This man embodies what i dislike. He is in my opinion a nihilist, materialist, hedonist...

>hating people you've never met
Imagine having mental energy on that shit

>Not being able to hate someone you've never met

This Peter Scully fella sure seems cool.

Imagine being so low energy that you can't hate strangers.

Attached: IMG_7286.jpg (774x850, 197K)

>If he was good at destroying our beliefs, we wouldn't believe them.
>There is nothing wrong with racism.
Ah you forget how stupid humans can be. Weird since you're a shining example of single digit iq.

Attached: c7e99c6b1aa0a83f1bc43121ab53f85d44692dd7a0378cfd6dfb4725c042144a.png (527x256, 130K)

(((livestreamers)))
oy vey

Eh, he's not particularly intelligent. He's the sargon of the left if anything. Just another smug prick that doesn't understand what he's talking about. Literally some random idiot that got lucky enough to play video games as a job.

>nihilist
based
>materialist
strong minded and honest, doesn't need wishy washy bullshit to lead his life
>hedonist
weak, but can you blame him? isn't everyone, conservative or leftist a hedonist now?
>rejects tradition and spirituality
strength of mind, again.
>weak and fragile
has high IQ and charisma, I think he's fine.

He has obliterated all opposition besides maybe fucking Vegan Gains for some odd reason. You hate him because he's talented at debating and has destroyed your retarded idols like Sargon. He's also not that "left" he believes in Capitalism, and the republic. He also wants to have guns even if he acknowledges that it's mostly for recreational use unless you're living like a hunter gatherer in the middle of nowhere.

>rejects anything spiritual

youtu.be/D2ZKZavOoCA

i hate him too

Regardless of IQ, if your beliefs are destroyed you no longer believe them. That's the implication when you say, "destroyed".
Don't attack other peoples' intelligence when you manage to fuck this up.

Attached: IMG_7497.jpg (365x431, 161K)

But like like hes so dumb and like a cuckold man like he just tries to trap and trick me with my own beliefs duude.

Attached: 1537690617157.png (653x657, 669K)

Only thing I would like OP to clarify is the hedonist part, is it modern hedonism where its pursue as much pleasure as possible without thinking of the future or old I guess 'classical' hedonism which advocates removing unnecessary stress and making time for pleasurable activities, whilst not overindulging to make sure that you don't burn out and destroy your ability to feel pleasure.
Because if its the latter then I would say he is not only based, but also redpilled.

Attached: 1541641686941.png (552x524, 76K)

>strong minded and honest, doesn't need wishy washy bullshit to lead his life
We all need non materialist aspects to lead our lives. You're deluding yourself if you think otherwise.

>weak, but can you blame him? isn't everyone, conservative or leftist a hedonist now?
Not everyone. Thegoldenone is a good example.

>strength of mind, again.
Hardly anyone has that strength of mind, thus, in order to have a functional society it is foolish to reject it.

>He has obliterated all opposition besides maybe fucking Vegan Gains for some odd reason. You hate him because he's talented at debating and has destroyed your retarded idols like Sargon.
Sargon and Metokur destroyed him independently. Jim made him cry and he got Sargon's channel banned to cover up his humiliation.

>He's also not that "left" he believes in Capitalism, and the republic.
If you're not a white nationalist, you're a beta leftist.

Attached: IMG_7485.jpg (173x202, 14K)

So let me get this straight, you watch a bunch of nu-males debate each other for hours over topics they have absolutely no power over (so the damn debate is effectively worthless)? Why even bother? I mean for fuck's sake, apparently this particular internet debater plays fucking video games for a living, how can you take this shit seriously.

Attached: 1544350326934.jpg (541x521, 168K)

Not them but you replied to the wrong person

Attached: 1543636549799.jpg (710x577, 76K)

>He believes in capitalism
Cringe and bluepilled
>Idols like Sargon
Who?

Destiny "Destroyed" noone. When talking immigration he argues from a CEO of a transnational corporations perspective how can you take a pure materialist seriously? Do you believe material well being is the only thing that matters or are there other aspects to a individuals life like culture, art, philosophy or any other higher values?

Okay

>He has obliterated all opposition besides maybe fucking Vegan Gains for some odd reason. You hate him because he's talented at debating and has destroyed your retarded idols like Sargon.
Sargon and Metokur destroyed him independently. Jim made him cry and he got Sargon's channel banned to cover up his humiliation.

