Why don't NEETs just make $100,000

Polio isn't a nazi

you didn't read the site:

nafcash.com

auschwitz isn't part of the deal. nor has there ever been an archeological excavation of auschwitz alleged "mass graves" ... the graves need to be proven to physically exist. which should be easy since, of course, graves full of millions of pounds of remains and 10s of millions of teeth do not magically disappear.

try Treblinka II:

according to wikipedia:

>Killed: Est. 700,000-900,000

>prove Holocaust is real
>okay here's primary sources
>no prove its real only the way I allow it
>okay here's primary sources
>NO prove its real only in camps I allow
Are you for real

>prove Holocaust is real
hey buddy, did you know? so-called "Holocaust deniers" claim HUNDREDS OF THOUSANDS died in the camps

so, proving people died simply does not prove the holocaust is real. the holocaust is a collection of stories, a narrative.

according to the "holocaust" 2 million people are buried in exactly known locations at "BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II"

of course, you win $1,000 for EVERY GRAVE you prove exists at these exact locations with at least 21 people

>no prove its real only the way I allow it
it's a challenge to prove 1/3 of the alleged "holocaust" exists. sorry, but piles of dead jews at camps where jews died of typhus doesn't prove they were exterminated

>okay here's primary sources
yeah, it's an ARCHAEOLOGICAL CHALLENGE. a mere paper won't cut it. show me the alleged "huge mass graves" and i'll take the reward myself

>Are you for real
did you read the site?

Attached: debating-holocaust-info.png (2402x1300, 330K)

How the fuck would you even prove some died, though?

loc.gov/rr/frd/Military_Law/pdf/NT_war-criminals_Vol-XIII.pdf

From the Library of Congress, Himmler's "Report to the Fuhrer on fighting against gangs". I made a mistake, it was actually not Auschwitz, it was in Russia and Soviet Occupied Ukriane.

From the report:

"1. Bandits

a) Established number of deaths after combat 1,337
b) Prisoners executed immediately 737
c) Prisoners executed after lengthy thorough interrogation 7,828

2. Gang helpers and suspects

a) Arrested 16,553
b) Executed 14,257
c) Jews executed 363,211"

There you go. That's not just 1% (60,000). That's 6%. Now where the fuck is my $600,000?

>so, proving people died simply does not prove the holocaust is real. the holocaust is a collection of stories, a narrative.

Did you hurt your back moving the goalpost that hard?

Attached: 1553565263748.jpg (960x574, 36K)

But user everything going against my narrative was faked by the Jews, this is worthless! Silly you.

Sheeeit, looks like I'm not getting paid today boyos

They played "Dust in the Wind" when I visited Auschwitz, Treblinka, and other camps on tour in Poland for a reason. The ashes were literally dust in the wind. The tour guide had poor taste.

What kind of primary sources are you even talking about

Come on OP, I want my fuckin money

HAS NOBODY HERE SEEN EPISODE 9 OF BAND OF BROTHERS?

Attached: MediumRealGemsbuck-size_restricted.gif (500x266, 474K)

mass graves which would necessarily be there if 2 million people were buried in precisely known locations

>I made a mistake, it was actually not Auschwitz, it was in Russia and Soviet Occupied Ukriane.

so now shooting partisans (completely legal behavior in war time) is now "the holocaust"

ok, no.

1 - it's an ARCHAEOLOGICAL CHALLENGE so you must prove the graves exist

2 - it's at one of the so-called "death camps" listed, none of them are in ukraine

3 - there is literally no proof that document is geniune. points:

- not official stationary,
- no letterhead
- no file no.
- no signatures
- no indication of typist...standard procedure
- it is cut off at the top and at the bottom
- this is only 'page 2'
- no forensic/physical confirmation via mass graves for huge numbers given; where would such numbers of human remains have disappeared to?
- could have been typed by anyone
- completely unverifiable
- it's never said where and by whom was it discovered

>There you go. That's not just 1% (60,000). That's 6%. Now where the fuck is my $600,000?
you can win $1,000 by proving 21 people exist in a mass grave at a camp where allegedly 700-900 thousand jews are buried, in precisely known locations. that has been excavated 3 times

>Did you hurt your back moving the goalpost that hard?

umm, no goalposts were moved at all. please read the OP. it linked the

nafcash.com

site the entire time. this challenge has been around for years

fact is, the "deniers" claim jews died. the "believers" claim millions of jews were gassed and buried in exactly known locations

you must prove THE HOLOCAUST which is much, much more than simply "some jews died in ww2, just like all other ethnic groups in europe"

not to mention, you haven't proven jack shit. show the alleged 'huge mass graves' with proof they were exterminated by nazis for being jews

Attached: what-holocaust-deniers-believe.png (565x616, 67K)

How about these fucking tattoos?

Attached: Tattoo.jpg (1280x720, 146K)

Can anyone prove 2 million germans were raped in Berlin?

