Why are women so obssesed with "open relationships"?

true, just say fuck buddies. or john/escort even.

>"One condition user, this has to be an Open Relationship."
You have two options here you half-baked retard.
>"Oh, okay stacy, whatever you want as long as we can have pity sex. Whenever you say it's okay, I mean. I wouldn't want to make Lamar feel uncomfortable."
OR
>"Sorry, Stacy, monogamy is important to me. But I won't hold you down, go and have a good life."
They only get away with this shit because they know they can. Grow some stones and tell them what's what.

its been said before but ill say it again
alpha fucks
beta bucks

An open relationship is a contradiction. A relationship implies monogamy and exclusivity between two people. Otherwise, you're just being promiscuous. Inventing a new word and concept to describe it is just disingenuous and a clear way to rationalize being a slut. They want the freedom to be with multiple people, but at the same time the recognition of being in a legitimate relationship that has the same intimacy and closeness of a monogamous relationship without actually having to put in the effort to be monogamous. It's completely selfish and degenerate.

It's shit like this that makes me want more Muslims in America. Just to keep these degenerate std carrying whores in their place. But then again I don't wanna get ran over by some Allah praising sandnigger driving a bus.

What the hell makes you think that Muslims would have a problem with this? If anything being an ethnic minority would make them more likely to support left-wing beliefs as opposed to supporting the right-wing that hates them.

If your partner asks for an open relationship you break up with them on the spot. No exceptions. They are already cheating or thinking of cheating and just want to lift the guilt off of their own mind.

It's not the norm. I don't know anyone in an open relationship. It's just an internet thing. I live in the Midwest on the line between the suburbs, farms, and wilderness.

It's not a matter of politics or political beliefs. Their religion simply puts women in their place.

Attached: Islam.jpg (792x612, 330K)

FUCK no open relationships. I'm dating a total fuck boi and as a way of "controlling" him and getting the upper hand I made it clear that I don't give a shit if he cheats on me etc.

But when he did I felt devastated. I want a man for myself. He should ONLY feel attracted to me for me to feel okay and safe. Unfortunately, thats never the case with men.

Attached: sexysaladman.jpg (878x494, 90K)

Because they love the materialistic things their current boyfriend offers and want to keep then while sleeping with other men.

It can be, but the man has to be madly in love. It still happens, but people jump into sex too quickly and don't let love grow.

The men in this thread are idiots. Instead of telling women no and breaking up when they ask for an open relationship they want to jump to Sharia law because they're too pussy to say no.

>women
>transgamerthink
Hate to break it to you OP but that's a mentally ill dude who grew his hair long

>chads off tinder to satisfy sexual needs
>beta bf to satisfy emotional needs

I want to kms because men aren't like this anymore unless they're religious and thus only committed to one girl. So many dudes are lifting too, which means they can get a larger pool of girls and leave me. FML

That's not a girl user, that's a tranny
What a shocker that a sexual deviant would want to sleep around while in a relationship

More men are only like this now because women are. Men saw that women were becoming whores who didn't commit, so they shaped themselves accordingly. Why be a good, honest, loyal guy if women keep going after fuck bois and keep sleeping around? So they became fuck bois themselves because that was the best deal. If women got their act together, so would men.

the funny thing is that if you agree to an open relationship and you end up being the one that gets laid more then they get butthurt as fuck

Attached: q9khzibd1x911[1].png (856x557, 540K)

>I want to kms because men aren't like this anymore unless they're religious and thus only committed to one girl. So many dudes are lifting too, which means they can get a larger pool of girls and leave me. FML
I am like this and I am religious. I could never imagine giving myself to more than one woman. The only woman I ever want to sleep with is my future wife.
Why aren't you religious? Also, why did you get yourself a "fuckboi" bf? You already knew what you were getting yourself into. Are you retarded?

muslim men are allowed 4 wives not to mention concubines. americans seem to love muslim somehow they know nothing about them

I'll be faithful to you as long as you keep the sex coming. I'm not going to be tempted to look for something I can have at home even if the other woman was way more attractive. That shit is too much work.

