One day he will be president and everything will be better

One day he will be president and everything will be better

Attached: kqpbolIc_400x400.jpg (400x400, 20K)

Fuck off my board you socialist cuck

Attached: -1538222824571.jpg (1080x1080, 153K)

>not a communist
Not close enough.

You get the fuck off of MY board, you brainwashed pawn.

Attached: 3AxOkva.gif (500x355, 164K)

But communism is bad, user.

Actually is good

if there were no material goods (nuptial gifts) to inflate your value as a male then there would be no reason for males to exist anymore at all.

>mfw unironically was a big supporter in the election
>mfw now if he ran I wouldn't vote for him

Damn right he will! S0ibois unite, cuck power, etc.

Attached: sBfwZl8.png (960x664, 1.25M)

you have a very cynical view of women

they only respond to obscene wealth because of the current system, or do you honesty think Melanie enjoys having sex with Trump?

Pretty nihilistic, Anonymous. Using that same logic, women are useless if they can't give birth. We don't exterminate post-menopausal women.

>you have a very cynical view of women
it's not a cynical view of women it's an accurate view of biology
>they only respond to obscene wealth because of the current system, or do you honesty think Melanie enjoys having sex with Trump?
No, there is no reason for males beyond the protection and service of females, in any species. remove this need and males are a redundant sex
no, it's scientific. This is literally basic biology.
Old females ARE in fact, usually killed in animals in nature when they no longer can have offspring. They are used as sacrifices when running from predators, for example.

>they only respond to obscene wealth because of the current system, or do you honesty think Melanie enjoys having sex with Trump?
so if there were no way for a normal male to inflate his value, then only the top 5% of men would ever be with women.
Fuck that, communism is garbage.

more like you would remove wealth from the equation and harems would stop being formed. trump has slept with a gazillion women and he's one of the ugliest people who ever lived.

There is no such thing as "basic" biology, and if you knew anything about anything you would also know that humans are complex creatures that take any "basics" that may exist and throw them in the fucking blender.
Get off my board and go read a book. Go kiss your grandma for me.

No, harems would be formed based on genetic unchangeable traits - height, attractive faces, broad shoulders, etc.
Female mammals form harems aren't the alpha males and they are not capitalistic economic systems, they are communistic.
You're selling yourself out.

usually the children are sacrificed actually. try again.

form harems around the alpha males*
What I'm saying is observable in most mammal species that are male-larger dimorphic, like humans.
No, the children just get caught.
many times, they will literally throw the older females or low value males down so they can get caught instead. You don't know what you're talking about.

>they are communistic
I don't think you know what communistic means.

And do most other mammal species have the largest brain volume by body mass? No, they do not, you fucking degenerate.

They act in a way that is now in any way shape or form similar to capitalistic economic models
You don't realize what communism would actually do to humans. We were essentially communistic for the majority of our paleolithic days and only 1 male bred for every 17
that's what would actually happen.
that is not relevant. We already know what happens in humans when material goods aren't used to inflate male value.

you morons are incredibly deluded if you think Trump will win in 2020

He has a 34% approval rating, hes fucking done

I dont give a shit about trump.
I'm saying unless we completely genetically change humans, communism will turn society into a disgustingly competitive state of male on male competition to win the favor of women.
like we see in almost all mammals.

>They act in a way that is now in any way shape or form similar to capitalistic economic models
>You don't realize what communism would actually do to humans. We were essentially communistic for the majority of our paleolithic days and only 1 male bred for every 17
>that's what would actually happen.
How was that in any way communistic? It was closest to anarcho capitalism and even that is a stretch even thought I hate fucking ancaps.

You're such a goddamn idiot.

>How was that in any way communistic? It was closest to anarcho capitalism and even that is a stretch even thought I hate fucking ancaps.
no it wasnt, they shared resources, all worked together, all raised the children as a group.
it's just only on male gets to breed.
I'm smarter than you. unless you have a math degree from a top 10 university, or something similar, don't attempt to compare us.

>communism will turn society into a disgustingly competitive state of male on male competition to win the favor of women.
so you're saying we need to seize the means of reproduction?

.02 cents were deposited to your account!

All men are created equal, you elitist fag. Another human concept developed by our relatively large brains that separates us from the animals.
You, I'm not so sure.

>no it wasnt, they shared resources, all worked together, all raised the children as a group.
they absolutely did not. they formed tribes but those tribes always had a leader telling everyone else what to do. there was no equality whatsoever

No, I'm saying communism would be great if we engineered the species to not be a patriarchal male-larger dimorphic tournament selection sexuality species, communism will not be good for the vast majority of men.
>All men are created equal
not in nature. You can dislike it but it makes no difference.
This is not true. The organization differed from tribe to tribe, but the reproduction did not. We have dna evidence to prove this.

You are wrong. It is self-evident. We all are born knowing nothing and naked, and we all die. Furthermore, God exists.

>This is not true. The organization differed from tribe to tribe, but the reproduction did not
you mean the part where the leader of tribe got to fuck the woman you clubbed over the head and brought back because the divines told him so? what the fuck are you even arguing? in no way were any of those tribes communist

People already push the idea that "sex in not a human right" and "you're not entitled to relationships".
In a communistic world, everyone gets their material needs met, but the vast majority of men do not get women and have no way of raising their value.
In capitalism, not everyone gets their material needs met, but the majority of men get a family.
I will pick the second one every time.
Unless you want to make humans like birds of prey, I will never support your system that is nothing more than male enslavement.
This is not an accurate picture of how these tribes worked whatsoever. It's almost like a fairytale.
A few males bottleneck reproduction in almost all mammal species, and it ISN'T because they force the females to be with them - its because the females force the males to compete and then select the winner.
It's called male on male competition and it's one of the fundamental aspects of sexual selection in evolution. males are the weaker sex.

in a capitlistic society, males compete by being better economic agents.
In a communistic society, males compete by being born taller, more handsome, etc.
The first one allows for individual growth. the second does not.

