Is this the true nature of women?

But I thought women said they want passionate men that are not afraid of showing emotion? Why the ruse? What's their angle for lying about that?

Ever heard of the shit test?

Some men are beyond pathetic. You're like a toddler who pretends he didn't hear mommy calling his name when he messed up. That's how many of you act. Maybe that can be the "redpill" about men? A bunch of damn children.

Attached: Tête.png (600x600, 108K)

no, please do tell. orignally

Once you're blackpilled, you can't wrap your head around the mental gymnastics people do to escape the truth about femininity.

Like, everyone probably has this general gist that females are more prone to dishonesty and manipulation, but they seem to explain it away by better "social intelligence" or some shit. No. Femininity, in its essence, is an evil force. There is an evolutionary reason for its existence, but setting it free it causes chaos and destroys civilizations. Females place absolutely ZERO value in honesty and integrity because they don't have the physical credibility to back them up.

It's the reason why allowing women's suffrage was such a disastrous decision. Women are not cut out for critical thinking, opposing existing beliefs or listening to their conscience.

If you look at the voting behavior of women, women as a group usually this big blob that supports whatever ideology happens to be mainstream. Women are never the rebellious individuals or outliers. They're always comfortably in the middle where everyone else is.

Women are absolutely terrible creatures if measured by the same standards as men (intelligence, presonality, strength). But if keep women where nature intended them, then they can be a wonderful part of humanity. Unfortunately the West is dead-set on artificially lifting women on the same level as men, as if such goal could ever be attained.

I think women understand "showing emotion" differently than we do. When we say it, we mean emotional vulnerability and insecurity, but when they say it, they mean everything else except for those things.

Different user.
Some women deliberately come up with things to piss off whoever they are dating to see how much shit they are willing to put up with before settling down.
They either turn it into an advantage and continue manipulating them, effectively pussy whipping their man, or they piss them off for months, then act like it's the other person's fault for not being able to "handle" their personality.

It's a lot of bullshit, honestly. Not worth the drama.

Attached: 1540318763064.jpg (481x498, 14K)

Literally pseudo-scientific nonsense. Get your shit together and at least try to come up with theories that can't get refuted extremely easily by anyone not completely disconnected with reality, and with at least some knowledge of how to read scientific studies.

It when they say shit like that so you expose weakness which they can judge you on.

>he isnt talking about women or redpills, just telling you to gtfo
Aiste you truly are a retard

>scientific
Who the fuck said it was scientific? Sociology is too crude to be science, but the only type of sociology with any predictive value is found on this website. Grow a spine faggot.

It makes sense. Physically, women are almost as vulnerable as children are. What is a typical way for a child to express their will in hopes of getting it fulfilled? Emotions: crying, screaming, and harmless violence. It's what a human has to resort to when they can't phsyically force their will to come true. It's a "strength" of its own.

But if a man does the same, then all that means is that his physical prowess leaves no other avenues for him. So obviously it's an indication of weakness in a man.

>What's their angle for lying about that?

shit test

Wait isn't he a tranny faggot?

The behaviour you are describing does happen, but I don't think it's the case with this specific thing. The women who say they want men to show their emotions seem to be saying it sincerely, but to be unaware of what exactly they are asking for.

Sociology is literally a science, you inbred idiot.

No, it's not. They pretend it is but it isn't.

If that's the case, then how come women don't express vulnerability and insecurity with each other?

If you think about it, you will realize why.

It's the same reason kids might mock each other for crying. It all comes down to difference in physical prowess. Female-on-female interaction presumably contains no significant discrepancy if phsyical prowess among the participants, so resorting to emotions is a sign of weakness. Same thing among children.

But introduce a man to a female, or a child to an adult, then the weaker party is left no choice but to leverage emotions.

>sociology is literally a science

No words

>Sociology is literally a science

(((sociology)))

Do you think I can't read between the lines?? I honestly hate arguing with people. But I've been in pain for 3 days now and will probably for 3 days more. I'm pretty damn irritated. I took a double dose of ketesse. It helps but I'm still pretty damn uncomfortable and then I see this thread and of course some guy pretends to be deaf and dumb in it. I've seen it a million times before.

Attached: Agité.png (600x600, 146K)

Literally denialism. Sociology uses the scientific method to derive conclusions.

It cannot replicate the majority of its studies.

