Which child Jow Forums?

The flute belongs to B. It's her property. "Giving" it to her is a poor choice of words, it's more like I would "avoid stealing" it from her.

mfw most people in this thread are wearing clothes made by child B

Child B, because if my daughter makes something and someone wants it they should pay for it.

Child C. Spread some love.

Attached: z.jpg (900x900, 58K)

>Not choosing child C

Fucking edgelord

Attached: 1528717929705.gif (900x900, 529K)

Child A gets the flute and plays music, but has a debt that must be paid or else the government will arrange for her salary to be garnished. Child A gets paid for their music and then pays back Child B for the flute and interest. Child B now can buy the materials to make two flutes, paying Child C a wage to do the lower complexity parts of the flute making. Child A has still been making money, so can buy the new flutes and start a band, which makes more money. Child B continues the cycle, slowly expanding her flute making enterprise. Child C uses the experience that they have from being the first employee to get promoted into a higher paying part of the flute production process.

B obviously.

The other answers are both commie shit.

B obviously. she made it so she owns it. if she wants to give it to A or C then s
she can.

whoever gives the best blowjob obviously

booo hooo poor people deserve other people's shit for free because they're talentless hacks.

soundcloud.com/saxoncasi/meridian?in=saxoncasi/sets/kxdx

;m

Child B. Then I try to convice her to give it to C. A can suck my cock

im not going to give it to anyone. its not mine to give, because i didnt steal it from child B like you guys did

Break the flute in 3 parts and give each part to one child and claim communism works

B >>>> A >>>>> shit >>>>> C
prove me wrong

Attached: 1541390243546.jpg (1280x1024, 248K)

Child B so I can fuck her with it

Attached: 1539285510096-r9k.jpg (354x462, 19K)

I think C deserves it, he is poor he gotta eat something (would watch)
what the fuck

All we need now is a pic of child A being fucked with the flute.

B, she made it. The other two fuckasses can make their own

The flute belongs to the factory owner. Some kid like B wouldn't have the tools necessary to make a flute. She can have $2 for her efforts and the factory owner should sell the flute to the rich parents of A for $20.

B.
A is a unlikeable cunt and C is a nigger.

>rule 34 of one of the flute kids exists

Attached: e1aa67534d84fca6ce3ccfacbe7a.jpg (183x275, 6K)

None. One of them has to pay for it

C. Females should not be allowed to own property, you daft cunts.

B may have made the flute but this work has no value. Child A gives this work value. Without child A providing value, there is no scenario were something of worth happens. (This applies only when:
-The only use a flute CAN have is to play it
-This is a one-time scenario, you cannot base a whole system only by focusing on child A but the system may start by doing so)
So yeah if your answer is not child A you are either too proud of already working capitalism which is not the case in this picture so it cannot be child B or stupid so it cannot be child C

Attached: 1540490035461.png (657x527, 15K)

Thats not right man. Once Child A and B have taught child C how to make and play flutes, he too can teach other children to make and play flutes. He might even be better than them

R34 is magical

Weird how you think the worker keeping the product of their labour is the non commie shit. Is american propaganda that good?

Any answer other than B deserves to be thrown out of a helicopter.

Obviously B, I dont understand giving it to anyone else

Child A. You need a slave class(B) to manufacture weapons and tools for the law(A), to get rid of the freeloaders and degenerates(C).

I'd straight up shove it up my ass and play the 3 movements of moonlight sonata, one right in the face of each child. Just as any /mu/tant like myself would do.

That's retarded, if you make something you have full ownership of it. You can stick it up your ass if you want, it's stupid to expect people to give up their work just because they cannot use the said item optimally

Attached: 8d6.jpg (645x729, 41K)

Child B, as it is truly her flute.

Although I am aware of the political analogy, I am viewing this simply in terms of general fairness instead of the former. Libertarianism is the Fedora of the political ideologies and wouldn't work in real life without everybody being screwed over.

