LOL im a cat mom!

Confirmation bias works wonders user. Who knew

>Not providing any examples
>Not realising burden of proof is on you
Yeah nah it means nothing. The only reason incels believe it is because they want to believe it - they don't care if it's true, or if the source is correct - they just want any confirmation that it's not their fault.

The one from okcupid that showed women rate unfairly, the one from the institute for family studies article, the tinder experiment that showed 78% of women go for the top 20% of guys all come to mind.

>if
what? so not only are you making an accusation, you are making an accusation that isn't even based in any sort of reality. Show me something popular that has spawned copy cats that is based on your idea of "a meme product attracted men to it"

The okcupid one doesn't mean anything because it has no real life implications. The "tinder experiment" was complete bullshit made up by an incel who sent a questionnaire to 27 girls and treated that as actual tinder data.

I mean I've seen them and I've seen that they are sourced so I know for a fact that people who say they're all unsourced are lying through their teeth.

It's funny how normies tactics are dismissal while incels tactics are discussion

The institute of family studies graph that showed sexlessness was completely made up. The incel who made it up admitted so on hig blog. Yet incels still continue to believe it. Mindblowing.

It's bullshit to say the tinder data is meaningless because it was a small study, and okcupid showed men rating more fairly plain to see.

Saying "hurr this uses gss data trust me I am not showing you my data or methods" does not make it sourced.

Think of a woman's hobby. Can you? You can't, because women don't really have hobbies. If you really looked for them maybe you would see horseback riding and sewing or something which has fallen out of favor or you only really see in the midwest. Many engage in some form of drawn or painted art, i'll say that much (only because this is easy for them to show off to others)

Hobbies among men? Sports, fixing up cars, cooking, woodworking, electronics and robotics, model trains, video games, writing, etc. And of course not all men have the same hobbies. They are clearly defined as part of that unique male personality. Sure many men love video games, but certainly not the same type. Some love FPS, some love racing, sports, RPGs. Women? 90% love the same type of movies. 90% love the same type of books.

How is it that they are all so similar across vast distances?

Okay, post them then dumbass.

google "meme costume"

No man is an island. Same thing happens with guys. People use their peers as role models.

It's not even tinder data you dolt. The incel literally made it all up.

Women are group animals, and subconsciously follow group theory to its limit.
when a meme fashion is marketed, women follow
when a meme opinion is shilled, women parrot it
they are the embodiment of the NPC

>"I've seen them"
>"I know they're real"
>Still no sources
>Still no proof
>"Yeah but let's just discuss it anyway"
Sure, make sure to talk about ghosts and Santa Clause while you're at it.

>source: i saw them
i'm going to jibble your nuts, kiddo

It's not though, it's from their website not an incel blog, what are you talking about even
I can't post em I'm on mobile but just saying that the graphs aren't as bs as you guys try to push.

>costume
oh wow, so something that other people are MEANT TO RECOGNIZE.

Yet women still have the popular slutty nurse, slutty devil, and slutty schoolgirl that pop up every year. Men are at least creative with their costumes based on content that is relevant.

go on literally any board right now and observe with your eyes men behaving the way that you project that women behave.
obviously Jow Forums is a good example because you mentioned politics. obviously /fa/ is a good example because you mentioned fashion.

I and every incel has seen the graphs, I don't care to convince you of them, it's you who needs to convince me they arent true. I'm not trying to spread a message here.

>people aren't meant to recognize a nurse, devil or school girl costume
user....

That's not what a burden of proof is.
Also I have seen them, completely unsourced and spread like wildfire around here and especially in women hate threads (which contain the same 10 plebbit screencaps and fake statistics every single time)

>obviously Jow Forums is a good example because you mentioned politics
>obviously /fa/ is a good example because you mentioned fashion.
clearly you haven't engaged in either or you would recognize that you are basically just shooting yourself

there are WIDELY contesting opinion on Jow Forums and even though /fa/ has a much larger percentage of women, not all of them love the urban ninja and yohji shit.

