"Why are you mad they circumcised you? They just cut off part of your penis...

>"Why are you mad they circumcised you? They just cut off part of your penis? lol inbd!!! If you complain about this you must be CRAZY!!!"

This is proof enough for me that this world is psychotic.

Attached: 544747474747.jpg (249x240, 7K)

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=BgoTRMKrJo4
youtube.com/watch?v=FNgerSYsHEw
youtube.com/watch?v=lmToXLVrZ7c
ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29210334
drmomma.org/2010/01/phony-phimosis-diagnosis.html
google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/travel/2016/03/17/welcome-tel-aviv-gayest-city-earth/y9V15VazXhtSjXVSo9gT9K/story.html?outputType=amp&ved=2ahUKEwjfg-jsx87iAhUmmuAKHcenCO4QFjAJegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3b6vFiNXbOL8UFK6dQK7bC&cf=1
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

People on Jow Forums will throw dozens of articles at you saying how, because you're circumcised, you'll never feel pleasure, you'll never know what sex is supposed to feel like, how everyone prefers uncut dicks, all this shit intending to make you feel insecure and awful.

Then you complain about being circumcised and the same people will act confused. "Uhm like dude you can't do anything about it so, like, uhm................... why get upset about it? like, just like, let it go bro!"

It's more like people share information about how fucked up forced child circumcision is to raise awareness and stop people from continuing this absurdity.

Feels like a personal attack when they say things along the lines of "you mad cutfags" or "how does it feel that you'll never ever know how your dick is supposed to feel" "how does it feel knowing you'll never be a man".

Yeah, in that case, those are indeed personal attack and I don't condone that stuff. I don't do it.

>Ew! What the FUCK user?
>what's wrong with your dick?!
>w-where is your foreskin..?
>why do you have that grotesque scar on your penis??
>what happened to you?
>I've never seen something like that in my life
>*gingerly touches your penis*
>*immediately recoils*
>oh my GOD your dickhead is like leather
>user, look, I'm sorry about your chemical accident or whatever the hell happened to your dick but I cant do this.
>that thing looks painful!
>...sorry...

Attached: 1403312238406.jpg (720x1280, 183K)

Yup, being a male sucks. You got the wrong side of the coin flip when the sperm entered the egg. NO one care about you, your presence is always annoying, no one really wants you around, most males are ugly, you are slime in public. Consider suicide

Nose ring = insta-reject fek off thot

Attached: 1559289198815.jpg (960x752, 239K)

In the US a majority of men are circumcised.

>Opened up about being upset with my circumcision to my therapist...she basically told me to get over it and that circumcision is a good thing.

She seemed confused as to why I was even upset about it. She said most guys are cut (true in america) and don't have any problem with it so why should I? She also said if I wasn't cut i'd "likely" have problems with it.

I asked her why can't society allow boys to decide for themselves if they want to be circumcised when they are adults and she changed the subject.

Your therapist is incredibly ignorant. If you still see her, you should educate her on the subject. You're the one paying her, and this is an issue that you clearly are pained by.

Her response is ignorant, disgusting, misandrist, and arguably a breach of her fiduciary duty to you.

There's a ton of information you can share with her to inform her of the truth about what this is. She probably thinks circumcision removes "a little flap of extra skin" or some utterly false bullshit like that.

You need to explain to her the fact that circumcision removes the most sensitive parts of the penis, impedes the natural mechanical motion of the male sex organs by removing the only actually moving part, and was introduced in the USA for the express purpose of controlling male sexuality. The "it doesn't affect sex!" idea came around the time of the sexual revolution. It absolutely does affect sex and that was precisely the reason why it was done before that time.

You need to redpill her so she doesn't damage another patient who comes forward.

Maybe you could also bring up the fact that being told to "get over it" by someone who doesn't know what they're talking about and will ridicule, invalidate, and shame, like she did, is one of the reasons more men who are angry about this don't speak up. Pic related.

Here's some videos you can share with her.

youtube.com/watch?v=BgoTRMKrJo4

youtube.com/watch?v=FNgerSYsHEw

youtube.com/watch?v=lmToXLVrZ7c

This could be split over a few sessions because it's a lot to take in. Anyway whether you do this or not is up to you but it's what I would do.

You can tell her that it would be very difficult and painful for you to explain this to her yourself but the videos will allow her to understand your issue better without hurting you so much in the process.

