Old thread hit the limit, so making a new

>online
How about "everything you do in the physical world is public and permanent" since that's how it actually is, with facial recognition and 24/7 mass surveillance now.

whatever you post online is fair game
when will roasties learn?

Really just use this on porn sites.
github.com/ageitgey/face_recognition

ok but how the fuck do you use it i wanna see if my old oneitis ever did porn

>based chinks ass fucking white beta degenerate people
>again
Fucking hilarious. Now we can see mutts complaining about being spied and tracked by some random nigger even tough CIA have been doing that since forever
Thats a big YIKES from me

What is a legitimate, non-selfish, non-wanting-to-deceive-a-husband reason to oppose this?

none. There legit is no reason at all

There is none. Dont expect rationale and logic from these people everything they do and carry out is based on emotion

>Roasties BTFO by based chinks making something useful with AI finally
AI-Based and Thot-Pilled.

MAKE Jow Forums GREAT AGAIN!

Attached: b&w.jpg (296x310, 43K)

I can see it being abused by people who have a disagreement with someone they don't like. Imagine you have a female boss and she's being a cunt. You run a photo of her face through algorithm, find that hardcore rimjob porn she did 6 months ago and circulate it around the office. Is that fair?

Still shouldn't have done porn, of course.

If you happen to look like a pornstar or if someone uploaded a video you intended to be private. Of course the people complaining arent complaining about this though.
Otherwise none

>fair
what the fuck are you talking about you stupid nigger? how would something like that would be fair/unfair?

>muh faces that match are just a bug
FFS, these hoebags are still in denial.

>You run a photo of her face through algorithm, find that hardcore rimjob porn she did 6 months ago and circulate it around the office. Is that fair?

absolutely fair, why would it not be?

Cool, now normies will go into overdrive with questioning the stigma against porn and it'll become even more normalized.

Attached: 1525672151697.png (543x435, 128K)

That is unironically 100% fair, my friend

Using something like that to destroy the life of someone you just don't like a bit. It's perfectly legit to use it to check on a gf, but it's shouldn't be used as a weapon.

You're presuming women will feel ashamed of this. They won't, women are not ashamed of their sexuality anymore, thots are happy to put their paypal link for nudes in their ig bio, pornstars go pick their kids up at kindergarten knowing other parents will recognize them and they don't give a fuck, especially if enough women are exposed and they all band together. Once something becomes a cultural norm, people stop giving a shit. I'm assuming a law will be passed against this soon, I mean this is just revenge porn but taken to the next level.

in that case, yeah, it would be fair
you want to hurt somebody, so you do it. its not rocket science

And the "acceleration" will process itself more faster.

Normies will see what reality truly is, in that marriage is just "legalized" prostitution, and nothing more.

The more that the normalcattle get aware, the globohomo and wimminz will finally feel the squeeze and the whole world will know that the incel was right and is right.

Based asian niggers trying to ruin the jew bussiness of marriage and removing the blindfold from men

Roasties and hoebags aren't really the target, they are the collateral.

Dropping them truthbombs, redpills, and blackpills, is the goal. This whole shebang about roasties and hoes isn't about shaming, it is about lifting the gynocratic veil laid upon hypergamy.

And when it is all laid bare for everyone to see...its game time.

On the contrary, jew business has been focused on destroying marriage. Marriage is an essential component for building stable communities.

>getting the government into your relationships is an essential component for building stable communities
hello mr schlomo

This is really funny.
My favorite replies were from women who angrily post that they wouldn't want guys who use this tool or care if they're porn actresses, because if that's case.. then why would they care? They do. Because they know it lowers the amount of potential mates for them.
In second place comes women claiming it should be illegal because it "violates privacy" when it's public data they willingly participated in.
Pic relates is a hilarious example of the cognitive dissonance experienced by women who claim to believe working in porn is enjoyable and empowering... until people know it's her. If it's so great, again.. why would she care? Same reason, we all know
Jej, I wonder how many fathers will find out their sweet daughters were in porn

Attached: 16E9BFA7-1042-4B7D-9299-E99E28709D6B.jpg (640x823, 280K)

>Because they know it lowers the amount of potential mates for them.
For clarification, by "mates," this means "guys who will support them once they're too old/unattractice to make money from posting their own source of value (having a vagina) online for all to see, other than said chump that supports her"

Attached: 3AF80C75-879F-4AFE-ABC4-33EBADEA30F7.jpg (587x487, 71K)

>own source
Excuse me, "only source of value"

It stems from a basic mistake that most women make, and that many never grow out of. They think that if a man wants to have sex with them then he also considers them to be relationship material and would consider having a family with them.
A man does not want to have a long-term relationship with a slut. It's not worth it.

>Marriage is an essential component for building stable communities.
Ya dingus, Marriage is the "formality" that both female and male meatbags agreed to take care of youngins that will be the consequence of the both having unprotected sex.

The "foundation" of a stable communities, are based on relationships built on trust , honesty, loyalty, and Agape, to name a few. The thing is, women are the part of the equation that will always fail, but were kept mostly in line ('twas an exercise in futility; even the roasties in the past cheated on their husbands with their manservants or to whomever they fancy. Although, they played the long and silent cucking game, many are found out, yet many have successfully duped their own husbands.) by patriarchy and the enforcement of monogamy.