Meanwhile there are three distinctive flavor of woman fashion, the normie, the indie with her yellow kanken and overalls, and the nuGoth that just wears a black tanktop, lipstick, and a choker

That graph with 0% sexless women was retracted by the incel who posted it on his blog page at family studies.

you clearly and fully missed the point, i'm saying that people do recognize those costumes, which is why women choose them the most. They are trying to be as bland and as generic like other women as possible.

They are not properly sourced, they provide no data or methodology. But no amount of facts would convince you, no matter how wrong you would be proven. You literally just said "I will believe them no matter what because they reinforce my beliefs, I will not accept facts over my beliefs".

Thank you for replying to that bait with that 10/10 post
couldn't have said it better myself

>Meanwhile there are three distinctive flavor of woman fashion, the normie, the indie with her yellow kanken and overalls, and the nuGoth that just wears a black tanktop, lipstick, and a choker
Note that this is so utterly archetypal of women that these three fashion styles TRANSCEND BORDERS. The American Indie is the same as the Russian Indie is the same as the Korean Indie is the same as the Spanish Indie.

Attached: 37808390_2132591763478983_574557888517767168_n.jpg (1080x1080, 1.17M)

Incels deserve to be ridiculed, not argued with. It's literally a waste of time to be trying to provide any arguments and not just laughing at them.

Probably why nobody ever does provide arguments

But that makes sense since online dating is for loser men and regular women. Lrn2logic kiddo

Incels would believe that dogs can fly if it means they don't need to look inward for their failure as a man.

yes because I need to succeed and be the best man that I could be so I can be rewarded with a woman. Nevermind that society never asks for a woman to work a day in her life to be better for a man.

They raise questions motherfucker. They are not random or coincidental. We can run our own experiments that support our beliefs. There has formed a sort of stairs that we go down in the incel argument. First you say that it's all wrong, then it's your personality not your looks, then the internet doesn't matter, then it's women have a harder time with relationships though, then it's just you incels deserve it all anyway just cuz and you ignore every thing said up until that point and start over in a new thread. If all you want is to stir up animosity here then good work but if you actually want to convince anyone here then engage us on our talking points. Women do have it veritably easy.

Wtf? Jow Forums is an echo chamber.

Then run those experiments. Using actual proper scientific methods and controls.

Make a chad and a stacy dating account and then an ugly girl and ugly guy dating account. It'll all be your personality.

That does not qualify as a scientific experiment. You need many accounts of different types.

Men pursue women. That's basic biology. Why do you care what a woman has to do? That's gossipy. Gossip is for women.

Ok then m8, good luck with the next incel

Online dating isn't real life.

Not really, not at all. Sure there are people FROM Jow Forums that infect everywhere else but you would be hard pressed to find even universal praise for Trump on Jow Forums. Conservatism sure, but in what ways? Economic conservatism? They're split there. Social conservatism? Where do people draw the line there? Jow Forums is split on a bunch of things and not everyone of them believe Alex Jones' shit.

>Gossip is for women
that's what im saying. See now you get it, all women are the same. So much so that you can generalize women like that. They're barely sapient, barely individuals.

You're delusional. There's like 2 kinds of guys. Tryhard effeminate beta males and men. You're the former :(

It's not meaningless and only going to get more relevant
Prostitutes turn down black guys.

But all men are the same too. Doing whatever they can to get laid

I think the real question is with all this incel ruckus why isn't the research being done?

Prostitutes can pick their clients. Wtf does that have to do with anything? Online dating is already dying out

How does she know that he's the type of guy her post was directed at, when there's nothing he said to show that he is?

Research what? Of course incels are wrong about women. Why would people who never talk to women know shit?

Well it's simple, they're basic/NPCs with no real personality lol unfortunately there's a good amount of them in both genders.

I mean incels are turning up data. The best you normies you can do is go "nuh-uh!" at the gss data because you don't like it.

Well "data" like a dating site blog.

Normies are fucking chicks and getting results.

Hmmmm. Which one knows more about women?

No.. the gss is a survey

Like the incel npc. Mindlessly spewing excuses for never becoming a man.

Or the anti incel npcs who can't form coherent arguments and look stupid in the name of normalcy

A survey doesn't trunp actual experience. Sorry.

What was incoherent? I'll dumb it down for you.

Actual experience as in anecdotes? Anecdotes matter more than data now?

