Femanons why didn't you have a kid at a young age?

Femanons why didn't you have a kid at a young age?
Pic related had him at 15. 17 years later they're more like siblings than mother/son.

Attached: mom son.jpg (754x881, 155K)

i want to have a son and then once he turns 18 become his gf

having kid at young age is good
look how he looks strong and healthy
old people breeding is like mentally ill kid
plus the generational gap isn't that large so she has energy to play and somewhat understand his generation
but yeah, she's just a hoe. in an ideal world that would happen in a stable relationship

I thought I was gay at 15

Only mega Chads are able to be desired by their moms

>32 years old
She looks 25

When you have a child young it doesn;t destroy your body as much, she probably looks excellent naked and still has a tight pussy if that is her only child.

>Everyone is supposed to look the age they are

Because I'm not a retarded slut, mostly.
Having kids that young is not good for your body (very young pregnancy is risky) and you can't give anything to your child because you aren't even out of high school and still a child yourself.
I am planning to have my first young, but I am engaged, have a degree, a house I own and a job.

>I am planning to have my first young
If you have your first over 21 you aren't "young"

Why did evolution allow women to have babies at 13 if they'd be born retarded half of the time

Average se for having kids is late 20s to early 30s. So yes, it's young.

((()))
>Having kids that young is not good for your body
how come we've ben doing it for millions of years then huh?

I had my first son at 13 and I am the happiest I can be childbirth isnt even that painful compared to things like stabbings tasers scorpion and ghost pepoers

Because dying from childbirth and having your children die at birth was an acceptable risk.

You have it backwards, having kids late (25+) is what will destroy a womans body. In the wild, a female can give birth as young as 12. So like 15 - 18 is actually a fantastic time to have the healthiest baby possible. Your body is ready for it plus you have all the good eggs. I have often wondered if that the reason autism rates in the white community are so high is because white women are having kids later and later. Asians do this as well and they're neurotic.

That isnt how evolution works.

Teenage pregnancy is dangerous for the mother, and having children that young has all sorts of developmental risks because you can't provide them with a stable household. Just because you can do it doesn't mean it's optimal or advisable.
Having children in your 20s is ideal.
Autism is statistically linked with the age of the father, not the mother.

The younger you are, the most likely you are to die while giving birth. Especially true for women under 16.
Deaths at childbirth both for women and children were the norm till not so long ago.

Bit older than you I had my son at 17 but I agree it wasn't really painful.

People died cause hospitals and medicine didn't exist neither did food. Old ladies are the ones who die getting pregnent not the young ones. The body knows when it can handle a baby which is why you cant get a 7 year old pregnent

Younger women STILL die of pregnancy a lot more, in 2018.
And no, the body doesn't know shit. Just because you can do thing doesn't mean you should do it, or it isn't dangerous for you, or it isn't advisable to wait more. Teenagers, especially under 16, shouldn't get pregnant.
Even in middle ages the peak childbirth age was in the early 20s, getting teenagers pregnant hasn't been a thing for a while.

if my mom looked like that I'd lose it

the girl look like my cousin

>Having kids
Refrain from doing that.

Attached: based dave.png (604x544, 272K)

>Autism is statistically linked with the age of the father, not the mother.
Do you have a link? I've always heard the opposite.