Abortion REEEING from whores

>abortion gets banned/restricted
>hundreds of millions of women REEEE and protest and cry

I don't get it. Like, it only exists so whores can fix their mistakes. It's whore enabling.

>b-but muh rape, muh incest

You can just literally use a morning after pill. There's no excuse. There is no legal, moral, political, or any justification for it other than allowing women to whore around. You have dozens of options to prevent pregnancy, including NOT HAVING IT.

And all the women dressing in red from that tv show are fucking cringe. Imagine basing your life and political activism on a tv show. Fucking millennial women, pure cringe.

What are your thoughts, Jow Forums?

Attached: 1527088937775.jpg (502x450, 72K)

i like how normies try to act like restricting abortion is about anything EXCEPT enabling whores that are too lazy to use birth control (of any kind) to be bailed out from their retardedness at the cost of a life.

why do people give a shit about this stuff? just let them kill their fetuses if they want to.

It's simple. I don't want women to run away from the consequences of their action. If you're a whore, you should be forced to deal with your whoredom.

>You can just literally use a morning after pill

Why do virgins who have never seen a vagina feel like they're qualified to talk about women's health and birth control?

Listen faggot, "muh pill" isn't some magic abortion medicine. It's effectiveness varies with weight, pre-existing conditions, etc. Even for a perfectly healthy woman it isn't going to have a 100% effectiveness. Not to mention taking these pills regularly has it's own health complications that you have to weigh with it.

Facts^^ just enables it. Stupid. fucking r/pics is a fucking mess rn. thats what i get for being a reddit fag

Attached: Screenshot 2019-05-17 at 9.22.30 PM.png (111x66, 11K)

>You can just literally use a morning after pill.
Those were illegalised too as "abortion pills." Not to mention, the new laws make no exceptions for rape and incest.

Then I guess don't have sex sweetie.

>t. obvious white male
You don't know what you're talking about, either.

Don't like it? Then fuck off to NY or Cali. Go be a whore somewhere else. Either don't have sex until you want to be pregnant or run the risk.

>sex makes babies
>literally the entire point of having sex
>women choose to have sex anyway
>obviously get pregnant
>somehow this isn't their fault

just don't have sex you idiot
don't want babies? don't have sex
it's really that simple

Abortion should be legal only in case of rape and if the female is underage. Banned in any other situation.

Abortion is a barbaric practice, sticking wire cutters inside your vagina to squeeze out the mushy fetus. If I was a female and i had to abort I'd be traumatized for the rest of my life. Yet so many of them do it like it's nothing.

If people actually used pills and condoms abortion and the whole debate about it would be obsolete and unnecessary.

Attached: 1557329508345.png (1024x919, 515K)

>I don't want women to run away from the consequences of their action.
Why not? I personally am not a bitter virgin like you and am okay with consequence free sex. Not to mention you're going to be creating more single mothers.

Women have a right to fix their mistakes. Abortion is just one of the dozens of options women should have to avoid having the burden of a child.

here is no legal, moral, political, or any justification to forbid it.

Under the same new laws, you can still face jail time for going to another state you don't live in to get an abortion. Not to mention, travelling just for that is mighty expensive.

>here is no legal, moral, political, or any justification to forbid it.

There is. I don't like it. And since I'm right and you're wrong, then keep your legs closed and I won't have to gas you.

Abortion only exists to let whore not face the responsibilities of their actions. End of.

Hopefully their is an underground railroad of roasties running from Alabama and Georgia going to Northern states for their abortions and their are roast hunters chasing after them to hold them in a room and force them to give birth to babies.

What exactly is wrong with consequence free sex? (Other than the fact you'll never have it of course)

No, women need to learn to take responsibility for their actions. Living on equal terms with men means being responsible for your actions, not having a free way out of every situation like a fucking child.

then maybe you shouldn't fucking have sex if you're not ready for the consequences
>t.female that has to listen to roasties complain about "muh bodee" all fucking day

Because of the "baby-killing" connection to it. For a lot of anti-abortionists, it's literally on par with watching an eight-month-old getting to a shotgun blast to the torso.

People are just overly sensitive to *anything* that happens to children. The recent uptick in anti-circumcision movements has a similar problem.

If pregnancy is a consequence of sex, then an abortion does not make sex consequence free. Imagine wanting your pussy to be a haunted graveyard. YIKES

imagine eating out a haunted pussy

>All babies are precious, life is a precious gift from God, even if they're born to single mothers, degenerates, or niggers

Attached: NPC-header-1-640x480.jpg (640x480, 33K)

Who put that hilarious "men are responsible for their actions" crap in your head? They have a lot more free ways out than women.