>The ashes were literally dust in the wind
this is nonsense and not even claimed by the "eyewitness testimony"

1 - remains do not magically turn into "ash" they DO NOT TURN IN TO ASH AT ALL. they turn into "bone ash" which is far different from "wood ash" or "cigarette ash" which you are thinking of

2 - they are allegedly buried in HUGE MASS GRAVES not "dust in the wind"

3 - 400-500 bodies takes up a cubic meter, if they are cremated. see: 4 - they were not allegedly cremated, but burned in open air pyres

5 - read, from a "holocaust believer" jew book:

from Yitzhak Arad's book - BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes:
>"The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained. Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt... [Eyewitness] Abraham Goldfarb relates: '...we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and we wrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing at Treblinka. We put the scraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intention was that if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found."

that's literally what the jews claim. you don't get ot make up "magically disappearing millions of pounds of burnt jews" nonsense claims

read: nafcash.com
^^^ that's the $100,000 challenge

you need to prove 1/1000th of 1% of 2 million people are buried in one of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" at one of the camps:

>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

>prove rape
not really possible

>prove 1/1000th of 1% of the alleged millions of pounds of remains exist in exactly known locations, merely covered by a layer of soil
should be pretty easy, right?

You're the dummy that just copy+pastes all his posts from an antisememic website. Not even a shred of your posts are yours

Attached: CFB23262-35C0-4978-98E8-7F24E57D69D6.jpg (1280x720, 116K)

why can't you prove 21 people are buried at a camp where allegedly 100s of thosuands of people were gassed to death and buried in exactly known locations?

it has been excavated 3 times, all failed to substasntiate the silly claims

anne frank was deported FROM auschwitz, the alleged "extermination camp" and died of typhus at bergen belsen...

hmmm, really proves the "holocaust" story is nonsense KEK

just one grave (at BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR or TREBLINKA II) with 21 people in it. prove it exists, win $1,000

should be easy?

>Just go dig graves dude

they've already been excavated, some multiple times

did you check the site?

just prove the graves that were allegedly excavated actually exist =)

you know there are literally maps on the website, where some jews fraudulently scribbeld shapes on and "published" to "prove" these graves exist... at places alleged to have 100s of thousands of jews buried there

your syntax is awful

>1 - it's an ARCHAEOLOGICAL CHALLENGE so you must prove the graves exist
>2 - it's at one of the so-called "death camps" listed, none of them are in ukraine

So you'll only accept archeological excavations of death camps because you know that well established historical facts easily debunk your retarded pseudo-scholarship? Whatever. I don't have the time or resources to do an archeological dig of death camps. I'm sure someone else can do it.

As for the source, I should've specified, it's pages 269-272. It's a translation of the German Original, which is what pic related is. The original was even marked "shown to the fuhrer". Also there is a letterhead, "SS Commander" in english.

Wait a minute, you literally just plagiarized that list from a holocaust denial forum:

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=6178

You absolute faggot. You're clearly not interested in having a debate, you just want to shitpost. Why don't you fuck off back to the shithole you crawled out of, fucking retard.

Attached: Himmler_report.jpg (449x606, 41K)

>from Yitzhak Arad's book - BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes:
>>"The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained. Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt... [Eyewitness] Abraham Goldfarb relates: '...we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and we wrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing at Treblinka. We put the scraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intention was that if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found."

from Yitzhak Arad's book - BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes:
>"The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained. Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt... [Eyewitness] Abraham Goldfarb relates: '...we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and we wrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing at Treblinka. We put the scraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intention was that if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found."

treblinka has been excavated THREE TIMES

according to wikipedia, treblinka 2:

>Killed: Est. 700,000-900,000

why can't anyone prove there exists even one grave with 21 people?? hmmm, there should be at least 30x that (in exactly known locations, just want to make that clear)

>When you're so much of a brainlet that when presented with contradictory evidence you have to frantically google search a subject you know nothing about so that someone else can debunk it for you

Tell me, if the holocaust never happened, why do you have to be so dishonest?

Attached: 20190327_000044.jpg (1080x1354, 347K)

>So you'll only accept archeological excavations of death camps
exactly, because a document can say anything it wants

>because you know that well established historical facts easily debunk your retarded pseudo-scholarship?
no, because i know a piece of paper can say anything it wants

>As for the source, I should've specified, it's pages 269-272. It's a translation of the German Original, which is what pic related is. The original was even marked "shown to the fuhrer". Also there is a letterhead, "SS Commander" in english.
show the original then

>Wait a minute, you literally just plagiarized that list from a holocaust denial forum
waste of time to even try to do any research on this silly "document" as a document can say anything it wants

keep in mind, at the NMT, it was "proven" that the germans were responsible for the mass graves at katyn. later it was revealed the soviets did that

there were huge document forging factories set up after the war, this is well known

>You absolute faggot. You're clearly not interested in having a debate, you just want to shitpost. Why don't you fuck off back to the shithole you crawled out of, fucking retard.
except it's an ARCHEOLOGICAL CHALLENGE

fucking retard

how about you show the grave of the alleged 363 thousand jews? fucking retard

THE CHALLENGE:
nafcash.com/

THE GRAVES ARE IN EXACTLY KNOWN LOCATIONS
IT SHOULD BE EASY

goofy """DOCUMENTS""" can say whatever the fuck you want them to say.

prove it's a legit document, faggot. actually don't even waste your time because it's not relevant to the **ARCHEOLOGICAL CHALLENGE**

See:
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12297

>>When you're so much of a brainlet that when presented with contradictory evidence you have to frantically google search a subject you know nothing about so that someone else can debunk it for you
the point is, the document is totally irrelevant to the challenge, hence i copy pasted

This thread is stupid and op is baiting for inflammatory responses. It's like arguing with a solipsist

>why do you have to be so dishonest?
what did i do that was 'dishonest' please be VERY SPECIFIC

nice pic, really shows how laughably fraudulent your goofy document is

which, once again, DOES NOT EVEN APPLY TO THE FUCKING CHALLENGE IN THE OP

>It's like arguing with a solipsist
actually the OP image says

>visit: NAFCASH.com

if you visit

NAFCASH.com

it explains the actual challenge

and some people seem to not be able to read

the challenge is real. how about you show me proof of ONE (01) 'huge mass grave' (21+ people) at one of the camps where allegedly 2.1 million people are buried, in exactly known locations?????