>Child A is a farmer
>Child B has a farm
>Child C is a starving child

The average retard
>NO DUDE JUST GIVE THE APPLE TO THE FARMER DUDE! SHE MADE IT
Hope you retards starve one day you fucking useless parasites. Here of all places you condemn yourselves to die like rats. Are you really that clueless and just preach Republican memes?

Attached: Gtsnuff+gtguro+gtloli+gtrape+_765d00fc159a6b740bb405671f872054.png (422x422, 93K)

The one who bought it.

Child C, I don't give shit to roasties

Attached: 1484704461947.png (322x395, 201K)

Title says "Who would YOU give the flute to" not "Who does the flute belong to" but people seem intentionally not to read this just to force in their ideology as if the system it is based on is already existing in the subsystem consisting of the three children

If starving people die we wont have starving people anymore

11/10 currently dying
originall

Attached: 1496814100405.jpg (1000x967, 189K)

Sure but in that case i'm pointing out that your decision is illogical, how can you deny the maker his rights?

A, assuming they're telling the truth

>when your entire ideology can be btfo by don't feed the wildlife signs at the national park

Based and incel pilled fgfgfgf

Attached: 43204217_2166367720270380_8823415559740719104_n.png (411x405, 197K)

based and blackpilled
oregano

this answer is so spot on

Attached: 1511941239241.gif (200x200, 91K)

I would unironically murder child C if he ever tried to pull that shit on me. Child A is a spoiled cunt. Anybody who chooses other than B should neck themselves.

I bet you have a job, and you're totally not living off the money the government steals from hard working people.

Attached: 0379f53774e2106774122ace22c3a1bf.jpg (289x314, 14K)

I unironically do have a job and pay my taxes you dumb fuck mongloid retard pol shitting projecting faggot.

Now get teh fuck off my board with your larping wwII studio pictures of pretty boy actors. I bet you self insert as those images and think you're super cool. Fucking pathetic

Attached: download (7).png (246x205, 5K)

is that form inglourious basterds?

Not him but you sound like a massive loser rn

I really don't care what you NPC's think of me

Attached: images (2).png (204x248, 4K)

How deluded must you be? Everyone who disagrees with your shitty argument is an NPC apparently?
Just drop the troll my dude, find something better to do

Attached: puak62u16kt11.jpg (300x291, 7K)

Ironically choosing B could be interpreted as communist-sympathizing (since they believe workers deserve the fruits of their labor)

>uses ad hominems
>thinks he was being critical of my argument
Your kind are hilarious

Attached: 230.jpg (490x586, 14K)

Keep it to myself. Spoilt little cunts can sod off.

Nah, we need child C being fucked up the ass by child B (a striking metaphor for the institutional cruelty of capitalism and therefore art)

If you're going to just take the apple I, the farmer, produced, why should I continue to produce apples?

>complains about ad hominems
>uses them himself
You amuse me
I'm probably getting baited though, i refuse to believe someone can lack self awareness this much

Because you'd be given payment for your work, therefore allowing you to buy more than the apple

but that's not implied anywhere in the original question or the farm scenario

child A because the flute is useless unless held by someone who can play the flute.
Child B received the joy of creating
Child C gains nothing from having a wooden flute

Real World Example: Child A plays in streets and pays Child B for flute aswell as giving the money
she made to child C who needs it.

considering how this is an analogy for communism and capitalism, in a capitalist system, the one i'm describing, you'd be payed for your work.

Wow rule34 honestly lets me down a lot but not this time

Attached: edc3719.jpg (709x395, 36K)

So the state handles how privately-produced goods are distributed? Isn't that state socialism?

>So the state handles how privately-produced goods are distributed?
Never said or implied that

In the scenario there's a figure with enough power to unilaterally decide how the good is distributed. I can't see how that could be anything but the state.

Free Market. The business owner decides how the good is distributed

There's also mixed economies like the US that have elements of Free Market and centrally planned economies

Because these rights provide no value thus disregarding them does not destroy any value B has. Only giving it to A will create value

Child B but also present her the choice of giving it to Child C as a gift or to make two more for the other children, possibly making friends in the process. I'm presuming it's a wooden flute and not a metal one since that would cost a lot more and take more time.
Who knows, maybe she'll end up creating instruments for a living.

