Only the highest of IQ will be able to solve this master piece

it's obviously 25
if you got this wrong you're underage

Bottom clock is pointing at 5 so it's
5+4*5 = 25

Clock = 5 since its 5 oclock

ye didnt see that changed too was to busy getting it done quick then sageing this thread like the one on Jow Forums that just got removed.

27
am genius

looks like no one here has high enough IQ to solve the big problem

Caterpillar on the last one isn't wearing a flower you fucking idiot

clock tells a different time and BODMAS

wrong

it's only impossible if you're a moron

you're a virgin

good stuff guys, you're actually not retarded. nice to see i'm browsing with at least some adults

OK so 3 catterpillars + 3 flowers = 21
12 hours + 1 catterpillar + 1 flower = 19
2 flowers + 6 hours + 1 catterpillar = 15
1 catterpillar + 2 flowers + 5 hours = ?

did I get that all right?

You can't solve it mathematically, but the answer could be 28 if you look at it in a really stupid way.

oh it's x 5 hours on the last one lol

are you fucking blind?
the last line has a multiply symbol

Actually, it could be that the caterpillar that's worth seven is worth 2 from the flower and 5 from the segments, so it's possible the other one without a flower and one more segment is worth 6 rather than 8 like I thought.

>the answer could be 28
holy fuck kys

3x + 3y = 21
1x + 1y + 12z = 19
2x + 1y + 6z = 15
2x + 5z(1y) = ?

is that the question?

yes yes I noticed right after I posted

oops, I fucked up on the last line lol, it should be

1y + 5z(2x)

Could you tell me why you think I should do that?
I'm considering it more likely that the answer is 26 now.
Why are you so mad? This is just for fun.

I noticed the last caterpillar was not only missing the flower, but olso had one extra "bump" in its body. The last one is the longest.

x = caterpillar. y = clock. z = flower

x+x+x=21. x=7
y+y+7 = 19 y = 6
z+6+7= 15 z= 2

7+ 2 * 6 = 19

the answer is 19? did i fuck it up?

anyone who got 26 figured it out the masterpiece and will now get a prize of nothing ;)

You fucked up pretty much in every possible way.

Shit, the right answer is actually
6+4*5=26

Cool, my revised guess was right.
That makes me not retarded.

Attached: happy 416.jpg (1200x1126, 269K)

i know see this faggot just got kicked of Jow Forums so only gave it a quick once over to solve and tell him to fuck off

it's not an IQ test, it's an eye exam

The correct answer is 30 and all of you are even more retarded than I am

first example: 21/3= 7 bug= 7
second: 19-7=12 12/2=6 clock=6
third: 15-7=8 8-6=2 flower=2
fourth: 7+6+2= 15

Attached: ladda ned (3).jpg (135x135, 5K)

>ctrl+f 23
>no results

never gonna make it, all of you

Solved it! Answer is 25

x+y = 7

12z + 7 = 19
12z = 19 - 7
12z = 12
z = 1

x + 6 + 7 = 15
x = 15 - 13
x = 2

2 + y = 7
y = 5

5 + 4(5) = 25

You dumb niggers. The last caterpillar has a different amount of legs and no small flower on its head. It's a completely different variable. YOU CANNOT SOLVE IT.

Meant to say 25, I'm tarded
7+7+7=21
6+6+7=19
2+6+7=15
caterpillar without flower is 7-2=5
two flowers is 2x2=4
6:48=6 so 5:58=5
therefore
5+(4x5)=5+20=25

oh fuck, I didn't see the legs being different, in which case answer is 26

3b = 21
2c + b = 19
f + c + b = 15
b + f + c = ?

b = 21/3
b = 7

2c + 7 = 19
2c = 12
c = 6

f + 7 + 6 = 15
f = 2

7 + 2*6 = ?
? = 19

This is just one massive exercise in simultaneous equations, its really not that hard.
I do not accept that the bugs, clocks, and flowers are different in the last ones as that's obviously meant to confuse people and doesn't actually test their mathematical ability, so you can fuck of.

oh boy
/a/ failed to solve this
/sci/ solved this 250 posts in
hope you guys can do better Jow Forums

Attached: 14502434.png (900x720, 422K)

I mean there's no right angles so I can only assume all the sides are different lengths

>cuboid
brainlet pls go and stay go

Fuck
Didn't see that
It also has one more.. lump.. thing
All's we gotta do is determine the value of the lumps and legs, user
We know a regular caterpillar is 7, without the flower is 5, so how can the value 5 lumps and 4 legs add up to that?

