That is not solvable, since we dont know how much 1 fries is. Just because a picture of 2 fries is 2 dosent mean that one fries equals 1.
Trips of truth
Kevin Bennett
Anthony Harris
Maybe if the two fries were different sizes but theyre not
Hunter Kelly
The only correct answers.
If we had to give a numeric answer, given all reasonable assumptions we could go with 15, but realistically it's not solvable. Pricing is scarcely a linear equation when it comes to restaurant pricing with the amount of deals and specials they have.
Jackson Sanders
You've never been in a store where they said "If you buy 2, you get x% off"?
Aaron Gonzalez
>Just because a picture of 2 fries is 2 doesnt mean that one fries equals 1.
it does tho retard, 1 is half of 2, therefore the price of 1 is half the price of 2, they're the same size
Ryder Baker
Another brainlet
4fries = 4
2fries = 2 because half
1fries = 1 because half again
Half of 2 is always 1
Jack Baker
Idk but for the sake of the problem being solvable, and because it being solvable uses less assumptions just go with that theres not some special deal going on
Charles Howard
Restaurant pricing doesn't work like that. See Without more info, it's unsolvable. With reasonable assumptions just for math's sake, it's 15.
Jaxon Smith
Youre retarded. If there is no added data to the equation why would you add any just by assuming there is? What if there is no special? Were not talking about restaurant prices. Youre thinking too much into it. Its a simple equation with the trick of the 2fries. If you really want to assume that there would be any difference in pricing then please go to McDonalds right now, buy 2 fries and ask if you get the second one for less. You cant just make shit up to prove your point. Thats not how math works
Jeremiah Reed
How is it not convincing? they all look identical
I think you're just pretending to be smart