Absolutely everyone who holds racist or homophobic thoughts should be burned alive...

FUCK YOU NIGGER, FUCK YOU FAGGOT, see, just words, ink in your screen and nothing else.

The problem with you absolute filth is you seemingly can dish it out but you definitely and certifiably can't take it.

w-why would I do that? That sounds painful user!

Attached: 1527950092529.gif (415x212, 1.68M)

Come on ladyboy, burn me, dont be chicken. You'll just solve all my problems.

Attached: 1539259142840.png (587x700, 166K)

>misgender someone
>"SPEECH IS VIOLENCE"

meanwhile OP literally using speech to advocate violence.
Really makes you think.

Fuck then guess I better hide just because a bunch of faggots are wanting to wave their dicks in my face and that I'm tired of seeing pics of faggots on the catalog trying to enforce their opinions on people. I dont really care for racism but I dont like immigrants and foreigners because they destroy cultures and think they can get away with shit because of the morals they grew up with in their country, for example, the Chinese refused trade with Europe because the Europeans were disrespectful in their eyes. Is that racism? No, it has to do with culture differences. Faggots stay on their side, straight people stay on our side

When you stare into the abyss.

Attached: 1491100998978.jpg (320x428, 42K)

niggers and faggots are a blight on mankind
as proven by life

I've wanted to do this very thing to a faggot.
Not a friend though cuz I like my friends and it would be too weird.
But some little faggot like yourself I would of loved to of done it to.
Fuck you, you little faggot.
not gay btw

Redpills on race and genes associated with intelligence

Attached: genesandintelligence.png (1058x1334, 148K)

Information on the MAO-A gene

Attached: mao-a gene.jpg (1136x2200, 812K)

Increased crime is more strongly correlated with race than income or other environmental factors.

Attached: crimestats.png (662x703, 123K)

How the fuck would blowing hawkman make me a nazi

>I've wanted to do this very thing to a faggot.
Please do it then! I'm starving for your big nazi cock, user..!

Attached: 1529975046562.jpg (985x944, 268K)

More redpills on race and crime

Attached: blacksmorecriminal.jpg (1224x1584, 879K)

This.
When biracials and homosexual men are obviously genetically superior to everyone else, there's no need to retain heterophiles, females, and monoracial untermensch any more, beyond simple gamete farms. It's so pathetic watching tribalistic mongs ooga-booga about living in a time-frozen, technologically restricted ethnostate because of their fee-fees. Just let us replace your feeble old races with a new and objectively better race.

>this map is actual bullshit
Then what do you think the correct world map of IQ looks like?
>first it doesnt source anything on its own
>second, the tests in the countries were conducted on fucking schoolchildren in PAIRS OF TWO
Sauce? Even if that is the case, there are studies of race and IQ that have larger sample sizes than 2. The Minnesota Transracial Adoption Study, for instance, had a sample size of 130.

Attached: 1467805496161.png (1228x1000, 163K)

Black people are better than you, kid. Don't throw a fit.

get lost you gay nigger

Absolutely everyone who holds antiwhite or degenerate thoughts should be burned alive. No amount of running your mouth or shit you heard on your shithole of a board can justify being as braindead, primitive and scummy as you are.

Attached: 1540942444307.jpg (550x671, 95K)

>live in shitty 2nd world country where no one gives a fuck about anything
Try and get me lad, the gypsies will rob you before you get within miles of my comfy commie block

>I hate Nazis and homophobes.

Spotted the basedboy faggot.

Attached: nu males2.jpg (1280x960, 178K)

Choke on a dick and die faggot.

NlGNOG

The usual sample size requirement for a study to be conclusive is 10,000. Below that, its a case study.

There's a difference between being "a bit racist" and actually making decisions in the real world based on racism. The former is basically everyone, the latter should be gassed to death in concentration camps.

Thats a given though. If you're racist against white people you're also racist. Why do you think an exception is made for that?

I'm not racist, I just don't want to live in the same country as nonwhites.

