Fact: most girls lose their virginity before age of 15

>he was

fuck off bot it's an original bang post

Attached: 1550250280549.gif (500x280, 1.99M)

yes, im a female volcel
the thought of exploring sex with someone who will mean nothing to me later in life disgusts me
im a minority but girls like me exist

>15 year old guys of course!

Oh no no no no no bruh look at this BRUHHH NO NO NO AH HAHAHAHAHAHA

Thats not a fact. I'd say here in the uk its more 15/16/17 but anything before is quite unusual except in really poor areas. I was 24 my 3 best friends were I think 16,16 and 21.
I can't comment exactly ona nyone else but I remember being sat in class with a bunch of stacies when we were maybe 15 or 16, and they were discussing how they would like to have their first time

Wasnt there a single guy whom you liked?

>I'm not like the other girls: the post

Yeah you damn right this wasn't an original post on nu-9k in this the literal current year

Attached: 1502140160691.png (239x310, 170K)

>15 year old guys of course!
More like 16-18 year old guys. Or older, really. Back when i was still in school most relationships had the girl 1-2 years younger than the guy.

wrong. I lost mine at 19..

He was Chad right?

a few, i realised i like people online more than i do in real life, ive only been attracted to people ive met online lol
the wording is cringe but im just spreading the word that there are girls who do value virginity

Yikes. More like 18-20.

lame sage worthy bait.
Most girls lose their virginity at 17.4 years, not before 15.

Well thats good user, thanks for restoring my hope.

I doubt that. I'm 18 and have a bunch of normie friends who still have yet to lose their virginity.

Common sense doesn't agree with facts? Maybe your "common" sense isn't that common but idiot sense instead. Makes sense since you are obviously extremely dumb.

Attached: virgins.png (1012x667, 72K)

I NEED THE FUCKKNG SUACE FOR THIS RIGHT NOW!!!!!!

Imagine marrying a girl, committing to her for life, and thinking of her as your soulmate knowing that THIS happened to her. And yet normies brush it off like it's nothing, or even find it a bit attractive because she's "experienced". Probably because it's the norm to accept this now, and they can't think for themselves. And they say Jow Forums is crazy!

>thinking of her as your soulmate
What the fuck is this disney bullshit?

>trusting self-reported data about sex
>ever

Cringe and blackpilled
Keep your chin up bud, were all going to make it

Attached: based pepe.jpg (1000x1192, 141K)

This webm made me pick up my guitar for the first time in like two years. Thanks, OP.

Women with premarital sex report lower marriage satisfaction because they reminisce about Chad
>I could've had Chad, but I ended up this loser?

Attached: 1550366172213.jpg (1223x1541, 368K)

>trusting a basement-dwellimg incel's anecdotal evidence over reliable statistics
Whoever said being an incel is a religion was right.

>2019
>still believing in meme graphs that have been shown to be fakes years ago
Those graphs are not found in CDC, just so you know. Somebody literally made them up and then tagged "source: CDC" to bait gullible brainlets like you.

that's a really odd jump for men near 45

Most teen girls in the US face pressure to have sex early and not be a "prude" or loner
If there's a bias in self-reported data, it'll be towards younger losses of virginity

>SAO
oh my god cringe.

Cope harder redditor

Attached: bc442edc2.png (650x530, 109K)

Are you going to post a source on CDC with those graphs? Or admit they are just made up? Posting a graph from an anti-sex ultraconservative blog doesn't help your credibility you know.

Wrong I still have mine a 34. If I cant fuck a sailor then I won't fuck anyone.

Mind telling us how fat you are?

Say I lived in an area where the age of consent was under 18, how would I go about getting a 16-17 year old gf as a 24 year old man? Not trying to be creepy

Cringe and edgypiIIed

>Kek 145 at 6"0 redhair green eyes.

>anti-sex ultraconservative blog
>Source: General Social Survey 1989-2016 by the CDC

>random r9k dwellers authority vs scientists authority combined with polled statistic

your ego > your brain

Didn't you hear? He got a full immunity plea deal.

Girls don't understand the concept of dignity or honor, evolution didn't select the ones who did and any who happen to mutate the ability become unhappy misguided messes
This girl doesn't actually have dignity, she just has common sense, which is honestly the closest you can get in a woman

>Only attracted to people online
I thought I was the only one. Do you think we're fucked if we ever try to commit and meet the person in real life?

Nothing worse than pure girls being devalued my underage losers
>but ima marry ma highschool sweetheart!
Yeah look how that turned out cucks

What makes you think having sex means not having dignity?

cope harder, read the graph before filtering out information that doesent agree with your worldview

I have a homeless ex sailor living on my property very smart very dangerous man nice body 6 pack abs a little wirey down from alaska has a nice pitbull but what do I get for setting you two up?

not him but as someone who has had sex I can speak from experience that sex out of wedlock and dignity are mutually exclusive no matter your gender

Her virginity, user. Don't settle for less. :^)

Why are you a asshole. You don't deserve to get fucked by a woman

What is it you want user. I really would like kids with a sailor.

