If women are most satisfied when their partner is 21cm taller than them which is 1...

If women are most satisfied when their partner is 21cm taller than them which is 1.5 times the actual average height difference between men and women (in the us) are they also most satisfied when their partner is 22.5% heavier than them? (1.5 times average weight dimorphism of 1.15)

Does this mean if there was a woman who was 4'10" and 101 pounds she would be most satisfied with a skinny manlet or does she still want chad please help

Attached: 1213656005941.jpg (450x600, 62K)

First figure out what 'satisfaction' you refer to.

Her own personal feels, or the social satisfaction she gets from other females envy?
Those are most times different matters, and of different priority depending on the female.

>would be most satisfied with a skinny manlet or does she still want chad
women always want chad, no exception

Attached: 1513121310768.jpg (619x720, 31K)

the study is behind a paywall idk how they defined satisfaction. Curiously 21cm above the average female height is very close to 180cm/6' but the study found that women are most "satisfied" with partners who were 21cm taller than them not necessarily 6 feet tall which makes me wonder if a short enough woman would actually prefer a manlet

173cm is actually the most attractive height as shown by studies, over 180cm is a clear disadvantage in looks.

Studies where?
Lots of north euro girls are over 180 themself. No way some "muh average in statistics" can tell me most of THOSE are comfy with guys where she could put her chin on his head when she's wearing stilettos.

Bullshit. Very few girls here are over 180cm. Cope harder.

All women want Chad. All. Of. Them. Even if they say otherwise. What women say they want is different from what they actually want. Women say they like things other than Chad. The truth is they just wish the version of themselves they project would like said things.

All people do this. "I'd be a hero if the need arose!" No you wouldn't. Most people are bystanders. All bystander claim they wouldn't be a bystander. These are just two of many possible examples. Humans think they're better than they are.

im a girl and i like a guy who says hes 5'10 but is around the same height as i am (5'6) but he slouches a lot so fuckin idk

Every woman wants their version of Chad. One woman's Chad is another's ordinary guy.

so then is every man a chad in some womans mind

I know a super beautifulaverage height, brunette blue eyed girl that looks Norwegian as fuck (in Canada) and she always, always dates and fucks manlets (guys 5'7'' to 5'10''). It's so weird
I know this because I creep her facebook
Every few months there's a picture of her and some manlet with his arm around her

She even had a child with a manlet that was maybe like 5'9'' or 5'8''

Pretty much. That's why you see even fat ugly NEETs with gfs.

Sauce please immediately.
(oregano.)

> 173cm is actually the most attractive height
>5'8"
>tfw 5'7"

Attached: image.jpg (668x389, 151K)

It's still plenty good enough to get lots of pussy.

i dun have anything else that's her ten years ago tho

I don't care about promiscuous sex, fuck off

She looks like the Chad of women.

Then just get a gf you mong.

I'm just gonna say if a woman cares about your looks to the point where it makes or breaks the relationship. She isnt a good girl to be starting a foundation with

If a woman likes a man she will automatically see him as more handsome.

Do you really think I can if I'm here?
Besides, fuck women, there's a ton of better shit I could do instead of chasing after a used hole

Attached: image.jpg (1091x570, 378K)

That is true as well. Because an adonis can say something stupid and look like garbage to me and quasimodo can say all the right words and I'll worship him

That is a cute wamen.