Personality is a complete myth. all relationships, especially romantic relationships...

relationships are based on the need of having someone because society says it so? yes
having a personality is a myth? only in your case

>muh matriarchy

Whining faggot. Not controlling women in the year of the lord 2k18 is downright pathetic.

interesting.

two people have already claimed i lack personality, despite having never met me. thanks for inadvertently underscoring the point of the OP.

>personality is a complete myth
Only if you yourself lack one to define anyone else's.
You can only trust yourself after all, and if you have no personality, then you cannot make a judgement of other's personalities as you lack reference, ergo you must lack a personality to claim others lack one as well.

I'd appreciate a true matriarchy because muh balance but currently we are witnessing humans becoming dumb fat pigs because of some trashbags on top which see us as cattle. If you fell for the "females are the reason"-meme you fell for the"divide and conquer"-strategy

if you are dominating your girlfriend, good for you. you are higher status than her and so will likely put up with almost anything you subject her to.
but on a social level i can't see how you are controlling women at all. half your paycheck is siphoned off by the government each month, a lion's share of which will be redistributed in a way that directly or indirectly benefits women. esp. if you live in one of the European welfare states. in addition, regardless of where you are in the West, every single social institution will discriminate against you in favor of women. if that is control, try harder.

>muh taxes

Try harder. True Chads are balls deep in the tax evasion game.

Hopefully my vital signs will become a myth after I slash my fucking arteries.

32 and no-one has ever been interested in me, my life's hard, yours isn't.

>currently we are witnessing humans becoming dumb fat pigs because of some trashbags on top which see us as cattle

That's so fucking delusional. The poor debased themselves, dude. It's impossible to spend 15 minutes around them without realizing that instantly.

Look at the niggerfaggot NEETs on this board.

>you must lack a personality to claim others lack one as well.
unironically based and personalitypilled

we're virtually identical.
have you started seeing prostitutes yet?

Jesus dude, you're desperate for confirmation that the world is hell and every woman is evil. I'm an overeight 6/10 and she's an 8/10 who's obsessed with yoga. If you want any change of getting anything good in life stop being so god damn pathetic and blame everything around you, accept you're personality makes people miserable and either improve it or die alone. Trying to convince the rest of the world everything's shitty just because you want it to be is just sad.

I wish. If the poor (I'd prefer to call them broken thus helpless and or dumb) would be as great as to destroy humankind singlehandedly without some "hints" given trough well thought trough social engineering they would surely also be able to change their situation for a better. Each species is designed to survive. Everything that goes against this natural primal urge isn't happening per chance.

I never claimed women were evil. they are just simple human animals. i don't even hate them. i just despise the blatant hypocricy of our society where men are constantly being told by reactionary morons like you to personalitymaxx their way to success with women (which in most cases only means submit and be docile, accept the predominant female narrative) when it is a complete exercise in futility.

>which in most cases only means submit and be docile, accept the predominant female narrative
you disregard his way to perceive the world
but you hope women accept yours instead?
>simple human animals

good luck with finding a gf you are pretty naive

>but you hope women accept yours instead?
no i don't. i just want the hypocricy to end, along with the female privileges that permeate modern Western society.
>good luck with finding a gf you are pretty naive
i'm anything but naive. thanks for your well-wishes.

>i just want the hypocricy to end
Just because you define it as hypocrisy don't mean its actual hypocrisy.

> female privileges
Females can bear a limited number of offspring. It's important for them to choose wisely with whom hey procreate because its for the future of humans. A man meanwhile can impregnate hundreds of thousands of woman if needed. Nature made woman less expendable. Complain to mother nature if you want to complain.

>all relationships, especially romantic relationships, are formed solely on the basis of social status
This is also bullshit. All relationships are in fact formed on the basis of microfloral compatibility. If the microbiomes inhabiting your guts and skin aren't compatible then neither will you be.

>credible scientific proof
>of scientific concepts

Attached: 1527262009159.jpg (645x729, 75K)

I'm friends with 90% girls and in general personality means nothing.
However, some uni age girls are serious about meeting a nice guy and care about personality.

"status" is definitely a factor don't get me wrong, but as long as you present yourself as decent you'll be ok.

based biologist
Can you explain to me how can someone lack a personality?
I dont know even the kind of people that one could say they act like "NPCs" have a personality, in fact thats their personality
bottom line it all depends on the female, not everyone thinks the same way some will value certain attributes over others

It was your looks that got you that girl.