>tfw OP didn't respond to

Attached: 1553052016261.jpg (225x225, 6K)

You copy and pasted directly from a forum because you're a complete brainlet who doesn't understand the subject we're even talking about.

i literally did though

'tattoo' isn't genocide, nor is it proof of a mass grave

>you need to prove 1/1000th of 1% of 2 million people are buried in one of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" at one of the camps:
>>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

read the OP pic

the challenge is at

NAFCASH.com

>You copy and pasted directly from a forum
so? i didn't claim that it was my original content. it's not "dishonest' by any definition

>because you're a complete brainlet who doesn't understand the subject we're even talking about.
you seem to not understand the topic

i made this thread

this thread is specifically about (from the link in the OP pic):

THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

The rules for laying claim to

THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE REWARDS

$1,000.00 - will be remitted for each one of the 100 fraudulently alleged / insinuated - mass graves / cremation pits - of Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - which have been scientifically proven to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of at least 21 people - ($500.00 for at least 7).
YOU = dishonest

dishonest - intended to mislead or cheat

you're fraudulently claiming that some unverifiable document is "proof" that there are HUGE MASS GRAVES at:
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor or Treblinka II

the fraudulent document does not suggest that at all

i literally went through the posts. you didn't respond to it once until now.

i did though. see: >you need to prove 1/1000th of 1% of 2 million people are buried in one of the alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" at one of the camps:
>>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

although you are acting kind of retarded i would like to apologize for my incorrect statement.

YES or NO -- do you believe 2.1 million jews are buried in "huge mass graves" at
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

???

i haven't done enough research to have an opinion. i'm just intetrested in the argument and wanna see someone get $1,000+ on Jow Forums.

>i'm just intetrested in the argument and wanna see someone get $1,000+ on Jow Forums.

Treblinka has allegedly 700-900 thousand jews buried in exactly known locations. recently, an excavation was conducted

youtube.com/watch?v=YuAAjrbbBiM

That video explains it

from [jew] Yitzhak Arad's book - BELZEC, SOBIBOR, TREBLINKA - (chapter 23) - The Erasure of the Crimes:
>"The camp command was confronted with the problem of disposing of the large piles of ash and bits of bone that remained. Ultimately it was decided to dump the ash and bits of bone into the ditches that had previously held the bodies and to cover them with a thick layer of sand and dirt... [Eyewitness] Abraham Goldfarb relates: '...we secretly placed in the walls of the graves whole skeletons and we wrote on scraps of paper what the Germans were doing at Treblinka. We put the scraps of paper into bottles, which we placed next to the skeletons. Our intention was that if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found."

yes, read that again:
>if one day someone looked for traces, they could indeed be found

hmmm, but they can't!

treblinka holohoax utterly demolished here:

vho.org/GB/Books/t/

Look man, I know you'll only accept human remains because you have to pull enough mental gymnastics just to get around documentary evidence.

>show the original then
I did in my post

>Prove it's authentic
Well here's a book with another reference to it. It references the German original from a library

books.google.com/books?id=qPV_rGdhYpkC&pg=PA3&lpg=PA3&dq=report to the fuhrer about fight against gangs&source=bl&ots=2AMRltrulN&sig=ACfU3U0YL3GGPYV_PBx9dHQ9seUKLLIHPw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwi4taaMvKHhAhVFnOAKHcGuCjEQ6AEwD3oECAoQAQ#v=onepage&q=report to the fuhrer about fight against gangs&f=false

The document has a letter head, it was signed, it even said read by the fuhrer. But you're applying an autistic level of skepticism and going "well how do we know that someone didn't make it up just cause lol". If that's the level of skepticism you're going to apply, then I'm sorry but we can't do history. You may as well accept no historical documents.

>hence i copy pasted
Translation: I frantically googled a debunking of this piece of evidence and got called out plagiarizing and am now trying to play it off like it's nothing

>waste of time to even try to do any research on this silly "document"
Yeah dude, research is for faggots. Who does actual historical investigation hahaha

>there were huge document forging factories set up after the war, this is well known
Source?

Look man, if you want to get into a discussion about the remains of victims, we can. Just admit that you won't accept documentary evidence because you're a brainlet.

Your posts read like donald trumps tweets

Attached: 4A6415F6-0455-4DDB-A714-0D08F51B13F8.png (869x640, 151K)

niggas like this is why i'm not a holocaust denier.

>Look man, I know you'll only accept human remains because you have to pull enough mental gymnastics just to get around documentary evidence.

why would i accept a fraudulent document that has no physical remains to substantiate it, made by the soviets (known document forgers)

see: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12297

>Well here's a book with another reference to it. It references the German original from a library
means nothing. a reference to a fraudulent document doesn't make the document any less fraudulent

>Translation: I frantically googled a debunking of this piece of evidence and got called out plagiarizing and am now trying to play it off like it's nothing
but the document IS nothing. it's not even relevant to the thread. i'm not sure why you're obsessing over it

i've copy pasted plenty of things in this thread, mostly from the:

NAFCASH.com

website, which is the source of the

>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

which is LITERALLY the entire point of the thread!