Attached: tax_dollars.png (756x768, 131K)

The point is it doesnt matter. If someone is stupid, it will show. If someone is smart, it too will show. There is no need to involve race into the equation on deciding if someone is smart or stupid. Doing so shows you're inherently racist independant of what reasons you state for being racist. I can even prove this. You claim you're racist because of IQ, yet you're a white supremacist. If your claim was not a lie, you'd be an Asian supremacist, as Asians have a higher IQ than all white ethnic groups. You'd be racist even if whites had an average of 50 IQ. IQ is an excuse, you're racist simply because you are against everything that doesnt represent you. Its not about IQ, its about YOU. Racism is inherently an egomaniac trait, and egomania is strongly correlated with low IQ and dunning kruger. Basically racism is being a subhuman and trying to cope by saying "but some people who look similar to are smarter than me".

So its a latino and black problem, not a nonwhite problem. I dont see Asians and Indians draining anything.

Hope he murders you afterwards, cuck

Wrong board nigger/fag or Jew/dyke

No, wrong board for YOU, Jow Forumsturd.

>There is no need to involve race into the equation on deciding if someone is smart or stupid.
that is not what is happening

Just as individuals have characteristics, groups also have characteristics, and to ignore the latter for fear of being called a "racist" or a "sexist" or a "xenophobe" is the worst sort of retardation imaginable

>You claim you're racist because of IQ, yet you're a white supremacist. If your claim was not a lie, you'd be an Asian supremacist, as Asians have a higher IQ than all white ethnic groups.

median IQ of a population is a poor way to judge if they are "superior"
we know dog breeds differ in average intelligence, does that mean the lowest intelligence breed is inferior, and the highest is most superior? What about dog breeds that are fast runners, or have a super sense of smell, or excel in some other heritable trait?

What is superior, a cockroach,snake, or rat?In fact, there is no "Superior" in nature. Believing in median IQ differences between races isn't any more "racist" or suggesting "superiority" than believing in skin color differences, despite variation within races. What is "TANSTAAFL"?

>Its not about IQ
The most "racist" white people in America (based on implicit bias tests) are the ones that live around Blacks. People generally hate Blacks because they live around lots of them, and their low IQ is a big factor in this. Yet, Blacks are smarter than dogs, but white people love dogs... so IQ alone simply isn't the basis of hate

Higher IQ correlates well with job performance (r = 0.54), increased wealth, increased income, economic growth, livability in a U.S. state (0.80), cooperation, and even life expectancy (0.85) and infant mortality (-0.84), so one might reasonably expect that avg IQ will determine economic success for an entire population. And, indeed, that is the case. Nations whose citizens have a high average IQ usually also have a high average living standard; the correlation is strong, 0.73.

Judging people in groups is tribalism and racism. You are not responsible for the actions or characteristics of other people of your "race" or ethnic group. So when you judge people based on race, thats exactly whats happening. There is no need to involve race into the equation, if someone is stupid it shows, if someone is a criminal it shows, if someone is neither than also it shows. Race doesnt affect the fact or reality of a person in any way.

>median IQ of a population is a poor way to judge if they are "superior"
Tell that to yourself. You're the one who makes an assertion that whites are superior, and you back it up with IQ. You did that not me. But when you're called out on why that doesnt make sense, you flip flop and you say "no it isnt IQ". Then why did you say it is? By flip flopping on your statement, you prove one thing only; my point that any reasons you give for your racism is irrelevant to the actual reason why you feel that way, they're just things you use to justify your stance when questioned on it. And two, you're a liar, you will say anything to prove a point and when you're called out on your bullshit, you'll change your argument into something else.

>Nations whose citizens have a high average IQ usually also have a high average living standard; the correlation is strong, 0.73.
So what is your point? Are you perhaps trying to say IQ determines superiority? But no, you just said that iq doesnt determine superiority (after saying that IQ determines superiority). So, which one is it?

>Judging people in groups is tribalism and racism
you're not going to stop it from happening. ethnic conflict and genocide within countries is far more likely than war between nation states, that's just how the word works... you won't stop billions of people from being racist by whining on a chinese pottery board

>You are not responsible for the actions or characteristics of other people of your "race" or ethnic group.
You must understand that we are in a planet-wide race-war, and the survival of my race depends on winning this war. We won't win by wasting our time trying to figure out who the friendly Blacks/browns are and who the hostile ones are. We won't win by refusing to talk about what the Jews are doing to my people from fear that I may be unjustly casting suspicion on Jews who are simply minding their own business. We must deal with them collectively, and when SHTF comes that's certainly the way they will deal with us.

