About to enter law school, is lifting common among law students? Any (former) law students here?

how is this Jow Forums? kys my man

And you still didn't get laid

Fifth year in law school for me (eurocuck)
>Females, females and females only. Mostly degenerate fucks.
>Only left a bunch of manlets and tryhards. Completely feminized for most of them.
>Not engaged in any fitness business exept for the insta thots

The journey will be difficult for ya

Attached: 1566688111937.jpg (640x446, 208K)

Country?

If I'm right about law being combative/adversarial
You're going to crush your generation of lawyers under your foot, because you're not a soft fuck like the rest of them

France-istan

Actually, that's true. Even if i'm autistic as fuck, I assert my dominance over my mates.
In the professionnal sphere, there is still a huge bunch of boomers. In a few years the profession will be almost completly feminized. It'll be a gold mine but you must remain discreet and not expose any politically incorrect belief since the judges are also more and more leftists, feminist scum angry woomen.
One day we'll be totaly screwed, and i'm patiently waiting for the collapse.

t. doesn’t get laid

>t. autist

French user who did law school too. Got my master's degree last year. This user is right, i was the only person who seemed to care about doing sports

cringe

>law
Enjoy being a piece of human filth.

Rather have a scumfuck lawyer from Jow Forums than a scumfuck lawyer who holds all the correct normie opinions

why do you care?

that says more about you than those scumbag lawyers

I'm third year in law school. Most my fellow students are cunts and I can't stand them. Not many of them are particularly Jow Forums.

jelly

Not really as I don't think we should have lawyers or democracy ideally
But if the game is to be played you want someone on your side

Spotted the edgy 17 yo. Besides, a good lawyer doesn't let their personal convictions influence their case work.

>I don't think we should have lawyers
How else do you expect our complex law system to work if there's nobody to understand and practice them?

>or democracy ideally
Oh I get it, you're retarded

>Besides, a good lawyer doesn't let their personal convictions influence their case work.
No shit, which is why it's better to have user than some brainwashed normie

Do you think your country's law system is perfect?

Democracy has a bad time preference, monarchy or dictatorship is preferable for that reason alone. It's also much easier to harass or physically remove a single leader than a whole parliament.
Democracy is a soft form of communism in the sense that the state is the ultimate arbiter.

I entered yesterday and only a couple of guys looked like they lift.
Many nice girls tho.

>It's also much easier to harass or physically remove a single leader

Attached: kimmy.jpg (992x734, 78K)

It's also easier to abuse power as a single leader than a whole parliament. Democracy exists because there's hundreds of examples of absolute states abusing their power to fuck over huge masses of people. Democracy isn't perfect but it's the best system we have and practically the only system where people in power can be removed without violence and bloodshed.

>Democracy is a soft form of communism in the sense that the state is the ultimate arbiter.
Lol wut, the state doesn't even exist in communism. It's literally a stateless society.

Lol you have no idea how the legal profession works, all your colleagues and all the judges will hate you

Also you've never read a judgment if you think judges are leftists

Democracy is objectively worse because of the shorter time preference
>Lol wut, the state doesn't even exist in communism. It's literally a stateless society.
That's why I said a soft-form you brainlet, in democracy you don't have private property because the state is the ultimate arbiter.
Under communism you don't have private property because it gets seized by everyone else

>In democracy you don't have private property
Why do you keep spouting nonsense? I know you're just an edgy teen trying to have cool and different opinions, but at least try to make it sound coherent.

>democracy has a bad time preference

Please stop trying to understand law or politics

Attached: 1445884232654s.jpg (247x250, 7K)

Try not paying your property or council taxes, you don't own your house.

4 years versus a lifetime. One yields a better time-preference.
If I pay for you to rent somewhere for 4 years, or give you a house to own which one would you look after better?

>Fact: you can't sell something you don't own
>Fact: you can sell your house
>Conclusion: you own your house
Your definition of ownership is subjective and doesn't fit any legal definition.

>you can't sell something you don't own
Yes you can, it's called fraud

>Your definition of ownership is subjective and doesn't fit any legal definition.
This is why people think lawyers are scumbags

>Yes you can, it's called fraud
Which is not a real sale

>This is why people think lawyers are scumbags
I don't care about the opinions of people who have no clue about what the profession encompasses. People hate what they don't understand

I'm in an economics and law high school rn and I wanna be a lawyer but everyone says that there are too many lawyers here and not enough judges so I guess I could be a judge. I'd rather be a lawyer tho my debating skills are kike tier

Chiming in just to say you are a retard.

>Which is not a real sale
Yeah duh, I'm not saying fraud is good

I know very well what the profession encompasses, I just disagree with it. There's a difference between what the law is and what I may think it should be
Do you agree with every law? I doubt it

And elections and accountability, and people having the right to decide who represents them means nothing? It's just about who's in the job longer?

Also how the fuck can you not think giving one guy all the power for a lifetime won't end in tyranny and despotism like it has nearly every other time this has happened

Most judges (at least in higher courts) have been lawyers prior to taking the bench, others have usually worked as civil servants and similar things. It's very hard to go straight into the judiciary, altho maybe it's different where you are.

