Tfw had an abortion because the baby was bumming me out

women's singular use in life is to be a baby machine

You talk like a man who's in financial charge of a black man's offspring. i admire your outward pro-life stance but we all know deep-down inside, you're a smug liberal

Try doing that in Alabama, oh wait, you can't without going to jail.

Attached: 2gr6fa.jpg (480x360, 51K)

>all these angry fembots replying
absolutely based

>Kept the child
>Dumped him on his grandparents and continued to ride the cock carousel
>Barely ever see him
>Post "#momlife" and "#ilovemyson" for people to see what a great person I am

And Missouri is next to ban abortion.

Attached: 1555574627566.png (442x481, 90K)

>we all know deep-down inside, you're a smug liberal

See? Why bother coming on Jow Forums at all if you already know all of my thoughts and opinions? You can debate with the liberal cucks in your head without my help.

women need to be controlled as they don't know what's good for themselves

Honestly I'd not trust a girl if she went like 9 months without drinking.

How is killing some unintelligent piece of fetus meat more important than the fact that women have all the power when it comes to the choice to do it?

How many times has a man wanted his fucktoy slut to do abortion but she just didn't because she wanted some change in her life or any other bullshit reason?
Oh wait, that part doesn't matter to ppl here.
How many baby throats you slit when cumming in your onahole?

Now Alabama black population will be 50%. Genius. Become the first majority black state

>DUDE, abortion is exactly like masturbation!

Attached: 1552286446731.jpg (387x437, 41K)

Hahaha roastie absolutely seething

>How many baby throats you slit when cumming in your onahole?

none because semen is not a fertilised egg that would develop into a human being

OBVIOUSLY all of you would comment on that part, not anything else.
So fucking predictable.

Women are too childish to have a choice in anything

More proof that estrogen causes narcissistic sociopathy
Seething femoid

Im commenting on this stupid whore

>dude killing a fetus is totally different from killing a newborn child

Attached: 1541815939035.jpg (600x600, 174K)

Killing a living being counts as murder yes

It's the other way around. You put the baby inside of you without its consent.

it's self-defense. i have a right to defend my body and mind from this unwanted intruder.

it is your consent if you dont use birth control
rapes are incredibly rare when related to abortion

using all the necessary safety measures and still having a car crash doesn't mean i consented to being paralyzed.

YOU GO GIRL YAAASSS

Someone post some abortion webms my gf saw one and threw up turned super pale like

I was thinking.

If I would get pregnant. Have a child and transfer its blood into my body. Would I get to live longer and gain immortality and eternal beauty?

Attached: tg.jpg (268x268, 20K)

Then don't get in the car. You could easily solve this by not having sex.
>b-buh it feel good!!
So does heroin, just wait to have sex with someone you'd be alright with having a kid with.

Getting into a car crash would be more akin to rape. Consensual sex would be more like entering into a demolition derby, so yea, you knew the risk beforehand.

Attached: 1d0d1cf.jpg (724x700, 56K)

but like driving sex has a lot of uses other than dying in a car accident or getting pregnant. mostly its useful for strengthening bonds between people outside of your family and is important for healthy relationships.

na, rape is when someone gets in a box truck and runs you over. car accidents and accidental pregnancies are a very good comparison as neither are the desired outcome of getting into a car/between the sheets. though your demolition derby thing is actually a really good metaphor for sex with the intention of becoming pregnant.

It's amazing to me women will kill an abortion from consensual sex and then weep about animals being killed for meat

This is supposed to be the more "emotional" gender with actual feelings.

Oh well honestly, I present a new law: Kill women if they want an abortion, thus ridding both of them.

How the fuck is that even comparable?
Why would you rather kill a baby than not have sex?

>car accidents and accidental pregnancies are a very good comparison as neither are the desired outcome of getting into a car/between the sheets.
Only if after your crash you murder the next kid you see

Women don't have feelings they only care about a thing called oppression, thats the only thing they care about. They have no feelings unless society turns them on.