>Sociology uses the scientific method to derive conclusions.
>the scientific method
holy shit you're fucking stupid. you're a stupid mother fucking nigger. fuck you you stupid dense fuck

>it uses the scientific method it says so on the sticker
holy shit based

>literally fighting made up enemies
seek eternal peace

Did you or do you have a penis, y/n?

Lmao, no It doesnt because the studies cant even be replicated and its a field of ((((OPINIONS))))

No point in arguing with baffoons, but you cannot make predictions of how complex systems will behave in response to inputs on the system
To claim sociology is a science, is to either be deceitful and trying to obtain value for this field of study, or to have no conception at all of what science is and attempts to do as a final product.

Not being able to replicate studies can be a problem related to the difficulty in finding reliable methodology for the field of study. It's difficult to account for, for example, humans misinterpreting questions. The very fact that they notice that they have problems with replication implies that they are using the scientific method.

Also, I'd have to google and check whether that is true, and I don't really feel like it.

>you cannot make predictions of how complex systems will behave in response to inputs on the system
You are clearly not an engineer.

Also, you are still engaging in denialism. I have yet to see a single valid argument as to why sociology wouldn't be a science.

No because all my interactions with females outside of my female family members have no substance

That's probably the nicest way someone has ever told me to kill myself.

Attached: Contente.png (600x600, 142K)

Why do redpill posts always imply that men can't be open about their feelings without looking like such and such?

lol, I am literally an engineer and that's exactly why I know you don't know shit about what you're talking about, there's never been a single action in attempts to steer society in one direction that had it's intended outcome without unforeseen consequences.

Mathematical fields like chaos theory even attempt to prove that in complex systems there is a mathmatical impossibility of determining the output in response to a certain input

You're literally a nigger, we aren't talking computer programs which while some can be extremely complicated, mysql for example having around millions and millions of lines of code is still NOT a complex system.

Now iamgine society, which is made up of humans and their interactions, economy, governance, etc.

Sociology as an entire field of study is NOT scientific and you're a fucking clown with zero education

What the fuck are you rambling about. I dont give a flying fuck whether you are in pain or not. You are not making sense

This is so redpilled its almost like a LARPer wrote it

Why wont you tell me if you have/had a penis? I want to know user kun

The red pill on men (for women) is to just find a rich beta because he'll be loyal and provide for you forever, keep yourself in shape so he remains happy and suck his dick

Based and raped that faggot pilled

>I am literally an engineer
Yeah, right. You literally said it was impossible to make predictions about the outputs of a complex system, but our field relies on precisely that. Evidently we can't get exact results, since we can't account for every variable, but we can make predictions.
The way you're talking about it is like:
>Why do people even make buildings and machines? Don't they know it's impossible to predict whether they will work well or not? Shouldn't we just literally never make anything new out of fear of what will happen?

>Now iamgine society, which is made up of humans and their interactions, economy, governance, etc.
There's more complexity and issues with finding reliable methodology, but to say that it is literally impossible to ever get some sort of predictive laws about it, regardless of the possibility of future technology allowing for improvements in methodology, is just plain denialism.

>Sociology as an entire field of study is NOT scientific
You don't know what science is. If you had lived back before instruments were invented to measure values related to electricity, you would say it would be absolutely impossible to ever get to any reliable conclusions about electrical circuits.

Literally kill yourself, you larper fuck.

based
fucking pseud faggot

No. Now fuck off. Everything is fucking ruined anyway. I hate my life and the fucking pharma won't give me anything better than ketesse. This country is a scam. I wouldn't mind killing one of you smug assholes.

Attached: Lørdag.png (600x600, 159K)

You're sure? I vaguely remember an avatar fag just like you who was. I think you're lying,
>I wouldn't mind killing one of you smug assholes.
You can have my heart if you can carve it out yourself, Shylock. Come and take it *smooch*

I am an engineer you faggot, and I'm about to be a master in 1 year.

"Our" field, which I put in quotations because I highly doubt you've even done basic calculus exists to make models and build tools.

You aren't even aware of everything that is at play, if we were aware of all the variables and could solve the millions of diferential equations composed from analysis the global market, we could compute a perfect price for every product, achieving a perfect economy. Except we can't account for all the fucking variables at play in the market at any given time, and the complexity involved in even solving that computation (IF you could formulate all the diferential equations in the first place) would be exponential and you wouldn't get an answer before you fucking died, and by the time you got the fucking answer the variables and values that you used to build the equations would be wrong and not up to date, making the whole endevour, useless.

