I just realized robots. i think we are the problem. The truth isnt that women are mean to use, its that thats just how women is. We are outliers because we need someone to love us to feel like we have a good relationship when in fact its just that normies dont care if they have unconditional love and/or they dont realize it isnt.
thoughts?
Most robots need just one person they can care about and that cares about them.
yeah normies don't care about love like we do. But women are also mean to us. it's both. I wouldn't feel nearly as bad if they didn't act like bitches.
i don't want a stacy desu, they seem like total bitches even without their gay hierarchy
Stacy rides the cock carousel until age 30 when she settles for the """nice guys""""
we are the problem according to roasties
you're a fucking retard. never ever share your opinions again. stop embarassing yourself.
i just want to be in a committed relationship with one person. apparently this magical thing called "loyalty" died out a few years back and now its all about getting drunk on the weekend and getting 100 guys to message you on tinder.
>I just realized robots. i think we are the problem.
The final redpill
loyalty requires one to have something of value to be loyal to; you're the opposite of that.
tough pill to swallow eh?
My long term goals revolve around post society
im referring to your complete absence of grammar, style and logic in constructing sentences.
Im going to have to ask you to leave my thread thank you
why me tho :(, I'm
soooo... tough reality to accept, got it
>hears the truth
>gets angry
Normie, go home.
oh i assumed you were being malicious. Im sorry if you are a fellow robot here to discuss
nope I think you've made a good point :)
>i think we are the problem
>goes on to say how everyone else is the problem
It's funny how even your """""""""insight""""""""" is passive aggressive. You're still blaming everyone but yourself; the only difference that you made in your outlook is that female/normie flaws are inherent. According to you, it's still their flaws that are responsible for your loneliness.
The actual truth is that you're completely lacking self awareness. You're completely unable to see your own flaws, and so you can't ever escape your predicament. In your mind, it's everyone but you, whether their flaws are immutable or by choice or whatever.
Kinda. I think it's more like we take women and relationships too seriously relatively to normies. Because of this, we are more likely to take it personally and become upset if women are mean to us, and more likely to act in creepy ways around them. This means women will tend to avoid us, and we won't tend to hear them being nice to us. So it's not that women are inherently cruel. It's just that our condition makes it so that the women who would be nice to us avoid us because we seem creepy. At least that seems to be the case with me. I don't know if this can be generalised.
Don't be mean to user! Being hostile isn't going to make him realise his flaws. You have to ask questions and get to the truth of the matter.
>get good paying job
>get in shape
etc etc etc
Then I'm "valuable enough" for a roastie? I'd rather be single.
tough pill to swallow I see.
*cracks knuckles*
you do realize that everything is subjective right? flaws, problems, blame, its all based on a certain view point. Most ideas on relationships and women are societal based, and societies always cater to the majority (ie. Not me)
you also need to realize its not my fault i am the way I am. (inb4 self improvement) Ive tried it all, ive played sports, been social, been fit, doesnt fix ones mind. I cannot be to blame for what my tendencies and desires are.
if we take both of these ideas then we can come with the conclusion that blame is subjective, Compared to me, normies are weird and vice versa. Considering that this board is a board for robots (or at least it should be) then i have no choice but to base my argument on the view point of the audience i am addressing so i can have the most effectively convey my message
Most people get gfs without having any of that stuff, so arguing that is pointless. Clearly the source of the problem is in our social skills. We need to study the normies and learn how to apply their behaviour to ourselves in a way we feel comfortable with.
>Being hostile isn't going to make him realise his flaws
Why would I care if he does or not? I laid it out in simple terms. He can take the advice and look at himself or he can continue to believe that he's a perfect sensitive soul in an imperfect world, offing himself when the loneliness becomes too crippling.
>*cracks knuckIes*
>you also need to realize its not my fault i am the way I am
Exactly my point. Nothing is your fault, user. You're perfect :)
Dumb faggot.
eat my ass, im fucking awesome
>needlessly aggressive
>logical fallacies
Im going to have to ask you to leave my thread
sorry but its procedure
>Why would I care if he does or not?
Because I got quads. Therefore my post is automatically correct.
I think the human species is the problem. I think we're just in way over our heads and we don't even realize it.
oh absolutely user, the only reason i stay alive is for transhumanism
No.
Both are at fault, if you play the woman's apologist you are essentially saying that women must be absolved of responsibility therefore shouldn't have voting right or any rights, since they do, now women have to share the same pain and responsibilities, except they rarely do.
This is why women are more to blame for todays society, they get all benefits of being a man plus all the benefits of being women.