>Men saw that women were becoming whores who didn't commit, so they shaped themselves accordingly
>If women got their act together, so would men.
>t.NPC
it is nobodys fault but mens themselves for allowing it to go this far

very woke post. if men collectively became strict then women would shape up overnight.

she femsplains the issue so eloquently

Attached: 1473748373596.png (225x225, 6K)

>transwtfever
>women

Attached: 1384274691657.jpg (326x246, 22K)

99% of religious Muslims don't support terrorism. I am a Muslim, I think sluts should hang, and I work for the DHS

Yeah, libshits are the only ones who like us. US Muslims are basically NIMBY liberals at this point, like we have gay friends, but also would flip out if our kids came out as gay

Midwest suburbs have the biggest swinger scenes in the us

We don't get the dirt poor refugee Muslims and Americans have tons of guns to defend themselves with. Every single Muslim I have met has been a very friendly person. They should reconsider their views on alcohol and pork though.

It says "FAKE" right there on the image. Why?

Liberals are noguns tho and want to make everyone else noguns as well

Wasn't aware they were?
Just another reason to continue not pursuing women. Also who cares what a delusional tranny thinks.

Men aren't working collectively because its our biology to peacock in front of women, just look at white knights.

Alcohol is an evil vice no one should be doing and pork tastes like shit compared to most other meats. Muslims are already based.

>trans
>gamerthink
>haughty
>mansplain
>open relationships
>slutshaming
>problematic
Jesus Christ, it's like I'm really in California right now

Attached: Screen Shot 2018-10-11 at 6.05.35 PM.png (463x604, 209K)

>why slutshaming is a problematic

fucking women, i thought theyre supposed to be good at grammar

Attached: 1527112509343.jpg (1000x913, 163K)

Because women know how difficult it is for men to actually get a relationship in the first place.

"I want an open relationship" Is code for "I'm not satisfied with you sexually any more but I don't want to give up your resources"

So the man has to either swallow his pride while his girlfriend fucks other men or lose out on the relationship completely.

Or kill her. You could end her existence.

>why are women so obssesed with "open relationships"?
Imagine if the majority of women were willing to have sex with you at any time, with almost no convincing. But your girlfriend didn't have the same luxury and had to struggle to get laid. You would probably be on board with the idea of an open relationship.

I... really fucking wouldn't? What the fuck is wrong with you.

It's just how they justify their hedonism.
>"it's okay if I do it since you would do it too if you could"

Are people really this fucking stupid?
Situation monogamy:
>Male protects, provides
>Female gives him exclusivity to child
>Male is happy since offspring is guaranteed his
>Female is happy since child will have necceseties

Situation "open relationship":
>Male protects, provides
>Female gives him NO exclusivity to child
>Male states that he does not agree and breaks up
>Female complains

It's like wanting to have and eat your cake at the same time.

all these buzzwords are melting my brain

Attached: no.jpg (640x640, 85K)

>It's like wanting to have and eat your cake at the same time.
uhhhhh user......

>The majority of women want to be owned by one man.
Yeah, and his name is Chad.

You really wouldn't? Throughout history, any man who has found himself in this position has basically tried to pursue an open relationship. In primitive societies (Arab caliphates, 19th century Utah, etc.) this meant actual polygamy, in slightly more advanced ones this meant marriage with openly acknowledged mistresses (most nobility throughout the last 1000 years or so), and in modern times it's tacitly accepted that men in high-level positions (Presidents, hollywood stars, pro athletes) can and do constantly cheat on their wives and their wives nearly always tolerate it.

I'm not judging them or anything, I would too.

>You really wouldn't?
Yes moron, I really wouldn't. Not everyone is a piece of shit like you Jesus fucking Christ.

I would legit ask the woman why I am the one that has to be in the relationship part and why I couldn't just be one of the side, "open" guys.

