People in Scandinavia are healthy because they eat Rye bread, and limit saturated fats. Saturated fats, like butter...

>People in Scandinavia are healthy because they eat Rye bread, and limit saturated fats. Saturated fats, like butter, cause high cholesterol and diabetes
>What do you mean, it's not true? People from Harvard said that's how it works.
>I will rather believe Harvard than you user.

How long until the brainwashing is reversed? Is it even possible in this generation?

Attached: BBVT5wB.img.jpg (624x416, 17K)

Other urls found in this thread:

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862455
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>It's impossible anything else is different about a Scandavian diet than one bad factor
>The most logical explanation that a bad factor is seen in a generally healthy population must mean that bad factor isn't bad
>Everything done by people who are healthier than average must be healthy

Attached: 1509498740750.png (1144x888, 337K)

For me it’s knackerbrod also op is a faggot

The real reason they hate butter/meat etc is because it's impossible to produce enough for a growing global population.
Basically they have already decided on a hundred billion Africans in Europe and North America so you're diet had to change true or not

Just moments ago, an dutch man told me exact opposite.

Post body

Was it on a Bangladeshi football production forum?

no

The Dutch aren’t Scandinavian

>I will rather believe Harvard
Why? Theyve spent the last 50 years leading the charge on affirmative action, gender studies, and critical theory. They're academic output is a joke and their student body is intellectually weak. People only go there for the name now. Now, those John's Hopkins guys, they'll tell you about bread.

there's obviously a coordinated effort to bury the evidence of how necessary dietary fats are in muscle/testosterone production. check out testosterone count over the years. It's gone down further and further every year, as fat consumption drops more and more

Attached: SEC_64635086.jpg (644x338, 58K)

>Sausage rolls are bad IF they're home made
So they're just saying the parents should be buying a food product instead making their child food. Disgusting.

>It's gone down further and further every year, as fat consumption drops more and more

Haha the only thing that could possibly explain a decline in testosterone levels would be eating less fat haha!

Attached: pepedurp.jpg (238x192, 14K)

WTF are parents really being told by the state what they can feed their kids now? How fucking embarrassing. The day of the rope can’t come any sooner. The west truly has become an unnatural Marxist dystopia.

Attached: 605D6269-4896-40BB-83A5-03C86A4466E1.jpg (678x1060, 125K)

Vegans fuck with ranchers and the police do nothing about it over there. Fuck Australia.

no, they're asking for nutrient value if they're home made because home made sausage rolls may not be too high in fat, whereas store bought ones are.
reading comprehension

>Be me. Swiss.
>Eat whatever the fuck
>Tons of butter, beer, cheese, Sausages
>Have longest male lifespan in the entire world
>Surpass even the insect races for Male lifespan
>Smoke a lot of cigarettes, Doesn't matter. Too strong to get cancer.
>Single handedly defeat Hitler (Twice)
>Be really fucking rich
>Vacation in Europe; Everything feels absurdly cheap because their economies are weak
>Retire in Thailand and fuck underage girls and do cocaine
Feels good being the true European master race

King of the trash heap is still a king of trash.

>Single handedly defeat Hitler
Good job contributing to the dysgenic death of your entire continent.

>Peoples created all things of value
Off you go muttalo
Hitler was a fag and so are you. Suck my dick

Degenerate as fuck

>Degenerate
Giving a shit about Jow Forumstard nonsense. Go LARP somewhere someone cares fag

Dude we consume tonnes of butter

>B-b-b-b-ut muh Hitler muh Race muh christian LARP
Don't give a shit. Atheist as fuck nation. Rich as fuck. No fucks to be given. Cruise control for cool baby

Fuck just finished the last shrimp in my package

Attached: 1557396548624.jpg (600x623, 79K)

With a smiley.

Response: none of your fucking business. Smiley.

It's trans fats that should be avoided, not saturated

True

Come back in 20 years after sandniggers have ruined everything.