Attached: james ketter.jpg (742x960, 100K)

Btw, regarding her "most guys are cut and don't have any problem with it"

First off, that's a vox populi fallacy. Secondly a lot of guys who seemingly don't have any problem with it actually DO but don't complain because they know they'll be invalidated, as I mentioned before. And many of those who say "I'm cut and I'm fine" actually don't even really understand what the foreskin and circumcision are. If they knew, they may feel differently.

>False beliefs predict increased circumcision satisfaction in a sample of US American men.

ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29210334

The more you know about this whole thing, if you have even a shred of moral fiber in you, the more you realize how absurdly, insanely evil nontherapeutic child circumcision is. And it's an entirely artificial problem that could be stopped by simply just not doing it.

And no, you wouldn't "likely have problems" with your foreskin, unless you were malpracticed on by a doctor forcibly retracting you when you were a kid.

drmomma.org/2010/01/phony-phimosis-diagnosis.html (This article is written by an actual MD; don't let the hippie sounding "drmomma" site fool you)

As a man, to society you're expendable and nobody really cares about you.

>men are terrified of speaking out about circumcision and getting mocked
fuck females

There shouldn't be cutfags, nobody should be subjected to that.

Depressing that sexism is okay when it's against males, even when it's genital mutilation.

>this world is psychotic.

It's worse than a psychotic world. It's an evil world and an evil society.

If you're not circumsized, you may as well be a buttfucking fag.

To be fair, circumcised men are missing out on quite a bit. Even if it doesnt agree with your senseabilites that doesnt make it a lie. If you want to get an idea of what I'm talking about, try doing something as simple as covering your glans for a few weeks while keeping them moist with something like squalane oil. You will be flabbergasted at how different the sensation is. It wont just be different for your dickhead, either. Things like your sulcus and frenulum (if it wasnt completely removed) will feel vastly more sensitive. Even your inner foreskin, or what's left of it, will feel different. Its hard to appreciate how much different these sensations are until you experience them first hand.

>sulcus
What is this?

I know frenulum from past circumcision threads

>If you're not circumsized, you may as well be a buttfucking fag.
t. cutfag COPE

>You need to redpill her so she doesn't damage another patient who comes forward.

I doubt somebody emotionally invested in circumcision, in a woman's case because she cut her sons, is jewish, or aesthetically prefers mutilated dick, can be convinced against it no matter the evidence

>Even if it doesnt agree with your senseabilites
All this circumcision whining is literally about how circumcision offends your sensibilities.

So kill yourself

as much as I hate my parents for their neglectfulness I am forever grateful for them keeping me intact.

Attached: 1498843309674.jpg (653x490, 32K)

>cut
>fag
t. faggot for the neverending fires of hell COPE

>The irony of this moron saying that
google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/travel/2016/03/17/welcome-tel-aviv-gayest-city-earth/y9V15VazXhtSjXVSo9gT9K/story.html?outputType=amp&ved=2ahUKEwjfg-jsx87iAhUmmuAKHcenCO4QFjAJegQIBxAB&usg=AOvVaw3b6vFiNXbOL8UFK6dQK7bC&cf=1
t.cutfag

The Second Temple was destroyed for this behavior. It hasn't stopped, and so there is no Third Temple.

And...?
What does it disprove. Those queers are cut and gay as gay can be. It's practically Sodom there, and there ain't a foreskin among them.

It is encoded in Mosaic Law that it is the spiritual circumcision (the cutting away of sin from the soul) that is most important:

The LORD your God will circumcise your hearts and the hearts of your descendants, so that you may love him with all your heart and with all your soul, and live.
DEVARIM 30:6

Furthermore, there is a curse for those and their descendants who accept the Mosaic Covenant but break it:

The Lord will cause you to be defeated before your enemies. You will come at them from one direction but flee from them in seven, and you will become a thing of horror to all the kingdoms on earth.
DEVARIM 28:25

It doesn't disprove my point. Paul also talks of being circumcised in the heart, but also states that physical sign of circumcision is over. Not like it's even the same circumcision though.

The Law will not pass away, not the smallest tag, until its purpose has been fulfilled.

