Would you rather a very plain girl who likes the same things you like and you can have good talks with...

Would you rather a very plain girl who likes the same things you like and you can have good talks with, or a dumb stacy that has a 10/10 face and 10/10 body and obeys your every command?

Both love you.

Attached: f25e48a0e00a69225d02a06ff4a20201.jpg (524x895, 290K)

option 1 pleas

Attached: 1497301551573.jpg (390x355, 36K)

Stacy everytime

Plain girl ofc.
I couldn't love some dumb normie Stacy.

i'd rather have the dumb stacy
>physical aspects > personality

>would you rather have a bio cunt or a bio cunt
Yeah... no thanks op. I'll keep waiting for programmable sex bots

Attached: 1542128718338.png (677x381, 114K)

obviously the former. we can steal paintings or something if we want something nice to look at

plain girl because they'll both be 60 year olds some day and how hot they were will be as real as a photograph.

and i can fap to photographs of 10/10s online already.

>obeys your every command?
sorry Jane, Stacey is superior

I'm sorry but guys will always value physical appearance above all else. And if the Stacy also does genuinely love and obey me, then that's all I could ask for in a woman.

They both love me, so I'd be happy with either, but I don't think I would be as happy with some Stacy. They're too social for me, so we'd be too different. Plain girl wins. I don't really care abut obedience or whatever, and it would be really nice to have someone to talk to.

Obeys every command? Ye's please. I can have girlfrI ends aswell then.

first option. I don't care for relationships, but it'd be cool to have someone to always play tabletop games with.

Plain girl by a country mile as long as she's not fat.

Plain girl. I'd give her footrubs while we watch stuff.

This thread proves robots are just as shallow as the normies they claim to hate.

Well, less than half of us chose the Stacy.

>tfw no plain girl life partner to play vidja with

Attached: 1455660209918.jpg (600x549, 16K)

is one person
fuck you

first by far
i would KILL to find someone who likes YTPMVs as much as me
BUT THOSE PEOPLE DONT EXIST

WHY
LIVE

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH

Attached: verysad.png (838x798, 1.13M)

I would always say Option 1, but I'm litterally trying to go for Option 2 right now, as Option 1 is being handed to me on a platter. You'd LIKE to think you can resist physical attraction, but it's not happening, ever, and you find that out when you actually get to have some options in front of you. And if you think the opposite it's because you're just pathetic and will settle for anything. Unfortunate but true.

Attached: 1480719907211.jpg (400x400, 88K)

i see what youre doing OP and i like it. i bet the incels refuse to catch it tho

Option 1. Plain isn't ugly. Stacy will age and will almost certainly do it worse than Jane.

You just haven't met the one yet. Nor will you until you lose your shallow superficial view of the world manchild.

Stacy slave. My love doesnt need to understand me, id love her dumb ass anyways. That said, this is unrealistic. If it was realistic regarding love chances and obedience, plain girl is the genuine option.

If you wanna be happy for the rest of your life...

Plain. I've always preferred normal bodies to gross, fatty ones anyway. Plus homely faces are cuter than "sexy" ones. Just look at Kim Kardashian, she may be a sex idol, but she really looks alien compared to normal humans.

>tfw no dumb stacey gf to do dumb shit with

>plain girl like who is like you
no thanks I hate myself
>cute girl who leaves the dull soul destroying shit to "smart" roasties
That's the stuff

>a very plain girl who likes the same things you like

pls pls pls

Having met option 1 in real life (and crushed on her), I would go for option 1.

There was a time when I for sure would've taken option 2. But after having had great, effortless and interesting conversation with a girl I was attracted to, from the first moment we met, this is far superior than talking to air headed wank material made flesh.