Why would anyone marry a non-virgin since they're way more likely to divorce?

Why would anyone marry a non-virgin since they're way more likely to divorce?

Attached: wolfinger-sex-partners-divorce-figure-1-1.png (640x363, 101K)

really I'm wondering why anyone would get married period.

The chance for anyone with a college education to get a divorce before age 55 tops out at like 20%. This religious shit you posted has been debunked.

Numerous problems with your meme graph: it doesn't control for any other variables, it's only 5 years of marriage which is way too short, and it doesn't take into account that all the virgins at marriage who divorce go into the non-virgin data bucket.

Attached: photo_20170708_140047.jpg (934x433, 44K)

>divorce rate for 10+ partners down in 80s
And then STDs happened
Thanks, God

Ah you're one of those guys who says that everything that goes against your belief not real science and just a coincidence. I guess it's just a weird coincidence user that roasties are more likely to divorce than virgins nothing to see here

Will this happen again? I fucking hope it does literally kill them

>Numerous problems with your meme graph: it doesn't control for any other variables, it's only 5 years of marriage which is way too short, and it doesn't take into account that all the virgins at marriage who divorce go into the non-virgin data bucket.
except it's consistent with all of the other data on the subject and all you've got is generic low-IQ redditard "correlation does not imply causation" bullshit in response

>controlling variables are a meme

No but the best we can do is to reconcile all available data, so instead of making spurious complaints about what we do have you can present something which contradicts it, as long as it's even semi-legitimate, which it is. Again, virtually all relevant data on this subject bolster OP's position.

What fucking roastslime licker seriously thinks a girl with multiple partners isn't more likely to drop you too?
Like, do you really need a statistic to have COMMON SENSE?

>Chart ends at 10 partners

Oh man, I've done that in a weekend...

To stop being a robot and actually grow a family like half of the threads on here fantasize about

takes a hell of a lot more to stop being a robot than to just have a family, it's not that easy either way.

You don't have to sign a contract to have a family dumbass.

this bullshit people here do about thinking a family will make them happy is exactly the same retarded shit women do, where they think having a baby with whatever chucklefuck they're dating will bind him to them and fix all their problems. There's a reason why people in their 40s and 50s and above complain incessantly about their spouses and children and how in hindsight they never should have done it, etc.

Dunno about virgin divorce rates but its a well known fact that 50%(number depends on country) of marriages end in divorces.

You wouldn't drive a car if on 50% of the trips someone would crash into you and they would get 50% of your wealth. Why even get married.

>but its a well known fact that 50%(number depends on country) of marriages end in divorces
That's actually a statistic from the 1980s, the divorce rate is lower now, more like 30%-40%

>really I'm wondering why anyone would get married period.
if you don't want to have kids there is no reason to, and a bunch of reasons not to. so basically kids?

>>Chart ends at 10 partners
yeah lmao i've seen hundreds of reddit posts of women claming to have over 10, lets see that data

Marriage can only end in two ways: divorce or death. Pretty grimy isn't it.

>relationship stat correlates with relationships stat
>huuur they're not related

imagine being this stupid

Mawd Roast Tea.