape".

>What evidence would prove him guilty in a court?
Two other women witnesses, if I'm being lenient.

it just meant that worthless woman was a heartless bitch

>It did not occur,
I quite literally just described a situation in which a man rapes a woman. How has the rape not occurred?

Well gee.
If a feminist thinks I'm being dumb, I must've said something right. Back to the gas chambers with you, creatura.

>Did what you claim happen really happen?
>Lol yeah
>Are you lying?
>Lol no
Of course, how could I have been so blind to the truth.

Also, Trump injected me with HIV+ blood, I have no proof but MY WITNESS STATEMENT should provide substantial evidence.

Because he did not rape her. She liked it. She consented.

Of course they're capable of lying; if they are, then there should be some sort of evidence to prove their testimony wrong, and they will be convicted of perjury.
Do you think no one ever thought of that before? No one is ever convicted on one single witness statement alone.

No, in my fictional example, it is a rape that happens to occur in a place where no evidence would be left behind.
Do you just not believe in rape, period?

Source of the four men in the notes vs. the two men in Fords allegations:

washingtonpost.com/investigations/california-professor-writer-of-confidential-brett-kavanaugh-letter-speaks-out-about-her-allegation-of-sexual-assault/2018/09/16/46982194-b846-11e8-94eb-3bd52dfe917b_story.html?utm_term=.71d32bea28a0

Once again, that is the Washington Post, hardly a right wing rag, stating that the therapists notes THEY REVIEWED said four men attacked Ford and in her own testimony she said two.

By your own logic of Kavanaugh not testifying, why won't Ford's lawyers release the notes to the press? The only ones who saw them were the Washington Post and during her testimony Ford said she was unsure of whether she gave them the notes or just described the notes. The Washington Post article says they REVIEWED the notes.

Why would Ford lie to the Post then lie in her testimony?

Also, what in God's name would the FBI ever find? The only other witness denies the attempted rape. Are they supposed to get in a time machine and go back to see the event? There is NO evidence. It is literally hearsay. The FBI can't investigate a bullshit claim from 36 years ago, magic doesn't actually exist.

Politics is gay and you should all kill yourselves.

Attached: 1537737099127.gif (487x560, 762K)

>No, in my fictional example, it is a rape that happens to occur in a place where no evidence would be left behind.
In your fictional example, the wouldn't would consent to the "rape" by not reporting it.

>Do you just not believe in rape, period?
In most cases for women, I don't, but there are rare moments when women are raped.

Honestly, he's already committed a few confirmed counts of perjury just today alone, and beyond that, this guy's easily the least articulate supreme court nominee I've ever heard. Dumbass literally didn't know basic legal terminology and tried to play it cool.
I don't give a fuck about the "big controversy", I don't care if whoever gets picked is left or right, but this assclown in particular needs to get lost.

>By your own logic of Kavanaugh not testifying, why won't Ford's lawyers release the notes to the press?
*Judge
Because the press is not the Senate judiciary committee nor is it a court of law, and therapy
notes are likely to contain sensitive material.

>Why would Ford lie to the Post then lie in her testimony?
How do you know that she was lying? How do you know that she was referring to the exact same situation and that the therapist's notes are a 100% accurate representation of the conversation?

>Also, what in God's name would the FBI ever find? The only other witness denies the attempted rape.
Judge didn't deny it; he refused to testify. They could subpoena him.

>the wouldn't would consent to the "rape" by not reporting it.
You're a brainlet. Congrats. Consent is given BEFORE sex.

>Do we have anyway of proving or disproving you claim?
>Well, yes and no, I was the only one who saw, heard, felt, etc. anything incriminating. But trust me, I know what I saw.
>I guess it's settled, we're taking this to court.
I don't care about what could happen, I care about what is happening. They are currently trying to convict him on single testimonies with nothing but hearsay to back it.

Before sex she consented, because she was inherently unable to resist a forceful dicking by Chad.

ok this guy is not who I'd want on the supreme court, but fuck this metoo bullshit. 36 years ago? a highschool party he may or may not have attended? fuck this.

>They are currently trying to convict him
Brett Kavanaugh has never been indicted or charged with anything. This is not a trial.
He is not entitled to a Supreme Court seat, and anyone who displayed behavior like his today should be instantly disqualified.

My politics are pretty left, but so far the only proof against Kavanaugh is Ford's testimony. Is that really it?

>36 years ago? a highschool party he may or may not have attended? fuck this.
Why is it suddenly not sexual assault because it happened a long time ago and he was too drunk to remember?

He is entitled to a Supreme Court seat because he's not a leftist cuckhold.
Nothing about his behavior disqualifies him in any way shape or form.

>Nothing about his behavior disqualifies him in any way shape or form.
Harrassing a senator about their family history of alcoholism?
Going on an unhinged rant about a baseless partisan conspiracy?
You see nothing wrong with this?