Of course not, that doesn't mean lawyers shouldn't exist. The average layman can't figure out how the law works on his own and needs a professional. Try being the director of a company and figuring out all the legal requirements on your own. A lawyer's job is to take care of that, if some people think they're a scumbag for that, so be it.

Judges are elected officials and virtually 100% of them are former lawyers. You can't just "be" a judge

>If I pay for you to rent somewhere for 4 years, or give you a house to own which one would you look after better?
Answer the question first

Why would you compare a house to a government? That's completely retarded. Dictators have run entire countries into the ground time and again. They don't actually care about the state of their "house", they care about keeping their power.

Sounds like a designed problem, you wouldn't agree that the system is perfect. So it could hypothetically be simplified yes?
Weren't lawyers banned from holding public office for a time in America?

You're not answering the question

>You're not answering the question
In your scenario, the owned house would probably look better but it probably depends on the the owner who lives there and their cleanliness. However, that doesn't prove your point because the comparison is completely irrelevant.

Sounds like a designed problem, you wouldn't agree that the system is perfect. So it could hypothetically be simplified yes?
If you simplify the law so much that a layman could understand it, it would stop working. Most (in my country) are sound and necessary, doesn't mean they're easy to understand.
It's like saying a car sucks because a layman can't build it on his own.

Your inference that you'd take better care of something because you have full lifetime ownership of it is fucking retarded.

What if I'm a slob who doesn't give a shit about the house's upkeep? If I was subject to a tenancy and didn't have full ownership I would have to give a shit. What if I wanted to sell the land when I got ownership, I can't even look after the house now, and this may be against the interests of my neighbours, the current occupiers of the house or the local community? What if I want to renovate the entire house but I'm a cheapskate and do it poorly so that the house's overall value and structural integrity is negatively impacted? What if all I care about is making money as a landlord so I don't give a shit about the condition of the house so long as I can secure rent from desperate tenants?

I could go on but the fact that you think this question would either necessarily be answered the way you think it should is retarded, let alone that you think this has some sort of 1:! logical correlation to questions of democracy v monarchy.

Attached: untitled3.png (640x427, 422K)

Okay so the time preference is better, we agree.
Of course the owner matters, people fuck up democracies all the time so what's the point of contention besides bad people do bad things?
A better time-preference would temper this shitty behaviour

>Most (in my country) are sound and necessary
Most laws in your country are sound and necessary? You're delusional
>It's like saying a car sucks because a layman can't build it on his own.
Amusing that you called my house comparison shitty and come out with this nonsense

By the way this fucking Ben Shapiro shit of 'answer my retarded question' doesn't make you good at debating or sound like a lawyer or whatever it just makes you sound like an annoying brat, as well as seeming intellectually disingenuous and evasive

that face is qt

Yeah lifting is common. Way more common than stem, at least. My law school sold cutoff tees with the school logo, pretty popular.

Is everyone lifting? No. Are people way above average at decent schools? Yes.

>If I was subject to a tenancy and didn't have full ownership I would have to give a shit
I didn't mention anything about tenancy agreements, but I get why you would assume so because of the word Rent.

You would have the accommodation provided for four years, you just give it back to me after four years. Nothing else.

I'm not letting some brainlet take the discussion off track, all his objections apply to democracies too so it's pointless
I assumed people would be smart enough to notice that too

I went to law school ('murica).

I lifted, but 95% of the men are DYEL leftists and 95% of the women are raging leftist feminists.

Oh, and if you're planning to go to a school ranked below the top 50 drop out now, you're wasting money.

Attached: couldhavebeen.jpg (1920x1948, 658K)

2nd week of law school. My lifts have gone to shit from workload/mental exhaustion after a week of bullshitting. The three or four times a week I can get to the gym are pretty good save for the fact my tendinitis prevents me from bench and OHP. One guy in class is pretty yuge. I don’t think it’s uncommon for normies in all academia to hit the gym, but certainly not for those that use it as a coping mechanism for their crippling autism and self-loathing.

I knew a bunch of lawyers and students through friends and family. All of them save for one girl drank a ton and we're dyel.

Lawyer is a Chad profession. Many lawyers are nerds, but a significant fraction are slayers, and of them, most lift.

Is it worth it bros?

>be me
>teaching English overseas for 3 years
>healthy savings account
>scored a 172 on the lsat a couple years ago
>got into some good law schools with good scholarships but chickened out after reading about all the shit that was going on with the legal industry
>daily confronted with what I'll do next with my life

>ITT: non-practicing nibbas about to get a rude awakening
From reading your posts. I'd post a Coomer face but I'm just2tired. Very rare to see young lawyers in court. Haven't seen anyone who look remotely like they lift.
t.in practice for 2 years

Depends on what kind of lawyer. Corporate bro-lawyers lift. Most others dont.

