Post in a rate me thread on /soc/

don't know where you live senpai but here it's pretty common to see 7+ on the street
big eastern european community here

Could you post a person you would rate 7 or 8/10? Not your personal taste, just in general.

At least link your /soc/post to here for other robots to rate.
>what does that mean?
That you're ""average"" I guess, which isn't bad.

If 5 is average, 4 would be slightly unattractive and 6 slightly attractive -> 7/10 = a normal attractive person. They aren't that rare.

>a normal attractive person

What does that even mean? 5 is normal. You can't call 7 normal. A 7/10 is attractive to nearly everyone, which is a pretty damn attractive.

Normies need to get out of their heads that 5/10 is bad. It's just fine.

Attached: qCJFUZJ.jpg (943x4211, 713K)

That's why I didn't say just normal, I said "normal attractive person". They're attractive, but not STUNNING. No idea where you live but I see conventionally attractive people everyday.

6/10 is conventionally attractive.

Attached: wIVLfWS.jpg (600x2000, 297K)

>tfw solid 4 according to this

not quite the 7 but a cute gal for sure
just from the face i'd say a solid 6

Attached: sKzmnhRx.jpg (1252x1252, 156K)

Don't you mean
>6/10 is conventionally attractive according to a bunch of people obsessed with attractiveness and rating people's looks
6/10 is slightly attractive, 5 is average.

This is probably the most accurate guide to this sort of thing i've actually ever seen. How is there based people like this on reddit?

normalfags usually rate on a scale where 7 is average. Seriously, rate a normalfag a 6 and they'll get mad at you like you called them ugly

>''Conventionally attractive people are the people who most people would find attractive.''
Most people find 6/10s nice/attractive looking.

>according to a bunch of people obsessed with attractiveness and rating people's looks
If such a large group of people who is ''obsessed'' and spends a lot of time studying looks and attractiveness can agree on ratings down to the smallest details, THEY ARE RIGHT.

You are right, normals are terrified of ''average'' because ''b-but I'm speshul''. There is nothing wrong with 5/10. When normies rate themselves and try to be humble they'll say 6/10. LOL

>How is there based people like this on reddit?

They gather from different communities outside of Reddit who are interested in looks and attractiveness. Posting in r/rateme surely must feel like a punch in the face compared to other rating subs where guys vote with their cock in their hand.

got a similar one before from here before. not sure if this is more accurate or less accurate.

Attached: 1535075658435.jpg (1000x1598, 437K)

>and spends a lot of time studying looks and attractiveness
I would argue that they do this for a reason. And not a good one.

Sorry, I meant r/truerateme.

no, you fags will save the pic and add it to your little compilation of subhumans

>6/10 is slightly attractive, 5 is average.
I think what happens is that some people are using a highly exaggerated normal distribution that clusters most people between 4.5 and 5.5. That means that the cutest girl in your high school was a 7 and the cutest girl at your college was a 7.5.

I on the other hand drop 10% of the population into each bucket, so that 1 out of every 10 women in the 16-30 age group is a 10, and 1 out of every 10 women in that age group is a 1. When you do that, a 6 is slightly attractive.

>And not a good one.

What do you mean? People find different subjects interesting. In my opinion being attractive today is more important than ever, and we should talk about it.

The vast majority of them are incels from lookism.net and sluthate.com. I used to be very active in r/truerateme and related communities. It's bullshit for the most part, trust me. r/truerateme began as a suicidefuel campaign for normies anyway.

How is it bullshit, did you find a gf or something? How come your perspective changed after leaving the communities?

It depends. You shouldn't take ratings from people online too seriously. Take this from someone who used to post his own pics all the time for ratings while also rating others. Some of them are trolls trying to get you to kys. Even when they're not, everybody has their own scale that they follow. It is hard to be truly objective when it comes to looks unless you are very attractive or very ugly. Either way, if you obsess about you will develop body dysmorphic disorder which is what happened to me and several of my friends from the lookism communities.

What convinced me it was bullshit was when I started experimenting with Tinder pictures. I was consistently rated about 5 PSL which is not bad, but basically a normie. According to that scale, I should have a few matches a week. For a while this was true for me until I started taking high quality pictures of me in nature and doing social shit. Now I'm getting definitely 30+ matches a week, sometimes with very attractive women. and I am able to get a few hookups a month just off dating apps.