So what if you didn't consent? The baby consented even less. This doesn't justify killing them. This argument could be used to justify killing kids most ages too

If Republicans wanted abortions women would be against them lol

Look at how women blame men for sexualizing them but sexual shit was enforced by feminists and when men were in charge of how women dressed they couldn't show fuck all skin.

Women are literally a hivemind of idiotic retards with no logic solving part of their brain.

>someone
Mothers in 2019.
That's your CHILD, are you serious?

Why is it the governments place to tell people what they can and can't do to themselves? I don't give two shits about someone wanting to cut their dick off or guys wanting to fuck guys, people can do whatever the hell they want so long as I can do what I do and they don't get in my way.

abortion is the insurance plan. it's the last line of defense and is always regrettable when you have to use it but you can't drive around a ruined car and not get your injuries treated. avoiding the accident is key but just saying "well now you have to deal with it with no opportunity to recover" isn't fair.

sex is enjoyable and useful. it's a foundation of romantic relationships and the driving force behind most male/female interaction.

>This argument could be used to justify killing kids most ages too

carrying a pregnancy to term is consensual though in theory/ i guess it's not any longer in places where abortion isn't legal but CHOOSING to carry the full 9 months and give birth is consenting to being a mother or to give up for adoption. that child has your consent to live by that point.

so if you are saying you don't have the right to defend yourself against your children? like you could go hold your mom and dad against their will for 9 months and they can't raise a hand to stop you?

Because women literally cannot think without a figurehead in front of them to make decisions for them. America would have been a shithole a long time ago if it was run by women

>too abortions
Probably for the best

>having sex before marriage or at least a year of dating
Christ, I hope Western civilization crumbles. You deserve it, all of you horny fucking idiots.

So you killed a baby out of convince?

>unwanted intruder
Shouldn't have let him in in the first place then? That's within your scope of control

I still don't care what people do with their body it's simply none of my business.

>so if you are saying you don't have the right to defend yourself against your children? like you could go hold your mom and dad against their will for 9 months and they can't raise a hand to stop you?
Except, he doesn't choose either.
And my parents would gladly accept to live a restrained lifestyle for 9 months if it was a matter of literal life or death.
You're like "ok kid, i don't want to feel nauseous at morning for 9 months so you'll have to die for my sake :^)".
Despicable.
Are all roasties all sociopathic cunts now?

>mostly its useful for strengthening bonds between people outside of your family and is important for healthy relationships
This would mean a lot more if 82% of women who aborted were single.
We live in a hookup culture, not one that encourages relationships. Abortion just fuels it further.

Muh consent
Muh choice
Muh body

Be honest, it's about being able to take Chad cock raw and then abort the baby because you were too retarded to put a condom on or use birth control.

>'now'
>implying they haven't always been sociopaths
Sorry you were late to the party

pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph5b4d971db4b25
All the proof you need to see why roasties are retarded. Chad whines like an annoying little bitch and they comply. Like c(l)ockwork.

Weren't* single. Fuck.

>CHOOSING to carry the full 9 months and give birth is consenting to being a mother. that child has your consent to live by that point.

What why?

>implying you let intruders in

i guess you're against deportation since you let mexicans immigrants in by boarding their country.

>ok kid, i don't want to feel nauseous at morning for 9 months so you'll have to die for my sake :^)

you act like there is something wrong with that even. like why would i want to be sick for 9 months if i can go to a medical professional and get cursed in under and hour?

being single is even more of a reason to get an abortion though. the world doesn't need more fatherless children.

because if you hadn't wanted it to live you would have gotten an abortion???

>because if you hadn't wanted it to live you would have gotten an abortion???

Perhaps some conditions changed, perhaps I just want to kill the child after birth because it would be cleaner or whatever. As long as someone personally doesn't feel like aborting for whatever reason, but still doesn't want the kid, your reasoning justifies murdering kids.

then there is adoption. i mean honestly not familiar with adoption laws and whatever but pretty sure as long as your kid isn't like 18 you can get rid of them in a non-murder way via adoption or just being a sucky parent so they take them away from you.

Yeah, but maybe that takes time, so I'd rather just kill the child. I mean as long as I didn't consent to something and it would improve my quality of life to kill a baby, I'm totally allowed to do so, right?