>gss data
It's not. They literally lie about it. If they used gss data they would show what data they use and how. You incels will literally believe any retarded shit as long as someone says "hurr this uses gss data". It's literally impossible to be an incel unless you are a scientifically illiterate brainlet.

A survey is anecdotes, bro.

See here please For real though I was referring to how your argument is entirely defensive, you are the one making weak excuses for why incels are wrong as you're proven wrong again and again.
orange

Have you looked at the gss data and what it contains? Oh wait. Obviously you haven't. Because then you would know those incel graphs use data which isn't found in gss at all.

Why would they lie in incels favor if they attempted to use the data to disprove incels, brainlet

Well obviously incels are wrong. Everyone gets laid without issue except video game playing, woman hating manchildren. So of course you're wrong, no matter how many dating site blogs you read.

Can anyone prove incels wrong, for humors sake

They lie to incels because you people are gullible as shit.

Sounds like you've got a conspiracy theory here. Incels have evidence, you have doubt.

I'm a 4/10 and get laid no problem. Incels ugly dads got laid.

Double standards these days! Yeah, user, I'm definitely a failure of a man for considering a woman my equal.
I've been in many relationships in the past but only at the cost of ingenuinely playing stupid fucking games for those women. I grew a spine one day and realized it was wrong from a personal moral standpoint! I'd rather be myself and get rejected than to be a stupid fucking asshole who just pretends to give a shit, with the biological desire to secure a mate like a stupid fucking ape being the primary driving force. I'd rather chop my cock and balls off than to ever again become a puppet who's strings are pulled by pussy power alone. I don't hate women, I just know for a fact that our culture is very heavily unbalanced, and that applies to both men and women, but for fucks sake, it gets worse as it gets more specific, contrived and less natural. Do I really have to bend over backwards in order for people to be bluepilled on the fact that all pentrative sex is rape? Look it up. That is just a single example of what people are being taught now by a vocal minority. You can thank the world wide web for that.

It's part of the incel narrative that times have changed. How tall are you, white?

No, you don't have evidence. Society IS the evidence against you. You have blogs on dating sites, which are for loser men anyway.

They do have evidence though, gets posted all the time.

This is part of the incel idea of just moving goalposts. Women don't care about height as much as you do.

So you are white and tall?

the only thing i worry about when trying to find a suitable partner is whether if shes mentally ill or not. usually excessive amount of casual sex and short term partners are good indicators of mental illness but since its widely accepted to indulge in this behavoir it throws off the crazy meter.

Actual evidence. Not blog surveys.

Guys shorter than you and darker than you get laid all the time. This is the truth. You cannot deny it. What else do you need to prove incels wrong?

That's a theory, it's not proven and they aren't trying to say "stop having sex"

In snails the male literally impales the female with a semen harpoon. The "professors" teaching this admittedly sensationalist pop science are probably suggesting that sexual reproduction as a whole is centered on rape.

Obviously, because animals can't consent (by our legal definition, i've definitely seen them protest against sex) males and even their sperm/parts evolved to get the penis in and out any bizarre way they can. See: ducks (horrifying things)

See? You're obsessed with saying things that you cant change is the reason you're a pathetic virgin. That's not it. You're just fucking lazy and probably mildly retarded. This is basically what incels are. Dumb, lazy, entitled manchildren.

I'm not white and tall btw.

But men pursuing women is natural. So you typed all that for nothing.

When women want equality they don't want to change biology, you fucking retard. You're misrepresenting the argument.

Go fuck yourself, I'm not lazy and I've had experience trying with women. I've seen first hand they get it better. Prove they don't get it better.

Place extra emphasis on "dumb" because that's really the important part, the other stuff can be forgiven by someone who is kind and patient (not
me)

Why do you care what women get? Do you want to be a woman?

And you're lazy and pathetic.

They put pressure on it. Women competing with men and refusing to accept men below them is oppressive standards on men.

>has never made any effort to get a girl or a job
>I'm not lazy!

Do you need time to prep your infograph folder?

Women date men below them all the time. They just don't date YOU.

I don't want to bother trying for a girl who can swipe left whenever she's mad.

No, it's biology. You can thank your god.