Is it wrong to ironically like Nazis?

Didn't have that notion until you pointed that out.

They only got a headstart because nobody else was a warmongering asshole

>still get beaten by Soviet "subhumans" after taking off the kid gloves

Glad german women got raped wholesale and german men died and got cucked

>They only got a headstart because nobody else was a warmongering asshole
Imagine being this illiterate.

By Hugo Boss himself. Anyone saying nazis weren't hip as fuck is a goddamn plebeian.

Facism is very likable, we're mostly just made to dislike it through propaganda.

Childhood is idolizing Allied aesthetic because it's all you know. Adolescence is idolizing fascist aesthetic because it's "edgy and cool". Adulthood is idolizing communist aesthetic because it's more effeminate, thus looking better on females, and thus more fuckable. Fur, loose clothes, scarves, thick cloth, all these things are best suited to accentuate the vulnerability of femininity, while the standarized and functional style of fascist attire and equipment is inherently masculine, making it less fuckable, and therefore, inferior.
Soviet > Nazi

Attached: glorious ussr.jpg (702x960, 333K)

Tbqh the nazis had a lot of great ideas that work really well.
Just to scratch the surface, nationalism.
If all countries were ethnically homogeneous, stuff like racism, affirmative action, hate crimes, etc, wouldn't exist.
It's only when countries are "diverse" that such things are of a concern.
"Melting pots" sound good in theory, but in practice they just accelerate the fracturing and demise of societies.
>Romans
>Mongols
>Ottomans
>French
>British
>Soviets
And in recent cases
>Americans
>European Union
>Chinese
The rule of empires is that most empires prosper for about 150 years, and then they are destroyed from within and create "dark ages".
Meanwhile, smaller homogeneous countries usually stand the test of time.

Don't believe kike propaganda. The world today would be a much better place if Germany won WWII.
youtube.com/watch?v=Be8u-ZoBG_w

Attached: fuhrer.png (662x675, 196K)

t. tranny
Go back to your containment board. You get the rope too.

This.

>imagine being this much in denial

germany was like a school shooter who cried unfair when the swat arrived

if some group would murder half of your people, bet you wouldnt like that group

Lol no you tard. What they were was old and extremely unprepared military. Hitler gambled as fuck three times in a row - with Poland, Czechoslovakia and ultimately France. France for example was probably the greatest gamble, since French had much greater military presence in Rhineland and would rekt Germans if they wanted. But they let them establish military force there from which later the attack was launched. Attack lead by mostly captured Czechoslovakian tanks mind you, they didn't even had enough of those.

Same applies to Czechoslovakia - if the Czechs would have defended, they would probably make German army unable to do any other conquest for years and that would probably also weaken Hitler's position up to the point he would maybe leave his place. This is another point - in early campaigns the national socialist government still didn't consolidated power absolutely in the state.

That brutal late-war total war machine was something completely different from German army for most of the war.

>the clothing a man wears should be determined by how good a woman looks in them

Attached: FB_IMG_1546637129424.jpg (640x202, 11K)

>if you disagree with me then you are [insert thing i don't like]
Go back.

>what is the rheinland, austria, sudeten crisis?

Attached: 4S4c9h3.jpg (700x609, 163K)

Why would you where the clothing? You're missing the point.

germany on a strategic picture relied on operational surprise to win operations, pretty much all the battles in 1939 and 1940 could have been averted if the defending countries succesfully mobilized and defended to the last
that is why the soviets ultimatly won, they refused to surrender

See
Hitlerino originalino