You clearly don't know what a COMPLEX system is, even tho i've tried demonstrating to you via a good example of a system that altho you could call it "complex" (A program with millions of lines of code) is still NOT a complex system.

You absolutly cannot get "predictive" laws when it comes to changes in society, any rational attempt to steer society in one direction will have unforeseen consequences, that you could never account for, and this isn't an issue of "methodology", it's an issue of computability and the way the universe works (This is what mathematical theory tells us).

I know what fucking science is, apparently you don't, because you seem to think that making predictive models for SOCIETY is the same as designing a tool to measure electrical current.

the day i let some undergrad in biology tell me what science is while arguing in favor of predictive models for steering society in any rationally chosen direction, is the day i'll bury myself underground.

I wouldn't mind killing you avatarfags. You're all the fucking same and orbiters like make you worse.

reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/aqge4p/aita_for_distancing_myself_from_my_bf_after_he/
the responses are great

Sorry, I tend to forget. Yeah, I'm just some fag.

Attached: Pavillon 36.png (600x600, 118K)

You think I actually like her? Do you have autism?

The fuck do you know? You're not one.

No, she's just a bitch.
But it's useless saying this here because what you want to hear is that, yes, all women are that horrible because hating women is better for you than the self-imposed torture of your craving of the female body.

>I am an engineer you faggot, and I'm about to be a master in 1 year
Already did 3 years mech eng. 2 more left.

>if we were aware of all the variables and could solve the millions of diferential equations composed from analysis the global market, we could compute a perfect price for every product, achieving a perfect economy
There's actually a book that talks about doing that, and proposes a solution based on production time. It's called Towards a New Socialism. It literally only involves linear equations, so you're just validating my idea of you as an obscurantist. You are literally so afraid of actually acquiring knowledge or trying anything new, that you will exaggerate everything in hopes that nobody else tries it.

>Except we can't account for all the fucking variables at play in the market at any given time
This is a problem of information. Realistically, it would be possible to account for all the relevant variables if enough were invested on measuring them.

>you wouldn't get an answer before you fucking died
The book I mentions disagrees with you. The authors find a way around this problem.

>You clearly don't know what a COMPLEX system
I do know. We use safety factors and other coeficients all the time precisely because we cannot measure all the variables with current technologies (and there may be situations where it would be too inconvenient to do so anyway).

>it's an issue of computability and the way the universe works (This is what mathematical theory tells us).
They don't teach us chaos theory in engineering, so I very much doubt you even have reliable knowledge on what it is.

>you seem to think that making predictive models for SOCIETY is the same as designing a tool to measure electrical current
Unironically yes. Complexity is an obstacle to be overcome. Humanity was not meant to bow down to before nature and cry like a little bitch because they're scared of progress. We're meant to change everything around us.

Is this guy actually the dumbest fucking argumentanon who's ever posted? Imagine not knowing what a science is.

Weak weak bait written by a larping incel

Wrong. There was a statistic that showed that most woman would never date a bisexual man, which is the real problem here. She doesn't care that he was raped, she cares because he was another man's bitch, most woman don't want a man that's been in that situation, whether it was forced or not.

You're a fool then. You're not playing with rocks and sticks anymore, it's not bronze swords and 12 foot spears that are the innovations of tomorrow.

I've never claimed to be learned in chaos theory, my field is computer engineering and i'm mastering in security.

Did you know that you can mathmatically prove the safety of a computer program? Do you know how many companies actually do this?

It's incredibly hard, insanely hard and time consuming for any computer program that isn't trivial, much less for a system composed of several of these non-trivial computer programs

It's not that we don't have the mathematical knowledge to do it, it's that it's so time consuming and expensive that not even the most powerful of global systems are doing it in all their programs.

Do you think that at the start of the industrial revolution people were aware of the effects of careless industrial exploitation and for example global warming 100-200 years down the road?

Do you not see that a simple change like for example, introducing women to the workforce, can have unforeseen consequences? On not just the social aspect of society and the interactions humans have, but economy, birthrates?

