Reminder that love isn't real. Other people can, and will, betray you at the first opportunity if it benefits them

Reminder that love isn't real. Other people can, and will, betray you at the first opportunity if it benefits them.
Love is a trick created by society in order to use the naive fucks that fall for it.

Attached: 1544345155606.png (409x375, 9K)

It's not a "trick created by society." It's our naturally evolved mating strategy.

The "feeling" of love is the mating strategy. The idea of romance and all that shit is society's doing.

I dunno mate it feels pretty real to me, maybe you should get a gf.

No girl would ever date me because they don't gain anything from it. Romance from the girl's side is all about what you can provide them with.

No, wanting to stick your peepee in da pupu is your naturally evolved mating strategy. "Love" is a socioeconomic fabrication created by corporations and propagandists to sell shit.

I often read biographies about people from the 19th century and it amazes me what people used to do for each other.
Devoting love existed and I'd argue it used to be the norm, but it died in the 20th century.
Feels bad.

sexual attraction and love aren't the same thing
love is definitely real, but love is also fleeting, meaning eternal love isn't real.

The feeling of love is obviously "real." Love as an action, though, with loyalty and commitment etc. -- that must be societally-enforced.

>I dunno mate it feels pretty real to me,
That's a good goy

Attached: 1-Draper-Sell-nylons.jpg (760x515, 102K)

People haven't changed. People didn't love each other back then either.

Then what do I do to cure my soul crushing loneliness, it's literally affecting my productivity to the point where it's null.

Attached: cryeve.jpg (595x840, 406K)

Just look like a male model brah

Attached: original.gif (416x234, 836K)

It's all an illusion to get you to mate. No one will actually ever love you.

It goes away because it never existed in the first place. It's an illusion. People don't care about you, they care about what you provide them and how you make them feel.

>sour grapes
you deserved to be treated like shit though. some people aren't supposed to be loved.

Quit whining and go outside then.

You have to learn to live for yourself. Stop trying to live for a fantasy, live to do what you want to do.

Defined as...? Love the feeling is as real or illusory as any other feeling.

I haven't been treated by shit except for anything but my own brain.

lol you are your brain dummy

based and redpilled my FA lad, stay redpilled

The issue is that the feeling doesn't represent what people think it does. Even if you are able to find someone who isn't a cheater or an abuser, they will still never actually love you for who you are as a person. They love what you provide them with.

>what you provide in a relationship is somehow different than who you are as a person
hmmmm may i ask how old you are?

Yay now you're getting it!
I'm the reason that I failed in this terrible world. Not that succeeding would make it any better, but at least I'd be able to laugh at the other people suffering rather than being one of them.

So you're saying that your money and social standing is all there is to you as a person?

Keep coping subhuman

>It's all fake
Lol, as if I care if it's real or not.
I only know that I'll never experience friendships (and love) like Tolkien did, or Maurice Thompson, or like almost anyone from this area.

you think people only provide money and social standing in a relationship? that answers how old you are...

I know I'm a subhuman, but that doesn't mean I'm wrong in this situation.

People only care about the PHYSICAL things you provide them. They can get things like emotional support from anybody.

>from anybody
LOL!

>I only know that I'll never experience friendships (and love)
You should be grateful. The only way to get a clear view of the universe is to clear your mind of life's many illusions. It's much easier to do that when you are already missing some of them.

Ok, I guess you couldn't get emotional support from a literal autist. I meant anybody that people would even consider dating for a second.

preach about worshipping thirst in the desert, right?

>emotional support from anybody.
I'm quite sure most people can't be empathic any more, even if they try.

I have friends. I wish I didn't. It makes it harder. I'd get rid of them if I could, but it's hard to let go.

They could never be empathetic. People are just really good at faking it.

It that was true then this board simply wouldn't exist

They have nothing physical to provide, therefore nobody is willing to give them emotional support. Life is all about the trade.

very based and blackpilled

I want to believe that true love exists, but never having experienced it , I'm finding it harder and harder to believe that it will happen to me. Maybe it just is a concept created by Hollywood for sale.

