so femanons, what's the deal with leg locking
So femanons, what's the deal with leg locking
It reminds me of a carnivorous plant that snaps shut when a meal enters inside
>a female will never lust after you so hard she locks her legs around you and demands you cum inside of her and make her pregnant and be with her forever
I don't fucking want to go slam down hos, I have only ever wanted to have ONE girl. Why is society so fucking whorish?
i used to think leglocking was where it was at, but desu, the hair is the best of all. There's nothing hotter than having a chick grab your hair and pull you close.
It may seem pretty mundane to most, but I love that. Not sure if it can really count as a fetish, but if feet of all things can have their own sexual "division" then so can this
Its serves as a symbol of dedication
>I have only ever wanted to have ONE girl
Beta faggot detected.
people who aspire to the hedonistic, aromantic chad lifestyle on this board are just failed normalshits and don't deserve to be happy.
And low test betas who don't have a normal sex drive and don't understand the sexual market place are pathetic and will be enslaved by women.
It's hot as fuck, that's 'the deal'.
Manwhore detected
Guess that answered his question.
No such thing as a manwhore. It's the male imperative to spread his seed. You can't call a male a whore because whore has negative connotations to it. There's never anything wrong with a man who slays.
agree with you bro
hope you'll find your true half
It's like a double hug and facilitates impregnation.
>There's never anything wrong with a man who slays.
According to manwhores. And regular whores.
No, according to evolution and biology. Only bitter betas deny it because they aren't able to behave the same way.
>sexual market place
>naturalistic fallacy
by feeding into this delusion you make it more real. how fucked is it that people are so brainfucked by capitalist and pseudoscentific "naturalistic" ideology that they project it into everything they do including the act of procreation? No, you're too chad to have sex for procreation too I bet.
We're not primitive animals who only want to fuck. We're a civilized society. Have some goddamn civilized morals.
>muhh capitalism
get fucked commie retard
>how fucked is it that people are so brainfucked by capitalist and pseudoscentific "naturalistic" ideology that they project it into everything they do including the act of procreation
It's just reality. Life is one big competition and you have to be ruthless to win. Sex and dating is no different. That's why criminals always have so many women going after them.
>We're not primitive animals who only want to fuck
We pretty much are. You can't suppress those instincts no matter how hard you try. The best you can do is channel it into a more appropriate way.
Fucking around as much as you can is purely animalistic and detrimental to society and human progress
>You can't suppress those instincts no matter how hard you try.
Stop projecting your lack of self-control on others.
So the most attractive men should be punished and restricted for being better? Sounds like commie bullshit.
It's a fact. Look how popular and big the porn industry is and how many men watch porn. That's the natural male sex drive at work. It's just that most men don't have the opportunity to behave like that with real women.
wish there was more desu
Because unlike sharks, deer, and other animals, where their young can work and act right from birth, it takes a human child 8 or so years to start work without supervision. Those seed you've sown in which you don't supervise have a very low chance of sprouting and if they do, they have a low chance of being successful.
>No such thing as a manwhore
Next you'll tell me the Walrus Pit doesn't exist
True. But monogamy is still a beta invention meant to favor low tier men and women. It actually makes us weaker in that sense.
If anything it's an invention of greedy men who didn't want their lands, skills, or trades to be given freely to neighbor bob.
>durr it makes us weaker
Technology was created by betas, and that technology is many times smarter and stronger than you, grug. Your argument expired 1500 years ago.
Leg locking feels really intimate and makes you feel as close as possible with your partner. Sometimes I get really emotional. I feel so loved and happy, I start to cry because the love is overwhelming. I'll lock legs so he won't go anywhere. I want him so much, I would die if he left so I hug him close.
It's also really comfy
Based. I wish I could have a gf like you, but I'm too ugly and insecure to ever be loved.
feminism, user and polyamory shit being normalized
Guard prevents the person on top from moving forward into a more dominate position while also offering some opportunity for sweeps and submissions.
Based and mmapilled
I like doing it, means I have trapped him and he is mine :3
THat I will NEVER know this feel is beyond cruel.
kind of an instinctual thing, kind of a let your pelvis grind into the clit for pleasure thing? keeps it more hot and personal. it's a leggy sex hug
Girl here, yes Im a female woohoo look at me! I lock my legs that way only because sometimes the guys are rude and wont hold them open for me while we fuckin, so that way i dont have to hold them open as it hurts after a while, why are you all so desperate!!