Violent video games have been shown not to cause violent crime

>violent video games have been shown not to cause violent crime
>porn has been show not to increase sexism or rates of rape
>Yet somehow loli pictures are causing pedophelia

I'm not a consumer of loli porn myself but I can't be the only person who sees how dishonest this is. Every time someone says "this piece of fiction displaying this subject (be it violence, rape, etc) causes a rise in this subject" it always turns out to be completely flase. In some cases just the opposite like with video games and a large and ever growing decrease in violent crime.

But somehow loli porn is supposed to be the exception to all this? Where's the evidence? I don't buy it. Pic unrelated

Attached: 08BECE3B-6AFB-4621-B6A5-84A335028F2A.png (1164x1080, 1.14M)

Other urls found in this thread:

sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180116131317.htm
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

As much as pedofags piss me off with their whole "innocence" obsession, gays are clearly worse and a massive genetic dead end. To answer your question, it's because of feminism in the early twenties, the worst thing you could do to a women is say you don't love her, or upgrade her for a younger model.

>>violent video games have been shown not to cause violent crime
>>porn has been show not to increase sexism or rates of rape
>>Yet somehow loli pictures are causing pedophelia
All of those increase the propensity for someone to commit the acts displayed in them

>being gay is worse than raping children
Lol nigga you are obsessed with faggots. Homos are subhuman as well but pedos are on another level of subhumanity

>pedophelia is because of feminism
the ancient greeks would like a word with you

It doesn't though. Every reputable scientific study done on video games has prove categorically that there is no link between violent crime and violent video games. Porn is the same.

Clearly not true, straight pedophiles are still vastly superior genetically. They are not carrying genes that put the brakes on procreation. Like I said, I'm not defending the faggots, just one has clearly more worth than the other.

If that's the case why are you all so worried about getting gay from Jow Forums?

Attached: 089CC93E-DC0D-43E3-B5C0-A383B5490D0C.jpg (720x720, 53K)

I already had the gay before actively using the chans so no real loss here

Nyyyan~~~!! uwu

Attached: 1523275211436.gif (720x720, 432K)

>an unbiased view of this caliber on this board

but why have you come? stranger.

Attached: 1551825136664.jpg (210x246, 11K)

Those studies are funded by the corporations that make that shit. Don't trust them

Who cares about procreation? A murderer who has kids is not better than someone who is not a murderer but doesn't have kids.

k fag
but a lot anons unironically believe that gay propaganda is making them gay
even if it's 2D

He's talking human worth brainlet. You keep getting confused with morality.

Well it would depend on how many people they murder and how many kids they have.

They literally arent porn hub isnt funding studies and you dont need a study to see that crime statistics for violent crimes have been going down while the popularity of violent videogames is going up

Are you denying the loads of scientific research on the effects of suggestion on the human mind?

eat my fucking dick you retarded cat

Attached: __felix_argyle_natsuki_subaru_and_rem_re_zero_kara_hajimeru_isekai_seikatsu_drawn_by_yxyyxy__7fd322a (1747x1200, 443K)

I'm talking human worth as well.

No it wouldn't. Infact the more kids the murderer has the worse he becomes because he is spreading his murderer genes.

Nobody that is actually straight is worried about getting the gay. Anybody that is "turned" or "becomes" gay was already gay. They always were. It's just that it's disgusting to have penises spammed all over the damn board, or have every discussion turn into tranny pill shilling.

>the seller of this product told me it's totally fine!
Are you literally retarded?

>It's just that it's disgusting to have penises spammed all over the damn board, or have every discussion turn into tranny pill shilling.
This

Da Vinci banged 5 year olds

>Statistics show this product is totally fine
>must be a conspiracy
Are you literally retarded porn and videogame companys didnt fund studies on the effects of porn and videogames.

>disgusting to have penises spammed all over the damn board or have every discussion turn into tranny pill shilling
Preach.

Are you seriously suggesting that viewing porn doesn't make you want to have sex?

