Men are the dominant gender. If you have a fetish that empowers females then you're a faggot, accept it

all i ever wanted was to be hugged and cuddled by someone who would care for me
that person always in my fantasies takes a form of tall girl with sweet voice and soft body that feels like it was made to be touched and felt
that implies a girl taking some form of control at least
but a faggot?
nah

What if I have a fetish for feminizing cute boys?

Just making sure that's what you meant. I'm inclined to agree then.

fuck off and giv gentle femdom gf right now

>Men are the dominant gender
t. fat loser on Jow Forums
The only thing you can dominate is a bag of Cheetos

Attached: average_mdom_poster.jpg (800x600, 124K)

Thats gay. Please tell me you're not talking about yourself.

Is he though? By OP's logic the other party's gender does not matter in classification of sexuality. Since he is in the dominate role, then he clearly is straight.

Actually playing along with a woman's submission fantasy is empowering the female. You are putting her fulfilling her fantasy instead of yours. This choke me and let me call you daddy shit is so boring. It would be more exciting if I really raped a bitch. Pretending is just for the female to get off.

I am undergoing a period of self improvement. I like being here because I feel at home away from the normies and chads. Thanks for making me laugh though, I sincerely appreciate it.

>Men are the dominant gender
The kinds of "men" that say this are the fatass beta kind who can't even see their own penis.

Attached: download.jpg (225x225, 9K)

I do and I fucking hate it. How do you cure a fetish?
This is %100 porn-induced fetish btw, I didn't have it before I got addicted to porn

>I am undergoing a period of self improvement.
You have "embarrassed chad" syndrome. You're only deluding yourself.

Hmm, this is a good point you are making, user. I am left with no words.

Because by OPs logic I am double straight because I'm making another man take my cock, as said.

Let us also point out that the most impressive form of domination would be to sexually dominate another dominant man. It would therefor follow that this is the straightest thing you can do, to hold a man down an fuck him against his will.

You must stay away from femdom and cuckolding porn. It is among the most evil inventions by the jews to destroy mankind.

True, I used to be into femdom and later I realized I was just a faggot

Oh god, what have i created? My skin is pale, I feel sick, this horrible oversight in my post has turned it into a gay-loving orgy. I must now leave this world.

But it's not gay, user. You'd only be a fag if you're fucking women.

I will try user. I blame myself everyday for falling for it and allowing my brain to get aroused to it. Thankfully it's only femdom and not cuckolding though

That's some cuck thinking right there

Attached: image0-2.jpg (683x670, 42K)

this to be honest.

every time I see a femdom thread I cringe because I know those sorry fucks will never find a girl. Women wanna be led and dominated by a strong man. Fekdom fetish fags are basically shooting themselves in the foot looking for a ghost that doesn't exist.

then you're my dream

why do men always try and restrict each other from expressing their sexuality? Seems pretty pointless

Attached: 561880.jpg (900x1200, 102K)

>that backyard
wtf is this his sister then?
youtube.com/watch?v=H8W7vgmgNFc

Attached: hmmmmmm.png (250x250, 36K)

Their backyards look totally different you autist

Men see evil as violations of abstract moral principles.
If you have an abstract moral principle you hold that conflicts with femdom, then that's why you lash out.
It has nothing to do with restricting other men, it's got everything to do with upholding your own rationalization for the restrictions you place on yourself.

This is one the feminists have correct actually. It's entirely defensive and fragile.

Yes. He is the only person in the world to have a deck in his backyard, so it must be.

why though. why can't women be the bigger dominant gender? it makes much more sense biologically speaking anyway

thanks man, this is an excellent post. And I agree with their point also

Attached: C_qC1TqV0AAziWO.jpg (900x1200, 160K)

Since the dawn of time, men have been hunters and warriors, they have cherished and protected women, whose duty it was to produce offspring and take care for them. It is the natural order of humanity.

Those have to be the most suckable nipples on the planet.

Evolution is about constant change in the environment. That's how it works. it makes no sense for what your saying in the modern environment, males are not as necessary and wasting resources on them makes no sense. we can have a better society where males are submissive, take up less space, are not dominant and exist as subservient to the main sex, women, who can run society now. That's how it is for like 90% of animals and in species with resource abundance. we should follow suit.

>sits indoors
>eats processed food
>conversing over the internet
>MUH NATURAL ORDER

Holy fucking shit those tits

Source pls???

google reverse m80

Attached: 1538953384960.jpg (750x1000, 113K)

Ugh was on safari on mbut phone but I actually just downloaded the chrome app just for this

Aka have men become literal slaves except the top %.
Let's not go that way, please. Speaking of which, though, I really wouldn't mind living in this gentle femdom society of sorts.
That would be interesting. Have women actually care about men and/or make males not disposable someway. That would be cool.