Too much of a good thing is a bad thing. Such it is with both capitalism and socialism.

Do not be overrighteous,
neither be overwise--
why destroy yourself?

Do not be overwicked,
and do not be a fool--
why die before your time?

It is good to grasp the one
and not let go of the other.
Whoever fears God will avoid all extremes.

Ecclesiastes 7:16-18

I will look towards actual biology, and sociology, and how animals and humans behave to come to conclusions about society. Thank you though.

Religion is a major part of society. If you read Proverbs and Ecclesiastes, I think you'll find that it's a short and worthwhile exercise.

I would think a communist would think of religion as the opiate of the masses.
I'll check it out

Did he say he was a commie? Religion is a major obstacle that needs to be overcome but these right wing retards have been stealing communist rhetoric for years. Nazbols define themselves as radical nationalists.

I see, but how will you get around the increased brutality that communism will bring to men?

Why would comunism increase brutality? We're talking about removing greed and exploitation as factors.

The only reason why capitalism isn't working is because religion was supposed to offset it. Unfortunately, capitalists have a much better advertising team. They would have received the death sentence in ancient Greece.

no he won't. he'll be curb-stomped by trump, who i'll probably vote for again 2020.

reminder that this is the hypocrite commie p.o.s who owns three large homes and is also the SJW who thinks whites don't know what it's like to be poor. on top of that, he supported hillary. also he's an old as fuck jew and and can barely form coherent sentences.

socialism doesn't work and it's been proven time and time again

do you ever get tired of being a living meme? like have you ever even once bothered to google what bernie sanders owns?

So then the only male on male competition will be based on genetic factors and social domination
did you not read the other things I wrote itt?

no. i love being a living meme. see the meme, feel the meme, be the meme. that's how you live life, friend

Not if he dies before 2024.

Besides better healthcare there would literally be no difference.

>owns three large homes
As a senator he's legally required to have two homes in DC and in Vermont. The other one is a retirement cabin.
>is also the SJW who thinks whites don't know what it's like to be poor
He was just bullshitting to win the black vote. Like all politicians his ideology is ticked depending on who he talks to.
>he supported hillary
He's technically a democrat so he'd lose campaign funding if he didn't.
>old as fuck
Only two years older than Trump, and Trump is overweight so Bernie still has a good chance to outlive Trump.
>can barely form coherent sentences
Literally not even a point, given Trump speeches have famously simple and sometimes poor grammar.
>socialism doesn't work and it's been proven time and time again
Would be valid if it werent for the fact that he's basing his policies on working structures. Such as the structure of Norway, who has the highest HDI in the world. If he wanted to nationalize the oil companies and distribute the profits to everyone like Chavez did I'd agree with you, but he just wants healthcare and estate taxes.
Note, I fucking hate Bernie. I just hate dumbasses who make literal facebook meme arguments more.

He said he's not running in 2020. If he did run again, the earliest would be 2024. But If you assume whoever wins 2020 has a second term, then realistically he would run in 2028.

Attached: 1519658834792.png (1260x1150, 847K)

I think 2020 and 2024 will be the last two elections he'll be able to run. Having an old man like him run for president is more stressful, just look at 2008.
John was 71 when he ran and barely made made it past 81. One of the reasons he lost was because he was so old that the stress could really do a number on his heart and his running mate was kinda shitty. Bernie will have to make a good VP selection to be taken seriously and, frankly, there aren't many democrats who'll be a good match for him, and grabbing an independent will make funding his campaign a nightmare. I assume he's only saying that so he doesn't look too big (as Hillary shows, nothing is more irking than grabbing attention intentionally after losing an election) or so the media can focus on everyone else's fuck ups.

Attached: 1533173747863.jpg (565x1027, 198K)

It's HER turn already.

Look Reddit! I posted it again!

62

I agree with you whole-sail.
It's her turn to perish.

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 9K)

>bald before 35
Why is this so prevalent now, when it was obviously an odd case for Charles II?

This is the cringest post on Jow Forums right now

Attached: 1526244740803.jpg (615x409, 19K)

What did she do that you think she should be jailed for?

Fuck off dumbass. It sounds like you're still in college, so I would advise taking some basic economics classes.

Food is too greasy and high in fats.
Peasants inbred more than the ruling class historically so maybe some lingerings of inbred genes.
Most cheap and popular shampoos have sulphates which are bad for your hair.
Maybe a conspiracy from health companies to force men to buy hair products.

>the SJW who thinks whites don't know what it's like to be poor.
Lolwat
Bernie isn't an SJW, he has lackluster support from minorities because he pretty much only cares about poor whites. You have to be pretty damn entitled to suggest dismantling the economic system that's brought literal billions of people out of extreme poverty just because no one told you taking out $250k in student loans was a bad idea.

She made deals with Saudi Arabia to allow them to commit war crimes and hired assassins to kill her opponents.

>She made deals with Saudi Arabia to allow them to commit war crimes
All Western governments currently do this for complex geopolitical reasons. I don't agree with it, but the US isn't the world police and it's stupid to throw someone in jail for other people's wrongdoings.

>hired assassins to kill her opponents.
There is no proof of this.

They werent ready for the bern

>realistically an 87 year old commie jew is going to run for president

Attached: 1508122154926.png (1223x785, 1.11M)