Birth control, plastics, less nicotine, less manual labour jobs, and less saturated fats.
It can be all, any or none of these

in norway people eat bread up to 3 meals per day and usually put butter on every slice. so we do eat a lot of butter

>less nicotine
Fuck off cigarette jew. The real answer is obestity, because fat cells secrete estrogen.

lol nothing will change. even if it does i make so much money i can move anywhere on earth ^^

...

Too bad the jews are destroying every good coutry at once

It’s also gone down in correlation with a decline in fiber consumption

>jews
lol dude grow out of your Jow Forumsphase already its embarrassing at yoru age to still be into that kid shit

You're a naive fool that will be taken by surprise when the barbarians you invited to your home do what barbarians do.

lol ok Jow Forumstard

>People in Scandinavia are healthy because they eat Rye bread, and limit saturated fats.
Who even told you this shit?

We're more healthy because we mainly don't stuff everything to the brim with palm oil and HFCS like you lads. We also don't eat on the go like you do either. So we eat a lot less fast food.

But the palm oil and HFCS in US food is retarded. When I was in the US everything was candy-tier sweet and greasy. It was honestly slightly absurd.

>When I was in the US everything was candy-tier sweet and greasy. It was honestly slightly absurd.
this is why they complain that food outside of their cunt is bland

By a guy living in denmark.

>muh corn syrup
It's just fucking sugar. The real culprit is overnutrition.

>It's just fucking sugar.
Sugar is already bad. It's literally a neurotoxin that gives you Alzheimer's.

An average grown man shouldn't consume more than 44ml of sugar per day. A woman about 30ml.

>44ml of sugar
care to justify why youre measuring a solid in fluid units

We mainly cook with butter and consume tonnes of dairy based food.

You seem to like an excess of it in everything, though

>It's literally a neurotoxin that gives you Alzheimer's.
lol. Unless you go into full ketosis, neurons ONLY metabolize glucose, you fucking idiot.

Most of your daily sugar intake isn't crystallized sugar.

but that doesnt make any sense either. a liquid with sugar could have any concentration. 44ml of a liquid containing sugar is arbitrary it means nothing....

this, when i visited even the bread was too fucking sweet, and we were served sweet pastries with syrup every morning for breakfast. burger palate is fucked.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29862455

Well, certainly my countrymen, and I don't appreciate it, because it increases caloric density of food and thus contributes to obesity.

Man why you gotta be difficult?

It's 45 grams for males 30 for females. Happy now?

im not being difficult. your original statement meant nothing.

45ml at 1g/mL is different than 45mL at 4g/mL. It made more sense before you said the crystal thing, because I then realized you weren't just doing the burger thing of saying "1 cup of flour" but literally meant 45mL of a sugar solution. Which is so fundamentally stupid I needed you to justify your thought process .

i eat 100g of sat fat a day minimum to spite the libs

So you are saying that a grown man shouldn’t eat more than 45 grams of carbs a day?

So to prove that sucrose is a neurotoxin, these mounties injected mice with a neurotoxin and replaced their water with 20% sugar water. Then they said that the mice had an "alzheimer's phenotype" even though wild type mice don't fucking get alzheimers and they didn't even measure tangles, plaques, or mental acuity. I wonder why this study was only published in a journal with an impact factor of 2?
You absolute fucking buffoon. If you don't know the first thing about science, hastily linking to the first pubmed article you find that kind of looks like it might substantiate your claim isn't going to help.

He said sugar, not carbs

Nah man. Like if you drink a single 33cl can of coke you'll consume 39 grams of sugar. Which is just short of the maximum you should be consuming.

Are you not aware that they are the same thing?

...

It's some science shit man. It looks complicated so I just assume its true.

Screw Scandi diet, I want whatever the fuck slavs are having to be that big.

Sugar is a subset of carbs, dipshit. Sugars are monomers and dimers, cabs from bread or potatoes are much largers polymers. Why does this matter? Sugars are readily converted to blood sugar almost instantly (or in the case of glucose, simply absorbed without modification), while complex carbs like starch require significantly longer digestion.

