>calories in calories out
Calories in calories out
Robert Gonzalez
Noah Thompson
Are you just now learning how physics and your body works, retard?
Adrian Nguyen
>muh thermodynamics
Leo Garcia
GonnaNeedBiggerBait.png.exe
Jayden Long
Seems like a good thread to ask this:
How do cheat days affect weight loss?
If TDEE is exactly 2000
and you eat:
1500 monday
1500 tuesday
1500 wed
1500 thurs
1500 fri
1500 sat
4500 sunday
After all bloating/water weight is accounted for, you you literally stay the same weight because of the 1 cheat day, despite the six days in a deficit?
Gavin Smith
b8
Carson James
>A detailed study of total energy expenditure under conditions of reduced caloric intake was done in 1919 at the Carnegie Institute of Washington.5 Volunteers consumed “semi-starvation” diets of 1400 to 2100 calories per day, an amount calculated to be approximately 30 percent lower than their usual intake. (Many current weight-loss diets target very similar levels of caloric intake.) The question was whether total energy expenditure (Calories Out) decreases in response to caloric reduction (Calories In). What happened?
>The participants experienced a whopping 30 percent decrease in total energy expenditure, from an initial caloric expenditure of roughly 3000 calories to approximately 1950 calories. Even nearly 100 years ago, it was clear that Calories Out is highly dependent on Calories In. A 30 percent reduction in caloric intake resulted in a nearly identical 30 percent reduction in caloric expenditure. The energy budget is balanced. The First Law of Thermodynamics is not broken.
Austin Nelson
You gain weight because calorie restriction lowered your metabolism.
Aaron Ortiz
Iq is a meme
Carson Jenkins
can you explain this?
Andrew Barnes
SAM FELTHAM, A qualified master personal trainer, has worked in the U.K. health-and-fitness industry for more than a decade. Not accepting the caloric-reduction theory, he set out to prove it false, following the grand scientific tradition of self-experimentation. In a modern twist to the classic overeating experiments, Feltham decided that he would eat 5794 calories per day and document his weight gain. But the diet he chose was not a random 5794 calories. He followed a low-carbohydrate, high-fat diet of natural foods for twenty-one days. Feltham believed, based on clinical experience, that refined carbohydrates, not total calories, caused weight gain. The macronutrient breakdown of his diet was 10 percent carbohydrate, 53 percent fat and 37 percent protein. Standard calorie calculations predicted a weight gain of about 16 pounds (7.3 kilograms). Actual weight gain, however, was only about 2.8 pounds (1.3 kilograms). Even more interesting, he dropped more than 1 inch (2.5 centimeters) from his waist measurement. He gained weight, but it was lean mass.
Kevin Bailey
Eat Less and walk more you fat pig
Camden Lee
Carter Gray
this is where calories in calories out gets you
Caleb Flores
>empty carbs
Zachary Harris
YES!!
Tyler Wilson
I'm glad I was too poor to pick up bad eating habits and get fat. Thanks mom, your cooking may have been shit but at least you tried.
Angel Evans
Dude, literally add that shit up;
[1500(6)+4500]Cal/7days =1928Cal/day.
you're putting in a lot of effort all week just to blow it in one day, idk how you even eat 4.5k.
Make your cheat days once a month or you're not going lost any significant weight.
Owen Walker
This is absolutely a Jow Forumslack larping as a nigger
Aiden Robinson
I wouldn't be smart enough to compose faux illiterate retard shit like this
Michael Ortiz
Good on the dude
that's still a really inspirational transformation, and he'll be a million times healthier and better feeling at least
Cameron Ramirez
thank you dude, i will take your advices. papa bless