Reverse search isnt giving any names, just lots of selfie and best nips compilations. Pls help a fellow horny robot

>thinks acting like a neanderthal makes him superior
lmao

look harder my guy

Attached: 1534006104201.jpg (1920x1080, 210K)

are you a man or a woman?
oriogionall

KingAura, ffs. Learn to use reverse image. I managed to find it in 5 seconds.

>Aka have men become literal slaves except the top %.
the top % shouldn't exist either there should be no male above women
>Let's not go that way, please. Speaking of which, though, I really wouldn't mind living in this gentle femdom society of sorts.
>That would be interesting. Have women actually care about men and/or make males not disposable someway. That would be cool.
yea it would be cool

delet this, he needed to learn

neither, don't assume my gender

He won't learn. He will just keep bumping this shit show for hours.

Attached: no.jpg (773x950, 111K)

>the top % shouldn't exist either there should be no male above women
I meant the top % among men. Obviously women would take the best men available while having the rest as slaves to keep the civilization afloat.
>yea it would be cool
This shit saddens me, man. How am I supposed to life with the fact that my life is literally worthless and I am a less of a human being because I was born with a dick and not a vagina.

You're a fucking queer. Thats why you want the human race to fall from its glorious ways!

I didn't assume, I asked, moron. Dont pretend to be smart when you arent. And I wont ask your gender, I'll ask your biological sex. Are you male or female?

>I meant the top % among men. Obviously women would take the best men available while having the rest as slaves to keep the civilization afloat.
it depends on the culture
>This shit saddens me, man. How am I supposed to life with the fact that my life is literally worthless and I am a less of a human being because I was born with a dick and not a vagina.
idk what to tell you

>OPs does not enjoy having a female participate during sex

wow such alpha much supreme

>You're a fucking queer. Thats why you want the human race to fall from its glorious ways!
lmao what the fuck

most women aren't really into bdsm and the ones that are tend to be fat/ugly/etc. It's their way of trying to lock down a Chad with extreme submissiveness. Women are only submissive in the sense that they are passive/lazy/etc

>Men see evil as violations of abstract moral principles.
What's wrong with that?

>If you have an abstract moral principle you hold that conflicts with femdom, then that's why you lash out.
Because those abstract principles are correct and your existence is a violation of them.

>It has nothing to do with restricting other men, it's got everything to do with upholding your own rationalization for the restrictions you place on yourself.
False. We restrict other men fron degeneracy because we need them to behave in a non degenerate way to keep society in tact.

>This is one the feminists have correct actually. It's entirely defensive and fragile.
It's defensive because every degenerate act is an attack on my values.
It is not fragile, and I invite any misguided attempts to prove otherwise.

Attached: IMG_5771.png (500x500, 38K)

>Evolution is about constant change in the environment. That's how it works.
Obviously we aim to change the environment to something that benefits traditional gender roles. If we abolish women's rights, the environment is changed.
The environment hasn't changed enough, however, for our lack of gender roles to be beneficial. That's why you see the west falling into despair and degeneracy.

>it makes no sense for what your saying in the modern environment, males are not as necessary and wasting resources on them makes no sense.
Males are the lifeblood of society and no expenditure on them is a waste.

>we can have a better society where males are submissive, take up less space, are not dominant and exist as subservient to the main sex, women, who can run society now.
We have that society now. It's hell on earth.

>That's how it is for like 90% of animals and in species with resource abundance.
Monogamy is a resource. Your degenerate behavior is wasting that resource.

Attached: IMG_6534.jpg (4544x5420, 1.83M)

>If you don't agree with my depraved behavior you're /fat/an incel
I'm thin and I have a girlfriend. What now?

Attached: IMG_5968.gif (800x894, 28K)

It's better than the female view of evil, which is what is personally harmful, physically or socially.
Women think harsh criticism is evil for instance.

No sorry you're wrong. What other people choose to do with consent, between adults, has no effect on you. You're not protecting anyone by attacking what is perceived to be degeneracy. You're protecting a restrictive principle you want to uphold.
If your values compel you to restrict other peoples freedoms, you're an agent of tyranny.

>fucking a feminine, girl thing
Fag. Real men fuck blokes.

>If your values compel you to restrict other peoples freedoms, you're an agent of tyranny.
If massive amounts of people are choosing to act in a way that is oppressive (even de facto) than not stopping them is allowing tyranny and oppression.
People do not have the right to choose to discriminate against others.

>No sorry you're wrong.
Don't apologize like a faggot. Substantiate your claims.

>What other people choose to do with consent, between adults, has no effect on you.
What if those acts eliminate motivation for the preservation of my race?
What if those acts further delude women into thinking their warped views have any place outside of the kitchen? What if that mindset leads to the further marginalization of my race and gender by both corporations and the government?
What if those acts simply repulse me on a visceral level? What about that?

