What an amazing coincidence! It's almost as if

why do racists idiolize losers so much? the texas republic, the confederate states, nazi germany? its all pretty sad desu.

......with bolt-action rifles

>No they're not
>Yeah it's called Lebensraum
>See above
>No they didn't? The Soviet Union economy's post revolution grew much faster, as did Germany after the war

Source? Please give a source.

Concentration camps faglord

Oh really? Please, give me source on the high skilled labors they performed.

Then how come Africa, which has engaged in rampant slavery since the beginning of time, has the worst economy out of all continents?

>Nazi Germany good at economics
They were awfully off, as bad as the Soviets were with economics. I remember reading about the assessment of GDP and using it as a measure of productive for the respective war machines, with the calculation being off for socialist nations because the worth was defined on the labour of the worker. It led to some incredibly skewed outcomes and assumptions on labour productivity & it's correlation on output.

Also, the people who make those greentexts have next to no understanding of capitalism or even what W*L=Y^p means

...while germans had more advanced tanks

Because theyre African

>muh German engineering

because those of other idelogies are labeled as racists or facists.

Doesnt matter who did what, they still lost. You are a remnent of a failed ideology of a militaristic fascist racial supremacist/eugenist regime that grew out of the great depression. Hitler was a loser, you are a loser

nazi germany had pinned its economy performance and wellbeing on its ability to imperialistic military expansion, not a very good economic move to make

...which they couldn't produce in enough numbers to make a significant impact

nothing important, just vehicle, weapon, and ammunition manufacturing, you know, the shit you need to wage war

That's not a source, idiot. Are you 12?

picture in relation

Attached: 1557850569627.jpg (600x699, 109K)

Source please, you dumbfuck. I have never heard of this, so I need a source.

>Can't provide source on claim
>Disappears without further word
Wow, so weird.

Oh sorry, I had other things to do today than look up easily-verified historical facts for you.

britannica.com/topic/forced-labour

encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/forced-labor

google.com/amp/s/www.independent.co.uk/news/world/german-firms-count-cost-of-slave-labour-1293045.html?amp

Back to Jow Forums, cucks.

Attached: 1516827489693.png (797x785, 490K)

What is that retarded picture.
It never happened, but it should have, and will. All of Jow Forums generally agrees on this

and you go back to /lgbt/ faggot

Attached: 1553717467587.jpg (1660x1309, 1.84M)

I fucking hate americans who don't have a single fucking clue about Hitler Germany or any history at all yet spout this bullshit they probably heard from some wehraboo blog or pulled it right out of their smelly asses.

I'm austrian and my great-grandfather lived through both worldwars and was drafted into the second one at the age of 38. All of my grandparents grew up in WW2 in rural villages of Tyrol and Salzburg. There are so many people I've personally talked to that have witnessed different aspects of WW2 and not one of them was biased by media reports or schools because our country only started to actually teach WW2 history in the 70s.
All of them said that towards the end of WW2, the general situation of the country was far worse than in the depression of before WW2.
In that depression many people, especially folks in rural areas bought state bonds during WW1 which were of course now worthless. Hitler appealed to those masses by promising to expell jews who people had to take loans from to cover their losses from WW1 bonds. Of course the debts of those farmers disappeared as soon as the jews disappeared too but all it did was prolonging the inevitable. People were once again forced to buy bonds to ensure that the war was going well. Nazi-Germany yet again had to face terrible inflations which all cut deep into the working force. There were no labour laws anymore, anyone who protested was either killed on the spot or sent into an internment camp for forced labor.

I could go on and on but the bottom line is, all those wehraboos would have killel themselves or would have gotten killed for being spergs in Nazi Germany.

>The Soviet Union economy's post revolution grew much faster

This is actually false.

The fastest-growing economy in Europe from 1890 to 1914 was Czarist Russia's. Lenin's initial economic program was a complete and utter disaster. The Soviet Union didn't make it back to the Czar's 1913 GDP until the mid-1930's.

If the Czar just hadn't mobilized in 1914, eventually Russia would have crushed everyone economically. But he blew it, and blew Russia's chance essentially for eternity.

>The country went to shit again when they started losing the war
WHO THE FUCK WOULDA THOUGHT?

>im retardod
yes we know, you use pol

Jow Forumsniggers who unironically think that Hitler ruined nationalism forever despite it having a worse track record than communism.

>easily-verified historical facts
And yet you apparently couldn't find anything that actually verifies them other than articles that boil down to "yes, this happened" without providing any inkling of proof.

Almost as if they lost a war
Jesus, you're stupid

Or keep fuel in the gas tanks of to even run

Not to defend Hitler lovers but what defines this track record? If we are to believe history the way we're heading is identical to that of Rome, which isn't exactly known to have had the peaceful outcome people like to believe. Unfortunately playing with millions of variables, you'd need to have a crystal ball to forecast what'd happen or what would've happened had Nazi Germany won, we can only extrapolate what happened. And unfortunately your story is also mostly filled with anecdotal evidence of people's recollections, which has hardly ever been a good way to measure. I don't agree with either side, Nazi Germany had utterly stupid things and our current day has utterly stupid things where money is basically stuck at the top or flowing towards it more and more, with heritage being an artificially bloated factor. But that's what happens when you have two extremes and no middle ground options to select.

Ayyo did dis nigga just give google as a source? HAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA

I said recovery. See how much it dropped and how fast it recovered to its previous state.

Based non-sequitor spouting sub-70 IQ nigger

>And unfortunately your story is also mostly filled with anecdotal evidence of people's recollections, which has hardly ever been a good way to measure.
OP's claim is such bullshit you don't even have to google it and I do consider dozens of people who don't know each other giving me nearly the same recollection about a specific occurance a better and less biased source of information than a wehraboo stormnigger pulling shit out of his fat asshole
>I don't agree with either side, Nazi Germany had utterly stupid things and our current day has utterly stupid things
You almost sound like you think that the current world we're living in is in any way comparable to the second world war or that our current society and Nazi Germany are the two ends of a horseshoe which just reinforces my point that you too just know too little about history to even post about it on the internet.

They tried the same shit with the Empire of Japan but it didn't stick because Japan decided to play ball after the war.