I've been having these thoughts lately. I think most normie women don't even view men as humans. I mean they know men are physically/biologically human but they can't comprehend the fact that there is the same kind of sentience inside the minds of men. Especially in this political climate. Whenever they see a strange guy the automatically assume that the guy is gonna rape them or some shit. Whenever they see a loner guy they assume he's gonna shoot up the school . I don't think they can comprehend the fact that men have emotions, interests, or personalities that are not connected in attracting women. Like every time a guy post on social media about their lego, mtg cards or whatever, some women can't seem to understand why they guys would like those nerdy things. In their mind all men does is to attract them. So why would those guys like to collect cards if they don't even know what mtg is. Normie women can't comprehend the fact that some men does hobbies for their own enjoyment. Are women inherently programmed to view men as disposable resource? Yeah I know I sound like an incel or whatever. Just sharing my thoughts.
Do women even view men as humans?
Share it, but don't flaunt it like that.
Girls don't like show-offs.
>Do women even view men as humans?
No. Women are inhuman, evil, vapid, soulless NPCs themselves, and are born self interested traitors with primitive brains. Women are incapable of true friendship or love, and are backstabbing, dishonest, insincere, and resentful and crass towards anyone who isn't their perfect handsome wealthy successful dominant Chad fantasy. Women think anyone other than Chad (and maybe their female competition) is below them.
Do men even view women as humans?
on Jow Forums they certainly don't.
No man (except gay guys) ever got rewarded for being nice to women. You just get shit on for it, till you start treating them like they want, which is like shit.
They're like the cats who were worshipped by egypt, act all full of themselves but in reality they're just dumb and spoiled. They don't see people they see servants and once you get that women's politics start to make a lot of sense.
That's such a feminine thing to say.
You're not supposed to treat others with respect in order to get something out of it. You're supposed to treat others with respect because it's right.
What the fuck it matters if you don't get a reward for everything?
there are some good ones, ones who were usually raised around men. but for the a large part, they'd rather not think of men other than as sex objects.
Why are you lying? Are you gay? Women love it when a guy is actually nice to her.
If you're attractive they love it, if you're average or below they don't really care
Rich talk from someone who is rewarded for nothing. You women are spoiled whores and your viewpoints reflect it
>women act subhumans
>pretend to be innocent shocked little victims when men view them as subhumans
Women are truly subhuman.
>things sociopaths say
I don't want a reward dingdong. I want everyone to participate in the social contract.
If women valued men being nice to them, all men would be nice all the time. They don't, so they don't.
>Women love it when a guy is actually nice to her
Yeah, and they will simultaneously shit on you for it.
I'm not a woman. I don't particularly care what women think of me. You seem to care enough to mock me for it, so I'd say your the rich one for talking about whoring yourself out.
Get into MGTOW brother. What you're saying is true. MGTOW helped me find that perspective better. Go on to youtube and look up Marcel Enlightened or some other MGTOW youtubers
>Are women inherently programmed to view men as disposable resource?
If you still don't now the answer to this question you've got some catching up to do.
Is this fucking bizarro r9k today? Can't you see this line of questioning can be applied to yourselves?
Really, switch the fucking genders on that and realise half the threads on this board is based on bullshit.
t. a woman not interested in dating who wants to just enjoy her hobbies but ohhh that doesn't stick to the robot agenda does it? So I must be lying.
If women valued men being rich, all men would be rich all the time. They don't, so they don't.
Women are, in fact, not actual people.
they mostly just view us as a bank account
I don't think that's the case. There is a guy in my university that is really nice to everyone in my class. I think he came from Romania or some eastern european country. A group of girls tried to use him to carry their bags, but some alpha thot-slayer called them cunts and they stopped. My point is if women like guys that are nice, those thots would've been having a 4some with that euro dude. Women can be absolute vapid cunt stains. Women need to stop patting themselves on the back and calling themselves all beautiful angels. The reality is women and men are all the same. Especially normies. Filled with narcissistic fuckers without empathy that would be the creators and the targets of the next Elliot Rodger.
>Whenever they see a strange guy the automatically assume that the guy is gonna rape them or some shit.
I'm wary around men, but not because I think they're ALL going to rape me. I just have to be conscious of the possibility that a stranger is one of the few shitbags who wants to rape me. Those shitbags are more common than you would expect.
>Are women inherently programmed to view men as disposable resource?
No. If anything, we're programmed to sympathize with men's struggles and hate ourselves.
I don't think OP has much experience with women at all. Obviously some of us are shallow, but most aren't, just like some men are shallow but most aren't.
>my singular incel anecdote trumps reality and research
Don't you realize that you are an angry asshole, and that's why you can't get girls? If you were nicer you would get girls.
>we're programmed to sympathize with men's struggles and hate ourselves.
