How can some "people" still deny the reality of lookism, inceldom and halo effect? I mean isn't it obvious that if you make a dating app account with your own (average) photos you are fucked vs if you make one with typical Chad's pics?
Is it about self-blue pilling, people don't want to hear the unhady truth? Or is it that they don't want people to rebel against the unfairness of our life?
How can some "people" still deny the reality of lookism, inceldom and halo effect...
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
twitter.com
Looks make it much easier but it simply isn't a be-all end-all. I consider myself fairly attractive, at least if I put effort into fashion and grooming, yet I'm a kissless virgin at 26 y.o. Meanwhile I know of some fat, ugly people that have girlfriends.
>I consider myself fairly attractive
Stopped reading there. I know exactly what you said later on. That you can't get girls as easily as I think, even though you are "fairly attractive" (which BTW isn't what top 20% sounds like, plus, all I know you can be ugly as fuck) and that you have seen a lot of ugly men walkign around with 10/10 women.
You blue pillers are so fucking predictable.
Cope. 100% Cope
Are you saying that my post is a cope or that people denying what I just said?
>typical Chad
Funny how incels always think this means a big muscular man. Yet these types don't attract women but gay men. It's almost as if incels were closeted homos.
How about actually trying to argue against it, then?
>Funny how incels always think this means a big muscular man.
Where did I say that? Nice projection faggot.
Personal, individual occurances are not argument for anything. There is literally nothing worthy of arguing against for a non-brainlet, even if it's all true. But in most cases this isn't even true, but a blue-piller's fantasy.
>Personal, individual occurances are not argument for anything.
It is when the point being argued is in fact one that can be disproven by individual occurrences. OP basically claimed that if you don't look good you are "fucked", which I interpret as having no chance. But since I know of occurrences where people that look good did get girlfriends, people like that do in fact have a chance.
Being fucked =/= impossible. It's like with lottery. Chad wins in most cases, an incel once in a million.
Also, you are most likely still just larping.
Incels don't win the lottery because they never bought a ticket. Chad did.
>an incel once in a million.
Since I know of a plural amount of these in my very modest network of acquaintances, I can say with a very high statistical confidence that the chance really isn't as low as you seem to think.
Are you implying that it's because "t-they didn't tried"?
the only thing that separates a normie from a non-mentally ill robot is the amount of experience they have socializing. Literally the only thing.
>t. former robot
Have you ever seen normies? If you're reasonably Jow Forums you already mog at least half of them. Yet you can't get laid and they have a gf. Why do you think that is?
>Since I know of a plural amount of these in my very modest network of acquaintances, I can say with a very high statistical confidence that the chance really isn't as low as you seem to think.
You fucking retard, incel = in 80%. Okay, in lowest 40% for you even. That's still a fuck ton of men. But you know of a few incels with gfs (most likely a larp, either that or they are together for some reason like money or whatever), oh so that must mean shit. Jesus blue pillers are so fucking right-hemisphere based, they are pathetically oblivious to logic.
bluepilled, just get Jow Forums bro, have you seen manlets with muscles getting mogged by lanklet chads
Plus some people literally can't change their frame. OP here, litteral skelly and it's just my genes I can't change. Yes, doctors admit that. I am not starved. I can't overeat or else I shit diarrhaea that is literally painful and burning and lose weight that way. Jewish genes.
You're backpedaling like crazy. First they are "fucked", then it's one in a million, now you're basically saying it's fairly common
This is true, social skills is more important than looks and social skills come with practice. However it's not so easy as to just practice and you'll catch up. Normies have an enormous head start, because they spend a lot of their free time for years socializing as a kid and teens, and people learn much faster then then as adults. If you are bad at socializing when growing up, you avoid it, thus getting even worse. It's a feedback loop. And to undo that as an adult requires an absolutely mind-boggling investment of time. Thousands, maybe tens of thousands, of hours of practice.
>backpedalling
No, I am literally just proving to you how, even if I lower my standards (which I didn't have to do), your "arguments" are dead when compared to logical thinking.
And if you are autistic enough to not understand meaning of "fucked" and of the saying "one in a million", then I have no hope for you, mr Chad unsuccessfull with girls.
Why do un-atractive people have relationships then?
Hm, so you are saying that you meant that it's fairly common all along? If so, what's the problem, exactly? It's lame that incels have to try a bit harder than good-looking people, but if them getting laid is still fairly common, then they have no excuse, they can just make an effort and they'll be fine in the end.
but lookism is bullshit
wow, you took the words right out my fucking mouth. You're 100% right. It is extremely difficult, but I do feel it is an achievable goal. It took about 2.5 years, and those years were filled with social ridicule when I mistakenly stepped out of line socially
Who the fuck cares if you get mogged by people? You still mog every fat basedboy who's never stepped in a gym