Why don't you just get married Jow Forums?
>lifelong companion
>never lonely
>double the salary
Why don't you just get married Jow Forums?
but to who user
I don't love anyone and nobody loves me
This is all I want.
I just want a guy to marry me so I can stay at home. I'll even have his kids if I must.
Why ever would you marry a woman without having children with her, its basically asking to be raped financially and getting cucked
>double the salary
Your income is "our income" and her income is "my income."
Plus divorce will financially fuck you, especially if you have kids with the woman.
Marriage is for cucks.
I dont want kids but if you dom me I'd marry you
I married my best friend, it is honestly rly comfy and wonderful but I understand that marriage is not for everyone
Um maybe because you love each other and want to spend your lives together? If you dont want that then fine, but let the rest of us be happy. Not sure where you got your toxic idea of marriage either, many marriages are built upon ove and equality.
I see more and more women admiting this than I thought existed. It really gets more obvious by the day that feminism is a lie.
That is not how it works user
Was your mom a gold digger or something? Because mine made more than every guy she has been with and they always pooled their income.
I did already, we split last year and seem to hate each other so much we can not discuss filing for divorce. I am going to file via the newspaper when I can get the cash, her mother says she would pay for part of it
Feminism does not mean you cant be a stay at home mom if you choose. It just means it isnt the only option like it was in the past and you do it out of choice and not obligation. I am a feminist and a housewife at the moment but for a long time it was my husband who stayed home and me who worked or went to school and supported us financially.
same, i hate working and i just want to stay home, make tasty diverse dishes, clean, play with my kids, greet my husband with a warm dinner when he comes home etc.
i agree, when i moved into the city and started working at a warehouse the number of guys trying to follow me home, say sexually explicit things, or creepy old married guys calling me sexy at work has made be become feminist
god I fucking HATE niggers, I HATE SLUTS AND WHORES and I HATE BOOTLICKING ASS KISSING CORRUPT PIG (aka COPS) FETISHIST/APOLOGIST
I wish Jehovah/jesus/Satan or WHOEVER would FUCKING BURN THESE SCUMFUCKING APES TO ASHES ALREADY SO THE EARTH CAN BE RESTORED AND GIVEN BACK TO WHO IT BELONGS TO, THE ANIMAL KINGDOM
FUCK YOU FILTHY HUMAN APES
DIE!!!!! DIE ALL OF YOU!!!
>except for some, I wont mention but they know
Because there's nobody worth being married to.
Anyone could abuse me in various ways and I could do nothing.
Being alone is painful, but being with other people is worse. All they ever do is hurt you.
Eh, I disagree but because of economics. If you double the workforce, you cut wages in half. It's not viable for a single person to sustain a house, not for the average Joe. The old mode doesn't work anymore because of economics. You can try to emulate it if the man or the woman makes enough money to cover both, but nowadays it's not common. Especially not for the women since they tend do divorce you if they make more money than you.
But hey, more power to you. If you are happy that's a good thing.
Sounds ideal, I always wanted to try dominating someone.
How far would you be willing to go in domming someone
I'd unironically consider marriage if we click in other ways
Thanks to most relationships being dual income, men lose less in divorce than ever. You are basically divorce fear mongering now because you think it's not obvious you were never going to get married anyway.
user is of course correct, doubling the work force lowers the wages which means that now most moms actually can't choose to stay home. If the individual decisions of women existed in some kind of atomized special space where they couldn't affect anything else maybe it could be looked at as "well work or don't, either's fine," but that's not how the reality worked out at all.
This is also buying into a common myth about women working, which is that women never worked until recently when they finally won the right from evil men. In fact most women have been working what we would recognize as jobs since the very beginning of the industrial revolution and had just recently won a reprieve during the post-war boom. Women largely pushed this reprieve away because appliances made housework much easier, schools provide "free" daycare and their husband's wages started falling off in the late 60s and 70s, meaning they had to return to work to maintain their standard of living. Feminism was largely about trying to make those jobs into good jobs, not mothers suddenly deciding that they love working instead of being with their children. That's not true even to this day, you can tell from all the bitching for more and more (paid) maternity leave (because I want to be with my kids but we can't afford it).