Attached: [JOdioJO]Jojo's Bizarre Adventure Golden Wind 01 [A69EDD44].mkv_snapshot_14.57_[2018.10.06_23.3 (1920x1080, 307K)

There is nothing wrong with not drinking alcohol and pork.
Alcohol and Drugs have always been one of the fundations of corruption and degeneracy.
Being straight-edge is the true path in becoming and authentic free philosophical man.
Even fucking based Nietzche hated drugs and alcohol and blamed the western society for being too obessed with it and not realising how stupid it all is.

This. If it weren't for whiteknights and beta cucks, cancer like feminism, gynocentrism, society-endorsed hypergamy, etc. would not fucking exist. Or rather, perhaps they would exist in some form, but they would be nothing more than irrelevant, obscure fringe movements, instead of the dominant social and political practices they are today. The sad truth is that women are absolute slaves to their biology and its inherent compulsions, but men are not. Men, even the weakest and most beta, have the capacity to better themselves, evolve, and grow, to tame their biological impulses, but instead many just squander this gift in the pathetic pursuit of pussy.

Attached: quote-they-re-all-weak-all-women-they-re-stupid-compared-to-men-they-shouldn-t-play-chess-you-know-b (850x400, 76K)

I remember the last girl I dated.

>First date
>getting along well
>she said she was in an open relationship right off the hop
>Me: "Oh. Nah I'm good on that."
>She bursts into treats
>Her: "b-but muh sexual assault and this is how I'm reclaiming my sexuality"
>I can tell she really wants it

Of course I fall for the tears.

>"well, OK, but if this is going to work, better end things with your FWB."
>"ok."

We date. Fast forward four months

She calls me out of the blue, saying it's over.

>"Our lives are headed different directions", -- and I bunch of vague stuff that makes no sense.
>I laugh
>"You went out and banged someone and don't want to tell me, right?"
>"No, I'm not seeing anyone else" she tells me with a straight face.
>No muss, no fuss, seeya later.

Fast forward two weeks.

>She shows up at my house unannounced.
>"Yeah, I did cheat on you."
>Me: " I know. What do you want?"
>"I'm pregnant"

I told her to abort it, and that I don't want to be tied to a lying whore the rest of my life.

Moral of the story: Don't be fooled by a womans tears.

Instead of dating some fuckboy that only acts based around his impulses and isnt able to self control find better ways to find a man that isnt like that in the dating process.
Its the diference between being with a beast and being with an human. Same applies to women.

Oh yeah, and fyi, """open relationships""" are nothing but soft cuckoldry. Anyone who disagrees is a goddamned liar.

Attached: ymoiq7d3i5j11.jpg (828x979, 360K)

It's just sort of weird how most men in that position of power have done the same. Maybe whatever it takes to reach that level requires you to be a piece of shit.

Its never going to happen, women normally act much more like as a team in contrast to men.
Men are always competing with each other to be more appealing to the oposite sex, good luck trying to control that shit in gang of normies and braindead dudebros.

>Maybe whatever it takes to reach that level requires you to be a piece of shit.
I mean... no fucking shit lol? Who is drawn to power but sociopaths?

Women don't have anything to lose in an open relationship. She has security while being able to search for a higher quality mate who can impregnate her.
A woman always knows she is the parent of her child, compared to a man. A man would want a regular man-woman relationship to ensure his offspring will be his.

She wants it open til you get some and then it's not ok. It's about making you insecure so she has the power in a relationship.

>Its never going to happen, women normally act much more like as a team in contrast to men.
It's just sort of weird how most men in that position of power have done the same.
Cucked and bluepilled as fuck. I bet you faggots were raised either by single moms or quasi-abusive weak boomerfuck fathers.

Attached: An+island+of+men+and+an+island+of+women+full_65a133_5822844.jpg (473x627, 104K)

>Cucked and bluepilled as fuck. I bet you faggots were raised either by single moms or quasi-abusive weak boomerfuck fathers.
What is cucked or bluepilled about noticing that rich, powerful men want to sleep with as many women as possible? Isn't that a redpill thing? Hypergamy and all that?

