Is this where western society is heading?

If I were japanese I'd be at a soapland every month, at least. God I wish I could get a soapy paizuri from a japanese escort with small tits.

Attached: mpv-shot0001.jpg (872x480, 40K)

Without a doubt.

If we were only counting whites, the west is probably already there.

Marx was right. Capitalism is killing itself. Because we automated everything to make production better and faster by removing humans out of the workforce we are left with men who have no purpose in life. Life is so easy that people rather do nothing but consume which is eventually going to lead to the collapse of all society and depletion of our planet's resources.

>depletion of our planet's resources
good, at least something like this will never happen again on earth.

No because american culture is drugs,sex and violence. If you dont want to be a virgin then embrace degeneracy and become its champion. That simple. Morals are gay as hell anyways and america has fallen beyond salvation so you might as well have some fun. Hurt some people,smoke weed,and fuck a ho.

Would you rather life be hard? Because making your life harder is easy.

And how was capitalism not a problem until the 90's?

Explain yourself, fag

the effect of 80/20 rule is at its peak at current times

all women are whores and don't deserve love from genuine guys, I hope in the future we will be able to simulate sex so realistically that real women become completely useless

>Almost 1 in 4 men in America ages 18-30 are virgins

Yes. This is where society is heading, hypergamy increases day by day and female standards only get higher. I am pretty damn ugly, but I'd be fucking lucky if I got a gf that was my looksmatch.The only hope is the rope, or hiring a prostitute and getting it over with.

Sources cited: health.howstuffworks.com/sexual-health/sexuality/how-many-people-die-virgins-never-have-sex.htm

rebelcircus.com/blog/adult-virgins-among-us-statistics/

theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/03/on-late-in-life-virginity-loss/284412/

Life doesn't need to be hard. Look at socialism in western Europe. Countries like the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden are paradise because they put public interest first and have relatively small populations. It's much easier to provide for 10-20 million people than billions. That's why places like China, the US and India opt for capitalism and say "fuck you, provide for yourself". With that comes all the problems of monopolies, wage gaps, and injustice.

With 7 billion people on earth we can't do anything but keep going full gas. At some point there has to be a great resource war or natural disaster that will reset human population to reasonable numbers.

>guise Niiiiitschh last man is baaaaaad

Attached: 34e9b98985e9931eab39e16e4428ace1[1].jpg (680x339, 35K)

None of these countries got their wealth from socialism or fit the classical definition. By that logic Portugal, Ireland, Italy, Czech Republic and others should be in better shape than the US.

Those countries are better because people are more resilient, work more and have a better attitude, the weather is shitty so you have classes that work all day because there's literally nothing to do outside of the cities, and a bunch of other mindsets and culture that work in their favor.

God I hope so. More virgins means more frustrated men which means more violence and unrest. If it gets bad enough, alternatives like sex dolls and VR will grow and 3D pigs will become obsolete. Either that or society collapses altogether and we start over without allowing sexual degeneracy. Future is looking bright.

Arguing how the weather or "attitude" of a nation affects their prosperity is laughably weak.

Those additional virgins are all volcels you idiot.

Although any sex between 'unspecified persons' is prohibited, it is not between 'specified persons' (acquaintances). In his book, Fuzoku Eigyo Torishimari (Control of Sex Business Operations), Kansai University professor Yoshikazu Nagai, documents that Soaplands exploit this to provide intercourse. The customers pay an entry fee to 'use the bathing facilities' and a separate fee to the masseuse. Whilst the massage takes place, the two become 'acquainted' so any paid sexual services that follow are not viewed as prostitution as defined by the law. This interpretation of the law has been in use since the 1960s.

Japanese are so fucking autistic sometimes.

That's fine too. Sexless men, regardless of voluntary or involuntary, means less power to roasties. So either way, women are losing their grasp on the sexual marketplace and we'll have a future free of their degeneracy soon.

Anime is considered a niche and unpopular thing in Japan and has an even harsher stigma than it does in America. Guys are getting their porno fix from JAVs and stuff smuggled in by the yakuza, the same 3DPD stuff everyone else likes.

China is ran by a communist government and India was strongly socialist until the '80s.

false. today's chads are tommorow's incels. the 80/20 will always hold true. even if all men looked like brad pitt the 80/20 rule would still hold true women would simply find other ways to rank males.

no, but you will die out as natural selection prevents you from existing further lol

the natural selection argument is retarded, ugly women can reproduce just as easily as good looking women.

This is where all societies will head to eventually, japan is just slightly ahead of the pack, which isn't surprising when it's sufficiently technologically advanced and safer than the rest of us.
Ultimately though, it's the result of making womens lives better and giving them more free reign with minimal to no repercussions for their actions or choices. So you won't see this shit happen in say, saudi arabia unless they change their shit drastically, but you will see it happen in india or africa much sooner as they're on the same paths, their countries are just technologically inept and shitholes that lack safety and comfort.

China isn't socialist in the slightest, it's completely capitalistic and run by a mafia government.

No, in the west most women will still have sex, just because they can.

What's 80/20 mean? That 80% of males fuck 20% of females?

>women can have sex
>men can't

80% of the females are getting fugged by 20% of the males

Most of those Japanese virgins have jobs

They're just being kicked out of sexual selection by women

Exactly. What people don't realize is getting rid of ugly men and losers won't do anything. It will simply raise the standard to newer and more impossible heights. Women will still be hypergamous even if everyone looks like Chad. Instead of going for meathead jock Chads, they'll go for rich billionaire Chads and the jock Chads will become the new incels. The root of the problem is female sexuality and how they're wired to select mates, not the quality of men.