TL;DR: Marriage is just a ceremony.

"Hello, wife/girlfriend. I was just wondering, what is your job?"
"That's none of your business, fascist."

Attached: 1AD04A20-7679-4BD5-BBAE-0AE58A8B6070.jpg (640x307, 92K)

That's completely allowed by the law, companies do that all the time for an undesirable.

Comes back to the basic idea that women are the gatekeepers of sex while men are the gatekeepers of commitment.
The women who are so angry about this have clearly overestimated their power levels.

Turns out there are legitimate public health reasons to screen for this. Not only for STD and other physical problems but mental and social welfare as well. Rare is the person who performed in porn and has proper mental and social adjustment. These women know they are damaged beyond being a normal relationship quality person. People deserve to not be duped into supporting anyone who makes or made money doing sex work. Stalkers are dangerous, ex partners can be dangerous, drug use and making money for sex work go hand in hand.

>Is that fair?
Of-fucking-course it is.

Not unless that it is a public position. Gotta keep up with the gender quotas that feminists imposed.

Fucking based.
Roasties trying to defend themselves by saying "I just want to forget about it :("
They should be hung for their past desu

Attached: Screenshot_20190530-032108.jpg (1080x4711, 1.74M)

link to website originally?

If the past doesn't matter, why do women stop talking to me when I tell them that I used to fingerbang my dog while dressed up as Chester Cheetah?
It's in the past, I swear. Someone's past actions can in no reliable way be used as a predictive measure for future actions.

Attached: tarded.png (500x500, 5K)

>They do. Because they know it lowers the amount of potential mates for them.
A bit inaccurate.
Women get easily get dick slinged at them. You only need to look at tinder experiments to confirm this.
The damage is that it lowers the number of men willing to betabux for them, which roasties deeply fear almost as much as their betabux finding out the kid isn't his.

Agreed, I clarified that here:

>Someone's past actions can in no reliable way be used as a predictive measure for future actions.
It dictates the general trajectory/flow of one's decision making process.

Using it as a specific layout/guide is quite stupid. Even retards manage to get things right, although not through them doing the correct stuff, but rather on variables that interfere/affect said retard's specific circumstance.

ffs stop talking politics and link the damn site

Stop being a nigger for once and go back to the original thread and find the link yourself you lazy piece of shite.

ain't there silly person

>"...she's not there..."
Well, your own problem now boyo.

If you cannot even be arsed to clink links and do your own digging, then that is not my problem anymore. Heck, just type out the name of these twattermongs inna jewgle, and links about these shitstains will appear. Follow it further by clicking the cancer-tier hashtags and reading every post, backtracking the whole shebang up until you are at the source.

Tedious, yet doable. I dunno how normalfaggots like you do though.

The only one I've seen is deepfakes, as deepfakes get better anyone could make a deepfake of anyone and with this they wouldn't have to spread it around, just post it on a porn site and then this software would show everyone that video. You could even make multiple deep fakes and make it look like it's that persons porn account

Even deepfakes can be sniffed out as fakes.

The software runs comparisons IIRC. AFAIK, even a "sophisticated" deepfake can still have minute differences that software will no doubt pick up.

>person does something or acts a certain way their entire life
>says they won't do it anymore
Am I retarded to put money against that claim?

No.

People who do that "they would not do it anymore" bullshit always does the opposite of what they promised to do.

I mean, hey, what are women?

They are all fucking brain-dead

Attached: Screenshot_20190530-042344__01.jpg (1080x2531, 505K)

This is true for now, it's only a matter of time until it isn't, with that said we should take advantage of the fact that's it's true for now and get the e-thot patrol going

>This is true for now, it's only a matter of time until it isn't,
I would not bet on this one, chief.

For the chinese dude to be able to pull this shit off, he should also be aware of deepfakes. Because misjudging those could land the dude in hot water really fucking quick. Dem roastie hoebags know that they still somewhat have the judiciary by the balls, and they would not hold back to using the "law-l" in order to circumvent the dudes anonymity.

Just so you know, socmed is a double-edged sword; put up a lying hoebags porn vid that they vehemently deny, and their credibility is immediately THANOSED.COM. Bitches will bitch, but the facts will remain.

>I mean, hey, what are women?
A woman is a hole that claims to be a mountain

Attached: ducksauce_gooddrink.png (700x900, 11K)

(Digits Witnessed)
Checked.

Attached: dubsorder.jpg (500x385, 23K)

Public record sex services for avoid sex traffic or chezze pizza

But goverment must running it
Or if some person is accusers begin in porn video can find real person, like abi shappiro confuse by UMass Rachael.

Attached: 1438236C-27F8-468B-BD0E-1664095DA5DF.jpg (300x225, 7K)

>Your partners job is none of your business

Holy shit what?

Attached: 1557264929909.png (594x500, 143K)

>my actions have consequences abloo abloo abloo ;_;
Women are dumb.

Attached: V1Ohq25tW9k.jpg (752x620, 227K)

>ben shapiro sister

fucking khazar milkers hnnnnnnnnnng

I dont usually get involved in gay twitter ops but godamn theres some gold in there.

Attached: Screenshot_2019-05-29_23-53-37.png (587x619, 208K)