>Yeah dude, research is for faggots. Who does actual historical investigation hahaha
not sure why you're clinging to this fraudulent "document" as if there's a shred of evidence it is legitimate

already debunked here:
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68

now, this thread is about:
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE
linked to in the OP pic

>Source?
jew Josef G Burg (who was in the camps) is the source: vho.org/D/miae/T5.html

translation:
>1945 - 1947 exist in Bavaria 3 document counterfeiting workshops, led by a Lithuanian Jew, who came via Brooklin / New York to the FRG and L.W. called.

>if you want to get into a discussion about the remains of victims
yes, that's what i have wanted. it's clearly laid out in the link in the OP

>Just admit that you won't accept documentary evidence because you're a brainlet.
it simply is 100% irrelevant to the challenge, is it not? yes, it is, brainlet

YES or NO -- do you believe 2.1 million jews are buried in "huge mass graves" at
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

there's literally ZERO evidence that the document is genuine. jew Josef G Burg (who was in the camps) claims: vho.org/D/miae/T5.html

translation:
>1945 - 1947 exist in Bavaria 3 document counterfeiting workshops, led by a Lithuanian Jew, who came via Brooklin / New York to the FRG and L.W. called.

Soviets were NOTORIOUS document forgers. see:

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12297

no dodging:
YES or NO -- do you believe 2.1 million jews are buried in "huge mass graves" at
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

bite me, shithead.

Attached: 1552453884202.jpg (750x742, 101K)

i'm trying to be ABUNDANTLY CLEAR ... no room for misconception.

finally, this idiot: is figuring out that fraudulent documents DO NOT apply to the
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

which is literally LINKED TO in the OP.
the guy is clearly a brainlet that can not read

or he's a MASSIVE BRAINLET that thinks a FAKE DOCUMENT (proven fraud here: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68) that does not mention

>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR or TREBLINKA II

somehow proves that there are HUGE MASS GRAVES in PRECISELY KNOWN LOCATIONS [as alleged] at

>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

so NO you do not believe 2.1 million jews are buried in "huge mass graves" at
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

or YES you believe 2.1 million jews are buried in "huge mass graves" at
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

but NO you can not prove 1/1,000th of 1% (21 jews) are actually buried in any "huge mass grave" as alleged at these camps?

the cognitive dissonance must be killing you

No amount of proof is good enough for you types.
It wasn't evidence based reasoning that made you believe in this and no amount of evidence based reasoning is going to convince you. Thousands of graves could be turned up, and you'd still deny.

actually, it's just the fact that i don't give a shit.

Attached: ye.png (720x646, 501K)

>No amount of proof is good enough for you types.
sure it is

just show the 21 dead jews

>Thousands of graves could be turned up, and you'd still deny.
actually that's wrong, and if you read
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

you would see:
>Eligible potential claimants may choose to submit their "huge mass grave" proofs directly to Greg Gerdes for his endorsement - provided that they publicly pledge to take the matter to court - (sans a jury and both sides pro se legal representation) if they refuse to accept a negative ruling.

no excuses at all

21 dead jews, out of an alleged 2.1 million

>A hallmark of self-deceiving cowards is their acceptance of authority as their truth - rather than the truth as their authority.

>i don't give a shit.
it's literally an imprisonable offense to not believe that millions of jews are buried at

>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

as alleged... despite the fact that literally **NOBODY** has proven that even 1/1000th of 1% of the 2.1 million alleged are actually buried there

at NAFCASH.com

there is a photo showing a "mass grave" with only SIX (06) people. ONLY SIX PEOPLE HAVE BEEN PROVEN TO BE BURIED IN THESE FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED """HUGE MASS GRAVES""" where allegedly 2.1 million are supposed to be buried...

Only lies need to be shielded from debate: truth welcomes it!

Attached: flyer-updated-map-questioning-2 (1).png (1626x2129, 452K)

I'm not addressing the issue of mass graves (yet). We can if you want to, but first you need to admit that you won't accept documentary evidence only because it goes against your narrative.

I've given you multiple sources and have explained you why the document is authentic. The forum post doesn't hold up. I've given you MULTIPLE opportunities to explain yourself. But you're dodging the question every single fucking time.

>it's literally an imprisonable offense to not believe that millions of jews are buried at >>stupid idiot locations that i always only put in greentexts.
i still don't give a shit.

>literally everything else
is it hard to believe i still don't care about an even that happened 70 years ago and had nothing to do with me, my family, my well-being, or my tastes? or am i just suffering from the "cognitive dissonance" when literally giving no thought to it at all? oh wow, when describing it that way, it almost sounds like i literally don't care.

