Hey cutie

woman are retards

>I'm waiting on a response after an opener like "hey cutie." Not sure why'd you'd open the conversation like that just to immediately ghost
Because within another 5 seconds they swipped on 5 Chad profiles, you are probably "ok" and "cute" but why settle if you can have the best with no effort?

>people really bileve this meme

>woman are lesbians deep down

Attached: 1557264018545.jpg (750x421, 41K)

why would chad use bumble when he can get much better looking women on tinder? bumble is for desperate beckys

Wouldn't there also have been 5 chads beforehand that negate any "ok" matches?

>>Hey cutie
>unmatches me

Because you're "ok" if by some odds literally none of the chads respond she'll message you

Ask stoic user (if he's here)
He seems to be a god at this.

Attached: 13.jpg (1080x3345, 689K)

>see you tomorrow
>never talks to him again

Lol this just seems so disingenuous to me

>yea I just never really cared about getting laid
>too much effort
Coming from the guy who installed a dating app and set up a profile

>"I-I don't care about what's normal or whatever. I do things my way!"
>"T-The effort reward trade off for getting laid is just unfavorable, that's all! F-Fucking roasties!"
Holy fuck you sperg, calm down. She was just curious and asking some questions, why get so defensive? Like, I get it, there can be a lot of work you have to put in to get with a girl, but holy shit you managed to find the absolutely spergiest way to say that. You were much more sane when you just left it at "I've never even made an effort to get one", why crash and burn so fucking hard?

what the fuck is bumble?

why am I not surprised that wasn't original?

Tinder but only the girl can message first

>Hey "sweetie" what are you looking for? chat? hangout?

what the fuck is that supposed to accomplish?

>The effort/reward ratio is unfavorable
This is exactly what a virgin would say to.

Basically the idea was to "give women the power", as if they didn't already have that. Basically, only women can send the first match/like, and then you have to do it back, and only she can send the first message. The problem of course, is that the first message is often a flat one-liner like the OP.
A good concept on paper, but terrible execution.

A lot of kids these days have terrible social skills. They literally don't know what's appropriate and not apprioriate and can't hold an interesting conversation.

>Girl messages me past midnight
>Interning in my city
>Profile has "something casual"

why do they even ask those questions? i have communicated with 3 girls and all of them asked about my virginity in the same rectlinear manner. i don pt understand why they care and also i cant imagine how it is easy for them to ask about such private subjects, wtf.

Social resume. Your virginity (prowess with women), height, status etc. Get used to our hypercompetitive world user.

It could just be because virgins tend to not be that good at sex, which isn't exactly surprising when they've never been intimate with a woman before.
Could also very well be curiosity, V-card hunting, specifically avoiding virgins, or really anything else. Don't worry about it too much. If she can't deal with it, then fuck her, move on. It's her problem.

>just move on, bro!
Women can do that but men can't afford to. If you're just an average Joe, you should feel lucky if a girl even notices you.

>nm u?
works every time

That is what I went with, so far nothing

Okay, so what, are you just going to kill yourself because Stacy didn't like you, pussy?
I guess I'm not one to talk for you, though, because I did have at least one gf in my lifetime, so maybe it is a bit harder to move on if you've never had anyone at all before. Call me a normie for that or whatever, but that's just my hot opinion on the matter.
Just consider that everyone will get rejected on those apps, it's just that everyone's success rates are different. If you can grind for that 0.0001% drop in a shitty RPG, you can do the same for a quick fuck, or even a gf if that's what you actually want.

>the effort/reward ratio is unfavorable
it sure is when you haven't gotten laid once

No because it doesn't take genetic talent to grind in an RPG. To get a quick fuck you need to possess good looks and height.

>To get a quick fuck you need to possess good looks and height
Yeah, that analogy was pretty shitty, sorry. But you get the point. You do know even burn victims and the legitimately mentally retarded can hook up with people, though, right?
What do you have physically wrong that you can't attract anybody at all? Are you sure it's not just your bio or something? While /soc/ is an absolute steaming pile of shit, their tinder/bumble feedback threads could possibly help you figure out what's not working in your favor.

>hey cutie
>nm you?
This is on the same tier as:
>enjoy your movie
>thanks, you too

It's not so much what I'm doing wrong. It's more what other people are doing right. You know how you go into a job interview and you crush it but don't get the offer? That's because someone else did even better. It's like that with me. Maybe I gotta go somewhere more remote.

Like, that could be right, but you can't prove that for certain without investigating into it. You know the interviewer can just decide he doesn't like you for any reason at all, right (y'know, except for the few reasons that'd get them a lawsuit, anyway)? Just because someone else gets the job doesn't mean they're necessarily better than you, it's just that they were chosen over you, for whatever reason. Heck, maybe the interviewer just didn't like your "vibe" or "aura", or other menial shit like that. Same thing with chicks, really. Maybe she didn't like your tone of voice/text.
>It's not so much what I'm doing wrong
And how are you so sure of that, without asking for any feedback? Again, it's very much possible, but without even attempting to find that out, how can you be certain? Sometimes it can really come down to just the camera angle you used in your picture or the lighting, or maybe your bio could use some work.