Institute for Family Studies is an anti-sex ultraconservative blog. GSS and CDC are not, but their data is not being used in those graphs. Don't tell me you are too stupid to understand the difference? Nothing in those graphs links to legitimate sources like CDC.

That's really subjective based on your views of marriage.
I don't think only having sex exclusively in a committed relationship means not having dignity.

>Girls don't understand the concept of dignity or honor
But robots do?

No, most do it at 16-17, and 15 its legal in my country.

Im going to get my pure gf or die trying. Fuck roasts.

The graphs say source: CDC. Meanwhile CDC does not have those graphs or even data used to build those graphs. How do you explain that?

LoL who the fuck are you bitch
1. I deserve whatever I rape
2. Women are the fuckee, get it

1. Actually backfired because my current emo sweetheart with a background of abuse went out with a sissy faggot to the movies instead of me and my rapist roleplay text game, oh well the bitch was already ruined anyway to put it lightly

He has an IQ of 150 Russian aryan chad mountain man divorced twice yes you heard it twice a little mentally unstable but a real catch like The Greatest Catch rode he hard seas for years with his hard body mind of an engineer heart of a tiger a little battered but surely not broken he a gud boy who din do nuffin but has ties to The Hells Angels

Oh idk what I want mostly just companionship of a warm teenage girl with deep emotions and abdication of all her rights

Broadly speaking they understand it at least a little better than girls, even if they are too pathetic to live up to their own ideal, their ideal at least has a concept of honor or dignity
Women pretty much never understand it, and if they act like they do it's either a coincidence or they are imitating a man who was influential to them
I don't mean this like it's a bad thing by the way, it's just the way the world turns

Generally there's a lot of underage girls at night clubs. I remember it being a game for girls to sucessfully enter one around the age of 15

Ask him if he likes redheads. Give him your phone to text me with

He told me he only likes Amish girls. Not a joke, I just remembered that. Although we are both quite fond of asian prostitute dens.

Like I'll see a thot on the street and say wow look at that I want to rape her, while he doesn't even see her just notices the Amish girl instead. True story. A real champion.

I'm laying in bed depressed because my abused emo girl in this cruel world is having her youth wasted day by day by day why is teenage pussy even put in schools by day with worthless immature faggots by day so no, I don't have the energy to help you out LADY. Maybe show me your fucking tits with a timestamp and your contact info. Ok. Bye.

im so tired of you fucking idiots its like you cant think for yourself. You realise most science is fucking bullshit right? Studies mostly mean nothing because the real world has too many factors to control

yeah but people being raped and diddled probably brings the average down, If the first we hear about in the UK is 15 then the average is definitely like 14 for girls

>Fact: most girls lose their virginity before age of 15

Is like saying

>Fact: You will get wet if you go outside in the rain

Attached: Big think.jpg (472x534, 43K)

>35 years old
>still a virgin

Girls 20 years younger than me have a better sex life than I'll ever have. An hero when?

>Source: General Social Survey 1989-2016

did you ever look it up or are you just insistent that your right, do you need people to link you directly or screencap it? your given the tools to find out the truth yourself, no ones gonna do it for you on your crusade to insist someone else is wrong on the internet.

ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/ the first graph IS in the cdc, you cant just blanket claim that IFS is fake, they source the CDC and GSS and link to the particular era of surveys.

sure, they have an agenda but that doesent mean the information they use is false. They havent been called out as far as I can tell on anything else other than being partisan, and being partisan isnt lying. The IFS is very well sourced compared to even more centrist or non-political studies.

>most girls
elaborate

>before age of 15
yet another PEDO thread

God damn women are promiscuous sluts

Attached: dikes.jpg (958x827, 105K)

You obviously do not read the links you post. They specifically do not source CDC and GSS. It's because IFS is an ultraconservative anti-sex blog. It is a fact that not a single graph on the IFS page is linked to data from CDC or GSS. Prove me wrong. Hint: you can't. Because they do not have such links. They only link to the main page of studies, not actual data, because the actual data doesn't actually exist.

Still waiting for you to post proofs on those 4 graphs of "source: CDC" by the way. Why haven't you done that?

I'm 50 and I believe you.
I have three virgin femfriends. First one lost her virginity at 45 to her husband (just married). The other two think they just didn't find yet an Insanely Rich Charming Prince.
and I'm 50 and neet and no house and no money and not eligible, sigh!