Attached: maxresdefault.jpg (1280x720, 143K)

>I'm not addressing the issue of mass graves (yet).
let me know when you're ready to stop spamming, and post on topic

>first you need to admit that you won't accept documentary evidence only because it goes against your narrative.
i will accept any evidence as laid out in the link posted in the OP pic, which you clearly didn't read:

nafcash.com/

the entire thread HAS ALWAYS BEEN ABOUT "HUGE MASS GRAVES" at
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

your document does not talk about "HUGE MASS GRAVES" at any of these sites. it's totally and completely irrelevant to the entire challenge. it's off-topic entirely

>I've given you multiple sources and have explained you why the document is authentic
no, you haven't. name one nazi who verified it

>The forum post doesn't hold up.
in your fraudulent opinion. there's a whole thread debunking it here:
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68

>I've given you MULTIPLE opportunities to explain yourself
simply: it has nothing to do with the topic. it's totally irrelevant, and does not, in any way, address the challenge as outlined in the link provided in the OP

>But you're dodging the question every single fucking time.
you're dodging
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

the literal POINT OF THE ENTIRE THREAD
the only relevant, on-topic point of this entire thread, since the first post, was the FRAUDULENTLY ALLEGED "huge mass graves" in PRECISELY KNOWN LOCATIONS at:

>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

your fraudulent document doesn't prove this at all

jew Josef G Burg (who was in the camps, persecuted by nazis) claims: vho.org/D/miae/T5.html

translation:
>1945 - 1947 exist in Bavaria 3 document counterfeiting workshops, led by a Lithuanian Jew, who came via Brooklin / New York to the FRG and L.W. called.

why can't you post ON TOPIC? your goofy document, if genuine (it isn't) still remains TOTALLY IRRELEVANT to
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

uhhhh about that user

Attached: neckbeardtriggerr.png (614x1690, 689K)

>i still don't give a shit.
then why are you in a thread for NEETs who want to win $100,000 for proving 1/1000th of 1% of the alleged 2.1 million jews being buried in exactly known spots in this place?

>is it hard to believe i still don't care about an even that happened 70 years ago and had nothing to do with me, my family, my well-being, or my tastes?
it's hard to believe you would enter a thread and continue posting in it if you do not care about the subject matter, yes

>or am i just suffering from the "cognitive dissonance" when literally giving no thought to it at all? oh wow, when describing it that way, it almost sounds like i literally don't care.
the fact that you're posting is ipso facto proof that you do care, and you care a lot. but you've been utterly refuted, debunked, spanked. now you're just trying to bitch and complain: for no reason

ha, pathetic

just 1/1000th of 1% is all you need!

>then why are you in a thread for NEETs who want to win $100,000 for proving 1/1000th of 1% of the alleged 2.1 million jews being buried in exactly known spots in this place?
'cause it's funny.

>but you've been utterly refuted, debunked, spanked.
never posted a shred of a shred of evidence.

>the fact that you're posting is ipso facto proof that you do care
only serious post i made involving me thinking you didn't reply to something and only wanted to see your reply to it for more keks.

>ha, pathetic

>just 1/1000th of 1% is all you need!

>about that
your image fails to address anything posted though. in fact, the post is specifically about the VOLUME of burnt remains, after cremation. it makes no claims about the alleged crematoria capacity. nor does it make any mention of "AUSCHWITZ" which is what your entire pic is about.

the post is about
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

These camps are NOT alleged to have used crematoria, they are alleged to have used ***OPEN AIR PYRES*** to literally ROAST the MILLIONS OF jews right out in the open (but all air reconnaissance photos seem to fail to show this)

Yes, it is claimed that they: dug the bodies out of alleged "gigantic pits" and then burned them on huge pyres made from railroad rails; then threw all the bones and teeth back into the same alleged "gigantic pits" and then cover all the physical evidence with: "A thick layer of sand."

>never posted a shred of a shred of evidence.
even if your life dependent on it, you couldn't

because it doesn't exist

holocaust = hoax

1/3 of the entire "holocaust" (2.1 million jews) is proven ***TOTALLY FRAUDULENT***

and let me tell you: the other 2/3 is pretty much bullshit too

Attached: holocaust-debate-points.jpg (576x720, 299K)

Appearently your severe aspergers keeps you from reading properly. I'm not claiming to show evidence of mass graves. You're just moving the goalpost to "show me PHYSICAL evidence lol". I'm just showing you this document and I'm explaining why you're a retard for denying documentary evidence.

I already explained why the thread you plagiarized is full of shit. I managed to find the document in full, not just page 2. Surprise, it parallels everything I said.

jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/no1128.htm

It has a letterhead. It has signatures. It has an indication of typist. It's more than one page. It was used as evidence in a prosecution exhibit. Now, if you're ready stop shitting your pants, we can talk about the physical remains in Russia and Ukraine.

>jew Josef G Burg (who was in the camps) is the source: vho.org/D/miae/T5.html

Wow! A "holocaust revisionist" site with absolutley no references! You sure showed me user!

>>even if your life depended on it, you couldn't
>tries to pull in interest.
>looks like a raving loon.
pic related, OP's argument face.