A. You are a fucking retard picking anything else but A

WELL I WONDER WHYYYYY????? YOU DIDN"T PRESENT AN ARGUMENT YOU STUPID FUCKING NPC PIECE OF SHIT

Yea delete your post you fucking useless piece of shit

THE RIDE SHALL STOP FOR NO ONE

Attached: b346fc22b6cc099a056be8bd2dcb2c3f.jpg (460x562, 41K)

Child B. She made the flute in the first place so it's her property unless she decides to give it to someone. A should get their own flute if they're so good at playing it, and C doesn't deserve free shit just for being poor.

Anyway this is obviously meant to be some analogy of society or something and it's not a very good one.

B, taking something from someone without their express permission is theft.
If she is not interested in playing the flute, encourage her to give/lend it to child A or C.
If you simply take it from her without asking she will learn nothing and she will resent you for it.

If anything, getting paid for your labour is the capitalist ideal though.
With communism, the flute would go to the state, and the state would make it available to all.

Attached: 1537733928173.jpg (600x600, 125K)

So why should the maker continue to produce when it's just going to be taken away from him?

I wasn't even talking about myself you absolute idiot. I was referring to this post You really are stupid

If he's poor do you think he'll have the time to learn a niche hobby like flute crafting?

Here's what happens if you give the flute to all the kids
A.) Girl uses the flute for a while then buys a better one
B.) Girl keeps the flute in her bookshelf and then goes on her smart phone
C.) Kid uses the flute and learns how to play it, and possibly learns to make money with it as a street performer. Or he just sells it for food that he needs.

Point being is that if child C was born in B's place he would be in the same predicament of doing niche retarded shit. It's not that C is lazy being poor is extremely taxing and debilitating. People who've never been poor would never understand. People are born into rich families most of the time. If that's not getting free shit then I don't know what is

Attached: 37039550_544432599304865_1898051326340759552_n.jpg (480x480, 83K)

Do you think every tool should belong to those who are already skilled at using it?
If you built a guitar, do you feel it would be fair if someone took it from you without your permission and gave it to someone who knows how to play it?

That is exactly what I addressed in my first post, you cannot make a system out of my decision, you can however create value. And because this is a one-time decision this should be the main focus

>49705367
That's not an argument he called me a loser NEET who mooches off the goverment or my family. Which is not true and I insulted him for insulting me.

Hence that's not an ad hominem. Do you even know what an ad hominems is??? You must be underage or just really stupid

But child C never stated she even wanted to play the flute, just that she wanted to have it because she has nothing.
Which sounds like a piss poor motivation to me, as if she just wants nice things because others have them too.
You see that a lot with poor people honestly, it's all about showing off to others and pretending they're not poor.
See Apple consumers and people who wear trashy jewelry.

I'd have a good talk with child C before giving her anything.

What the fuck? Anything but B is retarded. She made it she owns it. If she's nice she can let A or C rent it or something. Fucking commies I swear. Might as well take your Computer away because all you do is shitpost on Jow Forums, while some Chinese kid would actually use it to learn something.

B can either keep the flute or sell or trade it to A. Anything else is commie filth.

Child B. Unless child B voluntarily consents to hand over the fruits of her labor to child C - which tends to be the case because altruism is an innate characteristic in humans.

people.hbs.edu/mnorton/norton ariely in press.pdf

TL;DR: When presented with unlabeled pie-charts representing the wealth distrubution in Sweden and the US, 90.2% of Bush voters and 93.5% of Kerry voters picked the Swedish model...

This is heavily generalisation. Who's to say that C isn't poor because he's lazy, or A's not successful because she's talented?

The horse's name was friday

You guys do realise that this isn't a political analogy yeah? It's about how we determine justice.
It's right there at the bottom

Attached: 1539888101830.jpg (480x360, 10K)