So, what's your political views, r9k?

More right leaning than left, I guess

Attached: compass.jpg (992x1080, 419K)

I saw this pic on a russian Jow Forums analogue and translated it.

Or if we were going the other way around then it would be Vegetarianism or Zoophilia (two ways of loving animals), gross

Lol, transvestism?

is this self diagnosed or?

A few points down into libertarianism and just one point to the economic-left
I'm one of those annoying little centrists everyone hates so much

Attached: GrilledKambing-482735-Futanari_Pegging_Political_Chart.jpg (1500x1633, 854K)

Anarchism shouldnt even be in the scale desu.
But their base ideals are most of the time more close to the left than the right.
The same way monarchism is located between nazism and conservatives is not that accurate aswell.
You can live under a king and still have diferent ideas from right wing parties. And it can be even more "slave" driven than facism under some circumstances.
Also, Nazism is a subform of facism, the same way marxists are a sub category of communism.

It's a really shitty scale.

>Anarchism
>Slave

Who the fuck made this piece of shit anyway?

Attached: 1503062266847.jpg (700x469, 65K)

I just picked a random picture of the classical view to get my point across because I don't agree with the popular political compass everyone uses
I can't make sense of authoritarian and liberal in this what boils down to a system of coordinates because it's a terrible way to visualize political stances

my political compass is a circle

Attached: 123t.jpg (414x272, 22K)

Depression and OCD are professional, the others I don't think you can really get a professional diagnosis for.

Best political scale is the Political Tesseract

Are those... futas and pussyboys or what?

Well, in any real anarchy scenario you're either going to end up as a slave, or a slave-owner

>Be X element f(x)
>habe coordinates defined by (x|y)
>Cant be at (-0,8|-0,8) and (0,9|0,8) at le same tiem
>Feels bathsalts men.

>radical middle

I have no clue but now that I took a second glance this is pretty hilarious
communism and fascism is technically not even slavery

Futas? Yes. Pussyboys? Doubt it.

Attached: JUST.jpg (850x600, 207K)

Facism and communism are both ideologies were the state is prioritized over the rights of the people. You may not be forced to do a specific job per say, but you're still forced to work in an oppresive system. So I would consider both to be slavery.

>monarchism

doesn't fit, poster is a fucking faggot

>Anarchism is the oppisite of communism
>Anarchism shouldnt even be in the scale desu.
I don't think that is right because as far as I understood anarchism is also about abandoning the state
communism in itself includes anarchism because communists wanted a stateless society

the other thing is anarchism has attached itself pretty much to everything else like left and right wing ideas (capitalism/socialism)

Attached: anarchy-flags-set-24397502.jpg (1300x1239, 95K)

I'm against capitalism and states. We'd be much better off living in small communes.

Attached: 1520339970714.png (1267x1200, 789K)

it depends on how you define slavery
in the classical sense that is not slavery because it doesn't involve people being seen and sold as property

The Roman Republic and America had slavery yet they both weren't even close to fascism and communism.

used to be polfag, now I'm pretty liberal and idealistically demsoc. goddamn I used to be cringey.
>Anarchism is the opposite of communism
>Communism by definition is stateless
you silly

Attached: 1523123550718.gif (174x188, 1.03M)

what are you lads?

Attached: polidicalgombass_spurdo.jpg (320x320, 29K)

wew that is pathetically tiny
I am ashamed

Attached: 1476876939266.jpg (887x900, 232K)

-2.75, -4.82
So I guess closest to exhibitionism. Miss me with that shit

>Jumping from one extreme to the other.

Jokes aside. Jow Forums is a heavy circlejerk, but they're with many things right. I'm not someone who visits that shit frequently but Pizzagate gotta be fucking real.

I've experienced almost all of these at one point or another

is jacking off in some dudes cellar you don't know exhibitionism?

Can someone explain to me how the "libertarian left" quadrant even exists? Leftist economics and libertarianism are pretty well mutually exclusive.