The law already has been fulfilled in Jesus Christ. The law only serves to condemn, not to justify. Paul talks in Romans how we are justified by faith and not works of the law. We no longer have to try to abide by all the ceremonial laws (i.e. circumcision, keeping with the holidays) because of Jesus and his sacrifice on the cross.

Therefore anyone who sets aside one of the least of these commands and teaches others accordingly will be called least in the kingdom of heaven, but whoever practices and teaches these commands will be called great in the kingdom of heaven.
Matthew 5:19

He was talking about loving God and loving others here. Not practicing a modified horrific mutilation that stole the name to try to validate it.

i know that feel bro.

I don't think pleasure wise it's much different, but I lost a lot of functionality and I have some meatal stenosis that I'm having to address upon turning 24 and reaching full maturity. I had to do foreskin restoration because the hair on my shaft was irritating my partners and it was so tight I was beginning to get full on ED.

Now my gf says I can go a lot deeper and the hair is at the base, as nature fucking intended.

This is a jewish extremist horse shit thing they've been pushing in the US and the Gomco will fuck you up, it's practically giving everyone a penis removal surgery, but not only that but a bunch of people get nerve damage because it's not a clean cut, it's a horrible marred together traumatic injury.

Let israel burn. Christians are getting circumcised by them and used as their cannon fodder, and this shit has been going on for 2000 years.

I second this after getting the inner foreskin covered doing foreskin restoration.

Shit feels like an organ I'm putting inside of her, not just warm feeling, then cum.

Infant circumcision advances you 10 years of traumatic stress reactions in the brain and delays wanking/ weird child sexual behaviour

It was conceived as a way to make Hebrew children more mature then gentile children to make them capable of following the law

The stress is true, the wanking is not.

With the added benefit of making everyone turn on you when you perform it on a population, you would think the jews would unanimously know to keep it to themselves.

Suspect before porn and sexualised mass media in desert people without guaranteed access to lube it would have worked for wanking

They're probably just using it to sell more corrective surgery and antidepressants now.

Cattle vranding

Being uncut sucks, this shit is too sensitive. Be grateful cunts, you fags can last more in bed

There is nothing stopping you from lopping off the sensory tissue in your dick.

pics or it didnt happen

part of the reason I did foreskin restoration desu. can't take it off but you can hide it and stretch it into nonexistence. lol.

>there is no Third Temple.

Attached: CIA Nigger shot.jpg (1440x1440, 766K)

For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
Matthew 5:18

Is accomplished when the kikes killed christ

Christ's work is not finished until his Apostles finish their work:

And this gospel of the kingdom will be proclaimed throughout the whole world as a testimony to all nations, and then the end will come.
Matthew 24:14

He fulfilled the law yes. He then gave the apostles charge to further the kingdom until His return. He hasn't returned yet because He is waiting for the fullness of the herd to come in.

Christ is become of no effect unto you, whosoever of you are justified by the law; ye are fallen from grace.
Galatians 5:4 KJV

Invalid scripture. Christ validates himself using scripture.

>Hebrew roots
Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfil.
Matthew 5:17 KJV
He fulfilled it at the Cross.

If you're cut, you have a lot more to worry about than just what women think.
>circumcision affects ability to feel empathy
>large amounts of american men are circumcised
It explains a lot about the modern world when you connect the dots and it's very chilling

Attached: rUJ2Cbh.jpg (653x1024, 164K)

I don't believe you, but actually it would be pretty cool if I could blame my robotic remorselessness to the fact that my dick was mutilated against my will as a child

So everyone has already heard the gospel?
Get out of town

The coronal sulcus is the area where the head meets the shaft. There are some other sulci around that area too. A sulcus is like a fissure or groove in between where two things meet.

In certain forms of circumcision it's actually filled in with what was formerly the midshaft skin. The mucosal foreskin, ridged band, most of the frenulum, dartos muscle, outer foreskin, and much of the penile shaft skin is removed, and the skin of the middle shaft is pulled up and sewn to the head of the penis, where it fuses for life (or until it ruptures during masturabation or sex). These styles are called "beauty cuts". Pic related.

Attached: beautycutfusion.jpg (800x531, 77K)

No wonder they are like hat here in the US!

>my religion says that mutilating babies is a-okay
neck yourself you absolute fucking retard

Is your soul mutilated by removing sin? Try that first before you touch your dick.