21/3=7

19-7=12 12/2= 6 wich is the value on the clock as the clock is six

15-7=8 8-6= 2 wich is the flowers value

caterpillar without a flower gets minus 2 in worth therefore the catepillar is worth 5, there are two flowers giving it a worth of 4, and the clock is pointing at 5 making it 5+4x5= 25

it is 25 now blow me

Attached: HUZZAH.jpg (261x193, 7K)

I mean six legs showing
So 5 lumps + 6 legs = 9
What is the numerical value of lumps and legs

Attached: 707343C7-3A9D-4950-B053-EDA13299C6F7.jpg (1280x720, 43K)

sorry I never learned shapes

Since we know that the first caterpillar is 7 and the flower is 2, we can subtract those two numbers to get the number of just the first caterpillar without the flower. We can see that the initial caterpillar has 5 body segments while the last one has 6. Therefore since the 5 body segment caterpillar without the flower is 5, we can infer that the final caterpillar with 6 body segments and no flower equals 6. With that knowledge we can calculate 6 + (2*2) * 5 to be 26.
The final answer is 26.

I'm pretty sure the lumps/dots/sections are the only thing on the caterpillars that have value, that would make the large one at the bottom without the flower worth 6.

7 + 7 + 7 = 21
6 + 6 + 7 = 19
2 + 6 + 7 = 15
x + 4 x 5 = y
Impossible to tell what y equals because we don't know what the caterpillar without a bow represents. Are we supposed to deduct that it equals 6 because the caterpillar has six segments?

so the answer is 25 + 1 caterpillar lump?

5 lumps + 6 legs = 5, not 9
I keep fuckig up
Fdkuckinng losing evit here

right except the caterpillar isn't wearing a flower on it's head in the last picture, making it's value 1 less so the correct answer is 18

At what arbitrary point do you determine something can be split off this caterpillar?
If you don't define this, then it could be split down to millions of different pieces and then someone could arbitrarily say that a small green space on it is worth 90% of the value and all the rest is worth the last 10%
The entirety of the caterpillar has to be treated as one single variable that cannot be split up. That last caterpillar is entirely different from the previous. The flower too. It's attached and also a different size. It's not the same as the previous flower.
This fucking puzzle is for niggers to create their own arbitrary answer and then they move the goalposts when someone points out their bullshit. We have to put our foot down and tell them that these are completely different variables and that we refuse to answer them.

>7+7+7=21
>12.5 o'clock+12.5 o'clock+7=32
>(-4.5)+12.5 o'clock+7=15
>7+(2*2)*12.5 o'clock=57
57 o'clock

Bug = 7
Clock = 6
Flower = 4
Bug without flower isn't defined, but assuming bug minus flower, so 3.
Two flowers on top of each other is not defined, but assuming 4*2=8.
The clock with a face at 5 is not defined, assuming it means 5 however.
3+8+5=16.

Attached: 1547350409810.jpg (500x500, 108K)

There is a multiplication symbol in the last one.
I'm not sure how you came to the conclusion that a single flower is worth 4 when flower plus bug plus clock is 15.

so point b is about 3.4cm away from point A using the shortest route? How would we find a point with a longer route?