Attached: 1537528341412.jpg (1400x1920, 1.39M)

I define slavery as a person being owned by someone/something. The something in this case is the state. It might be a bit of a stretch but North Koreans have been sent to other countries for work which is kind of like selling them theguardian.com/world/2017/jul/05/north-koreas-global-money-makers-us-scolds-countries-hosting-guest-workers. And yes other systems can also have slavery; I never said anything about that.

you fucking retard, get this centrist bullshit off my website

they aren't mutually exclusive, communism by definition is stateless, that's the literally ultimate goal of the ideology. Plus you have mutualism, anarcho syndicalism, makhnovism, social anarchism and heaps more. If you look closely, the vast majority of anarchist/libertarian thought for centuries has been left wing. Marx literally opposed the existence of a state.

Things like minarchism, ancapism, etc, "right wing/capitalist" libertarian ideologies and stuff are very modern and new.

Attached: 1528769100429.png (540x534, 460K)

Its assumes that you cant be free without direct economic freedom; no state no capitalists.
The ability to own slaves is an economic freedom that infringes on another's social freedom; thats how a libertarian-left sees capitalism and private property, a freedom that steals more than it allows for.

>North Koreans have been sent to other countries for work
wouldn't they just be free at that point then

Same, just look how wel it worked for the Native Americans, and Africa.

>Capitalists came and killed everyone
Yes, it's a good example of why you don't want capitalists around.

Attached: 1508387042104.gif (448x448, 1.18M)

If those communes give me the women I point my finger at then I'm in.

Communism from an ideal ideological perspective would be stateless. All attempts at communism have resulted in oppressive states more restrictive than any capitalist nation.

The hypothetical classless, stateless communism is impossible because it gives against human nature. Without a state, you have complete economic freedom, inevitably leading to an economic system the strict opposite of the type of communalism it proposes. If you want to achieve the type of 100% autonomy and ownership of the means of production communism proposes, you need a state to keep it that way since otherwise the economy shifts back into the type you'd see in a libertarian system.

And yes, you may need a state for capital/legal tender to exist, but the fundamentals of economics, supply and demand, the allocation of scarce resources with alternate uses, remain even without state authorized legal tender. It would just be more crudely down via barter.

North Koreans sent abroad always have close family kept at home, and get told in no uncertain terms that fleeing gets their family tortured and killed. They do this even to ambassadors and diplomatic staff.

Political views are for fucking normies, if you were really a robot you just wouldn't give a shit.

Basically same.
>tfw no comfy agrarian commune

I guess I should have known but I would flee and never come back anyway since living like that makes family live and family members worthless.

I thought normies don't give a fuck about politics and just vote for the biggest retard who screams the loudset. The only reason you see them at those political gatherings is because it's like meeting friends at a party or in baseball stadium while doing a thing.

and right wing anarchism will lead to feudalism and robber barons and mcslavery.

I mean either way, they're "mutually exclusive" when we use our super future seeing goggles we see both fail.

Spiritually: Hitlerist
Politically: Identitarian

Attached: 8814.jpg (766x1024, 217K)

It's almost like statelessness is an impossibility because governmental hierarchies arise from social hierarchies

It's almost as if states didn't exist for the first 35,000-45,000 years that humans have been around.

Attached: 1525105278705.jpg (946x1107, 277K)

machine supremacist
death to meat

Is this shadman?
oregano

Try and make me live in a cave eating raw meat and dying at age 30 and I'll fucking glass you
Primitivists can fuck off accelerationism is my shit

Attached: 1517057474701.jpg (657x960, 76K)

Do what you want
Fuck what you want (as long as it's legal and consensual)
Taxation is theft

Pic is very related
you can take the test at politiscales.net/en_US/

Attached: 8 axis political test.png (591x826, 131K)

>Do what you want
>Fuck what you want
>Taxation is theft
imagine being this brainwashed

Attached: ss+(2018-08-25+at+04.03.38).jpg (412x404, 45K)

>imagine caring about what other people do

always interesting

Attached: ss+(2018-09-30+at+01.08.41).jpg (651x870, 112K)

Islamic national socialist
So authoritarian left/middle

Attached: one struggle.png (688x560, 280K)

>scizos labeled as the most authoritarian

What the fuck is this bullshit? They hate authority THE MOST and want to be free to do whatever.

How's it feel knowing the Jews are slowly making you lot infertile via "Halal" foods with special additives?

Attached: 1376667370045.jpg (350x350, 29K)

Hail Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, the Prince of the faithfull.