We're literally playing with chance and luck when it comes to this, the trend is for systems to use and abuse technology (And the technology now permits systems of a global scale) without any idea of the impact it will have 10+ years down the road.

Since your education on computation is literally reading technocrats marketable books, i'll tell you that my education on chaos theory is based on very much the same, mild interest, it's not my field of work definetly, computation however, is.

The most famous example of a COMPLEX system is the weather, do you honestly think you can predict how the weather is going to be 365 days from now? No, you can't, chaos theory ensures that your information is lost at each step of the process, making your prediction completly worthless.

Dude, I'm not denying that complex systems exist, and that there are cases where no accurate predictions can be made. I'm telling you that this need not necessarily be the case forever. There have been improvements in technology that have allowed for previously impossible to calculate problems to be solved with higher and higher degrees of precision. To simply dismiss all things that are today impossible to accurately calculate as eternally impossible to accurately calculate is irrational.

To compute the weather 365 days from now, you'd need to know the variables that make up the weather 1 day from now, which in turn is used to calculate the variables of the weather 2 days from now, so on and so forth, this is the nature of a complex system.

If you admit already that society is a complex system then you'll immediatly take back your words about sociology being a valid "science", i'd even argue that it's predictive value in the practical aspect of reality is the same as witchcraft and voodoo, absolutely unreliable and based on no credible information.

And you're not even thinking about it clearly, technology itself just increases the complexity of systems as a whole, we could say that nowdays we are all part of one, or several, global systems, which in turn are composed of subsystems. As technology increases, so does the complexity of systems, and thus, so does complexity of the largest abstract system which encompases all the other global systems, and their subsystems.

It's a paradox, having "more technology" may increase your computing power in order to resolve the issue of complex systems, but it also increases the complexity of the systems themselfs.

If you STILL don't see what I'm talking about when I mention complex systems and say that society is a complex system and that as such, the value of a field like sociology which doesn't even dabble in the field of mathematics is completly null and void as a scientific model to predict the outcome of inputs in this system, then my friend, you're a moron.

see
And i'll finish up with asking you the name of the book, it seems clear to me that in order to have the perfect economic system, product prices would have to be calculated in real time (this assuming that you have formulated all the diferential equations from collecting all the available variables in the global market).

Look at what you're claiming the author of this book is writing, it would be impossible to achieve this for an isolated nation, much less the global system as a whole.

You should stop reading technocrats wetdream and start thinking with your mind abit.

A lot of the time behaviors like this are unconscious. The people engaging in this type of abuse aren't even aware they're doing it.

Here's the thing: most women suck, but most men also suck. In fact, most people suck. That's why you should only focus on the good people. What most people on this board do is just look for the worst cases of people (especially women, since they are not interested in fucking them than men) so they can be mad and feel justified in their loneliness and worldview.

There are good people out there, stop looking for the worst, try to better yourself and look for the good around you instead of wallowing in the shit.

These statistics don't account for the whole gender. You are being biased.
Are you even sure you know where these stats were sourced and on which pool of people it was conducted? There is also the issue of social norms and gender roled that is not addressed by these numbers.

Sure there are outliers, but you're kidding yourself if you think most woman want to date a guy that's been fucked in the ass, its too damaging to your reputation, especially among other men.

Absolute piece of shit woman.
Doesn't even deserve a robot from this board.

as fucked up as it is. It takes a lot of work to deal with a rape victim. I don't blame her for leaving. She was probably in over her head anyway.

Ill bet 50 million Internets that she's going to fuck his stepbrother if she didn't already.

ooga booga cram yourself

>It takes a lot of work to deal with a rape victim.
That's not the reason she have for wanting to leave him

Women mostly want psychopaths who would fuck over anyone to get her resources. That's basically why they like "bad boyz".
Crying for getting raped as a child isn't what a psychopath would do, so he isn't attractive anymore.