>killing your unborn child
>themselves
pick one.

you did consent because you carried to term at that point though. i think you're intentionally trying to muddy the water with a bad faith argument.

abortion isn't simply i dont want to be a mother it's i don't want to be a mother + plus i don't want to carry a child 9 months and cause undo damage to my body and mind.

once you've carried the child and choose to take that risk to your body abortion is unnecessarily and adoption becomes the next viable means of rejecting motherhood.

>Your
Not mine, Tyrone's. If you're dating people that make you worry about them aborting your child you shouldn't be dating them.

I'm talking about the woman killing her child.

>Sorry you were late to the party
I come from a country where women are more decent, if a roastie would try this kind of shit, she would be beaten to death.
Western woman truly are the scourge of humanity.
>you act like there is something wrong with that even. like why would i want to be sick for 9 months if i can go to a medical professional and get cursed in under and hour?
Of course something is wrong you selfish retard!
You'll kill someone just for petty comfort?
Besides, if you didn't want to be pregnant, condoms + pills exists, idiot.
Now you make me sick, according to your logic i'll have the right to put you down, huh?

9 months isn't petty turdhead and condoms + pills aren't 100% effect or available to everyone.

>according to your logic i'll have the right to put you down, huh?

na, you have the power that every father has to just walk away from a pregnancy with virtually no consequence just like you are consenting to being around me by posting here. if i held you against your will for 9 months of your life you could kill me though i would be in favor of your right to do so even.

>abortion is the insurance plan
>murder is considered insurance

Attached: pepe_the_frog_sad~2.jpg (422x360, 26K)

Once again. None of my business what someone on the other side of the country does. I only have a problem when it's my child at risk which it won't be because I'm not going to have a child with a lunatic.

>sex is enjoyable and useful. it's a foundation of romantic relationships and the driving force behind most male/female interaction.
And this gives you a right to murder?
Fucking roasties

>available to everyone.
Literally who in a civilized country don't have access to it?
And of course it's not 100%, since condoms have 98% and pills have 99.7%, so both of them together are totally worthless, sure.
Protip: To fail with having those two, you would have only 0,006% chance. So fuck you.
>na, you have the power that every father has to just walk away from a pregnancy
Is this roastie serious?
In most countries, the man has no choice, if the girl want to keep it, she can force the man to pay alimony.
Fuck it, i'm rustled.
Gonna leave this gay thread, this is pointless.
At least you're not in my country so thanks God for this.

yeah, i mean murdering someone is your last line of defense against harm to yourself and property just like insurance protects you against accidents.

it gives me the right to choose to defend myself against an undesired result of sexual activity yes.

when you think about it, women are the only gender that has the ability to create life. why shouldn't they be allowed to decide whether or not they want to birth and raise a child?

what effects does this have on society other than upsetting people who hate women in the first place?

Attached: 300px-William-Adolphe_Bouguereau_(1825-1905)_-_Work_Interrupted_(1891).jpg (300x510, 42K)

>it's i don't want to be a mother + plus i don't want to carry a child 9 months and cause undo damage to my body and mind.

Now you're just changing your argument to that murder should be allowed because it would otherwise be inconvenient for the mother, but this was not the argument I was countering. I was countering the argument that only because you don't give consent to a child you should be able to kill it. If you really think you can kill a baby because it's inconvenient, I don't understand why you set such an arbitrary limit. What if the child is just 1, or 2 months away? Or what if it would take 9 months or hard work to make adoption happen?

> I was countering the argument that only because you don't give consent to a child you should be able to kill it

why do you think i don't give my consent? here is a hint: it's for the reasons you are claiming to be a different argument. i don't want damage done to my body over 9 months, i don't want to be a mother, i didn't intend to become pregnant these are all things i did not consent to.

the limits aren't that arbitrary honestly but i'll explain anyway. most abortions are carried out before 12 weeks because that is the safest and cheapest time to do so. an abortion at 6 or 7 months is extremely expensive and the bulk of the damage to yourself has already been done that is why they virtually never happen unless it's a matter of saving the mother's life.

