How come people say you shouldn't hit women because they're weaker but they don't apply this to weaker men?

How come people say you shouldn't hit women because they're weaker but they don't apply this to weaker men?

Attached: 1464821392844.webm (960x540, 822K)

Weak women are natural
Weak men are abominations and deserve to be hit

It's always seemed like a holdover from days when women were property. It was a sign of a "better" man to not need to strike the womenfolk, or something like that (or so I assume).

But in this day and age, there's no reason to have any special prohibition against hitting women. Not that I'm advocating that anyone SHOULD go around hitting women, but rather, that the same standards of (self) defense can and should be applied to situations of violence, regardless of the sex of the participants.

It's almost like most people are fucking retarded and their morality and reason do not extend beyond immediate impulses induced on them by societal expectations.

Because if a guy hits a woman he'll destroy her.

The problem is women hide behind the state and push guys to use violence thinking they wont.

"Pick on someone your own size" refers to not beating up weak men.

It does. People, or some people where I live have this attitude that if you know you would win 100% then why fight them? It's not fair and they feel like they shouldn't.

Because women are needed for reproduction, and weak men aren't.

Give me a good reason they deserve to be hit and not women.

Attached: DF4E359F-85A7-4FFB-9F47-6FD30020FE94.png (225x225, 14K)

Anime name pls

Do you have any idea how rare it is to find a man that is as weak as the average girl? Men have a 60% upper body strength advantage, double the hand size (where a lot of power comes from a punch) and on average have stronger bone and muscle tissue.

Attached: 1539604125292.jpg (540x720, 48K)

You know why men are stronger on average? Because a long, long time ago before society, the strongest men claim all the women worth having and left nothing to the weaker men. That 20% banging and breeding with all those women while that weak 80% died lead to our current sexual dimorphism we have where men a damn beasts on average compared to women. Society occurred and it needed a lot of happy little workers and men are not happy workers unless they feel they can get some pussy so bye bye polygamy and hello monogamous where now most men get a good shot at claiming a girl. This has birthed weaker and weaker men till we reach the devastation you see before you where these weak men have given everything to women and now things are going back to the 20% and as such this wasted song and dance is finally over. So imo don't punch weak guys, just fucking kill them.

White knights bruh

You didnt give me a good reason why they deserve to be hit and not woman still.

The natural conclusion of going back to the reproductive system of the caveman ages is going to be a return of the caveman ages in other ways as well. So i dont think thats something we should be striving for.

They deserve to be hit because they are not needed. Period.

Then we've lost our sex dichotomy and there's no point in interacting with females or even having sex with them if they are treated the same as men anyway.

That doesn't answer the question. Technically, in a fight, there's always someone stronger. It also seems that women are more into "fitness" and other bs more than men which offsets (or it should) a bit of that.

In my opinion is also wrong to hit anybody regardless of gender, it's a lose lose situation, either you beat up someone else and it's usually not an advantage for your life and someone gets hurt or you get hurt. If I'm in a position where I have to defend myself, or bitch slapping a hoe is the best way to get a point across where no one is getting really hurt, you bet your ass I'm doing it

Yeah, that's how we've survived for so long. By doing the shit that we know works. That's the whole point of conservatism.

Who said to strive for it? I'm sharing the doom we will get no matter what because of weak men, weak men create all our issues and grievances, they are weak in flesh spirit and mind so half of those weak men give women all the power and the other half mewl like children how hard it is to be a man. They are the cause of this "return of the caveman ages"

That's pretty dumb even for Jow Forums standards

Because Men=expendable and Women=valuable. Ooga booga, now shut the fuck up.

>They deserve to be hit because they are not needed. Period.
Thats a shit load of the population thats gone and even if you dont care for that they are still needed or else you would become the weak male.

>Technically, in a fight, there's always someone stronger.
That's the argument? A split hair retardation that you can't hit anyone that is weaker even by a small amount? Guys can fucking kill women in a single hit, women can't. That's what creates this "double standard" is because most weak men can still take a better punch.
>. It also seems that women are more into "fitness" and other bs more than men
What memes have you been taking to get that idea? Men make up over 70% of gym memberships and women are about twice as likely to quit working out.

I pretty much agree with him.

well it's 3 year old reworked pasta that still gets (You)s kinda standard here. Hell we see more of it if claiming to be a r9k "fembot" didn't get twice the amount of (You)s in half the time.

>Thats a shit load of the population thats gone
look at the last 100 years I can't say their presences has helped
>else you would become the weak male.
not how that works, the 20% operates on actions and desirability otherwise we wouldn't need laws and what no against having multiple wives in most 1st world countries.
It's rework pasta based on scientific accuracy on how we got where we are and why things have gotten worse in the last century. I'm not supporting hitting/killing weak men. But a undesirable male gets desperate and will have stupid reactions like giving a girl everything they want without thinking that makes them unneeded.

Unless you're going to kill them there's no point in hitting them. On a moral level.

>the 20% operates on actions and desirability
Exactly, woman will want the top 20% of the strong men and with out the the weak men the remaining 80% of you would become the undesirable and you would become the weak men.

I wasn't disagreeing about the double standard, that's obvious that it's because women are weaker on average. That doesn't mean that someone should chimp out on a guy beating ANY woman as a reflex, and not defend as passionately a guy the same size as a women and instead is seen as weak

>80% of you would become the undesirable and you would become the weak men

Why would you think I was one of the weak ones? I got a wife and a gf atm, pretty sure two girls willing to share me is a good sign I'm far closer to the 20% then you like to think.

i see it as both women taking advantage of their power over men to impose favourable rules on society and men looking to appeal to women by appearing 'noble' and 'socially just'. this improves their image to women, increasing the chances of putting their dicks into the vagina to satisfy the animalistic primitive desire to reproduce. the animal will do whatever it takes if it means it increases its chance of reproducing, and it's evident here; imposing and enforcing a stupid double standard rule that does nothing but benefit females and their thirsty male counter parts. life is a lie, learn to see past all the deceptions, especially thrown by humans disguised as righteousness, just, moral, "truth", etc. people usually say/do things that are benefitial and convenient for them, unconcerned with truth

We are talking about the top 20% of the top 20% omega chads the ones who dont spend there time on Jow Forums caring about weak men. you dont think woman would trade you for someone better? Maybe you could make it, but I hope you like getting cucked because thats what would happen. Plus anyone could say that I doubt you are who you say you are.