The ban is just another free way for men, restricting womens rights forever only to carry their offspring

Imagine an abortion roastie having a stomach ache years after getting an abortion and not knowing whether their stomach hurts because of indigestion or because you're being haunted.

>Who put that hilarious "men are responsible for their actions" crap in your head?
Men, likely.

What "responsibility" do they have exactly?

>be racist but hate roasties more
>get to play the race card and say how millions of niggers will be saved if abortion was banned
>watch the roastie struggle with that knowledge

Playing the race card is addicting and fun. It only works because it has power over retards.

Attached: 1129ab1d8beb70e13205c705595ace02.jpg (498x668, 69K)

>childcare payment
>alimony
>women often just get a slap on the hand compared to men when it comes to court
I could name more but I'm fucking plastered

>he doesn't know what deontology is

Attached: 19e50939c5d869af9d3fdfff72d2d20096adcac0a094997bbb35d10833fbe6e2.jpg (1000x1000, 206K)

Inventing literally everything and running every society in the world.

>The ban is just another free way for men, restricting womens rights forever only to carry their offspring
It isn't. It hurts men the most actually because most men who have unprotected sex with sluts don't want children.

>women's rights
You being a slut is not a right, stop being a cum dumpster for idiots who are too stupid to put on a condom.

>I need an abortion!!!
>Why?
>REEEEEEE

Simply questioning women makes them reee. How DARE you threaten their ticket to roast it up.

Look at it this way OP: Which situation would you prefer? Your taxes paying for an abortion? Or women being forced to have their unwanted babies, leading to more single mothers, alimony, broken homes/kids

It's not like having a kid is gonna make them get their shit together all of a sudden

I meant women retard

Freedom is a right, if it makes you uncomfortable well sucks to be you.

> It hurts men the most
lmao, lock that gross shit out then and toss the key, have some self control.

I would prefer the latter. The more people suffering because of women being whores, then the more social pressure there will be to stop whoring and only having sex leading to pregnancy when they are ready to start a family. The point of sex is impregnation and the creation of a new family.

OP, the more you spew your autistic meltdown, the more it becomes clear you just want to control women's bodies/sexuality because you're a bitter virgin. At least admit that much, don't pussyfoot around the issue and scream "MUH RESPONSIBILITY"

>you just want to control women's bodies

How is that making me have control over their bodies?

No one is denying you your freedom to be a slut. You just have to realize your actions have consequences and that there should be no free way out for you just because you're a female. I can't respect a female who had an abortion or even a couple of them, just the thought of sticking my dick inside that ugly distorted vagina that stinks of death makes me wanna puke. No self respecting woman should have to come in a situation to have an abortion.
>lmao, lock that gross shit out then and toss the key, have some self control.
I am not a cuck, and I actually use condoms, i have self control and plan ahead. When I want a child i will actually have it, without making any sudden mistakes.

>"You got pregnant, you should face the consequences and have the child"
>Why though?
>"REEEEE"

If this new law isn't struck down then you should prepare to have your tax money go towards feeding a whole lot more nigger kids in Alabama in the next few decades. The abortion rate for nigresses is almost four times that of huwhite women and on average, 900 nigger babies are aborted every day in America.

>>"You got pregnant, you should face the consequences and have the child"
>>Why though?
>Why not?
>REEEEEE

Attached: 1512408850534.png (645x614, 83K)

>there is no legal or moral justification to forbid the murder of infants
the West is truly fucked

>Why not?
Because having a child you don't want sucks? Is it that hard to believe? Why should they have to face the consequences of sex if it can be consequence free, or at least have less consequences?

I refer you to this post right here

Attached: fac612be32e1de2df5413f26dc3d0610 (1).jpg (720x303, 27K)

As a general principle, you own yourself and the results of your actions, because if you didn't, then someone else could, but of course, they wouldn't own themselves either, therefor, self ownership is the only logically consistent option.

It's almost like you actually want more niggers around getting on welfare and fucking shit up. I wonder who could be behind this post?

Circumcision is a kike trick and we should never let it happen to aryan babies. The origin of circumcision in America is actually anti-masturbation advocates, and how fucked do you have to be in the head to literally mutilate your son's dick just to make masturbating harder for him and have him feel less sensation during sex?

Whatever. The main tick that causes people to have an uproar over either circumcision or abortions is that it happens to babies. That's mainly it. Something they see as bad is happening to a defenceless baby, and everyone lose their minds.

If this happened solely to adults, no one would give a shit.