>So when you judge people based on race, thats exactly whats happening.
Wrong, I am judging an entire race based on their group characteristics, and deciding that TOTAL GEOGRAPHICAL SEPARATION is important. White-only living spaces. I would never look at a black guy and say "you must be stupid, because your race's median IQ is low" -- that is RETARDED, only a moron would think that way!

>Race doesnt affect the fact or reality of a person in any way.
Race and IQ are both determined by genes, with IQ being 70-90% heritable. Race doesn't determine intelligence AT ALL, obviously, genes do

>You're the one who makes an assertion that whites are superior, and you back it up with IQ
no, my first reply was: This guy: didn't say "superior" or "whites are the best" at all from what I see. you're hallucinating right now, attacking a strawman

>By flip flopping on your statement
I said:
>there is no "Superior" in nature

Damn that Jow Forumsturd got btfo bad

Attached: 1541472586384.jpg (600x450, 41K)

kek, projecting much?

Attached: african_american.png (726x767, 580K)

>So what is your point? Are you perhaps trying to say IQ determines superiority?
you're so obsessed with this "superiority" word that nobody else used, fuck off with that fallacious shit. IQ is a measure of intelligence. It correlates better with positive social outcomes than anything else, certainly anything you provided.

My point is, a population of intelligent people create better living standards than a population of dumb people. That's why white people have better societies to live in than blacks, there is a 1-2 standard deviation IQ difference. East Asians also have some nice places to live [japan, south korea], communism seems to ruin everything though, for both races.

>But no, you just said that iq doesnt determine superiority (after saying that IQ determines superiority). So, which one is it?
Who said IQ determines superiority?

You never answered:
>What is "TANSTAAFL"?

In economics, "there ain't no such thing as a free lunch" and that is also true in evolution. If an individual puts more resources into a larger, smarter brain, he has fewer resources available for his other organs.

Why are there no super-smart lions/gazelles? Any gazelle that invested more resources in a larger brain would have fewer resources to devote to the muscles and bones that enable it to escape lions, nor could a slower, but bigger-brained lion catch enough of even the stupider gazelles to survive. That is, an animal's brain increases in size only as long as the additional grey matter increases his reproductive success; after he reaches his optimal brain size, any additional brain lowers his reproductive success.

Since we humans have already invested so much in our brains (about 25% of our metabolism) going past our optimal brain size will rapidly lower reproductive success. Average human brain size has DROPPED since the Paleolithic.

I am not genuinely racist nor homophobic yet privileged well off people like yourself op would gladly attack me just for existing.

Thats because you suffer from Narcissistic Personality Disorder and so you use your perverted liberal ideology to attack people who you perceive as weaker and inferior to you.

You are god and they are to be your worshippers. But because they didnt worship you. you now use your ideology to denigrate them.

>you're not going to stop it from happening. ethnic conflict and genocide within countries is far more likely than war between nation states, that's just how the word works... you won't stop billions of people from being racist by whining on a chinese pottery board
this

Scholars point out that fear of and hostility toward other ethnic groups are far older and often more entrenched than modern principles of tolerance or equality under the law." No matter how we may wish for it otherwise, we did not leave violence against outsiders behind us as our nations became modern and democratic."

Indeed, over the past 50 years, the most frequent settings for violent conflict have not been wars between sovereign states, but rather internal strife tied to cultural, tribal, religious, or other ethnic animosities. Between 1989 and 2004, there were 118 military conflicts in the world. Of those, only seven were between nation-states and the remaining 111 occurred within a single state, a large portion of which involved ethnic conflict.

According to another recent estimate, "nearly two-thirds of all [the world?s] armed conflicts [at that time] included an ethnic component. [In fact], ethnic conflicts [were] four times more likely than interstate wars." Another study claimed that 80 percent of "major conflicts" in the 1990s had an ethnic element.