He deserved it, this is why the normie platitude of "being yourself" makes so much sense. You can't do a 180 on your personality once you get to know someone and expect that person to just go with it. She already built this idea of you that now you shatter before her, killing any relationship advance that happened with it

Be yourself and don't play stupid games user, women are a lot kinder than you give them credit for, they will understand

so Chad got raped kek

how is telling a trusted partner about this one time doing a 180 on his personality?
being raped as a preteen is everything but a stupid game

I know this is bait but imagine not understanding that people are multifaceted and behave different ways in different situations.
>the normie platitude of "being yourself" makes so much sense
>except when it contradicts what I want you to be and think you are ewww

Yeah sure, but it depends on the initial upbringing of said girl. Finding girls who see it as a fetish is not that hard either. Bi girls or girls who are into pegging or BDSM or have a gay fetish will rarely ever have a moral problem with it. Girls who think like that do so because they associate masculinity with a set of character and behavioral traits, but these people are wrong because their perception of genders is rigid as fuck and, quite frankly, this guy will hardly find any compassion out of a girl like this so he should be the one to move away, but it is plainly false to claim that you can't find women who are compassionate enough to understand.
And this is rape we're talking about. It's not like he expressed his passion for getting dicked by other dudes, he was forced into it, it scarred him. If all she cares about after learning that is how she'll see him from now on, then she is self-centered and quite simply a dumb bitch.

This is not being multifaceted, this is not being honest with yourself. His shitty dominant facade falling like that is a sign of deep unresolved issues that at no point his partner was signing up for.

It never was "what I want you to be", is more like "what he made me believe he was".

What the fuck is he supposed to do?
>hi, I'm user, I was raped as a child, be my gf?

It's the nature of men who write fake stories as 'women', yes.

yes, that is the true nature of women. they want a guy who is literally perfect, they want him to be completely confident, dominant, no mental problems, no traumas, and no severe emotional weaknesses. that's why all this fake confidence shit does not work, women want men who are actually confident, not some idiot acting like he's confident. you can only fake it for so long. once the curtain lifts on who you actually are she will bail on you. happens all the time.

jesus christ, you're a woman aren't you? basically you're saying the guy should have just given up as soon as he was raped and never try to be anything other than a perpetual rape victim. most people don't resolve issues, they just bury them, and sometimes they come back out. that's what humans actually are, not androids that can pick and choose which emotions to feel on a whim.
you're a fucking repulsive person

Sometimes R*ddit is alright, this bitch got annihilated in the comments. I hope this guy left this 'woman' and found a better one.

reddit.com/r/AmItheAsshole/comments/aqge4p/aita_for_distancing_myself_from_my_bf_after_he/

reddit.com/user/calinylo00/

It's funny cuz everybody in the comments called her an asshole

Welcome to /U/ (On The Discord App)

Discord Link
https:\discord.io\dkujHhf

A server with...
>Actual *E-Girls*
>Boipussy, Nudes, Jow Forums Memes, NSFW, VC, Megalinks, Voila, Dropbox, Kik swap, Nude swap, Porn swap, Snapchat, pornchat etc

Post what you want Mods don't give a shit. XPme

Attached: 1561875951.5829997.jpg (3200x2400, 1.71M)

>all those removed comments that were probably just being too harsh
reddirt is fucked up

kys

Scumbag fucking bitch if you ask me. I know normies are all shallow pieces of shit but let me tell you why this one is.

She describes him as the perfect man who shes attracted to but when he reveals how distraught he is about his past she just wants to drop him. Makes you question why she liked him in the first place. Was it because he was good looking and quote on quote dominant as she describes? If so it seems she saw him as nothing but a sex toy and provider and not as a person with rights and feelings. If he is a good and virtuous person this just makes it worse. He did nothing wrong to her, as far as i know he wasnt abusive or had a drug problem, and now she leaves him in his darkest hour because she does not truly love him when he is not super chad.

At least shes honest about her vile wickedness. What sucks is that society embraces this degeneracy.

>If so it seems she saw him as nothing but a sex toy and provider and not as a person with rights and feelings.
Are you like... new to women?

Welcome to /U/ (On The Discord App)

Discord Link
https:\\discord.io\dkujHhf

A server with...
>Actual *E-Girls*
>Boipussy, Nudes, Jow Forums Memes, NSFW, VC, Megalinks, Voila, Dropbox, Kik swap, Nude swap, Porn swap, Snapchat, pornchat etc

Post what you want Mods don't give a shit. LkXs

Attached: 1561881305.472.jpg (1506x1500, 217K)

But... that's wrong. Women are pretty evenly split between the two major political parties in the US. I would agree you would be less likely to find them in the radical wings of politics (fascism, communism, extreme libertarianism, etc.), but within the bounds of socially-acceptable public thought, they don't vote monolithically.