This is honestly the hottest woman I have ever seen. Holy shit...

This is honestly the hottest woman I have ever seen. Holy shit. I can't even imagine being a woman and having to comping with THAT. Holy mother of sacred shit.

Attached: 1559529948863.webm (640x800, 874K)

Other urls found in this thread:

instagram.com/pamelaalexandra/?hl=en
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

Because men are much less picky than women are

which men? the losers?

Just by nature bro. We're genetically predisposed to not be that picky, otherwise the human race would have died out a long time ago.

Women are the sexual selectors in society.

Attached: yllARsn.jpg (720x631, 81K)

All of them.
I've heard a story directly from a roastie, of her being pumped and dumped by a literal gym chad and She's a 4,5/10 more on the 4 side

hmm interesting. how many kids do you have?
so your idea of chad had the choice of thousands of women and slept with a plain fat girl? i can believe it, but you should tell Chad that he's a moron

>the losers
bro im guessing you have no chad friends who tell you how they fucked a 3/10 fat girl because they were horny and than they regretted it. men will fuck anything whether they're hot or not. but only some can

Wasn't fat, just plain ugly (despite being fat now)

What a grotesquely obese woman.

>but only some can
Even just mentally, i wouldn't bare the self shame of fucking a whale

it isn't an either/or situation, chad fucked the fatty in addition to the thousands of other women

>the slampig meme
your chad friends aren't chads. also how long do you think they'll be manwhores? that's not what being "picky" is about btw. girls who sleep around have plenty of regrettable fucks.

>all that excess biomass
>the vain personality you can glean from how she acts
Big pass from me. A perfect woman is flat chested.

>in his world chad has ten thousand penises and zero refractory period
OH WOOOOW!

You've never seen obese women, she's still chubby on the acceptable range.
Those clothing are a bit too revealing though

It's the other way around. Women literally do not give a fuck about how a man looks, it's all about the meta bullshit.

update for this image in 2019
>women: you can literally look like anything. big is beautiful. it's horrible to insult women even for things they can change about themselves
>men: be at least 6ft tall, at least 7/10 face and steady income so no wagie to look good

Attached: 44ih1kkbcez11.jpg (828x979, 101K)

she fat tho and nonwhite

Attached: 1420575140719.jpg (380x380, 60K)

you're right, I'm not American.

>tfw society is going to improve so much faster now

You watch too much porn. Also, eh. She's overweight and clearly half black or something. She may as well be naked with that outfit. Look at those stomach rolls. Give her 10 years and she'll be obese.

You literally have to argue using an imaginary 10 years from now version of her.

No, she's overweight now but she'll be obese in 10 years.

is this bait? non original

I don't see the problem, the human race (excluding niggers) will progress so much because of it, nothing but high quality genes for the next generation, although I'm fearfull that women will be regarded more than the baby machines they are

you're assuming women being picky will lead to traits being driven to fixation, but in other species (as in leks) this isn't the case. don't confuse hypergamy for eugenics

The chart on the right reminds me of how Incels all worship Stacey's.

>god i am so lonely i would kill for a gf i would die for sex please any woman at all just has to be female please god
>except for women who are thick because thats just fat

Lol. I will never understand how low tests would turn a slampig away.

Attached: DxxmdbtUcAAGN7Q.jpg (1024x576, 57K)

picky does imply better yes.

not if the traits women are highly selective for are examples of runaway selection

who is this user, can you sauce pleaze

that theory is fine for short term and small populations but doesn't make any sense in the context of "women are being picky for the best males"

hypergamy is literally a discussion of class preference. if the best males in the current hierarchy have the greatest reproductive success, there is literally zero argument against the idea that society objectively improves. beyond that, you're speculating that specific genes that may be good fall off because they don't correlate with class or dick size or whatever. if they are good in any meaningful way they will return or find a balance in the population.

