Consider the rectangular prism shown in the image.
The area of one of its sides is 21/2 while the height of its vertical edges is 8/3.
Provide the length of the red horizontal edge as a mixed number.
Then, calculate the volume of the rectangular prism.
Are you expecting me to assume that the top face of this prism is a square?
ok im a foreigner and i have no fucking idea what you just said
does that mean i pass?
You've been given more than enough information.
You're test is nothing to me you insignificant weasel
hidden and thrown away, it shall be!
This thread is dumb and you should feel dumb for having made it.
Do your own homework, lad
You are dumb and you should feel dumb.
do your own homework faggot, you may just learn something
No I won't do any of that. I ain't no mathamoligist
It's not my homework and you know it, I'm not 11 years old.
it absolutely is, stop lying on the internet, kid
>11 year olds are smarter than him
Is this solvable? I can't get the length of one of the top edges. I think I'm missing a theorem or something.
Horizontal edge: 3(15/16)
Volume: [0;inf) since we're not given enough information
>Volume: [0;inf) since we're not given enough information
I didn't even realise that, holy shit, what a fucking dumbass
the absolute state of american education:
Red edge: 63/16
Volume: 1323/32
How easy it is to bait
By "him", I meant you.
>he doesn't know what a mixed number is
>1323/32
>complains about amerilard education
Base is not a square retard.
I swear you all are retards. You can't calculate the volume because you have absolutely no idea what the measurements of the third dimensions are.
And I'm a retard for taking this bait.
mixed numbers are useless past 5th grade
>mixed numbers are useless past 5th grade
>never in my life i've used nor have seen somebody use mixed numbers.
not even going to comment
As I said, the absolute state of op's shithole country education
>never in my life i've used nor have seen somebody use mixed numbers.
I use them daily.
>the absolute state of op's shithole country education
Except unlike you, I actually know the answer you brainlet.
I struggle counting the correct change without having a panic attack desu Like hell i'll figure this shit out
Not being good at quick mental calculation under pressure is irrelevant.
Mine is the correct answer, but you'll never admit it because you thought you were going to act all """smart""" and shit with a middle school grade problem. You're probably reeeeing in your basement like the autist you are.
Fuck this gay thread im out
>Mine is the correct answer
It isn't, you absolute brainlet.
ok OP since you apparently know the answer feel free to enlighten us
>inb4 figure it out yourself brainlets XD
yeah nice try faggot, go back to trolling on /b/
easy it's 28
3 15/16
Assuming base is square
21/2 x 63/16 = 1323/32 cm3
To obtain the length of the red horizontal edge, you simply divide the known area of its parallel side by the known height of one of the vertical edges:
21/2 divided by 8/3 = 21/2 * 3/8 = 63/16
since the length must be provided as a mixed number:
63/16 = 3 remainder 15 = 3 15/16
now, you can simply calculate the volume of the rectangular prism with the information that was already given to you, independently from the previous calculation:
21/2 * 8/3 = 168/6 = 28
Again, 11 year olds do this.
>Assuming base is square
You don't have to assume anything.
no way to know how long the third side is. there is nothing leading toward the assumption that it is square OP is a bullshitting troll, ignoring that and assuming that it is square you get this nevermind it seems that OP is actually retarded.
You'd have to multiply 21/2 by the depth of the object, not the height, to get the volume. 11 year olds can tell that you're retarded. For your sake, I truly hope you're just trolling.
Woah this nigga be dumb.
If you have even the tiniest amount of imagination the calculations you did give a completely different figure.
He is probably not that dumb and just laughing in his mom's basement at how he "lul trolled hard" all of us.
anons proved OP is retarded
/thread
You give OP too much credit. He probably is just retarded.
There's no reason to assume that B and W are the same value.
Shit thread by a shit OP everyone go home, sage
>calculations you did give a completely different figure
how so?
Answer is whatever the answer to 21/2 over 8/3 is
I'll take it one step further. The answer is whatever the answer to the original question is.
Sorry, I worded that wrong. It's just a has a smaller volume. Bad habit from my retarded uni math classes.
>It's just a has a smaller volume.
how?
someone explain to me what the fuck is wrong with this rectangular prism, i'm losing my mind over this, what's the length of the red edge and the total volume?