Attached: 1553413627032.jpg (568x562, 27K)

>I'm not claiming to show evidence of mass graves
then you're admitting your posts are totally off topic. OK

>You're just moving the goalpost to "show me PHYSICAL evidence lol".
this is incorrect. if you read the OP pic, the "NAFCASH.com" link is displayed in VERY LARGE TEXT at the bottom. if you go to the website, you will see the actual challenge being described, which is proving 1/1000th of 1% of the alleged 2.1 million jews buried in precisely known locations at:
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II

anything that is not relevant to alleged "HUGE MASS GRAVES" at these specific camps is, by definition, totally off topic

>I already explained why the thread you plagiarized is full of shit. I managed to find the document in full, not just page 2. Surprise, it parallels everything I said.

as pointed out, it's totally irrelevant to the point
however, you can make an account and post here in this thread:

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=68

why you believe it is real. that's actually a place to discuss the document

>It has a letterhead. It has signatures. It has an indication of typist. It's more than one page
anyone could make that

> It was used as evidence in a prosecution exhibit
during the same "exhibit" that proved the nazis committed the katyn forest massacre? laughable

>Now, if you're ready stop shitting your pants, we can talk about the physical remains in Russia and Ukraine.
sorry, but these remains are totally irrelevant.

i am talking about:
>Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II
the entire thread, since its inception, have been about these specific camps. now, with one exception (Ponary) they are in POLAND. so both Ukraine & Russia are irrelevant and have been totally irrelevant since the millisecond this thread was created

>Wow! A "holocaust revisionist" site with absolutley no references!
the reference is jew Josef G Burg (author) who was in the camps
also: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12297

>Surprise, it parallels everything I said.
>jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/no1128.htm

yet your link admits:

Note: "No signature" but "Himmler's initials with handwritten note" -- where is the note?

The "letterhead" is typewritten -- the initials are not Himmler's -- etc.

I know I'll be accused of seeing only what I want to see, but the same must necessarily be true of the Americans as well.

For example: where is there any proof that this is a "report from Himmler to Hitler" at all?

At this rate, anybody who captures a typewriter can "prove" anything.

Oh well, at least they're both "copies", not "copies of copies" or "copies of retyped 'certified true copies' of copies", which is more common.

There are 2 "reports" - one in Times New Roman and one on something that looks like Himmler's typewriter, with characteristic type face.
The advantage of "copies" is that they do not need a letterhead or signature.

Porter admits here: jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/letter25.htm

READER: The only revisionist I have seen making any comments in regards to NO-1128 is Mr. Butz in his "Hoax", but only very briefly. He says Himmlers' signature is on an irrelevant p.1 while the execution claim is on p.4. That however seems wrong because the number -2- at the lower right hand, indicates the next page, does it not?

Therefore the execution numbers would be on the first page (which by the way is strange, don't you think?).

Butz's note indicates NMT, vol 13, pp. 269-272 (excerpts only). Would that be a facsimile?

ME: FACSIMILE IN THE SENSE OF PHOTOCOPY, NO -- THEY ARE EDITED AND TYPESET, WITH TYPEWRITTEN SIGNATURES MARKED SIMPLY "SIGNATURE" IN THE TYPESET TEXT.

While Himmlers' signature indeed appears only on a different page,
there seems to be a handwritten signature of a "Werner Grothmann", Himmler's adjutant at the lower right hand of the page detailing the executions.

ME: THERE ARE NO SIGNATURES ANYWHERE ON EITHER OF THE TWO DOCUMENTS.

Absolutely nothing forces him to cough up the money.

See:
>Soviet Union documented use of forgeries
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=12297

i'm not quite sure why the allies would give documentary proof of any sort of "forgery workshop" but why would a jew who was persecuted by the nazis lie about seeing it?

>anyone could make that
The burden of proof is on YOU, you absolute fucking retard. I've explained why your criticisms don't hold up. If you're going to be this fucking autistic about documentary evidence, then we can't know about anything that happened more than 25+ years ago.

Again, I'm willing to give you physical evidence. But I wan't to get this squared away first. Now, admit that you're denying documentary evidence only when it goes against your narrative.

this has been addressed and debunked

if you read

>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

you would see:
>Eligible potential claimants may choose to submit their "huge mass grave" proofs directly to Greg Gerdes for his endorsement - provided that they publicly pledge to take the matter to court - (sans a jury and both sides pro se legal representation) if they refuse to accept a negative ruling.

read:

nafcash.com/

it's all right there!

problem is, you can't prove 1,1000th of 1%. unfortuantely. just show 21 dead jews at one of these camps:
>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

>this has been addressed and debunked
>because the guy says he absolutely swears for realzy
kek/10

none of the way this man types feels human. it feels like all of the greentext and some of the normal stuff like
>read:

>nafcash.com/

>it's all right there!
just feels like low effort copy-paste.

Attached: 1553053280881.jpg (3024x4032, 968K)

>The burden of proof is on YOU, you absolute fucking retard
no, it actually isn't. you must prove the document is legitimate, because there is no reason to assume it is, since the source is most likely the USSR who were notorious document forgers

Himmler, the alleged author, did not verify it.

LITERALLY ANYONE COULD HAVE MADE IT

and, most importantly, which you do not understand because you're retarded:

IT IS NOT RELEVANT TO THE FUCKING CHALLENGE

>I've explained why your criticisms don't hold up
i explained why they're wrong

it's all in this thread, which you can post in. why not debunk the "deniers" then?
it's on topic there. here, it's OFF TOPIC

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68

your own source (Carlos Porter) explains how the document IS NOT GENUINE. LOL!

>If you're going to be this fucking autistic about documentary evidence, then we can't know about anything that happened more than 25+ years ago.
the entire thread is and always has been about ACTUAL MASS GRAVES which would PHYSICALLY EXIST

>Again, I'm willing to give you physical evidence
then post it faggot. post the physical evidence of 21+ dead jews from:
>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR or TREBLINKA II

ANYTHING ELSE IS IRRELEVANT

> But I wan't to get this squared away first. Now, admit that you're denying documentary evidence only when it goes against your narrative.
i am sorry, that would be a lie.
1 - the document is totally and completely irrelevant to the subject of the thread
2 - the document has not been proven to be genuine, at all

explained in these links:

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?t=68

and

jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/no1128.htm
(which you posted, despite it utterly debunking your claims for it to be "genuine" LOL!)

now please, just show 21 dead jews at one of these camps:
>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

>Note: "No signature" but "Himmler's initials with handwritten note" -- where is the note?