Also, I'm on r9k because I always have a good laugh at those pathetic faggots whining "hurr durr I'm 25 and virgin".

homosexuality is bad, you know. it instantly makes you gay forever.

>"OMG I'm 17.399974 and can't wait to become a real thot!"

there's a non-zero value for men and women above 44, yet I can't understand why the curve is not monotonically decreasing.

this.
"experienced" is the buzzword of a massive cuck.

>1. I deserve whatever I rape
AIDS

btw you didn't need that profuse wording to tell everyone you're even more virginier than all of us combined.

>I'm 50
wowwwww grandpa. what the fuck

Are you a male or female? Why didnt you lose v-card?

The "actual data" files are right here
ftp://ftp.cdc.gov/pub/Health_Statistics/NCHS/Datasets/NSFG
But how the fuck do you view them?

Just take the 2D pill, problem solved

Attached: 1520790354240.jpg (880x1244, 100K)

Yes, and that actual data does not contain anything that IFS has in their graphs.

>ifstudies.org/blog/counterintuitive-trends-in-the-link-between-premarital-sex-and-marital-stability/
are you fuckin retarded? here let me screencap it for you, the IFS USES THIS DATA, and its on better authority, intellectual integrity and scientific rigor than your word that it doesent.

NSFG == CDC study being cited, the thing cited in the first fucking graph that I didnt even post. Go look up the credibility of the ifs before you call it unreliable. They havent posted anything wrong, or ever been caught doing so. The data in the graphs is in the NSFG, the same data being used here by a reliable source.

If you are unwilling to admit its a reliable source you have to post something that both proves it, and then some statistic to falsify this by showing the actual correlation if your claiming the ones posted are not true.

mediabiasfactcheck.com/institute-for-family-studies/ heres your first destination, listed at the bottom of the page past 'yeah they are partisan but they are reliable' is the one time some guy that works for IFS endorsed a bad study while the IFS itself hasnt been disengenious yet. Just biased. And biased doesent mean wrong, even if in your case it does.

Attached: READING.png (963x748, 102K)

wrong (you) oopz

back when i was in highschool in the earl 2000s, most girls started having sex at 12 or 13. Usually with guys twice their age. This was a loooong time before smartphones and social media. I wonder how young they're starting now.

>the actual data does not contain anything that IFS has in their graphs
That's not true. Just look at the questionnaire questions cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/2011-2013nsfg_femalequexoutline.pdf
>Marital history and characteristics of each husband; more details for 1st and/or current husband
>Cohabitation history and selected details on each former cohabiting partner
>Age and date of first intercourse
>Number of sexual partners (in lifetime; in past 12 months; before 1st marriage)
>Wantedness of each pregnancy (by respondent and by father of pregnancy)
>Happiness to be pregnant scale
>Religion and attendance of religious services, at age 14 and currently
>Attitudes: including relationships, sex, condom use, gender roles, and parenthood
The evidence suggests IFS's graphs are legit

Where can I find the full video of this girl fucking

>the IFS USES THIS DATA
How can they, when the NSFG survey does not contain the data in IFS graphs? You can scream blue in the face all you want, but the fact is that NSFG does not contain that data.

>The data in the graphs is in the NSFG
Then link to it. Not a link to a graph on IFS. A link to the NSFG data where it's displayed. You have been asked this multiple times, why are you not linking to the data? Why isn't IFS linking to it either, actually?

tl;dr just give one link to NSFG which contains data of those graphs.

No number of premarital sex partners mentioned, which is what all those graphs were based on.

I lost mine at 13 and im a guy
im also intimidated by women dispite being much taller then them.

>No number of premarital sex partners mentioned, which is what all those graphs were based on.
Are you fucking retarded

Attached: areyoublind.png (625x376, 43K)

>implying that's the same girl
You fags with your guitar girl memes need to go.

Attached: guitargirlmeme1.webm (1080x456, 1.76M)

>aiming a firearm with both eyes open
more proof that anime is a mistake

>The evidence suggests IFS's graphs are legit
Most evidence suggests they aren't legit

is there one with sound please

yep. Which is why i simply can't bare to look at adult women. I can't see them as people.

Attached: 1490453530268.png (388x386, 164K)

seeing posts like this break me

such a waste of a human being

Attached: 1543381878700.gif (412x264, 938K)

youtube.com/watch?v=DwaLKs2fFe8
They have a song for these types of foids.

Attached: 1550214853452.png (469x515, 553K)

You're meant for higher things..

Attached: 1541746874773.jpg (480x522, 19K)

Even once upon a time when they pretended they did, I don't think they really knew then, either.

>Imagine marrying a girl
Strike one!
>committing to her for life
Strike two!
>thinking of her as your soulmate
Strike three! Yer out!