Attached: 3769585+_bb8f8aee1b9e75010e9404f67d7635bb.jpg (208x250, 8K)

Yeah basically, but it's existed far longer than Hollywood.
They definitely profit off it though, while everyone involved in the production goes out and sexual assaults someone.

>"Walking" is a corporate fabrication to sell sneakers

People actually walk. People don't actually feel love. There's is a tremendous difference.

>People don't actually feel love
Speak for yourself.

It'll fade. Whoever it is, you don't really love them. You love how they make you feel. It's selfish.

>the need to eat will fade
lol

I inherited from my grandparents a bunch of friendship albums, written in the 19th century. And I was profoundly shocked when I read them the first time.

The friendship albums reveal that they had a different understand what friendship (or love) means.
I realized, that we are no longer able to see human relationships in different terms than the free market: transactions, giving, taking on opportunity.
It's like travelling a train, where passengers come in and go.

In the 19th century friendship was seen as something eternal. Friendship albums document this, its entries show how they valued the everlasting over the ephemeral. Transitory things such as youth, beauty, money and suffering were dismissed in favor of enduring communion with God and friends. Hence a friendship was the ultimate enduring joy, and the survival of their friendship albums through to the present day proves the unending nature of their affections. They believed that nothing could end a friendship, not even death, because a benevolent God wouldn't allow that.
You couldn't end it, you were expected to write letters, to send gifts, and to commune with your friends until death, if you refused your peers intervened. And you had little choice in picking your friends, this was done by families based on your interest and personality, and restricted by circumstances and ability.


BTFO normie. You're samefagging all over this thread.

You will die if you don't eat. Terrible analogy.

Tell me what posts you believe are samefagging. I have not once responded to myself anywhere in this thread, nor have I responded to any reply more than once

it's a good analogy to show how dumb you sound

Eating is essential for your body to grow. But I just realized, you are actually right. The need to eat does fade, when the body is ready to die. It happened to my great uncle, when his body started to give he completely lost the urge to eat.
You will lose the feeling of love as soon as your body decides it is done with that person and is ready to move on to the next.

yeah i know i'm right thanks

You're right, but not in the way you wanted to be. You said something that you thought sounded stupid to undermine my argument, but you ended up supporting it by saying something factual

>Reminder that love isn't real
I'm still holding out to the hope that it is.
but you do you op.

That stuff you wrote still happens today, but it's rare.
t. has friends like that

It's going to hurt you hard when you realize the truth, just know that. I still feel like a piece of me is missing.

nah probably not. love feels good for decades and even if it falls apart you just move on to the next one in a month or two, it's fun.

What kind of "love" is so unimportant that you can get into a new relationship in a month

the kind that non-retards have. dwelling on the past has nothing to do with how much you can love or have loved.

>It's going to hurt you hard when you realize the truth,
I will risk it, but thanks for the heads up

>I still feel like a piece of me is missing.
obsessing over someone even after it's over is not healthy, you will never move on and love someone else, and it will hurt that much more when that person finds someone else to share their life with.
just setting your self for some royal cucking op.

Did you really have a connection with them if you can just throw them away and move on to the next thing that quickly?

>throw them away
wow are you pretending to be stupid or nah?

>nah
This one
There is no way the relationship was meaningful in any way if you can get over it that quickly. I still miss friends I haven't talked to in years. And these are people I wasn't even that close to.

>guy with no meaningful or successful relationships judging the meaning of relationships
can't quite put my finger on it but i want to say there is a good reason why everything you say sounds very stupid. missing someone doesn't preclude developing relationships.

someone dodged a bullet here with you, and it's obviously not the person who you are currently "in love" with, if there is even any.

been with someone for 8 years and defending the idea that it's good. how's your love life?

>how's your love life?
well enough that I don't have to grand stand online buddy.