Read the source, that's in reference to the Times New Roman copy. The Himmler typewriter report has a typewritten signature.

>No, it actually isn't
Yes it is. I've explained why your criticisms are bullshit. All you can fall back on is "well what if someone made it up lmao". You literally pulled the fact that the USSR forged the document out of your ass, you have NO indication in this case.

When I press you on the fact that you can't deny documentary evidence this easily, you always change the fucking subject to "but I want physical evidence". Again, we can talk about the physical evidence, but I wan't to get this squared away.

>Read the source

buddy that is an exact copy-paste from the website you linked. it is a literal quote from the document that is provided as the first image

remember: anyone can fake a signature, so it doesn't really prove anything at all

Soviets were KNOWN document forgers. see: forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12297

(Most sources are US government reports, not "nazis" at all by the way)

>The Himmler typewriter report has a typewritten signature.

yes, what does "typewritten" mean? it means someone typed it

also, check out himmler's signature, it's the easiest one to fake

>yes, what does "typewritten" mean? it means someone typed it

>denies the existence of type writers.

Attached: 1553661320750.png (500x500, 435K)

>Yes it is. I've explained why your criticisms are bullshit.
no, you haven't. your own source (Carlos Porter) utterly debunks the fraudulent document

>All you can fall back on is "well what if someone made it up lmao".
someone did actually make the document though. you, without a shred of evidence, claim the nazis made it. there's no proof for that

>You literally pulled the fact that the USSR forged the document out of your ass, you have NO indication in this case.
you must prove the document is genuine

i wouldn't waste the time though. even if you manage to do it, it's totally irrelevant to the ACTUAL FUCKING CHALLENGE

i urge you to post here though:
forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68

the proof that it is genuine, where posting about that document IS ON TOPIC (unlike this thread)

>When I press you on the fact that you can't deny documentary evidence this easily, you always change the fucking subject to "but I want physical evidence"
subject was never changed though. it was ALWAYS about physical evidence. documents were NEVER part of the challenge outlined in the OP. read the bottom of the pic, go to the link, and READ THE CHALLENGE

your fraudulent document **IS TOTALLY IRRELEVANT TO THE THREAD** and, quite obviously, always has been

YOU changed the subject of the thread, I never once did

>Again, we can talk about the physical evidence, but I wan't to get this squared away.
you're posting off-topic UNTIL you post about the physical evidence, specifically and ONLY at the following locations:
>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

anything else is 100% IRRELEVANT. go post it on: forum.codoh.com which is a holocaust debate forum

this thread is ONLY about:
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE

pic = you

Attached: brainlet.jpg (645x729, 57K)

1% of 6 million is 6000 and 1/1000th of that is just 60. Regardless of why and if it was regimented and organized campaign I think it's pretty safe to assume well over 60 jews died in nazi Germany during a war that took the lives of something like 75 million people.

>denies that anyone can type anything on a typewriter
so if i typed "1+1=3" on a typewriter, does it become true? Fucking brainlet

Attached: brainlet2.png (213x237, 8K)

>buddy that is an exact copy-paste from the website you linked. it is a literal quote from the document that is provided as the first image

Yeah, and apparently you didn't read it carefully. Because the second report down has a typewrttien signature. The lack of signature refers to the first document.

>someone typed it

It's still a signature you absolute brainlet. You even admit a written signature would be just as easy to fake. Again, the burden of proof is on you to prove the document is fake. All you can fall back on are classic "whatabout-isms".

>DUDE ANYONE CAN WRITE ANYTHING WHY TRUST ANYTHING AT ALL LMAO

please read the link provided in the OP at the bottom. also read this pic: simply proving jews died is not a 'holocaust' sorry.

anyway:

nafcash.com/

>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II
>Are the remains of over 2.1 million jews really buried in the alleged mass graves?

The site of the alleged "graves" - The # of fraudulently alleged phantom "mass graves" - The # of jews who allegedly "magically disappeared"
Belzec - 33 - 600,000 *
Chelmno - 21 - 300,000 **
Ponary - 7 - 70,000 **
Sobibor - 24 - 250,000 *
Treblinka II - 15 - 900,000 *

>The rules for laying claim to

THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE REWARDS

>$1,000.00 - will be remitted for each one of the 100 fraudulently alleged / insinuated - mass graves / cremation pits - of Belzec, Chelmno, Ponary, Sobibor and Treblinka II - which have been scientifically proven to actually exist and to currently contain the remains of at least 21 people - ($500.00 for at least 7).

>reads pic related
>realizes that the existence of anything you can type of was neglected.
>grammar implied that typing didn't exist.

Attached: Capture.png (386x57, 4K)

>no, you haven't. your own source (Carlos Porter) utterly debunks the fraudulent document

No it doesn't. You just can't read. See I've shown how the document is consistent. But all you can fall back on is "DUDE, WHAT IF LIKE, SOMEONE JUST MADE IT UP LMAO".

