Is having a sugar baby degenerate?

Is having a sugar baby degenerate?

Attached: 2017-04-12 2.jpg (1080x1080, 70K)

shit thread, but yes. you are enabling the worst aspects of females

>Is having a sugar baby degenerate?
Yes

No way, you need to burn as much disposable income on your sugar baby as you can OP :)

If you're only banging them in missionary and love them, then no

Beta shit

but they got themselves into that position, just like the person(male) using the sugar baby. Can't 2 people with issues be in peace without being a degenerate?

Usually yes.
Most sugar daddies are weaklings and end up actually believing their whores are human and into them.
Only a criminally dangerous man can keep a paid mistress and remember she is a tool and a scum. And only rarely.

No more or less degenerate than fucking bar sluts. Unless we start executing adulterers, sexual ethics are dead and gone.

How much money does a man need to have before he can afford a sugar baby?

3,000 a month

so do you fuck them? or do you just walk around with them and pretend to fuck them

only if you don't work her throat daily, she must earn that cash

>Can't 2 people with issues be in peace without being a degenerate?
Can 2 people ignore their deficiencies and not degenerate? No.
So your answer is no. Stop paying women for being women. Giving people money when they provide zero value is bad form and weakens the dollar.

If she's like 35 not at all. At 55 is very retarded and disgusting too.

THAT, is a lot of cash on a recurring basis! She CAN'T be worth that kind of output. You could literally do anal with a 10/10 chick in Vegas for 500.00$ and be done with it. This is paying people to like you Op, and it's just sad. I can't justify this.

I think we should mix among Boreans.

Of course it is, how is this a question.
I feel bad for the guys that do it though, must be a pretty sad life to give money for girls to buy shit and be with other men without ever meeting in real life (the reality of 99% of these sugarbaby things).

A fool and his money are soon parted.

It’s the norm here. Called “compensated dating”

>is [blank] degenerate?
Needs to be grounds for an instant ban

What, hooking?

>Stop paying women for being women.
It's either that or you marry them and raise kids
> Giving people money when they provide zero value is bad form and weakens the dollar.
That's what the dollar was made for, medium of trade. It's not supposed to be a finite source and thus it already has 0 value other than it's usage

>You could literally do anal with a 10/10 chick in Vegas for 500.00$ and be done with it.
Yeah, but then what about next week?

Who cares. It's a viable option if
>you have lots of money
>you are old and want to fuck hot 18 year olds
Sugar babies, escorts, whores have been around for millennia and have been enjoyed by all kinds of men. I hate Jow Forums's deluded nostalgia for the 1950s which they think was a pure Disneyland of purity and chastity. Ridiculous.

No.
Now don't forget to work hard next week!

Attached: theAbsoluteState.png (584x496, 389K)

No.

It’s actually quite pure, and a great reason to achieve wealth and assets. However, you only should do this once you have fully wired and raised good white children. Preferably males.


Also, this shouldn’t be confused with findom. Findom is cuck bullshit. This is different because you make these bitches entirely dependent on you. You do have to acknowledge that you don’t own the, and they will go back and fuck guys in their circle of friends or whatever social ladder they are on. But they are still dependent on your money. It should be reverse findom really, without the masochism bullshit.

>But they are still dependent on your money.
what does this do to them psychologically? will they sort of do anything you want? can you get them to do whatever you want sexually? does it build affection for you?

Yes to all.