Shut up niggerfaggot, I won't be one of the idiots mentioned in . Kant was a tool and having more niggers around to fuck shit up in our communities has no conceivable benefit at all.

user I-

you shouldn't be having sex for pleasure either in that case

Emergency contraception is not the same as a typical dose of every day birth control in its active ingredients or mechanism of action. You'd know that if you had even cursory knowledge of pharmacology, or bothered to google before you got your roast flaps in a twist over being called out for your thotery.

If you don't feel like flooding your body with synthetic estrogen and progesterone, or you don't feel like dealing with the consequences of that, don't fucking take it. Wrap it up. Use a spermicide. Get fit for a diaphragm (oh wait, then you dumb whores would have to admit to daddy that you're getting stuffed with obscene amounts of sausage every weekend). Use a sponge. Get an IUD. Utilize one of the several legitimate calendar methods to know when your safest days are. Determine ovulation by temperature. Pull the fuck out.

Quite frankly, I support abortion because the only way to possibly "accidentally" get pregnant with such a dearth of contraceptive options is because you're an abject and unequivocal retard who shouldn't breed and indeed would be sterilized and possibly have your organs harvested in any reasonable society. Fuck you and please, please kill yourself.

That's true but beside the point I'm trying to make. We shouldn't mutilate white babies born in America for absolutely no reason. The jew laughs every time this is done. Do you serve the zog?

>We shouldn't mutilate white babies born in America for absolutely no reason. The jew laughs every time this is done. Do you serve the zog?
That's still playing into the "ohmigod think of the children" angle of abortion/circumcision. Not to mention you're completely missing the point, and topic about something that isn't relevant.

user, I'm pretty sure he/she was baiting
Hence the >why do virgins think x

>like, wow, bro. People only care if someone who is incapable of consenting to a permanent, irreversible mutilation procedure gets it and not if an adult of sound mind and with given informed consent elects to have the procedure performed on himself

Chug bleach.

Kant isn't the only deontologist, and the field existed before he did.
What's wrong with niggers fucking up your communities?

Life begins at conception.
I saw an interview this morning with Alabama's governor.
"Aren't you concerned about the extra costs of childcare?"
"You can't put a price on human life."
Bravo, lady.

>People only care if someone who is incapable of consenting to a permanent, irreversible mutilation procedure gets it and not if an adult of sound mind and with given informed consent elects to have the procedure performed on himself
Yeah, you pretty much hit the nail on the head. Hence why people tend to get overly fussy about abortions or anything they see as babies.

I'm tired of political candidates pussy-footing delicately around the issue of abortion. Every time I turn on the TV, there's always some group of hippies protesting "for choice" or "for life." Each group pisses the other off, and no candidate will take a strong enough stance on the issue of abortion, so I've decided to form a political party of my own:

The Regressive Party

I have a different stance on abortion: I'm against abortion, but for killing babies. That way everyone loses, and I win. I'm neither pro choice, nor pro life; I'm pro you-shutting-the-hell-up. The only way I'd be "pro choice" is if it meant I could choose which babies I could abort, and only then if I could lift the age restriction to 80. I was at this mall the other day watching some shitty documentary when I came out of the theater and saw old people dancing to country music in the courtyard. I couldn't remember the last time I saw a group of people begging this hard to be aborted.

Attached: regressive1.gif (409x325, 15K)

I'm gay so I'm exempt from the abortion controversy. I'm also not a whore. Having safe sex solely within the context of a committed loving relationship is fine. Whores are not. Use a condom you braindead slut.

No, it's about da joos making a mockery of the white race and having their brand or "covenant with god" on most Americans. I am beginning to suspect that you are an israeli, perhaps a part of the jidf?

Here is where I stand on other issues:

No protests. Under my government, there will be no assembly, peaceful or otherwise:

Why does everyone always sing the praises of civil disobedience? What good did it do for Gandhi? He's dead. What the hell is civil disobedience anyway? You can add the word "civil" to any crime (and yes, protesting is a crime, or will be if I'm elected in office), and suddenly it has a positive connotation? What next, civil first degree felony with aggravated assault? What's worse is that these black-foots stink up the streets with their VW bugs and harass the officers just trying to crack some skull. Which leads me to my next point:

No more police. Police officers will be replaced with a strike force with the ability to tap into your phone conversations, spy on your Internet connection, arrest you for no reason or any reason at all, and interrogate you behind closed doors during secret hearings. It'll be awesome, and if anyone complains, they will be labeled unpatriotic. The beauty of it is that people won't protest because protesters will be victims of police brutality. The reason I say victims is because the punishment for the crime of brutalizing police would be murder. It's the criminals who need to be brutalized, not the police.

Attached: wcower7.gif (385x385, 13K)

Vampire hunting will be a government sanctioned profession.