If you imagine this in a 3d space the area of one of its sides is being extended over the length of its height which would create an object with a smaller volume than that area being extended over the length of its side. There are probably much easier ways to explain this but I am not very good at verbalizing them especially in English.
Length of the red edge is
(21/2)/(8/3) = 63/16 = 3 15/16
Total volume cannot be determined because we have no information about the depth of the object.
Oops! lol
OP here, I'm not actually retarded, I just coloured the wrong edge in blue while I meant to do pic related and thus flip the rectangular prism to multiply the area of its base times its height in order to obtain its total volume.
I also wrote:
>divide the known area of its parallel side by the known height
since I forgot the word "width" in english and so mistranslated "larghezza" in my language to "height" while the latter is "altezza" and to confuse things further:
>height of its vertical edges is 8/3
prior to flipping the prism, in pic related, 8/3 appears as a horizontal "lunghezza" (length) that can be a "larghezza" (width) and so I didn't notice the error sooner because it then seemed logical when appearing as an "altezza" (height), that I even thought of as a "larghezza" in english, in the first image I posted as if the flipping already occured. I didn't mean 8/3 to be the height at the beginning because I already cropped the image leaving no space for it to appear next to it.
My calculations are still correct based on pic related which I did have in mind ;^)
So much for the universal language, huh...
You know you are still retarded?
inadvertence != retardation
How do you calculate the red line? Sure the volume is no problem after you changed the blue line but now the red line can't be calculated.
You spent the whole thread calling others brainlets who couldn't solve a trivial math problem. Meanwhile, you can't even draw the problem correctly. All the facts point to you being retarded.
>PROVE YOU AREN'T RETARDED
himself cannot prove he is not
>You spent the whole thread calling others brainlets
Don't get so triggered over shitposting, lad. I'm also literally taking a shit while on my laptop.
>All the facts point to you being retarded.
Ok, since you're more intelligent than me, tell me...the value of a computer is decreasing at a rate that is proportional at any time to the value of the computer at that time. The computer is worth $850 initially, and it is worth $306 after 2 years. How much will the computer be worth after 5 years?
>PROVE YOU AREN'T RETARDED
Who are you quoting? l wasn't asked to prove anything.
>backtracking this hard
oh nononononono
>G-g-g-guys I'm just shitposting. I'm totally not triggered right now. Your words don't hurt me cuz I am trolling you lads hard. DON'T LAUGH!!!
>Ok, since you're more intelligent than me, tell me...the value of a computer is decreasing at a rate that is proportional at any time to the value of the computer at that time. The computer is worth $850 initially, and it is worth $306 after 2 years. How much will the computer be worth after 5 years?
It will be worth -510, you retard.
$66.10
now tell me how to solve the length of the red line in the new image
wow, this sure was a success, huh OP?
>he actually beIieves this
Man hold on.
Lets call the length of the segments of the xyz axis xyz
So we have
x*y=Axy
x*z=Axz
y*z=Ayz
x*y*z=V
Known are Axy,z
unknown are Axz,Ayz,x,y,V
your solution is Axy / z
state that that is irrelevant
Axy*z=V
Axy=x*y
therefore
x*y*z=V
How about you learn English so people can read what you writ instead of gibberish ramblings that have nothing to do with the question.
In your corrected image yeah sure all good. Yet you fucked up giving the question and were too retarded to understand you couldn't solve it.
Show all your work.
A-At least yesterday it was...as we say in my language: "un bel gioco dura poco" (a fun game lasts little)
850/306=25/9
850/(25/9)^5/2=66.096
now spit it out buddy
You can't solve the red line there is not enough information.
verify it in my post
SIETE RITARDATI
>YOU GUYS ARE RETARDED
SIAMO RITARDATI E ANCHE TU
Correct, not op here.
Should I still be able to do this if I dropped out of school in 7th grade?
Dioporco impiccati ritardato di merda
Ma l'hai fatta la scuola dell'obbligo?
Im pretty sure youre just trying to get people to do your geometry homework for you lol
Leggi il filo, pezzo di deficiente.
You can find it with trig
No it's exponential decay. we have a constant k = ln(306/850)/2
And the answer is 850*exp(5k)
How? You only know one angle of the triangle.
The answer is 31/6, as for the volume. It is impossible to know. x = 21/2 - 2*(8/3)
28
Volume is any solution to 28*(8/3)*x where x is a free parameter in the positive real numbers.