You started the thread implying that any evidence would do. But when pressed further you moved the goalpost to "I WANT PHYSICAL PROOFS REEEEEEEE".

pic = you

Attached: 1553658444493.jpg (868x2664, 1.46M)

>Because the second report down has a typewrttien signature
which is still a "lack of signature" buddy, typewritten means someone typed it on a fucking typewriter. it's not "signed" it's TYPED, which is the point. even though himmler's signature is the easiest of all nazis to fake (just look at it)

>It's still a signature you absolute brainlet.
well that's where we differ. you think some random person typing "H. Himmler" proves Himmler typed it. i think it only proves some person pressed those buttons in that order

>Again, the burden of proof is on you to prove the document is fake.
it's totally irrelevant to the thread. how about you read the links posted:

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68
also
jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/no1128.htm
and
jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/letter25.htm

the document is simply irrelevant for this thread

i think you're GRASPING AT STRAWS because you know you can't provide A SHRED OF EVIDENCE that 1/1000th of 1% of the alleged people murdered at
>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

actually exist in any of the supposed "HUGE MASS GRAVES" in PRECISELY KNOWN LOCATIONS

quite sad really!

>DUDE ANYONE CAN WRITE ANYTHING WHY TRUST ANYTHING AT ALL LMAO
that's the opinion of the US government when it comes to Soviet documents (with 1 exception: during WW2 NMT).

read NUMEROUS US govt reports on soviet forgeries:
>forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12297

you (brainlet): lol if someone's name is typed on a paper it means they wrote the document lol

regular person (non-brainlet): by default, virtually all "incriminating" Soviet documents must be presumed unreliable until established otherwise

>you (brainlet): lol if someone's name is typed on a paper it means they wrote the document lol

>regular person (non-brainlet): by default, virtually all "incriminating" Soviet documents must be presumed unreliable until established otherwise

If all you have to go on is "anyone can fake anyone's name LOL", then you really are a brainlet. You've not shown any evidence that this document is fraudulent other than "well the signature could be fake". You're also trying to use the fact that the soviets forged documents as a red herring to try and prove this document is fake somehow.

I'm surprised you have the IQ sufficient to breathe unassisted.

Also, I looked at the links you posted. I explained earlier why the forum post is bullshit (I'm not entering the forum cus the thread is 8 years old btw). Also, I explained why my sources don't prove their fake, you just can't fucking read.

don't prove they're fake*

Attached: 1550203642463.jpg (756x1008, 362K)

typewritten signature doesn't count as a real signature though, brainlet. obviously anyone can type anything on a typewritter

>No it doesn't. You just can't read
C.W. Porter is a well known revisionist, ya doofus. He wrote the book "Holocaust: Made in Russia"

He totally debunks that laughable fake document.

The fact is, a "typwritten signature" can easily be made by ANYONE, especially the WELL KNOWN FORGERS aka "Soviet Union"

>I've shown how the document is consistent.
no, you haven't. it claims 300,000 jews were exterminated. show me the physical evidence which suggests this is true.... but post it on:

FORUM.CODOH.COM

because it's off topic for this thread, idiot. this thread is about:
>THE HOLOCAUST ARCHAEOLOGY HOAX CHALLENGE REWARDS

specifically the alleged mass graves at:
>BELZEC, CHELMNO, PONARY, SOBIBOR and TREBLINKA II

why you can't understand this is beyond my comprehension LOL!

>You started the thread implying that any evidence would do
this is incorrect. I started the thread with the following link at the bottom of the OP pic:

NAFCASH.com

it quite plainly tells you to "VISIT" that URL. now, if you followed the SIMPLE DIRECTIONS, in that link, it explains how you win the $100,000 reward

>But when pressed further you moved the goalpost to "I WANT PHYSICAL PROOFS REEEEEEEE".
read above. you didn't follow simple directions, you're a total brainlet

>pic = you
yeah well jews actually admit to playing sports at auschwitz, which doesn't really prove or refute anything. fewer than 5% of aucshwitz birkenau jew testimonies mention gassing. auschwitz is 100% irrelevant to this thread though...

i'm asking for proof of ONE (01) mass grave with 1/1000th of 1% of the alleged remains that are claim to exist at the places i've mentioned (which would come out to 21 dead bodies)

just admit you can't prove 1/1000th of 1% of the "holocaust" at these specific locations [despite multiple attempted excavations...]

Too busy working on a millennium prize problem.

>you just can't fucking read.
actually you can't read, because the OP pic quite plainly tells you to "VISIT: nafcash.com"

which, if you did. would explain the challenge

>I explained earlier why the forum post is bullshit
wrong, it's a 5 page thread

>(I'm not entering the forum cus the thread is 8 years old btw
and how old is the [fraudulent] document? brainlet

you can post in old threads. you're just afraid, because YOU KNOW there's not a SHRED of evidence that the document is legitimate. there's no actual physical evidence to substantiate it either. it's garbage, trash

it's also irrelevant to this thread, and the challenge linked to in the OP pic

>Also, I explained why my sources don't prove their fake
you literally linked to Carlos Porter's utter debunking of that goofy document

Document is refuted in these links:

forum.codoh.com/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=68
also
jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/no1128.htm
and
jrbooksonline.com/cwporter/letter25.htm

now, are you read to post ON TOPIC? please tell me youre ready to stop spamming this thread with irrelevant nonsense

let's start with a simple yes or no question

YES or NO - Does the OP pic have the following text at the bottom: "visit: NAFCASH.com" - YES or NO????????