In general women like not working. I've met few who have husbands that have the luxury of supporting them that don't push their jobs away as soon as they have kids, or even just so they can do volunteering and other unsustainable forms of activity instead of a breadwinning job. And it's no surprise, working mostly sucks, that's why traditionally men do it.
Marriage is a trap designed to steal everything from a man, even his children and dignity
Daily reminder that 50% of all marriages end in divorce
Have fun finding out she's been fucking Jamal while you were wageslaving all day
Have fun watching her take half your shit and the kids
Have fun watching her find another man to fuck while you wallow in debt
The amount of money, time and heartbreak you WILL experience chasing after a """partner""" makes the entire thing pointless. It's unironically cheaper and easier to hire a hooker if you want someone to fuck
>men lose less in divorce than ever.
No, not really. Back before no-fault divorce you could successfully avoid ever losing anything by just never giving your wife a fault to divorce you by; if your wife just up and divorced you it would be treated as a breach of contract and she would get nothing even if you made a lot more money than her and she relied on you entirely for all the essentials. When morality counted for a lot, you could hedge against loss by being moral. Nowadays divorces can happen for no reason at all and the higher earner is always treated like they were at fault, and that higher earner is almost always the man. You can even, in some states, get stuck paying alimony for life. You could end up in your 60s sending checks to a woman who would spit on your grave that you haven't even seen in decades. Prior to the 1860s, if your wife left you she didn't even get to keep the kids, you got those by default. A man today loses his money, his kids, and his freedom; big alimony checks mean you can never quit working. Men lose more in divorce than ever.
And all this is of course ignoring even earlier societies where a "divorce" would only ever occur if your wife got executed for some reason. You lose nothing at all in such a scenario, you keep your money and your kids, so all you've lost is your heretic wife.
Once upon a time getting married was a pretty solid deal for a man. This is no longer the case.
Sad but true, but in original kind of way
absolutely, fully based
Commitment just hampers your ability to do what you want. Imagine answering to someone after working all day, or losing half of your shit when it inevitably doesnt work out. Humans aren't meant to be together for that long. Non committal relationships are best. That way you aren't legally bound to do shit and can nope the fuck out of the relationship anytime.
So show the stats to back it up. They're easily available and show men losing less than ever.
If you're so eager to see them, you post them.
Lol. I tried. Dated for 3 years then she lost feelings for me or some bullshit. I want to get married but fucking christ is it hard to find someone right.
So show the stats to back it up. They're easily available and show men losing less than ever.
No fault divorce doesn't mean no alimony. Where did you get that idea?
I did. We've been married for five years now. It's wonderful.
I can't even get a girlfriend, how the hell do you expect me to get married.
I got married with a woman that cried on our wedding night that she didnt want to be married at all. Wew why didnt you say that earlier?
Disgusting fucking succubus whore. Never fall for the marriage meme.
>double the salary
but I just want to be a house husband
I don't see how your second sentence corresponds to my post, obviously you can end up with alimony in a no-fault divorce, which is especially heinous in that you can do nothing wrong and still be punished. This is also a big part of men losing more; with divorce happening more frequently, more men lose money where once they would have lost nothing at all. Even if you could find a year where only one billionaire got divorced and "men" lost 10 billion dollars in one year, that'd still be better than a year where "men" only lost 1 billion in aggregate but that 1 billion was made out of a thousand broken marriages. The money is only one of the things you lose.
Mine was a house husband for a while.
You guys have a very warped view of what marriage is and what it means. I am very happily married, neither of us controls the other, we spend all our time together because we genuinely enjoy it and want the others company, and both of us contribute equally to our life together. Pretty awesome actually.
we really could've guessed
This, I was never qualified to get a gf, and now I'm a wizard. Probably game over on that end.