No, everyone has not heard the gospel. But Jesus Christ fulfilled the law with His sacrifice on the Cross at Calvary. We don't have to keep with the holidays anymore, or the continual sacrifices, because Jesus is the perfect sacrifice to pay for our sins. The Bible is clear, we are not justified by works of the law, but by faith. It even states that no one was justified by works of the law, but by faith.

>sin and foreskin are the same thing

Faith without good works is DEAD.

Just ignore him, he's a Hebrew Roots heretic that rejects the apostle Paul and makes salvation so works based, it makes Catholics look like Presbyterians.

What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if you say you have faith but do not have works? Can faith save you? . . . So faith by itself, if it has no works, is dead.
James 2:14 & 17

Since you're actually rational. Riddle me this. At what point are you so blinded by your faith that you resort to allowing people to have parts of their body cut off without their consent? Why are people tricked into this so easily?

Meh. Kill yourself.

Many reasons really. The Pharisees created a system of logic that basically argued that they followed a law by not following it. They did so to make themselves seem better than the publicans, saducees, and the tax collectors. Spite is another. Circumcision was not as bad as it used to be. Then when apostates from Judaism stretched it back, they made it to ensure no growing back.

Wherefore when he cometh into the world, he saith, Sacrifice and offering thou wouldest not, but a body hast thou prepared me: By the which will we are sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all. And every priest standeth daily ministering and offering oftentimes the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins: But this man, after he had offered one sacrifice for sins for ever, sat down on the right hand of God; From henceforth expecting till his enemies be made his footstool. For by one offering he hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified.
Hebrews 10:5, 10-14 KJV
A faith that does not produce repentance is dead correct. However, we are saved by faith, not works. Because if we could be saved by works, we wouldn't need a sacrifice. But God in His grace sent a perfect sacrifice. James is about testing and proving your faith, to see if it is true. If your faith is in your works for salvation, and not in Jesus Christ alone, then it is not a true faith. The Pharisees and saducees were strict adherents to the law, but they weren't saved, they put their faith in themselves and not in the Messiah.

For if Abraham were justified by works, he hath whereof to glory; but not before God. For what saith the scripture? Abraham believed God, and it was counted unto him for righteousness. Now to him that worketh is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. But to him that worketh not, but believeth on him that justifieth the ungodly, his faith is counted for righteousness. Even as David also describeth the blessedness of the man, unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works, Saying, Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven, and whose sins are covered. Blessed is the man to whom the Lord will not impute sin. Cometh this blessedness then upon the circumcision only, or upon the uncircumcision also? for we say that faith was reckoned to Abraham for righteousness. How was it then reckoned? when he was in circumcision, or in uncircumcision? Not in circumcision, but in uncircumcision. And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also: And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised.
Romans 4:2-12 KJV
Abraham was justified by faith. His faith was seen when he believed God's promise of an heir. An entire chapter of Hebrews is dedicated to explaining faith, showing faith. It is like believing it is going to rain, so you bring your umbrella. If you didn't have faith in your weather man, you wouldn't bring an umbrella. If you believed him, but didn't have faith you wouldn't bring one. But if you had faith, you'd bring an umbrella.

I get the idea that it's just more crab bucket mentality and kicking those lower than you further down. There was a thread the other day where Americans were complaining about the shit state of the US education system and a bunch of Euros came in calling Americans uncivilized, and one posed a pic of Omaha beach the caption "DIE MUTTS DIE"
This board isn't healthy, make sure to only come here in small doses. If a thread is bad, just don't respond and hide it.

Fuck off kike, I'll kill a thousand of you for every child you've tortured, scum.

Attached: image.jpg (957x626, 512K)

Is any man called being circumcised? let him not become uncircumcised. Is any called in uncircumcision? let him not be circumcised.
1 Corinthians 7:18 KJV
This word for becoming uncircumcised here in Koine Greek means to pull over. This was because circumcision originally only took some of the foreskin that extended over the glans at the eighth day. When apostates started to regrow their foreskin by stretching it over(pulling it over) a rabbi started having everyone "circumcised" and took off all the skin that isn't the skin on the glans(ignoring the fact that the forskin actually has muscles, blood vessels, nerves, entire structures such as the rigid band etc.)

>torturing a newborn leads to emotional difficulty
Who'd have guessed?
We have issues more deep-seated in society for something like this to have been allowed.