>He's also not that "left" he believes in Capitalism, and the republic.
If you're not a white nationalist, you're a beta leftist.

Attached: IMG_7495.jpg (194x259, 9K)

If you follow livestreamers to this degree, then you're the beta here, user. None of the people you're talking about matter to anyone besides mindless beta teenagers (or teenagers at heart) trying to find internet icons to love or hate.

You're making a circular argument
>if I don't change my beliefs it's because your argument is good enough
>"but my argument was perfect"
>BUT YOU DIDN'T CHANGE MY BELIEFS
Ideas and beliefs can be destroyed and you can still believe in them. If I make a good and irrefutable argument against your beliefs, it is your own failing to not understand or believe my argument. How can you be sure that you (the royal you, not you yourself) aren't holding on to inherently fallacious beliefs, how can you be sure personal boas isn't causing you to poke nonexistent holes in the argument, what of the times where someone makes an argument and then is shoo'd away without being able to fully make your case?

I don't know who this guy is.

>If he was good at destroying our beliefs, we wouldn't believe them.
>there is no such thing as irrational beliefs

his audience is the same group that thinks dissenting political opinions are "punk" and "countercultural"

petersonfags, shapiro fags, sargonfags, eminem fags all need to fucking go.

>He also wants to have guns even if he acknowledges that it's mostly for recreational use unless you're living like a hunter gatherer in the middle of nowhere.

this is where you are wrong
we need guns to protect ourselves from niggers.

youtu.be/asolvYnj51s

>Weird since you're a shining example of single digit iq.
Fucking lol'd.

exactly what he said, especially:
>He acts like a computer which can only reason from material parameters.
It's so embarrassing to watch people reason this way.

>Muh lethal, cold-steel rationale
he should off himself

That's every Twitch chat tho

Yea he's pretty retarded honestly, I watch a few videos where he was right and started listening to more, then slowly he revealed himself as being a reductionist robot larper just to "win" an argument.

fpbp. racist white boys annihilated again

Explain to me how caring about things makes you beta.

>You're making a circular argument
No, you're just being purposefully obtuse.
>if I don't change my beliefs it's because your argument is good enough
This was not the argument I made.
The argument I made is that as long is a person still believes in something, their beliefs aren't destroyed.
Even though it doesn't address my actual argument, I still take issue with the majority of your post.

>If I make a good and irrefutable argument against your beliefs, it is your own failing to not understand or believe my argument
Maybe it's your failing to understand that your argument is not good or irrefutable.

>How can you be sure that you (the royal you, not you yourself) aren't holding on to inherently fallacious beliefs, how can you be sure personal boas isn't causing you to poke nonexistent holes in the argument,
Because I'm confident in my beliefs. How can you be sure that your inherently facetious beliefs and personal biases aren't causing you to deny these holes in the argument?

Attached: IMG_6694.jpg (329x328, 6K)

Now what if we also took the niggers guns

>So let me get this straight, you watch a bunch of nu-males debate each other for hours over topics they have absolutely no power over (so the damn debate is effectively worthless)?
We, as partisans and voters do have power over these things. That's why winning over people matters.

>apparently this particular internet debater plays fucking video games for a living,
Ad hominem

Fucking kill your self you fucking centrist ppl like you are the real reason the world is a shitshow

Attached: D3A2E4D5-D11B-4817-ADD2-937E29A76687.jpg (499x680, 148K)

Your right fuck ppl that play video games for a living thier fucking dumb pieces of shit I mean look at pewdiepie

>that obligatory eclectic lot of niggers and faggots
>NAZIS R OBVIOUSLY BAD
>Equality for all
No.

Attached: IMG_6899.png (1334x750, 1.43M)

Imagine being this much of a faggot
ITS HARD TO COME UP WITH ORIGINAL SHIT WHEN REPLYING TO A FAGGOT

Attached: 346B094B-4C76-4A6B-B212-6DA4A41E0289.jpg (237x316, 29K)

Oof, you seem a little upset there, champ. Did you forget your daily BLACKED session?

Attached: IMG_5747.png (400x397, 244K)

No you made a foggoty reply and I called you out
>BLACKED
It's weird that you would bring a porn site up

>should have been killed by nature for being weak and fragile
Like most of Jow Forums?