25 + 1 lump and 1 leg
You won't stop me, I'm too autistic and too invested

Attached: 4A6F47DE-8C28-49BE-8843-32B53A3FEE54.png (640x1136, 317K)

Caterpiller = 7
6 o'clock = 6
flower = 2
caterpiller without flower = 5
5 o'clock = 5

so 5+4x5=25

Attached: 1541304836334.jpg (1080x1003, 47K)

I did it in my head and did 7+6=11, as if it was 5+6. I should kms for missing the multiplication symbol too.

Last caterpillar has more lumps and legs plus a small flower.

3x+3y = 21
12z+x+y = 19
x+2y+6z = 15
x+(2y*5z) = ?

x+y = 7
12z + 7 = 19, z = 1**
7+y+6 = 15, y = 2**
x = 5**
5+(4*5) = 25***

is the bottom blocked by the ground?

I've got it. It's all so simple.
We could just assume that legs and lumps are all of the same value, making both worth 5/11, meaning the correct answer is 25 10/11
Feels good, man

Attached: 86853CED-8F81-47A1-8FC8-5A416883AA08.png (1600x900, 1004K)

what about the head? Is that really not worth anything?

What about the head, user? You mean the flower? Because that was already accounted for when saying we had 11 objects that came out to a value of 5 (instead of 7 since thr flowers are worth 2)

2 flowers is 4
4*5 is 20
Caterpillar with flower and 5 dots are 7
Each dot of the caterpillar is 1 making the last caterpillar be worth 6
20+6=26
All asuming the last clock is worth 5 for pointing at 5

point 2A. if all the possible points are 1,B,2,A,11,1B and 2A. 11 1B and 2A are where the lines meet or the line meets a point.

no I mean the caterpillar's head

Oh wait.. you're saying we have to determine a value for every part of the caterpillar, not just the legs/lumps
If that's the case, would we include the legs that aren't showing? It's internal organs?
Fuck these puzzles I need a rulebook

Or we could simply open do it by how many pixels the extra leg and lump take in comparison to the caterpillar as a whole

How far do you have to stretch to interpret it as that? did you say x was always 2 because its two bars crossed when you were doing math in school? No, that's fucking retarded.

Its just a variable, all the math i did can be done with the letters alone, the pictures don't mean anything.

you just use it as a fucking variable and do some middle school level math to find out what the ? is, there's ZERO need to count any legs

No, thats what i got

Is the caterpillar worth more if it has more segments?

Attached: sigman_frod.png (665x907, 957K)

Do you not value your own legs?
I'm starting to think we approached the entire problem incorrectly. Perhaps it's meant to be a philosophical question rather than a mathematical one

Attached: 96A75425-681B-4824-985E-D22A85DCCF7B.png (741x568, 29K)

if you don't count the head i think that could be how you assign the value for the caterpillar

At some point, it must become a hindrance.Consider being three-legged human.

It makes sense to include every part of the caterpillar, but more importantly, we need to clearly identify the context in which this value stems from.
For a two-dimensional figure, counting pixels seems like the most objective option, but that continues to imply every part of your body is equally valuable, which isn't necessarily true.

Why would it make sense? You aren't counting every petal in the flower, you just count the flower as a whole, also in the clock, you're just counting the hour hand, therefore you only consider one aspect of each one.

You're saying the value of something develops only upon being taken away? It's certainly possible, but inherently subjective.
If there had been an instance in which a single flower pedal or, or example, the seconds hand of the clock were omitted, we'd have to determine their value, but only the caterpillar gained/lost a part of itself.

This one's a bit tricky.

The first 3 are easy:

7+7+7 = 21 (bug = 7)
6+6+7 = 19 (clock = 6)
2+6+7 = 15 (flower = 2)

Now, for the last one:

(1) The bug is now a longbug (increased from 5 to 6 body segments), AND is no longer wearing a flower. These two changes *suggest* that its value should increase by 1 (to account for the additional body segment), but then also decrease by 2 (to account for the missing flower). If all this is correct (and that's a huge-ass assumption), then let's go with longbug = bug + 1 - 2 = 6.

(2) The flowers are doubled up, so I think it's pretty safe to go with flowers = 4.

