Why are women always ready to scream about their "rights"?

You have no rights over my piss until I allow it. I must consent to you drinking my piss. This is because I have rights as a US citizen over my body. A foreign organism in my body is at my disposal to remove. For example, no one rushes to save endangered tapeworms inside people. I do not consent to its existence inside me so I have it removed. A tumor is an abnormal growth of my cells, its essentially human genetically, but its in my body and what I say goes. So the tumor is removed. A growth of sex cells turned other cells inside a womens body has no rights. Its not a person. A woman has the right to remove that growth if she no longer consents to its existence inside her.

Despite this fact, we still give these nonperson growths special rights. Also despite the fact that its existence or non existence has literally no bearing on you. It is a vestige if a time when we considered humans property. If you think humans can be property, then being antiabortion makes sense. Otherwise its a non sensical position.

I'd argue that, unlike a tumor or a tape worm, a fetus growing inside a woman's body is another human being, completely different from her, that she created by her own will when having sex (this obviously not considering cases when the woman was raped).

You're just mad cause you were aborted.

Feminists/lgbt fags don't understand basic biology.

Her child. Why do you care if it lives or dies. Population control.

Legally speaking, and thats all Im speaking, a fetus has no rights as a person. A person is separate and born in this country. A fetus is neither.

Furthermore more, when a woman has sex she only consents to the act of sex, not procreation. Legally speaking.

holy shit you are dumb, at the point where abortions are hold when they arent even human but some fucking alien like creature

To roasties, rights literally means
>I should be allowed to do whatever I want whenever I want with no consequences

I don't think a fetus is another person with the same rights of a person, but it is another human being.
I'm not even anti-abortion, I just find the tumour argument lazy.

>when a woman has sex she only consents to the act of sex
If a woman is old enough to have sex, she also knows that pregnancy is a consequence of sex.
If you consent to sex, you accept the risk of getting pregnant.

I understand the tumor example is overdone, but its necessary for a legal argument as a foundation of understanding.

And no, legally speaking she only consents to sex. I understand theres a risk of pregnancy but she has the right to terminate before a birth. I believe that choice exists. Thus, my prochoice stance.

If it was up to women they would make it legal to "abort" kids even after they left their body.

>it's her body
>this nigga is inside her
>ima kill this bitch so it doesn't ruin my life
simple as that