>nothing wrong with racism because my opinions are objectively correct because I feel so

I really, really wish Jow Forums is right about the multimillenia ethnoconspirarcy. Id give up just about anything to see you fuckers killed and enslaved.

he's all that ok, but he has a job playing video games, a wife and a daughter
we are the supreme gentlemans and what do we have? mental illness and sadness

THIS MAN SPEAKS THE TRUTH origipoo

Attached: 8DCE7962-78DD-426F-A280-21D1CB4627C4.jpg (1920x1080, 311K)

Someone post the photo of him looking tiny in that Cloud9 jersey. Shits hilarious.

There is nothing wrong with racism because there is nothing wrong with anything by default. You have to prove that there is something wrong with it beyond YOUR own feelings, but instead of doing that you'll just fantasize about me being enslaved or killed. Brava, faggot. Brava.

Attached: IMG_7449.png (597x570, 245K)

>No you made a foggoty reply and I called you out
But it's not.
You only think that because you're a deranged cuck.

>daughter
you mean a son that is already taller and more alpha than him at the age of what? 10y old? "His" wife banged some other dude. This is always what happens to libtards.

>moral relativism
>no its YOUR burden of proof

Youre not worth the time to explain why racism is a fundamentally dangerous belief system

>but I assume he just picks the lowest of the low to debate against
He'll debate pretty much anyone. It just turns out most people willing to debate him are retarded. If you wanted to, you could probably get him to debate you about something, he even debated someone from Jow Forums once.

Imagine being so starved for things to do that you follow literal whos like this one and bitch about them on the internet

Personal interest in the thought process and justification behind people beliefs? Even if you are powerless it can bring satisfaction when you find "truth"

Imagine being so starved for things to do that you look for other people starved for things to do and act superior to them

Attached: 1bcaff44dbe342d95e3f6f7edcadba23dfc84d2e95cae9500144bdb92b47f173.png (424x598, 234K)

Destiny is the average leftist who talks fast, with as much substance as he is tall, very little. The people he "debates" are low hanging fruit which almost seems paid to be stupid.
The arguments tend to delve into "here is my list of studies I trust, and they also back up my point, unlike yours since [reasons]". Numbers are just assumed to be factual and true (even if they span a range), but anyone who does the same will be criticized as if their entire argument is null and void.
He will go on long and tedious tangents that doesn't really mean much, and isn't always slightly relevant to the topic at hand. And a heavy use of symbolism or what it's called in English - where y ou compare it to something and argue within the new frame and just assume it makes sense outside of it.
>Trump is like Voldemort. You banish Voldemort
And somehow, that translates to the real world, without really meaning much in practicality. Another example is comparing being against abortion, but also oppose (heavy) immigration.

He and his other fellow cult-leaders claim to have an analytical and pragmatic approach to issues, but they project feelings and emotions onto others to have the moral highground. And will always fall back on misconceptions that if they were true, it would be horrible, but also are "too true and everyone knows it to argue" - mostly because the implications would make the house of card fall and they're hypocrites.

>no its YOUR burden of proof
It is your burden of proof. There's nothing wrong with it by default.

>Youre not worth the time to explain why racism is a fundamentally dangerous belief system
Said everyone without an argument ever.

Attached: 1529885027723.png (1000x400, 25K)

By default we should care about human wellbeing. If you dont, youre fine with the death of our species. I think thats a robot belief but then again we dont participate in society. We should also care about equality because humans thrive in those conditions. Source every fucking government both successful and not has demonstrated when we let go of bullshit like race and focus on what matters, like prosperity, human society flourishes. Romes golden age was run by nonRomans. Rome fell when they genocided and executed barbarian leaders despite competence.

>nothing is wrong with racism, the assertion without proof

Its your burden of proof, but I already offered a political and historical example of why states run on racism dont last. The American South and Nazi Germany barely lasted as a white nation and did not and would not have lasted the second the blacks or the Slavs realized what was planned.

Your argument is based on feelings a lacks any evidence and you go ahead and forgo conventional debate just attack me.