Please don't do cocaine. it creates the criminals you guys complain about so much. Enjoy the rest, I guess.

>every zoomer is on keto
>every zoomer is also low test
>Ergo: eatin less fat lowers testosterone
This is your brain on Jow Forums.

No, carbohydrates are by definition sugar you fucking moron.
You can divide them into “simple” and “complex” carbs, as you already have figured out.
So when you say “don’t consume more than 45g of sugar” you mean “don’t consume more than 45g of simple carbs”?

Sugar means simple carbs, not all carbs, retard.

Pork, salami, lard, bread, beer, pickled sauerkraut.

but I don't want any more nigs to come here

So you make your dietary restrictions based on random shit you google without even seeing if the source is respected, much less actually understanding the study? Then you spread your non-understanding as advice?

if you want to be reductive to the point of meaninglessness, you are correct, as complex carbs are built from sugars.
in general usage sugar refers to simple carbs, and carb refers to all types.
>houses are by definition bricks, you fucking moron

Holy fuck how can you be so fucking dense you stupid twat, go look up some definitions.
And faggots like you are out there giving nutrition advice, holy fuck

Yeah pretty much.

That’s not the point of my original question. What you meant with “sugar” shares its negative traits with many of the other carbohydrates, even many of those that we consider to be “complex”. Someone could follow your 45g “sugar” rule and still consume way too much actual sugar, in the form of the other carbs.
So you would have to draw the line.

Scandifag here, we put butter and cream in/on everything

I can't believe you are doubling down on your retardation. Sugars are only monomers or dimers. Large carbs are not sugar. You know one way to tell? Starch isn't fucking sweet!

i'm not the guy who advocated the 45 g of sugar limit. i just think sperging out over the commonly understood meaning of a word is pointless.

It’s not pointless, I have just explained to you why the original question made sense.
I only replied to the 14 yo teenager that can’t use google to educate himself () and that’s why he keeps arguing against common definitions of biochemistry

>Finland that high
These charts are so fucking retarded

then the solution would be to provide a total carb limit along with the sugar limit, wouldn't it? fortunately this is an autistic argument on a mongolian basket weaving forum that won't have any impact on the world.

I'm the one giving the correct biochemical definition you stubborn moron.

Something along those lines, yes. It would include people developing an understanding of what some quality carbs are and what aren’t.
To this day, this board idolizes the chicken rice broccoli diet, as if it was somehow the pinnacle of proper nutrition. Fucking rice is maybe a sliver better in terms of negative effects than what people here refer to as “sugar” - and people don’t even fucking get it.

People who aren't retarded know that macronutrient balance doesn' t matter beyond protein intake

Life in Finland is generally okay

Life being okay isn't a good indicator for happiness. Neither are the metrics they use to make these stupid charts. Finns are depressed because of low vitamin D

Perhaps, but people obviously aren't happy, it has an enormous suicide rate.

You can take a pill to get vitamin D

You mean people like you, who haven’t spent a month of their lives professional engaging in any related field?
Yeah, I believe that.

Countries such as Belgium have a higher rate yet I never hear anyone mentioning it

Swiss are worthless MountainJews

Africa has a really low suicide rate. Seems a shit metric. Incel

>fuck underage girls and do cocaine

you know, user, there are bigger joys in life and more to it than this

Once you mature mentally past 13, you will understand

kk Jow Forumstard ill be sure to take your opinion into haahahhahahahahahaha

How do you know there aren't Africans living happier lives?

Upvtoed.

Attached: 1549565518355.png (464x450, 59K)

You are mentally retarded if you dont get the point. Jesus fucking christ im staggered at how low American IQ is

>Israel that high

Bruh...

M8 if you can't spell "their" correctly you have no business shitting on one of the best places to research life sciences (I don't care about their humanities research, and you clearly have no idea how universities are organised).

you sound like a cool guy

Come over to my eastern European country, we can hang out