Free pornography and video games aren't worth being born in this shit period of human civilization where we transition...

Free pornography and video games aren't worth being born in this shit period of human civilization where we transition from wage labour to wherever the fuck we are going next.

Attached: tfw.jpg (1000x1000, 174K)

Born too late for a good job market, born too early for widespread AI and robotic takeover + UBI

Born just in time to get cancer at 50 from the stress of wageslavery.

Pure capitalism = survival of the finest

False as long as inheritance exists. An unfit person can have great success, because their parent was fit. Inheritance in general is an enemy of meritocracy.

The poor still need to survive in capitalism try again

>pure undistilled capitalism
>wealth concentrates quickly
>the poor have to fight or starve
>mob rule ensues
>a leader emerges from it

Napoleon, Stalin, Caesar, pick your poison.

M8 just live off multi vitamins and onion rings.
The vitimins give you your necessary vitimins of course and the onion rings give you the calories you'll need because you only move around at work not at home.

HR is a demonic profession

>the poor have to fight or starve
and that doesn't happen in other governments?

It's amazing that people actually need this to be pointed out. Like just shocking, really.

And with enough money, you can give your children a better education and living conditions, so in general, they are more likely to become better people too...

Its easy to see why money tends to accumulate in jut a fraction of people.

Paris Hilton is unfit, yet still rich. This resource distribution scheme isn't fair on the "individual" axis. Capitalism is about bloodline fitness or whatever the fuck you call it, but its not about the individual, and you don't stand on your own legs.
You may be high quality human material, with a potential to be a messiah for human civilization, but not know how to read because your parents were alcoholic junkies who broke your legs as a 4 year old so you can get more money begging.

Why work or have children if they can't inherit what you acquire? Dumbass.

Poor people seem to both work more, and have more children, despite not having anything to leave as inheritance. Almost as if you are WRONG.

fuck i want to be a programmer. but i cant go study computer sience
is it really that hard?
i had a "job" were i leared java but they kicked me out because i "needed too much help with lerning java and wasnt concentrating hard enouht, also i stayed too long and that appatently isnt legal in my country" (eu btw)

i also really really love Video editing, i'd love to work in a vfx studio but all the experience i have is working with sony vegas and playing around with cinema 4d as when i was 12

What you said has NOTHING to do with my post. Do you still believe that "Pure capitalism = survival of the finest" ? Lmfao

>they're trying to create wealth to provide for their kids
>somehow not proving my point
Retard

Rich people have less children, and poor people have more children. The opposite would be expected if you were correct. You aren't correct.

It's all part of the plan. Join us.

Attached: TheHollowMen.jpg (1536x817, 419K)

The number of children is irrelevant. Learn to logic.

You can provide for them when you're alive.
If you die in a freak accident before they come of age life insurance, child services and/or something like it would set them up to launch their lives.
There is no reason for a 45 year old man to inherit wealth from the death of his 78 year old Dad. Maybe in the 19th century.

Hear hear, give me the dark ages! At least back then you knew where you got your noodle oodled, if you know what I mean.

>makes illogical statements
>"learn to logic"
Brainlet detected.

tl;dr: We're going to be China.

Because not everyone knows what other people know.

It's amazing that people actually need this to be pointed out. Like just shocking, really.

Is that supposed to be a pwn? Were you stupid enough to believe "Pure capitalism = survival of the finest" too? Lmfao. That's the context of what I was saying. Moron.

don't believe this guy a major happening is coming soon and the foundation of our society will crumble. just stay alive for a bit longer so you can experience it!

>The reduction of the American man into a feudal serf.
the feudal serf unironically had a better life than most of us

I did not believe in anything. Like I said it is because not everyone knows what other people know.

>Lol he is so stupid its common sense, like you should know this

Thats exactly how you sound like.

if there is enough of a technological leap that a significant number of people are put out of their jobs, optimistically the economy will shift to arts and entertainment focuses. You could learn to make music or images or porn or food. We'll all trade these things with each other that are more like high value crafts for enjoyment because necessities will be very easy to get.
The pessimistic view is that most people will be useless but I think this is way too common and littered with misconceptions.

My brother is under the impression that manual labor would be the first to go, but I really don't think that's true. Manual labor automation requires the intersection of computer systems and sophisticated robotics. The automation of white collar intellectual jobs only requires software automation.
I think the pacing of AI development is more promising than it is for mechanical engineering and robotics. I think managers will be put out of work before their underlings are.

But anyway these things always work themselves out.

>All the video game franchises that I grew up with are now just cash grabs

there's really no point anymore
i think at a certain point i'll just give up video games.

I work so that I can enjoy my life, but I'm working all the fucking time, my body gets beaten to hell and back, and my life won't change until I'm like 90 when I might be able to retire after decades of working nonstop.

Yes, that is exactly how retards who say shit like "Pure capitalism = survival of the finest" deserve to be treated. Glad you're catching up, Junior.

Why?
Original comment is original

France? I know some bakers there kicked up a fuss because they weren't allowed to work on Sunday and serve tourists during their peak season and were losing phat money because of it. They were self-employed and WANTED to stay open.

What kind of nanny state tells someone with the gumption to start their own business "Woah there, bucko! You're working a bit too hard there, might make the wageslaves look bad. Take the day off, or get a fine."