My God, the political dialogue nowadays is so utterly retarded.
>If you disagree with the regressive left; you're suddenly a far-right nazi. >If you disagree with the alt-right; you're a social justice warrior cuck. >If you despise both sides of this shitty coin; you're called a fucking centrist.
Free and independent thought is an alien concept these days. Everyone is so utterly idiotic they believe themselves to be freethinkers, yet swear allegiance to a label or an ideology.
Americans are at fault for a great number of things, however, seeing as this is a global phenomenon I would find it difficult to blame them for this situation.
Levi Smith
Just cross out "centrist" and replace it with OP's super-unique political stance.
They'd track ya down and put you in jail. That's how it works.
Levi Sanders
You do realize that in our political systems you have to work in groups or else your political party splits and loses elections? Democracy is about compromise and labeling your party as and the endgroup and t h e m as the outgroup. But have fun putting your ideas into action when you won't compromise on a single one.
Jack Anderson
For what? I've broken no laws. >inb4 all authoritarians are anti-gay
Henry Ward
Oh look, my point once again being proven correct. >"Not belonging to one of these camps must mean you have no serious convictions" You must have an IQ no higher than 85.
Ian Taylor
>t. 110-120 IQ basically the sweet spot for being smart enough to question why things are so fucked but not having an answer for why, or how to fix it
>baseless assumptions >You must have an IQ no higher than 85.
Nolan Turner
You're basically implying that because I don't subscribe to this cesspool of self-affirmation by likeminded robotic fools, I haven't got my own opinions on the solutions to what I see as issues in the world. My dearest friend, you're no better than the rest of these mongoloids.
Isaiah Adams
no, I'm just implying that this commentary is stereotypical of a specific demographic. Anybody can come up with a "solution", but that doesn't mean it'll solve anything, especially if you don't understand the problem.
Henry Bennett
Okay, let's break this down and let me get this straight. >Anybody can come up with a "solution", but that doesn't mean it'll solve anything. This is so obvious that going into it further would be a waste of my time and yours, however the last part of your following statement really annoys me. >especially if you don't understand the problem. There is an undertone of innuendo here; you assume, that simply not subscribing to one these two sides assumes a lack of knowledge. Once again, I will restate my previous sentiment: You are part of the problem.
Sebastian Miller
everyone is a part of the problem and we should all gas ourselves
Juan Roberts
>There is an undertone of innuendo here; you assume, that simply not subscribing to one these two sides assumes a lack of knowledge. You can infer whatever you'd like but there's nothing more or less to what I'm saying than what's there in writing.
Perhaps my English is too limited to comprehend what you're trying to say. If so, I do apologise. I am however very confident that there are only two ways to interpret your statement. 1) What I've stated several times now. 2) You simply wanted to state something so obvious, in case I was mentally challenged.
If neither is correct, then you are backtracking on your own statements.
Samuel Johnson
To expand on two a little bit, I figured you weren't actually aware of how typical your sentiment was. I'd be a bit surprised if someone self-aware of this would make the remarks you do in the way that you do.
Xavier Lee
Try reddit it sounds right up your alley
Kevin Reyes
>I'd be a bit surprised if someone self-aware of this would make the remarks you do in the way that you do. This is not expanding on your answer. This is simply restating the same shit you've said over and over again in a different way.
Kill yourself.
Jaxson Phillips
That's untrue. Perhaps your English is too limited to understand what I'm saying. I'll take that apology now.
Jaxson Campbell
>like whites >don't like nazis because retarded >muh conservative values >but please don't kill me just because i'm faggot >free market is good >but for fucks sakes don't make sopa de macaco out of kids because its profitable RADICAL CENTRIST on politcompass god this is so fucking retarded
Ayden Garcia
That, my friend, is called "hyperbole". I comprehend every word of your reply, and the meaning behind it. Mutual understanding is a prerequisite of any intelligent discussion, however, as I see it; you're simply too stuck up to realise what you're saying.
My apology was meant as a courtesy, in hopes of you not restating the same thing. Consider it retracted.
Leo Young
This bait is unworthy of a response, but fuck it, I'll bite. Here, have your (You).