Any listing of the world's most brutal wars in the past few decades would include ethnically based internal warfare or massacres in Rwanda, the Congo, Ethiopia, Sudan, Lebanon, and Indonesia (East Timor). In 1998, one authoritative study estimated that some 15 million people had died worldwide as a result of ethnic violence since 1945 (including war-related starvation and disease).

Attached: tatu1sml.jpg (432x258, 20K)

I read something interesting about Africa. Some researchers went down to Southern Africa to hang out with the Khoisan and covertly IQ test them. They asked them a few questions about organization of, say, crops. These questions were basically IQ test questions asked in a way that a tribesman could understand. The Khoisan gave their answers, which were "wrong".

The researchers then asked "ok now organize the crops the way a fool would". The outcome was either very close or exactly what a westerner would've considered the "correct" answer. I'll have to find the study.

Tell him his mother can't season food or his family shoots each other on Thanksgiving and he'll go on an autistic stormfag rant.

Attached: 7DB6EBE8-3429-4417-A5CB-248BAEC20B6A.jpg (431x650, 131K)

>you're not going to stop it from happening.
That was not the point now, was it? The debate here is on what is correct or not, not whats going to happen or not. But you are wrong anyways, its happening, anti racist sentiments are astronomically more popular than they ever were before and its only rising.

>you won't stop billions of people from being racist by whining on a chinese pottery board
Last time i checked its poltards who are SEETHING on the internet all day every day trying to actively stop anti racist sentiments. Quite ironic that you're speaking about it as if racism is a sad truth that you just reluctantly are accepting while you do everything in your power to stop it from becoming even more irrelevant than it already is.

>I am judging an entire race
Thats literally the definition of racism and tribalism lol. The latter is one of the most strongly correlated traits with low iq btw.

>You must understand that we are in a planet-wide race-war,
> I am deciding that TOTAL GEOGRAPHICAL SEPARATION is important

Im sorry, i didnt know i was talking to a child and/or schizophrenic. I'll leave you alone from now on, you can calm down.

Attached: 2ec(2).png (327x316, 208K)

Its implicitly said. You can replace "superiority" with "better". First you say, white people are better because of iq, then you say, no iq doesnt determine who is better or not, then you flip flop again and say that "iq creates better societies", again implying that white people are better. My point here is that you're a liar and this shows through your inability to stick to an argument. You're doing what i explained an in my first post, making up justifications for prexisting beliefs that were formed independently of the given justifications.

>>What is "TANSTAAFL"?
I dont give a fuck. Im not obsessed with race. Neither were any of the "white" (Jewish) inventors and scientists who made white countries great. Here is a tip for you, the more you're obsessed with other people in life, the less happier and succesful you'll get. Focus on actually contributing something of value to the white society you love so much. Focus on making some kind of technological developement or anything of value. As of now all you're doing is leeching off of the work of other white people and wasting your days whining about black people on the internet.

Attached: 61k53ARQ5QL._SX425_.jpg (425x425, 18K)

>The debate here is on what is correct or not, not whats going to happen or not. But you are wrong anyways, its happening, anti racist sentiments are astronomically more popular than they ever were before and its only rising.

not really, check it out, all the jews are complaining about anti-semitism being on the rise. Jow Forums used to not be a thing

>Quite ironic that you're speaking about it as if racism is a sad truth that you just reluctantly are accepting while you do everything in your power to stop it from becoming even more irrelevant than it already is.
you keep using "racism" as some umbrella term to pidgeonhole. if you can declare any one idea someone expresses as 'racism' no matter how far of a stretch, you declare that person a 'racist' and thus he must absolutely believe all other 'racist' things.
like the "IQ = supremacy" strawman you invented, nobody brought up that word at all. you're obsessed

is it 'racist' to love your own family and treat them better? race is just a large extended family

>Last time i checked its poltards who are SEETHING on the internet all day every day trying to actively stop anti racist sentiments
last time i checked, Jow Forums had to be made because people were being 'racist' everywhere on the site LOL!
and how are they actively trying to stop anti racist sentiments, exactly? aren't a lot of people actively trying to stop racism? yeah, they are, with billions of dollars backing them too =)
>Thats literally the definition of racism and tribalism lol.
and what is judging an entire species? that's not the definition of racism at all. i judge blacks as darker skin than whites, is that racist? i don't even care about being "racist" just being correct