>You're not protecting anyone by attacking what is perceived to be degeneracy.
I'm protecting my race from devoting itself to carnal pleasure instead of survival.

>You're protecting a restrictive principle you want to uphold.
Yes, yes I am. And there's nothing wrong with that.

>If your values compel you to restrict other peoples freedoms, you're an agent of tyranny.
I am an agent of tyranny. I'm not a lolbertarian. I believe people must be restricted to live fulfilling lives.

Attached: IMG_6430.gif (220x159, 8K)

The distinction I'd draw is using force to stop oppression. Because really, you stop nothing. You just substitute force for force.
The ethical way to stop mistreatment is by convincing people that it's wrong.

You've drawn a false dichotomy between carnal pleasure and survival for starters.
Listen senpai I know what fascism actually entails. I'm not one of those idiots who think that it's anyone I don't like.

If you want to live in a fascist society, they do exist, simply go to your local mosque, speak the shahada, and move to Lahore.

>You've drawn a false dichotomy between carnal pleasure and survival for starters.
It's not a false dichotomy. If you're too busy getting pegged by Stacy while sucking Tyrone's cock to raise a family, your family is not going to survive. You'll place pleasure over unifying family values (including strict gender roles) and within a few generations your descendants will be brown goblins dumpster diving for frozen mcdonald's patties and dildos.

>If you want to live in a fascist society, they do exist, simply go to your local mosque, speak the shahada, and move to Lahore.
Islam is not for whites, and I would not be helping my fellow whites if I only helped myself.

Attached: IMG_6422.jpg (1200x926, 76K)

what a woke post
every time I see someone say he likes small-breasted girls, a bunch of faggots jump on him to scream LOL DUDE U GAY WTF and post loads of cows.
And it goes both ways: you get antithiccs who keep saying those women are overweight, antimaledoms who go muh insecurity etc.
Fuck you all. We were supposed to achieve unity through dick and you want the exact opposite.

Attached: 1000 periods.jpg (900x705, 436K)

There's no such thing as gender. Only male and female which are dimorphic.

What the hell stops user from pumping his gf's vag full of semen before (or after) the pegging?
inb4 muh women lose respect (they don't, I have gf)
inb4 muh normie get out screech to avoid answering the first inb4

Being attracted to women empowers them.

What about dominant women? Can't blame them for wanting to be empowered.

I have a femdom fetish and I don't care

>What the hell stops user from pumping his gf's vag full of semen before (or after) the pegging?
Nothing physically bars you from impregnating girls after getting pegged or masterbating to traps. You simply lose motivation.

>inb4 muh women lose respect (they don't, I have gf)
You're lying or she is the exception.

>inb4 muh normie get out screech to avoid answering the first inb4
I have a girlfriend too.

>she is the exception
Well. Either you pull out a goddamn graph with believable info on whether women who peg lose respect for their boyfriends, or we both shut the fuck up because there's no way you can prove either of us right on that.
>You simply lose motivation.
Maybe you do, champ. And honestly, a man who loses his erection over something as silly as a dick up his ass is a man who doesn't deserve to procreate. It's like faggots: would you really have wanted them to reject their degenerate ways and spread their crazy genes around?

>not wanting a domme mommy tittymonster gf to smother you smugly with her milkies
>not wanting to struggle for dominance and ultimately come out on top by smothering her with your cock and balls
>not wanting to feign submission to make her even more smug and sexually charged
You are a tremendous faggot and projection to this degree is neither healthy nor warranted, get fucked.

>Well. Either you pull out a goddamn graph with believable info on whether women who peg lose respect for their boyfriends,
Put out the graph of women whose significant others even ASKING to get pegged who do not lose respect for said significant others.

>or we both shut the fuck up because there's no way you can prove either of us right on that.
The burden of proof is on you since you've made the outrageous claim.

>Maybe you do, champ. And honestly, a man who loses his erection over something as silly as a dick up his ass is a man who doesn't deserve to procreate.
That's a moronic distinction and it isn't sodomy making him lose his erection that's the problem here. It's the fact that this degenerate garbage becomes more important than the act of reproduction and raising a family.

>It's like faggots: would you really have wanted them to reject their degenerate ways and spread their crazy genes around?
Their genes aren't the issue. Gays are a product of their environment.

Attached: IMG_6434.jpg (1234x1070, 102K)

Describing your faggotry in explicit detail doesn't make you any less of a faggot, Satan.

>the outrageous claim
Now you're gonna want to argue whether it's more outrageous that a woman loses respect for her man because she put an object up his ass, or that she doesn't. And that's exactly the unarguable point I anticipated, because "outrageous" is an opinion we don't share. But go ahead and pull out the graph for public opinion on this.
> It's the fact that this degenerate garbage becomes more important than the act of reproduction and raising a family.
Does it? Now post the graph for that, too!