Seriously.

I can't stand vampires and people who claim to be them. If there are real vampires, then there should be real vampire hunters. I don't have a beef with Mr. Tepes because I think we can all agree that impaling 20,000 people on stakes as a negotiating tactic is sufficiently awesome. What I have a problem with are these 14 year old losers who hang out at raves wearing prosthetic fangs, listening to obnoxious happy-hardcore dancing with giant platform shoes (courtesy of "Hot Topic," because all vampires shop at trendy clothing stores for their pre-packaged sub-culture needs). When they're not busy doing the dishes for their allowance, they're out doing evil things like smoking, staying up past curfew, or reading books on the occult at Barnes & Noble. They join little "sanguinarian" clubs and they change their names to something adequately evil like Raven, Ivy or Memnoch.

These are the same people who say they laugh during dramas when someone gets killed. We all know a person like this, they think they're morbid and mysterious because they force out a contrived chuckle during a death scene. Oooh, you laughed during a murder, you're so unique and evil. The fact that the number of members in these stupid clubs surge every time a new "Blade" movie comes out eludes them. Who has time for things like facts and responsibility when you're busy "feeding" yourself by having orgies that give you magical powers? Idiots.

Ska is banned. Nobody listens to ska.

That's pretty much it. Oh yeah, I was going to write about how I was going to take away women's right to vote, but that one is pretty obvious since nobody wants women to vote, except for women, and they don't count.

Attached: fuck_dracula7.jpg (400x387, 34K)

No, it's because it happens to babies; therefore the discomfort around circumcision/abortion. Jews are only incidental (and the implementation of circumcision into American culture was originally a Christian thing).

>Kant isn't the only deontologist, and the field existed before he did.
Both denotology and utilitarianism are flawed, but denotology is especially stupid. It is nigh impossible to be a perfect denotologist with no contradictions.
>What's wrong with niggers fucking up your communities?
Thank you for alerting us all to your jewish heritage.

The truly redpilled position is going full antinatalist and enforcing mandatory abortions

If you're gay why is this an issue for you?

also
>use a condom you braindead slut

shouldn't the blame lean more on the male on this case for not doing so?

This is correct, as stated in my initial response, but the kike still laughs when it happens nevertheless. The issue is that you are forcing a unnecessary procedure that will negatively impact sensation during sex on a nonconsenting subject. The fact that the subject is a child is irrelevant, the only thing that matters is that they did not consent to the procedure. I'll ask again, are you a kike?

>Use a condom you braindead slut.
Good luck getting a Chad to a use a condom.

>but the kike still laughs when it happens nevertheless.
That's a completely different discussion altogether.

>The issue is that you are forcing a unnecessary procedure that will negatively impact sensation during sex on a nonconsenting subject.
You sound like an anti-abortionist.

>The fact that the subject is a child is irrelevant
The fact that children are involved are the sole reason there's controversy.

>the only thing that matters is that they did not consent to the procedure.
Rape of a child is generally viewed as worse than rape of an adult.

>I'll ask again, are you a kike?
What in my posts would even suggest that? Not to mention, that's binary opposition fallacy.

based. Birth control is the single biggest thing undermining society today. Men and women used to understand that sex was a big deal because having a child is a big fucking deal. Nowadays women just want to fuck around until they're 30 something and then latch onto some provider after they've had their fun. Anti abortion laws are a small step towards repairing the natural balance of society.

>mfw I've ever see Jow Forums transform from indifferent/pro-choice to a growing pocket of pro-lifers

It's like you all think restricting "whore enabling" will get you laid.

Jow Forums was never pro-choice, but it wasn't strictly pro-life until now.

If you think about it christianity is really just judaism 2.0. The word judeo-christian is still used to refer to their shared abrahamic culture.

>murders a human
>there is no legal, moral, political, or any justification to forbid this

Attached: aborted-fetus.gif (337x234, 50K)

>If you think about it christianity is really just judaism 2.0.
That would be Islam, actually. They're closer to each other.
>The word judeo-christian is still used to refer to their shared abrahamic culture.
That was done to separate themselves from Islamic associations. Not to mention, judeo-christianism is a mainly western thing.

Sincerely, /his/.

Jow Forums is pro-choice because they hate niggers, while Jow Forums now seems to be pro-life because they hate whores

>hates whores
>make whores have kids so they can raise kids with the same shitty lives they have
Makes sense

Attached: 1557308891151.jpg (488x430, 27K)

Why do so many femcels and ugly girls stand with Stacies and normie roasties? Don't you realize that these whores are the reason you don't get to fuck Chad? Most femcels on this board tend to have feminist and pro choice leanings despite roasties being the reason you can't get laid.

