What is objectively wrong or bad with nudity?

What is objectively wrong or bad with nudity?

Attached: 1548734629143-1.jpg (1752x2628, 602K)

I'll answer your question but first I'm gonna need you to explain how something can be objectively right, wrong, bad or good.

I guess making a case for the existence of objective morality is a good starting point, user. Go.

I'm with this user.
Whether "good" or "bad" is a matter of opinion; however, humans clothe themselves for legitimate reasons.

Nothing is bad about nudity, the government oppresses it so it seems bad

Nothing.
It makes people feel uncomfortable (either out of embarrassment, arousal or just surprise) so we like to reason that there must be something wrong with it. Like homosexuality or being the quiet kid in class. It's not "normal" so people try to make it stop. Beat up the gays, put the weird kid in special ed. Shame people who are being naked.
Nakedness is our natural state. Everyone is naked. It's the most normal thing in the world.
I'm not saying I support people walking around naked because I find it very uncomfortable too, but there's absolutely nothing wrong with it as long as it's not some form of sexual harassment.

>Guy in the back taking a picture
lol

Some people are too stupid to realise that clothing is for protection against the environment.

Everyone you see nude outside, of the bedroom or the beach, is doing it either as advertising (Europe takes "sex sells" way too far) or attention-seeking.

>red-pilled

>blue-pilled

it is not objectively wrong, however it is bad for a well regulated society that functions with rules of decorum. Hard core conservatives of all types, not just Muslims want women especially to cover up because it distracts men, heightens their base aggressive-competitiveness, and takes them from being as productive as possible in the context of furthering society. Also jealously.