Tfw would be willing to share Chad with seven other girls than give a non-Chad my attention

>tfw would be willing to share Chad with seven other girls than give a non-Chad my attention

any femanons know this feel?

Attached: 146921548363.png (609x749, 17K)

Why 1244357

i guess all of them, now leave roastie.

That's a very natural feeling sweetie.

In a nomadic society, there would be polygamy for sluts like you

Preferring to be part of Chad's harem rather than fuck a beta is pretty much ingrained in women. In the caveman days this is probably how things were desu. We're seeing society regress to this primal state where the top 5% of guys get to fuck 90% of the women.

Yes, 100% agree. I love my boyfriend very much. If he were to leave me, I'd rather beg him to stay and compromise that he can fuck anyone he wants or share him with others. Even saying that, I'm a 100% monogamous person and don't believe in polygamy. I wouldn't cheat on him of course even though he's with other women.

Not true it's civilization that gave rise to women slitting around. Nomads weren't degenerates. Don't feel bad though you're the product of 10000 years of shit women.

desu i'd want my kids to have the best possible genes so yeah i'd fuck chad.

I won't share but I'm not ready to have a bf yet. I had one and it was to restrictive, he always wanted to know where I was and got mad all the time when he found out I talked to other guys so it is so not worth it. I have way more dates without a bf than I ever did with one so right now I don't want a boring relationship.

There really is nowhere left for the true yucky forever alone fembot.
Fuck off, alt Stacy.

>We're seeing society regress to this primal state
No we're not. Its always been like this, always. You guys compete against each other and the winner scares all the other guys off so we accept the guy on top. Let me say that again. We don't pick the winners, guys do after fighting among yourselves.

You're both right. This is getting interesting.

Maybe our ancestors instituted marriage not as an oppressive structure, but as the only functional safeguard against the animalistic tendency towards harems and the inevitable cumulative accumulation of power into a very steep pyramid with a very wide base at the bottom

I'm sorry but that's actually pretty disgusting behavior. This isn't coming from a place of incel rage that all women are whores, etc., it's just genuinely disgusting. It's self-deprecating, whether or not you realize this. Know your worth or be nothing more than a toy.

Attached: 7.png (259x224, 32K)

If other men left women alone if they were married or clearly with another guy but men don't work that way. They see a female they want then they go after the guy she's with and try to knock him down. I have guys all the time shit talk every bf I've had. Even their best friends go behind their back and offer up negative things to me.

You are a cuck.

Also a cuck.

Same but not just any guy. I want it to be with someone I love

I'm not a cuck, I wouldn't receive any sexual pleasure from it, just jealousy and pain. but how can I say I love my bf if I can't do anything for him?

I was part of a Chad harem for a short time and honestly it was pretty great. So it's not such a strange desire.

Girl im seeing said something similar to me. She said that even if I cheated on her, she would be extremely devasted but would come crawling back like a dog back to me. I own that girl, shes indecisive so I tell her what to do and she likes it.

She sounds pathetic and spineless and you sound like a beta male.

thank god for people like you, blows this whole hypergamy thing out of the water. i bet your boyfriend is not a chad, you just love him

Unironically this is how I feel. Why would I want my children to have weak/ugly genes? I don't even care if he doesn't stick around. I'd rather be a single mom than have no children, and I'd rather have no children than go out with some beta cuck.

>Its always been like this
It really hasn't though. Women may have had the desire to but due to their financial dependence on men and men's dependence on them for access to their kids we saw very little hypergamy. You have a defeatist view.