(3) The newclock is showing 5:00. Since the original clock showed 6:00 and has a value of 6, it's reasonable to assume that the newclock should have the value 5.

So putting it all together, we have:

longbug + flowers * newclock

... which evaluates to:

6 + 4 * 5

which gives us an answer of 26.

In my opinion, this one crosses the line into unreasonable territory, because of all the wild-ass guessing I had to do to determine the value of the last bug.

The answer may simply be 25 if the addition of a lump and a leg ultimately makes no difference. I think the best bet would be to consult an evolutionary biologist in order to determine the extent to which it would assist or hinder the organism's ability to continue its genetic legacy.
For example, female caterpillars may find the extra length attractive, but that may make it more susceptible to being attacked by predators.
All that being said, a more nihilistic approach that acknowledges the pointlessness of the question from any and every option among endless possible perspectives may let us agree upon 25.. or perhaps there simply is no answer.

? = 200 = my score on this IQ test

You get a consistent result if you do the following:

* Don't count the head
* Count each body segment as 1
* Count the flower on its head as 2

So:

* The first bug has 5 body segments and a flower, so it's worth 7.

* The last bug has 6 body segments and no flower, so it's worth 6.

This is fair, but if you wanted to include the head (and assumed it was as valuable as each segment, and that all segments are inherently valuable which isn't necessarily true, but we'll accept it for the this example), the bug without the flower is valued at 5 with 6 segments, making each part worth 5/6 or .8333333...
So we could say the answer is 25 5/6 or 25.833333333 upon assuming a caterpillar's value is solely based on how many segments it has, that all of which are equally and inherently valuable, including the head.
Correct me if I'm wrong.

Attached: 5722047C-5C67-4532-B7F8-F925D11A0F0F.jpg (250x246, 7K)

I considered that line of thought, but I didn't like the non-integer results. So I settled on the following model, which I described in my second post:

It has the advantage of keeping everything as integers.

It's 17 you fucking faggots

you can't verify the value of the segments though, as far as we know the head is worth 4 and each body segment is worth 0.2, there's no way to know.

there is insufficient information to form a meaningful conclusion.

85/3
But more importantly
NIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGERNIGGER

See if you want an answer that only attributes value to that which has been added/removed and values visible lumps and legs equally
Yeah, even though whole numbers don't necessarily make it "right" (since there isn't really a right answer here), I think that's an acceptable way to approach the problem without getting into measures that are overly subjective.
And that shows the true philosophical nature of this question. Legs, while smaller, may be of far more value than lumps, because lumps without legs would arguably be worse than legs without lumps in terms of mobility.
And yet just enough information to create thoughtful discourse.

Attached: 7E15F2E5-F2CF-4461-8B4F-69C3C73BBA42.jpg (317x475, 44K)

Can only be on the interior of the upper square (any other point is reached before some point on the upper square border & it's not B).

Certified Geniuses
uhh uhhh uhhHHHHHHHHHHHHHH B

7 + 7 + 7 = 21
clock + clock + 7 = 19
clock (6 o'clock) = 6
flower + 6 + 7 = 15
flower = 2

bug without flower = 7 - 2 = 5

5 + ((2 flowers) times 5) = 25

one flower = 2
bug without flower = 5
clock = hour hand (6 or 5)

>you can't verify the value of the segments though, as far as we know the head is worth 4 and each body segment is worth 0.2, there's no way to know.

>Yeah, even though whole numbers don't necessarily make it "right"

I agree with both of you.

The only argument I can suggest here is based on the idea of "elegance": I subjectively consider integer values to be more "elegant" than non-integer values.

My view is perhaps slightly bolstered by the fact that at least 6 other posters here arrived at the same answer. I theorize that people tend to prefer a more "elegant" solution, if given a choice of solutions. If we all agreed on what's "elegant" here, then perhaps that's the best we can do, given the mathematical ambiguity of the problem.

I cant believe someone hasnt said this already. OP is a faggot

Attached: 796.jpg (625x626, 80K)