But that's wrong you fucking retard. Where did you get this from?

Not that user, but 80/20 isn't literal. It's more of a description and generalization of sexual dynamics when left unrestricted. See pic related.

Attached: 80-20 redpill.png (1867x439, 101K)

Your math doesn't add up. According to you every woman has access to a top rich billionaire Chad. The world has 3.5 billion billionaire Chads? And what, 50 billion other men?

Yes, and it is completely natural.

Attached: GlaDv3N.jpg (500x637, 107K)

you're right, it's outdated, from the early 2010s. now it's more like 100% of women fuck the top 5% of men.

are you an actual retard, or a woman?

>top 20% of men
There's that meme again. What determines who goes into this group and who doesn't?

If this Nurgle looking blob can get a gf then so can you. I believe in you anons. Be yourselves!
vimeo.com/333853620/33bc710553?cjevent=a6bc6077734f11e980e800b70a24060f

Attached: great-unclean-one-nurgle-death-guard-wal-hor[1].jpg (1024x617, 85K)

I said hypothetically if everyone looked like Chad.

You didn't answer the question, why do you think every woman on the planet has access to a billionaire Chad?

Jaw size, protrusion of infraorbital rims, gonial angle, maxillary forward growth and width, eye coloration, clavicle length, height, robust wrists etc. in other words, the signs of optimal (mostly craniofacial) development that women look for.

>100% of women fuck
>25% are still virgins in the 18-24 age group

How do you objectively quantify this? And what makes you think any of that matters for shit? You're literally describing your gay crush, not what women care about.

HEIGHT
FACE
FRAME
status
wealth

Most maxillofacial surgeons use 16cm rulers to measure those attributes.

>How do you objectively quantify this?
Most of those things are measurable.
>And what makes you think any of that matters for shit?
Women consistently choose guys with those things.

They don't, that's the whole crux of hypergamy. Women still desire the most exclusive and valuable men despite not having access to them. And the billionaire Chads will be the most exclusive.

>Most of those things are measurable.
Then provide an objective way to measure it. One that gives out an objective number for every male.
>Women consistently choose guys with those things.
I should say "source" but even you know you are talking out of your ass. You are so obviously gay in denial you project your homosexual lust on women.

>Countries like the Netherlands, Denmark and Sweden are paradise

All three of those countries would be in the bottom third for per capita income among US states.

>Countries like the Netherlands
> put public interest first
Hahaha yeah that's why they went the US route and now we need to go into loans to get college education when before they gave us money for it. They only care about the elderly, they couldn't give a fuck about anyone below 40. Also our housing market is trash

>and have relatively small populations.
Wtf did you just say?

That's where humanity is heading. Expect future human population ratio to be 5 women to every 1 man.
If women can keep civilisation going, that is.

>"attitude" of a nation

Not that user, but as Milton Friedman pointed out - there are virtually zero poor Swedish-Americans, either. (And yes, there are quite a few Swedish-Americans.)

That makes it difficult to determine whether Sweden is prosperous because of how it is governed, or because Swedes are just so damn good that they manage to get shit done no matter how they're governed.

it may already be there but no one has actually done the research yet. Its fine though because nothing but good will come out of having more and more men who have nothing to live for and everything to die for.

The more we have the bigger the uprising will be.

Dude, how fucking hard is it to believe that most women will be attracted to tall, fit, and successful guys with nice faces? You're really deluded if you don't think these are traits that are objectively seen as attractive.

If they are objectively seen as attractive then it should be easy for you to provide a source. A link to an actual scientific study.

you are so deep in the closet its not funny

Not him, but:

>Tall
Is bad unless you are appropriately sized. Sticks are terrible. You want taller and well-proportioned according to the height. Too tall is a turn-off too and it actually fucks things up a bit (including sex). Taller > Equal height > shorter, though.

>Fit, and successful guys with nice faces
Nothing against this besides a personal anecdote: I've seen women cheat on fitter men to get with fatter men for the "safety" of the fitter guy not going. I'm chalking this one up to a weird outlier, though (fame and fortune were not factors unless the women in question got a bigger portion of the guy's money). I'd agree personally though.

>Successful
Highly depends. Two guys who are the same with the only outlier being status or finances? Sure. But most success comes with a cost, either emotionally or physically. Some women prefer a bear and some women prefer a guy in a suit they won't see most of the day.

>Nice face
Faces are still somewhat personal favor (green vs blue eyes, hair color, facial hair vs no facial hair). It's mostly bone structure that's objective.

Issue with all of these, there are so many things people forget: A guy's attitude (is he cocky, is he a go-getter, is he edgy, etc). The way he presents himself (high voice from the throat or an actual manly voice from his lungs). And god forbid, the way he makes a woman feel through his words, actions and how he performs in bed.

Wow. And yet the 19 year old virgins here complain all day despite being the statistical majority among teenagers. Snowflake weeb bastards.

So 9/10 men aren't?

Attached: 1452329719191.jpg (1436x1077, 105K)

Asia is going to be a depressing place when the 1 child policy bullshit catches up with them.

that doesn't make any sense, all you're doing is making more losers

you know what, just keep saying this please okay

no way, anyone with that much money must be a business man of some kind