So yeah, kill yourself m8

I've only ever watched him debate ryan dawson, and dawson made him look completely uneducated

>He has obliterated all opposition
nah, watch him and dawson

>Romes golden age was run by nonRomans.
Rome had the emperor be away for 6 months/year in raids. People barely knew who the emperor was, apart from name. It didn't matter for a farmer who took their money, nor did they ahve any say in who it was. If the Muslims promised safety and protection, then they would pay tax to them. If the Romans promised the same, that was who they paid tax to.
And you frame it (like Destiny would) that Rome was some glorious empire that thrived in any way, but because someone didn't like having outsiders as leaders becasue they were outsiders they just killed them, and then it all started falling down.
That's dishonest, you know it, I know it, but you use it as an argument to somehow make it relevant today when there's so much different.
And it wasn't internal strife that killed off Nazi Germany and the American South, you might even argue it was outside pressure and different groups.

Argue all you want about how Rome was a multicultural empire. It's not false, but it's not relevant either. It was locally equal, with merchant outposts for foreigners. So eastern part of the Roman empire was genetically different then the western part.

Literally none of that is true dude. Diocletian avoided certain parts of the Empire because the people viewed him as a man rather than a distant god emperor. Read a book that wasnt written in the 18th century, Gibbon was wrong. If white nations are so grand than the Nazis and traitors should have won.

You still havent provided proof as to why racism is so good.

I'm not part of the initial argument of why racism is good (which by the looks of it was never claimed, only that racism is racism, not that it's [entirely] good or bad).

>Diocletian avoided certain parts of the Empire because the people viewed him as a man rather than a distant god emperor.
What does that even mean? I am sure any emperor avoided certain parts of the empire. It wasn't exactly a road on roses to the top where you could rest on your laurels. It's a literal non-argument. No emperor visited every single area of the empire.
>If white nations are so grand than the Nazis and traitors should have won.
Why? I never claimed they were grand or good or evil or bad or whatever. That's on you. It's not like numbers count for something. Yet, if white nations are so bad, why do people want to go to white nations? What's next, to argue for multiculturalism, you can point out how awful African countries are doing because they are not diverse ;-)

I see what you're doing, the typical Destiny way of arguing. Making up strawmen, and never really having an argument, but rather vague definitions and semantics.Then you will go and say we were unreasonable and that you tried so hard to ask for an argument (a stance you made up) which was never provided and you had so many.
I am sure Trihex is impressed

>I dont read history so the arguement doesnt work

Guess not

>why do people come to white nations

Because its not run by warlords

>ecelebs

Yeah Im done here. I bet you think Gibbon is a streamer.

>By default we should care about human wellbeing. If you dont, youre fine with the death of our species.
I don't care about the death of my species. I care about the death of my race. You're trying to be objective again and I don't like that.

>I think thats a robot belief but then again we dont participate in society.
I participate in society.

>We should also care about equality because humans thrive in those conditions.
Equality is an extremely nebulous term. What forms of equality help humans thrive and in what way?

>Source every fucking government both successful and not has demonstrated when we let go of bullshit like race and focus on what matters, like prosperity, human society flourishes.
Define flourishing.

>Romes golden age was run by nonRomans. Rome fell when they genocided and executed barbarian leaders despite competence.
So what I'm getting from this is that I don't want my ethnostate to be reliant on other races for anything. The Romes made a mistake my allowing themselves to be co-opted just as the Americans did when they brought Africans in as slave labor. It makes them weak and decadent, just like white liberals. Just like Destiny.

Attached: 1525560004978.png (339x301, 114K)

>nothing is wrong with racism, the assertion without proof
It's not an assertion, it's the opposite of one. Prove that racism is wrong.

>Its your burden of proof, but I already offered a political and historical example of why states run on racism dont last.
One example that I easily dismantled is not going to get you very far, so the burden of proof remains on you.

>The American South and Nazi Germany barely lasted as a white nation and did not and would not have lasted the second the blacks or the Slavs realized what was planned.
The American South unfortunately was not a white nation. Nazi Germany was not pro white. It was pro German.

>Your argument is based on feelings a lacks any evidence
My argument is based on facts and logic and the burden of proof is on you.

>and you go ahead and forgo conventional debate just attack me.
Conventional debate? What a faggot.

Attached: ogatha.png (253x225, 80K)

You just said nothing with all that word salad. You have confirmation bias.

Classic projection, LUL as they say in your chat.

I would never see Destiny as a rolemodel.

Does this guy debate actually politically naunced people or just internet gamers?

