A study carried out by Schlaffke et al...

>This was before you finally realized that for my assumption to make any sense there would have to be two light sources.
You mean before you back rationalized your incoherent bullshit. If UV from the sun caused the shirt to look blue, there is no secondary light source.

Look at this handsome man stock photo.

Attached: 99135613-handsome-smiling-man-standing-under-skylight-in-kitchen-with-open-shirt-six-pack-abs-using- (866x1300, 147K)

I don't think you understood. I'm not saying the other light is necessarily from the sun. And even if it was and the dim sunlight came from a sort of a window or something, the harsher light would illuminate the inside area in the background regardless.

yes im convinced we are being trolled, how is it anything but white & gold...wtf

So there's not only a very bright light, conveniently behind and pointed away from the dress, but also a UV light source illuminating the dress. Very obvious and very likely.

>normalfag memes
gross.

Why are you boxing in this discussion with your autistic parameters?

All that matters is that there is some commonly found set of lighting conditions that could allow a white and gold dress to look bluish.

That's as easy as being in a large department store 100feet away from the front tinted windows with a very bright dressing room behind you and dimmer flouresent lights above you.

I see blue, black and gold, but no white

Lighting can be a very complex thing, user. And yes.

>explains a solution mankind has sought throughout the ages
>goes completely ignored

Why am I in this daycare full of retards. God I miss Babylon.