Women can choose anything, they can be anything.
Men can only choose to be men, ie suck it up get a job and pay taxes.
Some tried to be trannies and they end up an hero because they'll never pass, even radfems hate them.
Either give the same power to men or "oppress" women again.
The former is on it's way, feminism is a tool of capitalism, society and politics follow the money(power), look at how scared women are of sexbots, dolls or whatever entertainment men can get outside biocunts.
We are caught in the shitter, the descendants of zoomers will not suffer the same way.
Fugitall.
You're quite close OP, but what you have to understand is this: the true realization will be noting that women only seek two things in ANY relationship -- resources & status. This is hardwired into them, almost like firmware on a computer. They can't escape this mode of behavior, no matter how they act. Every woman reacts to how she has been valued and considered and then going forward attempts to modify her personality and existence to ensure the maximum amount of resources + status possible. A guy is a high amount of resources AND status -- if he is able to prove that he does in fact perform this function.
Most posters here miss the mark with that, they want to be "loved" but don't realize that women love automatically, this is why normie relationships seem so fucked. They love people who give them resources + status despite how these people react towards them.
I will be open to questions and debate and I fully appreciate the circumstances of the posters here.
After all, I'm not from this universe anyway.
Fool that you are. Do you not see that this is all a game?
People like us csn get girlfriends, but they themselves, like us, must be a low value member of their sex.
The female is only low value if there is an abundance of women, which drives the value of each woman down through sheer supply, or if they themselves are a defective member of society. The defect can be anything from looks, to height, to autism.
In a state of male abundance women thereby gain relative value. In that scenario you will see the defects get the almost chads, simply because there are less women for the chads.
If you want a female you will must choose between becoming chad, moving to high female area, or going for the most defective females.
Be warned, this is all a game. They can leave at any time.
It's all a game, my friend. Learn how to play it.
>becoming one with the machine
Ha, you think you can control it? You realize that it won't be good upstanding people getting the leg up from transhumanism, right? You're going to have evil people on steroids running around.
Funny how you hypergamy faggots can't explain any of the exceptions that disprove your outlook on life without claiming that "we're just talking about the MAJORITY of women, not all!", while simultaneously arguing as if it really does apply to all women, and presenting absolutely no credible statistics to back up your claims.
I honestly think that it's different for every single person why they are unable to find someone. You can't really generalize most people who browse Jow Forums like that, for some people it's really obvious that they are the reason why they can't get laid or socialise. For example, some people might have trouble with their self image.
But I see what your point mainly is, the society around you can't really emphasize or relate to you so much that even communiction is pretty much impossible to do without forcing yourself to, I get that.
The only way to fix the problem is to adopt normie culture and try to act as normie as you can to reach this imo.
>ignoring quads
>believes in "his" muh intellect
I don't have a brainlet picture that is strong enough for this.
I think if you try to approach women statistically you're not going to have a good time. They behave strongly on emotion, even when they recognize this and don't want to, they do. Emotion is not something which can be accurately measured. How mad does this post make you, how frustrated, can you quantify that? Does it make you sad to feel alone, how sad? What is wistful? What is strong? We know these feelings and ideas through our connection to the energy around us, but not through the lens of logic or knowledge.
It is neither a bad or a good thing that women are more emotional. They also produce eggs, bleed monthly, and have self-cleaning genitalia. These are neither bad nor good things. They merely are.
That'd be me ofc
Yeah, we tend to idealise this things because we dont really know about them.
I fear reality may be that cold
women having the best of both worlds is the true problem, we are paying for the crimes of our forefathers. What the future holds we cannot be certain for this is a first in human history, women with rights.
Yes this is of course true and i have been preaching this for a long time. My goal is to educate people against love and how it is a societal construct to keep monogamy.
this is true, anyone can have anything if they lower their standards.
we will get the breadcrumbs of whatever the elite recieve that is true, but a breadcrumb of perfection is better than none at all
i lived most my life under normie culture, it made me miserable, so no that is not the best option. to live with sheep is the worst fate i feel, at least now i can say im not living a lie about who i am.
the ideal situation is to be born a normie
Found the lying tranny psyops. Who let you out of /lgbt/? Stop telling us to become girls.
You are right, but that is not really an option because you were not born with normie intrests and thoughts that would fit their idea.
Its either starting to apadt normie culture and trying to fit in, or just giving up like a lot of people here do
>imply women are anything else than STRONG, INDEPENDENT, GODDESSES
>lol, kys tranny
Say again, why should I put up with females?