Attached: 1545104965929.jpg (1051x1051, 54K)

>doesnt want a conventional debate but wants me to define terms and acknowledge burdens of proof, but not him
>wants an ethnostate but has no idea what that is or when its happened, his ethnostate hasnt been tried yet
>has facts and logic and hasnt provided one for his shitty feelings based argument, swears he has them

I only came back to call you a double nigger.

Just retards and gamers, which is funny since he gets made to look like a retard himself by some of them.

What is this, why should anyone care and, why the fuck is this thread on Jow Forums? Fuck off to /b/ or Jow Forums or whatever shithole you came from.

maximum overbrainlet

(You) should pack your bag and fuck off from TECHNOLO/G/ board with your eceleb bullshit, you pseud mongoloid.

Attached: 1538950193231.jpg (758x768, 57K)

>doesnt want a conventional debate but wants me to define terms
It's irrelevant to me whether we have a "conventional debate" or not. I made fun of you because it's yet another term you've failed to define even subjectively.

>and acknowledge burdens of proof, but not him
I did acknowledge the burden of proof. I acknowledged that the burden is on you.

>wants an ethnostate but has no idea what that is or when its happened, his ethnostate hasnt been tried yet
My ethnostate existed in Europe for the majority of it's history, considering the amount of non Europeans were negligible.

>has facts and logic and hasnt provided one for his shitty feelings based argument, swears he has them
If I make a good and irrefutable argument against your beliefs, it is your own failing to not understand or believe my argument.

Attached: 1.png (189x168, 59K)

>still hasnt made an argument other than no u

Racists are fucking stupid. That is an assertion that requires proof. My proof is you.

No u is a legitimate argument when the burden of proof is on you, and I made several others in addition to that. If this is the power of destinian argumentation, I feel bad for the left.

>no u is a legitimate argument

And now Im done for real.

You'd be killed in nature for being weak and fragile too. No normal person cares this much about what some dude who plays video games says lmao. At least he's able to articulate his thoughts well and argue, you sound like a sperg throwing his weekly man child hissy fit. Thankfully your inferior genetics will be erased completely due to your failure at attracting women while his will continue on. LARPing subhuman.

Destiny needs some reality checks, Id like to send him to live in uganda for 5 years.

based and Kaczynskipilled

If only you could see how myopic you Wikipedia intellectuals are.

Metokur owned him. Destiny is pathetic

>He acts like a computer
Does he dream in code aswell? I know nothing about Destiny, but I disagree with you

i liked watching him getting destroyed by that Jow Forums girl ayden palydin. shit was hilarious is was constantly backtracking on his hatred for trump but she dismantled him by simply, intelligently explaining how terrible of a person hilary is. how she's a criminal a verified fucking criminal who accepted bribes from foreign countries and the worst the left has is 'trump jokingly told his male friend grab him by the pussy' but notice how that was one of the main things the left latched onto.

it was just hilarious to see him thinking she was just erratic and crazy and then he realized she was actually hyper intelligent and he was caving to her by the end of it.

only europoor 9gag immigrants post this reaction pic

>nincel isabelle poster
>dumb post
JUMPMAN JUMPMAN JUMPMAN WHAT WAS YOU EXPECTING WOO

>muh gene pool
any normie who spouts this dogshit about muh gene pool is retarded and I cant wait for the third worlders to outbreed your ass then we will see about genepool

also it during that debate she mentioned how hilary despite breaking the law and he said someone is only a criminal if they've been convicted or had charges brought against them so if you steal or commit a crime your only a criminal if your caught was his logic.

she explained how hilary has people in high places which is why she wasnt brought in front of a judge but shes still a criminal.

It's because right wing retards also try to mark off immigration as bad because it's bad for the economy, he explains that's not the case. He knows right wing people are just racist and are scared of brown people but they never admit it on stream. That's why he avoids the unwinnable "culture" (feels) debate with them.

>leftist
>livestreamer
okay, i wont argue with you then. i don't know this man, but i don't mind the description.

have you thought about the possibility of how all you'll ever contribute is either making things comfier via taxes and whatever discoveries, or absolutely nothing?

Attached: Air-fwddash03_robofortune_1p.png (830x421, 189K)

He debated Lauren southern, ( but she just went on about muh culture and white race). He seeks hard debates with the big dudes, but most of them are big youtuber with larger following so they dont notice him ignore him. I think he has a Shapiro debate planned soon at some uni. But yes most of the people he has on are you average retarded Pol monkey

He does seem cool tho