>"I'm pregnant"
I hope you smiled like pic related and closed the door.

Attached: 1485505846890.jpg (400x505, 133K)

What a total fucking retard.
I would more than gladly just setle with one that best fitted with my tastes and personality and tell the other thots to go fuck themselves.

This reason and logic you are trying to put to justify your monkey like behaviour only shows how narcissistic you are.

>Tries to justify his point with the degeracy of of complete illiterates like himself.

Most real geniuses and genuine good people in history where never like that, Marcus Aurelius was a roman emperor and even him didnt partake in any of that. Let alone most of the high society romans when stoicism was trending.
Almost none of the great scientists and philosophers in history were polygamous or had affairs with other women. Some of them were even vocels with the intention to not be distracted and manipulated by degeneracy.

Go eat shit and die with your bullshit arguements

Attached: 250px-MarcoAurelio.png (250x310, 101K)

Literally this, it happens too often. Even with ex gf's they get jealous at the fact that you're able to be with another woman so easily.

>me and girl fall in love, becomes my gf for 3 months
>notice things aren't as good as they were before and we talk
>she expresses she's in love with her ex who lives states away from us and breaks up with me to be with him
>heartbroken but stay friends because we still care about each other
>come to accept the situation over a week, and decide to put myself out there again
>hook up with different girls over the period of a month
>ex gf gets upset at me for "moving on so quickly" and she thought "i loved her more than that"

Attached: daniel the alpha.jpg (1221x1080, 499K)

You're assuming intent where there is none. WOMEN want to fuck them, and they just let it happen. Literally nothing personnel kid. All that shit about the right of prima nocta and powerful lords casually stealing and raping any female they desired is mostly based in myth. It almost never actually happened like that irl.

You exaggerate how often it occurred
Having bastard children could cause great complications.

Im not talking in actual "teamworking" to reach a goal.
Im talking about more in the sense of helping themselves instead of trying to screw eachother over.
Like when women see a guy being a creep to another and try to come near and act as if they are well known friends just to put the creep away, kind of help.
If you get what i mean.

they do it because they want to be able to get away with cheating. they want to have their cake and eat it too. this is the byproduct of white knight induced overinflated undeserved ego and also of hubris from being surrounded by yes men types for most of their post-puberty lives.

don't forget that women also will not dump a guy, usually on some bullshit excuse like:
>"i need space"
>"we don't have chemistry"
>"i don't feel _ for you anymore"
etc.

until they've found (what they think is a "better") replacement, since they don't want to be single and alone to face the crippling reality of how underhanded and scummy they often act. this shows physically over time due to the stress and/or unhealthy repression of emotions and living a lie that everything is ok.

also friendly reminder that women are usually looking for another guy to make them feel excited emotionally even if they're dating someone (see "replacement" from earlier comment)

remember most women want to be the more attractive one in the relationship so they date someone they feel like is less attractive so they don't ever feel like the "desperate" one by dating someone more attractive and dating someone less attractive in their mind = that guy would stay after being cheated on because the woman thinks she's better than anything else he can get and takes advantage of him emotionally/mentally due to this perceived advantage

This dumb because of Bateman's principle and how women are more pickier when it comes to sex rather than men, while men don't have to invest in my resources than women. It really is women who should become strict because they basically control who gets sex with their higher standards.

>I'm dumping you because I love someone who's not you and I want to go and fuck him
>how could you fuck another girl I thought I meant something!

I think it's an elaborate shit test, like almost everything else women do nowadays.

Femon speaking, the only reason to enter an open relationship is because there's something lacking, not just sexual satisfaction, but anything. Intimacy, emotional connection, financial support, whatever. Problem is most women feel like they HAVE to be in a relationship, so they settle for someone they don't really like. Women seem to be scared to death of being alone, open relationships is just the latest way to not be alone but not take yourself off the market for someone better.

My cuck of a husband even encourages the shit behavior because his defeatist attitude tells him he'll never find anyone better anyway. Lucky him I only want one fwb on the side, right? Don't be a cuck, and don't date women who want open relationships. You're worth more so act like it.