No. I'm saying (and the studies agree) that like watching rape porn for example doesn't make you a rapist. Or watching incest porn doesn't make people want to fuck their mom.

>violent video games have been shown not to cause violent crime
this is a a lie. being desensitized to violence increases violent tendencies in adolescence.

They are funded by the corporations making them. Pornhub doesnt make porn. You are a very naive person.

>gays are clearly worse and a massive genetic dead
Gays aren't a genetic dead end. A gay guy can always impregnate a woman if he wants, either naturally or artificially. The fact that 99% of his sperm is "wasted" going up the anus doesn't diminish his ability to reproduce at all. It only takes one sperm.

sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/01/180116131317.htm
This is one example of a study not finding a link between videogames and increased violence there are many more and it was not funded by any corporation that would profit off of this result the science is real and you are wrong

It's a subconscious fear. It's not a concern backed by science or anything.

Nice hypothesis, tard.

Attached: 1525759377149.jpg (960x960, 75K)

>The gay gene
No evidence homosexuality has anything to with genetics besides the part where they don't always spread theirs.
Pedos also probably aren't genetic. What they do instead is, through acts of pedophilia, create broken people who raise broken households that create broken people. If we are talking in purely utilitarian terms, gays cause far less damage (a net zero with possibility of a normal good from a surrogate) and pedos cause a net negative (any genetic reproduction is countered by the cycles of abuse that develop from abused victims). Pedos should be shot, gays should just shut up more often.

Words words words, none if what you said has any merit. Pedophiles that are non-active can still raise proper families and have a structured life, gays have none of this, gays by the very nature breed perversion and chaos. This is not a nature vs nurture argument. Gays as a whole poison and corrupt society, for ever y kiddy fiddler that commits crimes, there are tens of thousands gays breaking down family values, ,sanctity of marriage etc. For every Jarrod fogle, there are the Jazz Jennings, Desmond's, Ru Paul's, etc causing massive destruction to children. Look at the down turn since letting gays get married, they are teaching children in school it's ok to be a gender fluid dolphin, and anyone who says otherwise is a psychiatrist bigot. That's chaos, not good decent values. Breeding with someone who is gay is further poisoning humanity. They have no values, everything is sex and degeneracy. I don't fucking care if you call me an idiot or pull up so e psuedo science bullshit, this is the reality.

Here we are, 'muh moral degeneracy'.
First, you obviously ignored the obvious and very well recorded consequences abuse has. The jury is still out on homosexual parents. But homosexual parents are still obviously better than a single mother who can't make good choices due to her childhood abuse and it's faaar better than two straight parents where one is a pedo who abuses their children. Lastly, the whole deal about gays teaching kids it's okay to identify as a jailbait bisected caterpillar gender, I've heard only a few gays take this point while far more obsessively social liberal straight people take the position. So the issue isn't really with the gays their, just another out of control ideology. Anecdotally, most gays I've met hate the social left using them as some sort of victim to spread their politics.
Don't reply to though, because your obviously a pedo who thinks they're superior because you hate fags. Baby raper's like you deserve the cross.

And we come full circle, her you have the faggot accuse others of sins their kind commit. I hate pedophiles, I'm not arguing for their rights, but they are vastly superior from a genetic stand point. The dick has addled your brain, you're too much of a retard to understand civil debate.

I've literally addressed every argument you had. All you got is moving goal posts and vague references to social collapse. Try again big boi.

>video game companies do not benefit from people being told that their product is not harmful
You are indeed literally retarded

Are you just stupid or are you purposley misrepresenting what i said. I never said they wouldnt benefit i said they didnt fund it and it was objective retard

First is true, second - porn do not make you rapist or sexist, but makes you addicted, helps develop fetishes and generally fuck with your sex life, porn is harmful and claiming that it is otherwise today, means that you are ignorant or degenerate in denial, third - maybe not causing, but not helping to cure either.

No instead they're raping people who can't reproduce yet and are sometimes theorized to be the reason some people grow up to be gay, imagine being this retarded

Attached: cuntface.jpg (640x680, 39K)