It's all unarguable. You just feel bad that other men do shit. Stop acting because of feelings.

>Now you're gonna want to argue whether it's more outrageous that a woman loses respect for her man because she put an object up his ass, or that she doesn't.
Gender roles are the norm. Women do not penetrate men. Your claim loses.
You're seriously retarded if you think that's up for debate.

>And that's exactly the unarguable point I anticipated,
You anticipated it because you know that's the logical rebuttal to your claim. By default, the idea of a woman not getting upset over her significant other getting fucked up the ass is outrageous. I don't care if you live in Malmo or San Francisco.

>Does it? Now post the graph for that, too!
Ask Jordan Peterson, Jared Taylor, The Alternative Hypothesis and Marcus Follin for the graphs.

>It's all unarguable. You just feel bad that other men do shit. Stop acting because of feelings.
I provided the reasons that I feel this way. I'm literally not going to stop acting based on these feelings if my life depends on it.

Attached: 1541206979782.jpg (900x900, 78K)

too bad every sexual counter you have needs the consent of both people which means men really have no power at all.

But what if you want the other part wanting it, or "consenting" as you put?
Check mate! Dominance power!

Attached: maito gai..png (720x720, 335K)

you have no idea what power is do you? Women are naturally submissive and will consent to a strong man's desires. You don't need to force them because nature takes its course.

my point is you will only get laid if a women allows you to sl you can be the most dominant strong ever it won't mean you'll get more pussy. If you engage in a consensual act with a women you are empowering her.

this, its the subs that have the real power

Attached: 08__2_.jpg (614x821, 49K)

You keep going off the deep end. My claim is that it's not "outrageous". Normal, sure as hell it isn't.
Regardless, nothing about that says women would lose respect for you just because you did an abnormal thing, and quoting Peterson on his opinions about sex in general is useless.
The question is: will a woman stop talking to you because you do something you both want, that happens to be degenerate? That's what I'm asking for, and that's what's unarguable.
Hell, I agree with OP. But this specific topic is retarded.

>This shit saddens me, man. How am I supposed to life with the fact that my life is literally worthless and I am a less of a human being because I was born with a dick and not a vagina.

Deal with it. Or don't. No one cares either way, because, as you noted, you're a guy.

>You keep going off the deep end.
The only one of us going off the deep end is the human cow that thinks indulging in his most sordid pleasures is a good thing.

>My claim is that it's not "outrageous". Normal, sure as hell it isn't.
So it is outrageous.

>Regardless, nothing about that says women would lose respect for you just because you did an abnormal thing,
Liking anime is an abnormal thing. You've gone far past abnormal, motherfucker.

>and quoting Peterson on his opinions about sex in general is useless.
It's far more useful than quoting whatever you believe in.

>The question is: will a woman stop talking to you because you do something you both want, that happens to be degenerate?
That is not the question. The question is whether she would lose respect for you if you did so. She would.

Attached: 1538193011509.png (658x464, 237K)

>If you engage in a consensual act with a women you are empowering her.
Who's more powerful corporations or their customers?

>abnormal means outrageous
>a casual insult based on your personal opinion
>I win because I believe in something!
And no, she wouldn't. At least not 100%, given I have my proof sitting right next to me.
Now, I know for a fact that it's not 100% but I don't know if the nonrespecting women come closer to 99% or to 1%. That's what I can't prove, and neither can you, and even worse: you think "believing" in something gives you a better claim on it.
You clearly don't understand conversation, so I'll leave you to your reeing.

>this, its the subs that have the real power
In the past some people willingly became slaves to other people. Were those slaves more powerful than their masters because they wanted to be slaves?

>abnormal means outrageous
It does when your opinion is so abnormal that it becomes outrageous.

>a casual insult based on your personal opinion
There's nothing casual about it. I choose my insults wisely.

>I win because I believe in something!
I win because my beliefs accurately encompass morality. Morality starts with the family, and family starts with the character of individuals. If you're sucking tranny dicks and eating ass, you've lost your moral imperative.

>And no, she wouldn't. At least not 100%, given I have my proof sitting right next to me.
You can't read her mind, so whether she's next to you or at the other side of the globe is irrelevant.

>Now, I know for a fact that it's not 100% but I don't know if the nonrespecting women come closer to 99% or to 1%.
99%.
Women want to be with men, not with subhuman goblins that like getting fucked up the ass.

>You clearly don't understand conversation, so I'll leave you to your reeing.
Reeeeeee, this other person is trying to justify his shitty life choices. Reeeeeeee.

Attached: 1543090087249.jpg (512x512, 33K)

actual slaves and sexually submissive people are two completely different things. Why would you compare them? cmon man use that brain of yours

Attached: 1501564630492.jpg (1932x2576, 280K)

Guys who fuck dom women are still getting more action than you are.