>nothing but high quality genes for the next generation
the opposite is true. what we want are healthy kids from the backbone of the population, slightly above average people. what we're producing massively instead are two (should be) outlier groups: low IQ single-mom / drug dealer babies from the segment of the population too stupid not to reproduce, and high IQ neurotic only-child weaklings from 40 year old couples with low sperm counts and shriveled eggs, born autistic and allergic to water, air and land. our best are failing to have kids at the appropriate age or altogether while our worst make up the bulk of the next generation. we're producing 60% retard jamals we lose the last use for as mcdonald's kitchen becomes automated, and 20% future incel robots who couldn't solve the demographic problem by shooting up their schools even if the girls joined in. the remaining 20% actually fit children are hopeless to manage the 80% garbage all by themselves. we're running off a cliff and there are no brakes. we can't promote fertility for useful people while also neutering the subhumans. we can't outlaw birth control for people with an IQ over 110 and make it mandatory for anyone under 90 but that's what it would take. failing that we only have the globalist Orwellian nightmare as plan B: automate everything, start to enforce the law with perfect surveillance, then enjoy about a century of soulless high tech civilization before nobody knows how shit works any more and one hiccup of the automated system sends us back to the stone age for hundreds of years. a masked, invisible decline followed by a painful, sudden reboot of sorts.

no, she is just fat

>bro just go to the gym
>bro just shave your head
>bro just take a shower
>bro just grow a beard
>bro just go outside and get some sun
>bro just stop giving a fuck, be confident, be tough, the pussy will come crawling to you

Yikes. It looks like Chad's advice was bullshit. I guess not everyone has a chance. Some guys are just screwed. Lol.

Attached: justliftbro.jpg (2358x4192, 1.99M)

why isn't trump deporting all these fucking spics

because hes basically a left wing pussy.

dude has no idea how to lift and he looks like shit with a beard

Pamela Alexandria on Instagram. Blew mad loads to her last night

Attached: 20190602_192818.jpg (889x1311, 873K)

Idc if shes a fat nigger she makes my cock hard

Attached: 20190602_192933.jpg (748x1331, 922K)

fatty mcfatfats

Get a load of this faggot. This woman was MADE for being bred. Imagine bending that over and pounding from the behind, raw, and reaching forward to grab her bouncing titties and unleashing a fat was of warm nut into her warm, wet and welcoming pussy while your to guess is in her mouth.

Hngggg

>Pamela Alexandria
i cant find her

thanks

instagram.com/pamelaalexandra/?hl=en

Give her five years, lol.

nah only the best males are reproducing by definition. if competition increases because fewer males overall reproduces, males have to become even better than before.

>little fats
am I doing it wrong?

Why do you think that women like the one OP posted are interested in robots? It's a mutual rejection, idiot.

the most important traits to develop for the well-being of the human race are:
1. empathy and good nature toward fellow man
2. intelligence
3. good health and longevity of life

so if women were selecting for these traits over less important ones like say height, facial aesthetics, hair, or whatever else, then i would agree with you

right picture is bullshit made by low IQ mgtows, to be good looking as a man you just need a good face and be below 18% bodyfat

if height survives multiple generations and "empathy" only survives one generation, then heigh is a more important trait. but it's good that you agree society will progress.

The future humans will just be more attractive than the present humans with this selection.

>dude has no idea how to lift
If you think this, you must have never seen someone who didn't lift. Did you grow up as a prisoner in a gym?

by important, i mean traits that would benefit everyone if they were more developed. evolution often selects for suboptimal traits, and they're usually because of sexual selection. this is well known.

height happens to be one of those traits for humans, because it's actually negatively correlated with longevity of life. i'm 6'1, so i'm not even manlet coping. it's just the truth about how evolution works

who is this woman?

i have to know please

if height survives multiple generations and "muh arbitrary benefit for every1" doesn't survive past one generation, then height is objectively more important and the population that is taller will outlast the population that isn't having any kids.

your "truth about evolution" doesn't take into account how evolution actually works you just think humans are like RPG characters and compensate one trait for another. Intelligence, height, longevity etc. are relative. If current society selects for taller people, that doesn't mean people are getting dumber. Any correlation you would find there is just regression to the mean. At some point height may actually come at a consequence to reproductive success, and then people will max out on size or become shorter.

tldr you are stupid

There was a study done that shows women are more into dad bods than the traditional ripped model look, and it makes sense.

Go outside for once, you'll see a lot of decent to great looking women with chubby dudes, you won't see many good looking men with hamwhales though.

. If current society selects for taller people, that doesn't mean people are getting dumber. Any correlation you would find there is just regression to the mean

the example doesn't make sense anyway given height and intelligence are correlated due to taller people having larger brains