...so? What the fuck does it matter if RT is funded by the Russian government, does that mean we just should disregard all points made by the documentary right from the gate?
...so? What the fuck does it matter if RT is funded by the Russian government...
Other urls found in this thread:
aljazeera.com
dailymotion.com
twitter.com
it's funny how they have this warning for RT, but not for the BBC or Al Jazeera. seems they're ok with state propaganda when it's on their side
Because RT shows no even point in showing the other side of the debate
All the trannies they've interviewed so far in the documentary have been Americans.
But BBC/Al Jazeera/MSNBC/CNN/FOX does?
Obvious agenda aside, that doc is retarded
>check out these three old trannies who regret it
>see, told you all trannies are bad and wrong
That isn't the argument. The fact that RT designs strictly antiwestern material with literal no sources. Even those you've mentioned at least mention their the opponents.
Old trannies regret it because they're old and have had a lifetime to reflect on their decision. Younger trannies don't regret it for this reason, because they are young. How can you be this retarded?
I look forward to youtube disclaimers for all the NGO propaganda online
They were the only trannies they could find that hadn't killed themselves by then.
>put a disclaimer only for the narrative that disagrees with their own
>use Wikipedia as a source, a strong left-wing website not at all known for impartiality, which among others actively censors anti-tranny content
>well our outlets would clearly do no such thing as one-sided treatment of an issue
RT is generally focused on being the other side that other news doesn't show
RT is unironically more pro-western than BBC
It doesn't happen to mine since I'm not an NPC who willingly accepts any dogshit new layout that YouTube shoves out.
Neither does it happen with the video in the OP. Stick to the old layout for as long as you can.
Funny how nobody cares that the BBC is funded by the government. Of course they're completely impartial.
Russia and RT are primarily concerned with undermining globalism. It is in Russia's interest, they try to undermine globalism in any way they can: just look at their backing of Assad and China. They'll back any country that does not bow to the global elite. Whether that's purely because Putin wants to consolidate his control of Russia or he believes he's some sort of protector of national soverieignty, that's what RT attempts to do imo.
wtf I love putin now
Actually they do have that little banner for Al-Jazeera and BBC.
They give the same disclaimer to all state run media videos
They also do the same for the left-wing Bolivian-Venezuelan-Cuban media outlet teleSUR, I think it's automatic as they say Latin American Government singular, rather than specifying that it's multiple governments behind this.
bbc also applies but its obviously less biased.
They also link to the Global Warming wikipedia page for videos based on climate change.
As a Venezuelan I would rather die of hunger (impossible btw because if you just stick something into the ground it will grow) than live with an American puppet
It means it has an agenda, just like you Jow Forums
>anyone who doesn't want to enable mentally ill faggots is Jow Forums
never change, tranny
>As a Venezuelan
>In a country which literally banned the internet
Stop propagating socialism you fucking racist pig
aljazeera.com
the rt one is more noticeable tho
>o sheet, my constant shilling hez been exposed
Fuck off Russians, and take your gay porn with you
How? They're the same size and take up one line of text
i recall the prof who was the head of the ecology department in my uni whom i highly respect was very skeptical about the human involvement in the global climate change
what about the channel logo tho
the rt logo is nearly in the center of the screen
As a geologist the only people I ever meet who deny it (in my work anyway) are southern Americans and Poles, literally no other group I've encountered has denied it.
i didn't say she'd denied the fact, she was skeptical about the human involvement in it
i'm russian btw
RT puts that there themselves. Here's a non-youtube version which displays the logo in the same area.
dailymotion.com
>The fact that RT designs strictly antiwestern material with literal no sources.
do you imply those aren't real trannies or something
Just Gorbuchov in a wig.
You've been fooled all along