>The latter is one of the most strongly correlated traits with low iq btw.
prove it please

>Im sorry, i didnt know i was talking to a child and/or schizophrenic. I'll leave you alone from now on, you can calm down.
retard NPC confirmed. quit ignoring:

Attached: brainlet.jpg (645x729, 49K)

This thread is literally

Attached: de1c4b6d-9ef3-4791-94de-4c0a628c4a8c_1.dcef6a080c598b7fbcd60de1456562cd.jpg (450x450, 44K)

Whoever made this is clearly missing a few of those basic MUTATIONS correlated with intelligence.

Learn some biology, retard.

>Muh mutations
Impressive denial

And then watch all those great things be vilified and detested by Jews and non-whites then have them be happy at your extinction. You will never convince me otherwise, not anymore

>P-Powerful...
I am just trying to imagine how fucking weak you are. I literally can't imagine a man who is masculine that acts like you.

Thats the warrior gene. Jow Forums is first saying whites are the strongest people and best warriors, and then saying blacks have twice the percentage of people with the warrior gene. Epic

>whites are the strongest people and best warriors
They are the best not because they act like chimps you fucking mong. They are the best because of their intelligence and ambition, which has allowed us to build world-spanning empires through military conquest.

>LOL!
Holy shit go back to r*ddit faggot

nigga based man

>intelligence and ambition,
So they're basedboys who need technology to fight against the superior races of man and they have beta male rage at their inferiority causing them to sperg out and attack everyone

Got it

But that's literally what an SNP (rsID) is: a mutation. Every homo sapiens should have 2 copies of every gene in the genome (except the ones on the little Y one). The mutations present in an individual may vary but the gene should still be there.

And you can breed dogs big or small, smart or dumb, and they're all still variations of Canis Lupus. I don't see how focusing on mutations is a valid argument against scientific race-realism.

>superior races of man
like?

>beta male rage at their inferiority causing them to sperg out and attack everyone
you mean like how blacks sperg'd out and genocided nearly a whole race of people in africa (khoisan)?
or how asians sperg'd out and genocided various peoples too?

shitty samefagging troll, pathetic

>valid argument against scientific race-realism.
there isn't one

that's why OP is so desperate to paint us as "racist" so he [or she, honestly] can just pidgeonhole us and then claim we think whites are just objectively superior to everyone else.

a race is simply a large, extended family

loving your race and having loyalty to it is no different than feeling the same way towards your family

>having a male sex slav isnt gay
Trips died for you to post this. I hope you commit actual suicide

I dunno. When I was younger I hated the 2 black girls in my class. Dunno why. One ate food I thought was gross. I also remember thinking how ugly many people in public were (I was 6 at the time). Most of these people were white. Eventually those racist thoughts faded and I almost forgot I ever had them. Then a few years ago with Drumpf they started coming back thanks to Jow Forums strawmen and Jow Forums in general. It's like a dual reality: the black ppl I know in real life are cool. The ones I see online are obnoxious cherrypicked examples. Admittedly the blacks I know have a lot of white blood in them. Still. I dunno, I don't think I judge by color as much as by clothing. Still shallow, but at least it's based on a choice instead of a birth condition.

Like the superior African man with his warrior genes and natural ability in combat.

Those are the beta blacks. Betas always group up and slaughter innocent people because theyre too weak to fight on their own and they are too insecure about their lack of masculinity to not kill innocent people.

Who am i samefagging as lol? That does not make sense

>he doesnt know Jow Forums are all angry closet homos who are angry that they dont have their ethnostate of white boipuccy to fuck without the niggers stealing their traps
Unironically the best thing that could happen to the world is if you took both traps/trannies and Jow Forums and put them on an island to form their own ethnostate where they can have gay sex all day long without being bothered, so they can leave the rest of humanity alone

Libshits should be sacrificed to Moloch desu

If we're gonna get rid of liberals, we'll start with you.

>If someone is stupid, it will show. If someone is smart, it too will show.
Like pic related?

Attached: nobelprizespercapita.png (4500x2234, 261K)

>warrior gene
Renamed from "thug gene" because it was deemed too rayciss.