>You're worth more so act like it.
This doesn't actually work btw. I've been acting like it and all it got me was heartbreak and no one actually wanting to be with me.

If I wasn't done with life and people in general and actually still felt desire for companionship, I'd have killed myself a long time ago.

Almost did the last time anyway.

id torture you if i could

forgot to mention how most women are too lazy + mentally weak to learn how to balance their hormones in a healthy way in order to prevent mood swings or depression and to control their basic "fuck feed repeat" urge

also most women are so emotionally weak that they wilt at the first sign of any sort of conflict so instead of wanting to talk out any (perceived) issues they expect men to be psychic and read their minds. often times the longer it goes without the man doing so, the more passive aggressive the woman becomes rather than addressing whatever small issue it is that builds up and gets worse over time.

This. Only mentally ill women believe in this kind of shit. Sane women actively engage in monogamous relationships AND slut shame other women. In fact, the biggest proponents of slut shaming are women.

At least you've tried then. Admirable, even if you fail.

I'd deserve it.

>At least you've tried then. Admirable, even if you fail.
Literally nothing admirable in failure, that's like saying "at least you tried to fly, crashing against the rocks is still an admirable outcome".

No smugness, lol.

I was cold and sharp. That was a shitty relationship. But it's my fault for feeling sorry for her, instead of shutting it down.

I'm going to be steering away twice as hard next time I encounter redflags.

not anyone involved but I'd rather be alone than be in that probably fake marriage.

I wouldn't. I would literally accept anything at this point. But of course I have to pretend I wouldn't. Do you want to hear my latest failure that made me give up on everything?

I would not call that teamwork lol, not really. That example and others like it are purely situational. They're only "teaming up" to use their inflated social and privilege to put undesireable beta males in their place. It requires no real group cohesion, self-control, sacrifice, etc. Plus, women are significantly more psychologically homogenous than men. At face value, I know this sounds like it would promote greater levels of teamwork and cohesion, but its actually the opposite. Its more like a team where everyone wants to be the center of attention or the leader or whatever. This is why myopic female nature inherently tends to create toxic dynamics.
>remember most women want to be the more attractive one in the relationship so they date someone they feel like is less attractive so they don't ever feel like the "desperate" one by dating someone more attractive and dating someone less attractive in their mind = that guy would stay after being cheated on because the woman thinks she's better than anything else he can get and takes advantage of him emotionally/mentally due to this perceived advantage
Its true lol. Women may want to be sexually owned by chad because he gets them all hot and bothered, but irl, unless they are really naive or stupid, they don't want to date him, because they are acutely aware that he, in all probability, has more sexual leverage than they do.

>goddamn, it's a requirement to be in one if you want to have a girlfriend in this day and age
If you interacted with women irl you would know that's a load of bullshit. They are more common nowadays but nowhere near a majority.

Sure user go for it frienderino

>Do you want to hear my latest failure that made me give up on everything?
Go ahead user, opening up only helps with your self analysis

It's not the outcome that's admirable, it's the willpower and sense of self you need to put into not being a doormat that's admirable. You continued holding yourself to a standard instead of buckling in to what might have gotten you companionship.

And I'll die alone, likely by my own hand. Great success.

I analyzed everything already, it all boiled down to liking someone more than she liked me and actually wanting to help her in life and do stuff with her.

Turned out that I've deluded myself into thinking that she's something she wasn't (with plenty of help from her of course), you know, the 500 days of Summer scenario.

First person I actually loved in the last 15 years or so btw, I managed to hold on that long without getting emotionally attached to anyone since the last time before that ruined my life entirely.

Eh, i guess you are probably more or less right about that.
Its just that have been growing a bit of hate towards the "male competion" lately.
I've been forced this semester to work with a bunch of dudebros and a few extroverted stacies, and i grow tired of seeing the dudebros making cringy shit and screwing themselves over just to get the attention of 1 female.
I dont say it infront of anyone because i get quickly labeled as "you are just jealous" by other normies.