But how do you just go out and become involved with someone that soon after drifting away from someone you were supposed to love. Love is supposed to be some beautiful, powerful thing. How do you move from one to the next so easily?

that's your answer?
>supposed to
if you value that "beautiful" "powerful" "thing" you should pursue it. what you mean is that you value the person you were with and don't feel like anyone can replace them. that feeling is what you should be attacking, not the subject of love. that person may or may not be special, but if you can't be with them anymore you shouldn't sacrifice your health for no reason. there are other special people.

True, very true. Every relationship you make, whether romantic or not, is conditional on what that person can give you/what you can benefit from them and what you can give that person back. Life is just one big transaction and people are simply looking for the best deals. Don't fall for stupid idealistic shit like love and friendship, it'll just bring you disappointment.

>if you value that "beautiful" "powerful" "thing" you should pursue it. what you mean is that you value the person you were with and don't feel like anyone can replace them. that feeling is what you should be attacking, not the subject of love. that person may or may not be special, but if you can't be with them anymore you shouldn't sacrifice your health for no reason. there are other special people.
I still don't believe love exists, but that was well put together. Definitely gives me something to think about

>Don't be lazy and think that people should just give you everything in their life for free just because you want it
Who taught you what friendship is?

Ladies and gentlemen, a typical woman.

This. Some people know about how it really works, some people are naive and believe in concepts like love, but everyone is a slave to reality and will never actually experience those feelings like we think we do.

>capital letters and punctuation
>thinks only women can believe in or enjoy love
welcome to Jow Forums! most people here have the exact opposite view. its going to be a wild ride if you stay

>that's your answer?
I don't feel like arguing.
but I do think, in your exasperation to prove a point (that love can be discard easily) you missed the whole boat, you don't just suddenly stop loving someone after the relationship ends, you slowly fall out of love with them, which then allows you to move on quickly as you say, because the feelings are not there anymore, they dissipated gradually, which is totally understandable.

take a deep breath relax, and think things through.

>>Don't be lazy and think that people should just give you everything in their life for free just because you want it
>Who taught you what friendship is?
Are you saying that's not what friendship is?

They must fall out of "love" pretty quickly if they can start fucking someone else in a month

i didn't say it can be discarded easily. the difficulty with finding someone new is that you break your routine, not that you physically can't become closer to another person.

some people take it slower than others but you're way off if you think a measure of "love" is how long you mope and gripe about a relationship after it ends.

I meant to imply that you fall out of love with them, while in a relationship, which happens all the time

How strong was the bond then, if it can crumble so easily? That's a big part of the reason I heavily doubt love's existence
That's not even bringing up the constant betrayal that happens all the time by people who are supposed to love someone else

how did it get strong in the first place? there's your answer. if something can develop it can also degrade. it doesn't exist for you because you're too scared

>fall out of love with them, while in a relationship
That just means you're a lazy piece of shit who doesn't want to work on the relationship.

It got strong because your body wants to mate. That's the same reason it goes away.

lazy people still fall in love.

>how did it get strong in the first place?
Biology. It's all biology. I guess love if you reduce it to the need to mate. But the romanticized version of love you see in the media, which is what we typically view love as, is all bullshit.

Attached: Untitled11.png (1831x209, 30K)

*I guess love exists
That's what I meant to say.

using a computer is also biology but that's not a very interesting statement. i agree that love doesn't revolve around money or crazy adventures. for most people true love is just having fun conversations and supporting each others lifestyle

Exactly. "Love" exists because of a variety of factors that people find attractive in a mate, but "love" for shit like personality is nonexistant

Is it okay to watch women getting BLACKED if they're non-white?

Everything is ok. Morality is a meme.

Personality is nonexistent.

Yes, and then they don't work on it, and then they "fall out of love" instead of having a lifelong relationship and have to invent rationalizations on why this is somehow good.

Who hurt you user?

originu

it's not good to break up dummy. it's good to love.

Reality hurt me. The thought that love exists out there, that someone in the future would love me, was what kept me going. And then I learned it isn't real.

A fembot
I thought I found someone but she broke my heart after telling me she loved me

Sympathies, but I think that just further proves my thread's point.