Levi Jones
don't be such an indian giver
Bentley Phillips
also I have to add that I resent the accusation of being "stuck up". I've never been called that in my life, nor anything synonymous to it. I feel that it's very far off the mark.
Hudson Russell
blame americans they're fucking retarded animals
Asher Bailey
I was attempting to be kind with that remark. In my opinion you're far beyond "stuck up".
Wyatt Green
real bait is that Jow Forumstards really think this is what radical centrism is
Nolan Sanchez
I beg to differ. In my experience, based on real life interactions, scandinavians and germans tend to espouse the trait of "stuck up" very greatly, and I dislike them for it. I believe you're reading my remarks in the way one of your countrymen would make them, which is not an accurate interpretation of my tone.
Matthew Torres
Perhaps I am. However, what point is there in further discussion if you refuse to state them in a different manner? I have read your original post over and over, and I can come to only one conclusion.
I am still interested in your opinion, if it is any different from what I deem it to be, (which I highly doubt). If this is the case; I would be eternally grateful if you would spare me the time and restate it one last time, in a way that is actually different this time.
If not, do me, and yourself a favour; and shut the fuck up.
Ryan Thomas
If it is what they really believe then it wouldn't be bait, would it?
Chase Evans
I earnestly do not believe you've taken from my comments what I have intended, but I have tried as best as I know how to state them as plainly as I can. Despite my remark that perhaps you lack the understanding of English to interpret it as I intend, I'm inclined to think perhaps our difference in disposition is the cause, but a failure to communicate is almost universally the fault of the speaker, and so I will take responsibility for my failing and do as you request, and "shut the fuck up" from here on out.
Benjamin Richardson
maybe its not bait and you're just a Jow Forumstard?
Lucas Long
Greatly appreciated. I have however enjoyed our exchange. Good day to you, sir.
No, I most certainly am not.
Grayson Murphy
My bet is that OP got a mad butthurt and now he thinks he's trolling us by going full retard.
Adrian Long
sake in all replies *hic*
Robert Wilson
Honestly I would point the start of it at the Americans. I mean to blame them is wrong, but they are definitely at the forefront of this problem. The American individual isn't to blame, they just logically live in the first country where this current shitstorm trend would start and it's automatically spreading to others until someone finds a way to stop it. We're all being swept up in this "new" internet that is basically one massive chaotic propaganda machine pulling on all sides of the political spectrum. And this internet machine chugs out little errors with every fact that gets passed along at the speed of light, somewhat like a huge, overpowered, global game of telephone. And eventually this machine slowly erodes all facts this way and leaves only opinions that get more and more simplified and extreme because none of us simple laymen can keep up with the enormous amount of objective data that has to be processed anymore. The Americans are the first to experience this because 1. their country is huge, and lots of people means lots of internet traffic. 2. their country's two-party system already was very easy at creating huge divides in the first place. 3. their senate keeps giving them very little more than platitudes and they're generally getting a bit (righteously) pissed.
I think gay people should have rights, abortion should be illegal unless it puts the mother's life in danger, and gun laws should be tighter than they are now but not too tight. What political party does this make me?
Not the US, we had decent politics for a couple centuries. I know this isn't a particularly new idea, but I think it was the internet, particularly Facebook/Reddit. These sites allow people to enclose themselves in their little bubbles, so they never have to acknowledge other opinions.
Landon Peterson
>gun laws should be tighter It makes you a bitch nigga
Jeremiah Perry
I know how you feel OP, have consider becoming a Democratic-Republican? It's neither left nor right or center.
But central banks are evil boi, and the Federalist were for monarchies and were against free speech.
Isaiah Robinson
>Federalist were for monarchies and were against free speech nigga what? Jeffersonian rhetoric doesn't mean the Federalists were actually interested in a monarchy or against free speech. The Alien & Sedition Acts were pretty retarded but it's hardly fair to condemn something like that as being representative of the party in general. The Federalist view of a strong central government & industrialization was a lot more accurate and intelligent than Jefferson's agrarian dream and states' petty squabbles
Kevin Green
there are two things infinite: The universe and human stupidity -Albert Einstein
But i agree tho
Elijah White
It always was stupid, the difference is that it became more widespread on the internet