Psychiatry is not scientific tho. Psychiatrists don't use science to diagnose anyone they literally just make shit up so they can sell drugs

Education required: Doctor of Medicine (MD)
Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO)
Bachelor of Medicine, Bachelor of Surgery (MBBS/MBChB)
Bachelor of Science in Clinical Medicine (Psychiatry)
Higher Diploma in Clinical Medicine and Surgery (Psychiatry)
Diploma in Clinical Medicine and Surgery
Diploma in Clinical Psychiatry
You sure about that? Granted im not an expert but im pretty sure psychiatry is backed by science

>All the triggered narcissists itt that can't handle the idea of their personality not being special

Appeal to authority is not scientific.

You're a fucking idiot my friendaloo

social status = personality. you can't have one without the other. if you have a lot of friends, it's because of your good personality.

>western men
lol. look if you suck ass and can't get a girl, that's a personal problem. maybe you should be at a bar and not on a computer if your goal is to slam pussy, you retard.

I can agree on this but personality is still just a front you put up. There's strategy to it, not only quality matters but also frequency, and good merit from others.

>what we are witnessing in the West is the emergence of the first truly matriarchal societies.
That's not what will happen at all. Return to patriarchy is inevitable. Feminists don't reproduce.

Attached: wedonotbreed.jpg (1280x2096, 761K)

How do you know that user?

Oragami

Yes it is. Granted you could argue there's been some financial pressure to sell drugs, but it's not bullshit.

Attached: 1541600462834.jpg (3000x2419, 1.14M)

>Most scientists would agree that newtons theory of gravity is corre-
>REEEEE APPEAL TO AUTHORITY

third post best post based oregano.

The people who write the DSM do so behind closed doors. The hallmark of pseudoscience/religion is when we're not allowed to see how they derive conclusions about mental illness.

people agreeing with each other is not criteria for science, that's dogma.

Relevant video you should watch

Is in this post right here. This is the link: liveleak.com/view?i=c31_1466476415

>The people who write the DSM do so behind closed doors
No brainlet, its put together by the american psychological association. It involved various conferences with help from other psychological associations, and findings were subject to peer review

replication crisis in psychiatry is insane like 95%

But jeffery schaler is a psychotherapist

This.
Also neuropathologies generally, let alone those with a primarily psychological manifestation, are really poorly classified because psych is a top-down approach and neuroscience the bottom up approach is progressing slowly because of R&D cuts from pharma

Is Europe giving free money to women or something? U.S. does for children which are often in custody of women, but not single women. In fact, our social services are very dismissive of childless women who do not live with a man. What's going on in Europe, my dude?

The real and only black pill is that humans are not capable of defeating their biological impulses

Humans may be animals. But we are human. We can only percieve and interact with the world around us as much as humans can. Personality is built around a base personality and developed by interacting with the world. When we arent able to fully percieve the world our personalities may be limited or under-developed.

Since humans are a social creature with the ability to communicate we need personalities to judge and interact with others. Otherwise every interaction would actually be like AI conversation. I would say that there are no unique personalities. Every personality is based off of another human or idea. Ideas usually arent original either though, they are copies of others.

Looking at relationships as "formed solely on the basis of social status" is how a sociopath looks at a relationship. An empath looks at a relationship as a tie or bond between one another. Love is a chemical reaction but its also a feeling we get when we reach a hightened level of bonding between eachother. It's a very important feeling and event in the human life. I would say it is very necessary to realising just how human we are. Through fate, random happening, or (religious belief here) some may experience this phenomenom others may not. Dont get your panties in a twist if you dont get there because there are a lot of difficult challenges that can be set in the way of this. Most of them are probably not your fault user. But know that life is a challenge. Social interaction is a challenge. And that conciousness is a challenge.

Attached: IMG_20171229_081657.jpg (680x503, 45K)

>An empath looks at a relationship as a tie or bond between one another. Love is a chemical reaction but its also a feeling we get when we reach a hightened level of bonding between eachother. It's a very important feeling and event in the human life. I would say it is very necessary to realising just how human we are.
And those bonds can only occur when shallow, surface-level criteria dictated by our animal brains are fulfilled and maintained. We're simply wired to find a mate who fills biological imperatives, and it's been that way throughout most of history. Romantic love has been a recent, human invention. It's largely an ideal meant to keep us civilized and make us think our relationships have meaning beyond animalistic instincts. Biology always wins in the end, not love.

Attached: Untitled11.png (1831x209, 30K)

what do you mean?
obviously breathing a biological impulse, but it's not one worth fighting, but monks do defeat their biological impulses.