>what if
it doesn't though.

Imagine thinking this
Imagine thinking that it is okay to murder just so you can have premarital sex

repeat after me.

abortion is not murder, it is self-defense.

having a lock on a door fail is not consenting to a home invasion.

having sex is not consenting to motherhood.

its okay to kill people who will do harm to you.

They are different arguments because all you're appealing to now is that it would be inconvenient for you to be pregnant.

The reason why they are arbitrary is that you didn't tell me why you can kill a child one day, but not the next. If it's about money I sure think there are a lot of situations where murder would be justified outside of abortion too. You can't give any argument to why it would be limited to abortion, especially if you can't give up the child for adoption.

>it doesn't though.
What if I'm somewhere where I cannot, or it's not convenient with adoption?

they aren't different you fool. the fact that its "inconvenient" to be pregnant is the reason i don't consent to being pregnant. if it weren't for all those downsides pregnancy like being pregnant and having a child then no one wouldn't consent because there wouldn't be anything difference.

because there is no easy hard cut off point so the general guideline of 12 weekish is probably the best to go on. i'm sure it's different for each pregnancy though. it's limited to abortions because fetuses can't really live outside of you so your consent is specifically required for them to remain alive. once you've had a child you HAVE consented to them being alive and have many options outside of whatever weird postnatal abortion you have in mind.

if your adoption process is so fugged you probably should have had an abortion.

>the fact that its "inconvenient" to be pregnant is the reason i don't consent to being pregnant.

I get that, but why is it justified? In the end, is it because you don't give consent, because it's inconvenient, or both?

>it's limited to abortions because fetuses can't really live outside of you so your consent is specifically required for them to remain alive.

How is this different from a new born baby that you have to feed. It would also need your consent, and would die if it was alone.

>if your adoption process is so fugged you probably should have had an abortion.

I was kidnapped and forced to give birth in captivity before I escaped, and now I'm with a child in a country where I can't put them up for adoption.

it's ultimately all of the negative aspects of being pregnant and being a mother. its justified by the fact that i have a right to decide what happens to my body and even if an accident occurs i have the right to decide how to proceed from there.

at some point during the pregnancy you consented to carrying the child full term and keeping them alive has become your responsibility but you can remove that responsibility still by giving them up for adoption.

is this still a hypothetical or did that really happen because if so very sad and you should do your best to leave that country and start a better life for yourself and a better life for your child by putting them up for adoption in a place its legal to do so.

>tfw i murdered the baby because he was bumming me out
Fixed it you degenerate scum.

Abortion is not a contraceptive, if you can't handle the responsibility of a condom breaking then don't fuck.

Attached: 213454365245436.jpg (504x500, 98K)

women can kill men by yelling "rape" in public and conservatards think that's ok

but somehow abortion is a different thing altogether

> its justified by the fact that i have a right to decide what happens to my body

Why though? I have the right to decide what happens to my property, but if a 3 year old would trespass I wouldn't be justified in shooting them, especially if it's my fault they entered my property in the first place.

>at some point during the pregnancy you consented to carrying the child full term

Why? Because you didn't have an abortion? There are other reasons why you wouldn't want to have an abortion. You just keep saying that. Why isn't it consent when you consent to intercourse knowing the risks?

>is this still a hypothetical
Yes, but you're to retarded to understand the purpose of a hypothetical by picking on things irrelevant to the central meaning of the hypothetical

What I don't get about anti-abortion is why you would want to put a child through being raised by someone you view as morally bankrupt.

a 3 year old doesn't pose a threat to your body most likely but if someone did come onto your property or more comparable into the privacy of your home EVEN thought you had a door and it was unlocked then you would still be justified in possibly shooting them or at least it would be within your right to choose to do so.

yes because you didn't have an abortion. again because sex isn't only for making babies it's just a thing that can happen. just because you got into a car doesn't mean you consented to having an accident but you knew it's a possible risk to driving. and if you do have an accident its within your rights to seek medical attention and to pay to fix your vehicle you don't have to just "live with it" you can correct your situation.

i'm not interested in dealing with endless what ifs.