LOL BULL FUCKING SHIT. You actually think we believe that shit. Fuckk off!
This is a horrible over simplification of a much more complex issue. She does not belong to him, neither should she accept his claims of ownership of the others. It's not something that you can just solve in an afternoon.
>you are an angry asshole, and that's why you can't get girls
Angry guys get laid and have gfs all the time.
>If you were nicer you would get girls.
Pure soi. Read any of the "nice guy" thread where women work overtime to convince anyone and everyone that not only do nice men not exist, but that they are actually secretly pieces of shit. Women loathe nice, "nice", or anything remotely like it.
We grow up reading books about male protagonists and their struggles. We watch movies all about male protagonists and their struggles.
Whenever a movie is made featuring women and their perspective, everyone loves to shit on it. See: Twilight. That was shit, but I don't think the men criticizing it could even describe the overarching plot or major narrative flaws if you asked them to. They just saw something women liked and they hated it. Also see: pumpkin spice lattes. It's a fucking drink.
>research
Yeah right retard. Cite me some social "science" paper with more than 40% reproducibility.
Yes but that's because women are not people.
twilight is a piece of shit, are you kidding me? how about terminator/terminator 2, alien/aliens? you know, actual good movies
"nice guys" aren't nice. If angry assholes got laid all the time then how come you are still a virgin? And how come angry asshole incels are all virgins?
>We grow up reading books about male protagonists and their struggles. We watch movies all about male protagonists and their struggles.
The read books and watch movies about female protagonist you dumbfuck. Jesus christ do you honestly just gobble up all the shit that companies provide to you?
>women hate guys who are nice to them but love guys who abuse them
This is what incels actually believe.
>"nice guys" aren't nice
Yeah, like that.
>If angry assholes got laid all the time then how come you are still a virgin
I'm not mad, just disappointed.
user never mentioned an argument of his own. He just stated that anecdotes aren't a valid form of argument. If you want to make a sweeping statement about women's cognitive or emotional abilities, the burden of proof is on YOU. You need to provide reproducible research.
I am a woman and even i don't believe that. In truth, everyone (female or male) cares only about themselves, no one is "programmed" to sympathtize with other's struggles.
Women love abusive relationships. What planet do you live on
>could even describe the overarching plot or major narrative flaws if you asked them to.
That's really why I criticized it.
Can you explain to me why it's shit? This is my point. People instinctively criticize things like Twilight for appealing to women without even having a proper argument as to why it's shit.
>The read books and watch movies about female protagonist you dumbfuck.
? I never said it's bad. Personally, I think it builds character to learn to empathize with the opposite gender.
I'm not sure how that remotely relates to my post.
That sounds like a very low intellect statement. What do you base that on? Studies and data?
>That's really why I criticized it.
Sure. Tell me all about the subtext of Mormon sexual values in Eclipse, then.
>Can you explain to me why it's shit? This is my point. People instinctively criticize things like Twilight for appealing to women without even having a proper argument as to why it's shit.
lmao everything about it is shit. terrible acting and an awful story. the baby plot was probably the dumbest thing i have ever watched in my life
The reddit is just spewing out of you. I was just saying my own opinion. Read again retard. You refuted it saying the inverse is fact. So the burden of proof is on you, you stupid fucker. Show me a social science paper with more than 40% reproducibility with actual quantifiable parameters.
women are incapable of love is what it boils down to
Truth to be told i don't think neither women or men view the opposite or same sex as human beings. The world we live in nowadays is selfish, and everyone cares only about their own needs and wants, not minding if they ruin/make harder other peoples lives.
>I was just saying my own opinion. Read again retard. You refuted it saying the inverse is fact.
So you're admitting that your opinions aren't based in fact?
Is YOUR refutation of my opinion based in fact? And where is the research I kept asking about? If there isn't any here's another opinion for you to refute:
>You are a retarded redditorfag.
That one I know for a fact
>Is YOUR refutation of my opinion based in fact? And where is the research I kept asking about?
Dude, you need to get a grip. The burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
If you're claiming "women don't see men as people", you're the one who needs to provide proof. Counterarguments do not require proof unless they contain further claims. I don't think it's that hard to understand.
No women see men as a utility. Women are human beings and men are human doings. A women has intrinsic value because vagina and babies. Men only gain value as they prove they worth as an implement. Buckle up, women arnt capable of the type of love you want. Sucks dat be life doh.
just look well 50 shades series did
BDSM != an abusive relationship.
This is like sexuality 101.
They can only see chad as human.
When are cattle created solely to be our property for amusement and child bearing.
t. a woman not interested in dating who wants to just enjoy her hobbies but ohhh that doesn't stick to the robot agenda does it? So I must be lying.
stopped reading there.
>sexuality 101
See incels never took that class.
Dunno about human, but women always seem to assume that guys do things "just because" whereas women do things because of reasons.