If there’s one thing I noticed in law school — just my experience, I don’t know if this is typical — is that most students are ostensibly quite antisocial. I don’t mean autistic or awkward or anything, they’re just not incredibly interested in being social at school or perhaps they’re shy. The lecture room will often be completely silent during breaks. However, as much as the students seem cold, pretty much everyone is extremely friendly and chattt once finally spoken to. It’s like everyone thinks that everyone else is unfriendly so they’re afraid to speak up.

On topic: there wasn’t a single bodybuilder or whatever in my classes, but there were very, very few fat people. Like two fat girls and one fat guy (2/1 being a fairly accurate studebt gender split). Demographically interesting was the fact that ethnic diversity present among women was completely non-existent among men. While the vast majority of female students were white, there were a few minority and recent immigrant female students. Aside from one Indian guy, all male students were white.

Most of the students could be described as “conservative progressives”: they’re upperclass (often from lawyer families) old money kids with general left leaning academics politics with a conservative flavor when it comes to general taste (general style, music, racism), such as a strange xenophobic slant among most of the women (there was a bit of controversy because many white female students refused to interact with non-white female students). Ironically, the girl with the most radical look (a few tattoos on her arms, slicked back dyed white hair, lots of leather clothing) was openly Jow Forums.

What does it even matter, what kind of moron you are, and what you are doing in law school? Just fucking do what you want, and if you dont have time, fucking make it. Everybody dies, boy, the clock is ticking.

I just started Law school too OP. I’ve been okay. I just schedule my week out ahead so there’s time for gym and the 100 pages of case reading and notes every night. There’s a gym 5 minutes away from my apartment and a branch 5 minutes away from the school. So it makes it easy to go.

sure is tucker max in here

Im going on my second semester, Couldnt really tell you, my class is only me and 7 dudes, all dyels but nice people. The rest 50 ish are women, most of them ugly af, but a couple are pretty cute. Get mires or chiks wanting to talk but I just dont give a shit cuz currently getting over ex gf oneitis. I just go to class and then go home and lift.

So no, no fit bros in my class

what school

most law students are losers and lifters are also losers, so you'll fit right in.

1L here, desu theres only like maybe one other guy who lifts and girls seem to get us mixed up

Currently a 1L who's been lifting for the last 3 years. It's amazing for your mental health, and you'll be an attorney who has a good physique if you stick with it.

UCSG Im not from 'murica

youre a fake law student. Stop bragging about the weights you don't lift you beta pussy

homework in law school is literally just reading. What do you mean? you got them to read for you?

>this, us actual law students can pick out the "someone does my homework and i just study for exams" frauds
>good luck learning every element of a law and how it applies to facts without doing the readings

POST LSATS/GPAs

>you got them to read for you?

Attached: 8BA2614B-7B32-494B-AA82-0A7A8AE4E862.jpg (1024x576, 110K)

based

Do lambos make for good readers?

>Former law student here.
Funny way of saying attorney. Wait a minute.

According to Tai they do.

I’ve only ever seen that commercial. What was the actual bullshit he was telling in his “lessons”?

filled with white whores who fuck the felons they represent and prosecute

something happened, buddy?

fucked my married public defender in the ass after getting me off

rly?

no i actually caught life in prison without the possibility of parole

I can't believe you're larping as an attorney on Jow Forums and pretending law school classes have "homework."

he never said he was an attorney, just a former law student

How do you deal with the fact that you're going to lie, pervert the law and get known scum bags out of prison. You're what's wrong with the world.

Attached: 1566141474399.jpg (887x900, 164K)

Let’s just assume he’s a law student in some third world country where a law “””degree””” is just a 3 month certificate in Abuelo’s shack.

>common law master race here

Because due process my guy.

>He likes English common law defending non-whites

Aw yeah, a Hoppe fan

The patrician autist's political philosopher

2.5 years out of law school here.

If you are have a ton of scholarship money or your parents are paying for it, or you are at a Tier 1 school (or high tier 2). Quit ASAP and dont take on the loans. They are not worth it.

I make (just) 100K per year but have 300K in debt.

I'd much rather be making 50-60K per year with 0 debt, desu.

You are better off not lifting in law school and using the time to be an intern and/or get on law review.

>But I'm just a 1L, I have time for it.

No, again- there is a better use for your time. Meet and know your advisors, know the available programs and clubs and get involved there. ESPECIALLY the schedule and prep for on campus interviews.

I was late to the OCI prep game and feel like I left money on the table because of it. Also the more you legitimately study- the better you will be prepped for the bar exam.

Assuming you mean “if you’re NOT at a tier 1...”

Yes. I meant "Unless you have a ton of money..." or "if you are NOT at a tier 1"...Thank you for the correction.

On the defense side, it is less about lying and more about holding your opponent accountable and making them do their job. You don't lie, you show the weaknesses in your opponent's argument and make sure they follow the rules. Ultimately (we hope) that the judge will allow for flexibility given the circumstances in the interest of fairness and justice.

If you want to be mad at how court cases go, blame judges, bad juries and inept attorneys.