Why are you pro-life?

All it will do is create more robots whose parents don't want them. You're only turning people into yourself.

I didn't want to be born, why would I wish that upon someone else?

>All it will do is create more robots whose parents don't want them. You're only turning people into yourself.
You answered your own question.

>I didn't want to be born, why would I wish that upon someone else?
I want to spread that kind to misery onto everyone else.

I don't understand why roasties are so horrified when sex works the way it's supposed to i.e. it ends in conception. Maybe the pill lulled them into a false sense of security i.e. thinking whoredom has no consequences. Which is frankly fucking dumb. Sex is not just some great positive thing. It can result in STD's, it's associated with affairs and power and abuse. These whores have had it so easy when it comes to spreading their legs that they forgot sex has its consequences too.

>while Jow Forums now seems to be pro-life because they hate whores

That literally makes no sense. If I hate whores, what do I give a shit if they continue to get abortions?
It seems like r9k would like to see a return to traditionalist values and hope that restricting abortions makes women less "whorish" and more "wholesome". The sad part is that, even if this works, its going to be a generational change and anyone hoping for this won't have any children that will benefit.
tl;dr who fucking cares, let women do whatever the fuck they want

argumentum ad hominem is not an argument. I'm not for niggers fucking up communities, but I just want to know what reasoning you have for your position.

Attached: 1535147325863s.jpg (125x105, 2K)

>If I hate whores, what do I give a shit if they continue to get abortions?
There's catharsis in seeing people you hate face some kind of suffering and punishment.

>argumentum ad hominem is not an argument
yes they are (just bad ones)

>basing your political opinion on the fact that women having sex upsets you

Thank God you retards have no real political power.

Not even really a bad one, just an overused one

Remind me who the current president is?

>just an overused one
that does not determine whether or not an argument is good or bad

Spongebob and Patrick?

>You sound like an anti-abortionist.
A foetus is not a person until it has both brain activity (used to determine whether comatose people are truly alive or just vegetative) and is viable outside the womb (usually 24 weeks after conception). It has no right to stay inside the womb until those conditions are met. A newborn baby, on the other hand, is undeniably a person and accepted as such by most of society. I agree that crimes against children are generally seen as much worse than the same crime committed against an adult, but that isn't the issue here. The issue is that a person, the child, did not consent to a completely unnecessary procedure carried out at the behest of the parent. If the parent wanted the subject's ears to be cut off because they thought that was fashionable, then would that also be okay? We should all follow Iceland's example in attempting to ban circumcision, as that will prevent as many religiously devout semites (joos and ayrabs) from migrating here as well.

This. It's a fallacious argument. Simply means it produces unreliable results. Only emotional children tend to use it such an overt way. It's more common to see it in the form of an appeal to authority (which is subset of argumentum ad hominem)

Women having sex doesn't upset me, its necessary for life. Women demanding rights while shirking responsibility like a child and then screeching like crazy banshees when their childish bullshit is called out is icing on the cake.

>i got pregnant in this age of abundant options to prevent it
>i must terminate this human life now to preserve my autonomy

Personally I think we should just legalize the buying and selling of children as goods, and repeal child labor laws. Corporations assuming guardianship while exploiting the child for labor would be preferable for the child over being killed. It would be preferable for the mother because she'd get paid, seems like a win-win.

Attached: 1506190146291.jpg (636x820, 91K)

>missouri
abortion should be required there, not banned

>A foetus is not a person
It is according to a lot of people and (as of recently) laws.

>The issue is that a person, the child, did not consent to a completely unnecessary procedure carried out at the behest of the parent.
The issue is that these are happening to babies. Which is why there's controversy around them. It doesn't matter what they are, or how they play out; it's something that happens to kids that makes other people uncomfortable, and thus want to cause an outrage. Any other details are utterly irrelevant, and only relegated to their respective niches.

And that's not without mentioning that people are neurological capable of consent until upwards of 25-years.

>If the parent wanted the subject's ears to be cut off because they thought that was fashionable, then would that also be okay?
Strawman, and the same type of fallacies anti-abortionists commit.

>We should all follow Iceland's example in attempting to ban circumcision, as that will prevent as many religiously devout semites (joos and ayrabs) from migrating here as well.
Tangentialism, and increasingly nonsequitur.

Yes, since joos and ayrabs are both culturally and linguistically semites their religions have much in common, while christianity was westernized (europeanized) but still retains its semitic abrahamic roots. I don't really want to have anything to do with semites or afroasiatics though so I would rather stick to atheism or paganism than any abrahamic religion.