Why are women so meek and discreet when it comes to mirin’ men?

Why are women so meek and discreet when it comes to mirin’ men?

Attached: CC6A8B21-91BC-430A-9A40-9CFB30E8FE73.gif (480x480, 3.87M)

Other urls found in this thread:

pickeringpost.com/2013/05/09/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/1316/
intellectualtakeout.org/article/muslim-inbreeding-huge-problem-and-people-dont-want-talk-about-it
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

fear of rejection
same as modern men who live off vidya gaems

Rejection from what? You’re just fawning at someone. It’s not like they’re asking out guys.

You really dont get, do you?

Evidently not, you faggot.

Sana is better.

No wonder why you are a virgin

Attached: 1558057211322.gif (511x512, 105K)

I don't think it's a fear of rejection so much as the average female has never NEEDED to actually express interest in a potential partner. All they have to do, given they find a potential partner "satisfactory" is just NOT reject them. 90% of females have never developed the skill of approaching (hence the shyness) someone because they way the sexual marketplace works, they have never had to, they just have to witness the competition between other males and then accept the winner with open arms/legs.

Attached: yoked riker.png (613x754, 512K)

Not just fear of rejection, but fear of retribution.

Women have what they call dualistic mating strategies. Let me go into some background.

Before DNA testing men generally wouldn't have any way of know I'd a kid was there for sure, most communities were small and homogeneous and so the kids would all have the same racial traits and characteristics. As a result, women could cheat and have offspring from multiple partners and get away with it-IF they didn't get caught. If they did, there would be hell to pay. Social ostrasization, lowered status or even physical retribution or even death. You still see this shit happening today.


The benefit though is big. If you have only one partner and he has a genetic defect, let's say a heart defect, or a deathly allergy or a weaker immune system than others, your offspring would inherit this and your chances of passing on your DNA would be greatly decreased.

Now, this is minimal close up, but as you go to the edges of the spectrum this compounds over time and a 1 digit disadvantage to survival quickly turns to two and over time this you get weeded out.

So back to the dualistic mating strategy:

Women have been proven to be attracted to more masculine faces and features around time of ovulation, and softer, more feminine faces the rest of the time.

Why? Probably because this allows the best options for survival. You get the strong "alpha" type to create strong hunter babies to survive but then you have "beta" types to help provide them a home and shelter to survive in. This gives her the biodiversity for her DNA for greater success, while also providing the safe and stable homestead to raise them in.

Now, when I designate alpha and beta it's not one is better than the other, they are different, and each have there place. That's it.


Alphas may have a lot of partners, but the ones that have a family are typically the betas.

people on here are mentally ill

This
Not this

Women don't approach men and have little skills for it and there being a man that's obviously extremely desirable but isn't interested in them is a hit to the self-esteem

He's absolutely correct regardless of that.

They're not.

If you don't catch them miring or they aren't blatantly forward about it, then they aren't miring. Women are never "meek" or "discreet" about showing their attraction.

Now back to the point, the only way this can work, generally, is if the women do not get caught. Who wants to raise another person's child? A lot of men, I'd say most, instinctively do not. Go ask single mothers what dating is like, and I bet they'd say it's harder, not easier, than when without a child.

So, overtime, the women who were subtle had the best chance of diversifying their genes and having those children grow up in a stable household. Those with this skill would be much better off than forward women who had a lot of kids by different men, but no stable partner, and more survivability through diversity than the ones that were only and always monogamous.

Because most so-called mires are actually just girls glancing in the direction of fat incels who then go on to post about the experience anonymously online in order to reinforce their and their anonymous brethren's’ belief that women really do like them but are just too shy to say so.

Haha, the best part bbnis I was taught this in college and read numerous books and studies on it. It was a long time ago, but a good compilation was a book called "Psychoanaylytical perspectives on love"?
I think that was the name, again, it was a college book, but I think that was the name.

It covered the effects of oxytocin on the brain, the changes of a females brain because of the menstrual cycle and progesterone etc. All scientific and really eye opening.

Everybody listen to riker and this guy.

You have roughly twice as many female ancestors than male ancestors. As a male you can impregnate a ton of women, as a female you can only be pregnant with the seed of one man at a time (disregarding weird stuff). You also go infertile at a certain time point and you lose attractiveness fast.
So for males it was (is?) a great strategy to simply express interest in many females, while as a woman you should be picky. What if you are pregnant and someone with better genes comes along? What if you wasted your 15-30 years on the wrong guy?

The other result is that women never really needed to approach guys which is also the reason that women never evolved to be funny.

>absolutely correct

this bonobo doesn't even address the question, he's just ranting about why women want alphas (totally outside the scope of the argument), not to mention it's pretty clear english is this nigga's 3rd/4th language.

I wholeheartedly disagree, please refute my argument

Being subtle had no correlation with being able to pass on genes, dudes chased chicks based ont he genes they presented (healthy weight, femenine facial features), not how "forward" they were. plus, what kind of dumbass would reject a seemingly optimal partner off the basis of "dude she approached me tfwREDFLAG.jpg"

You're a fucking loser, keep rationalizing being a cuck lmk how it goes.

Attached: riker superman.jpg (272x320, 28K)

n-no...

YOU get the point, and i apprecaite that

thumbs up for you

Attached: riker thumbs up.jpg (222x320, 30K)

This is the correct answer.

Attached: D36A6D1F-BAC4-4CFC-979F-6583175D03BD.gif (600x408, 1.55M)

And you think that guys can just chase women without consequence?
If you think your boss' wife is hot you're going to go and hit on her in front of him?

What if she thinks you're hot? What is she going to do? Crab your crotch?

Here, ask yourself this, why do Arabian Muslims have some of the highest rates of incestual genetics on the planet? Maybe it's because women haven't been able to diversify there genes because of how oppressive and deadly it is for a woman to even think of cheating on men?
Without that ability what happens? That's right, you get a small and very fucked up gene pool.

staring is a signal of dominance

This. Women look at me like they are hypnotized. A few days ago one drove her car on the sidewalk and almost hit me while trying to park

>And you think that guys can just chase women without consequence?
Nope, never said that

>If you think your boss' wife is hot you're going to go and hit on her in front of him?
Nope, never said that either

>Here, ask yourself this, why do Arabian Muslims have some of the highest rates of incestual genetics on the planet? Maybe it's because women haven't been able to diversify their genes because of how oppressive and deadly it is for a woman to even think of cheating on men?

that's not an issue of cheating, that's the Quran saying it's cool to bang your cousins.

WHADDYA KNOW OUTSIDE THE SCOPE OF THE ARGUMENT.

>Maybe it's because...
That's unfounded speculation based on your personal feelings, and you're trying to put words in people's mouths. I seriously recommend you concede here, I got nothing to do all night and i already slammed my pound of chicken thighs for the day. You can't form an argument to save your life dude.

Attached: riker relaxing.jpg (320x211, 28K)

>highest rates of incestual genetics on the planet

I think you're talking about Protestant Anglos

i'm just gonna leave this here

pickeringpost.com/2013/05/09/the-cost-of-islamic-incest/1316/

Attached: riker eating.jpg (293x320, 30K)

Nope. Arabs are extremely inbreed.

intellectualtakeout.org/article/muslim-inbreeding-huge-problem-and-people-dont-want-talk-about-it